User Panel
[#1]
Quoted:
Thank you! Will you be offering the rifle with different rail configurations? I would ideally like a 12" MLOK version. What kind of accuracy can I expect out of the rifle with standard ammo? Good enough to engage gongs out to 600 yards? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Would a magpul UBR gen 1 be able to fit on the DD5? I don't believe we've tried this internally, but in theory it should work. While the buffer tube on the UBR is proprietary, it's the same length as a carbine buffer tube which is what our DD5 Buffer and Spring were designed for. Thank you! Will you be offering the rifle with different rail configurations? I would ideally like a 12" MLOK version. What kind of accuracy can I expect out of the rifle with standard ammo? Good enough to engage gongs out to 600 yards? The DD5V1 is our very first .308 platform. There is certainly the possibility of seeing different models in the future. It is our policy not to release any details on new products until we are ready to deliver. Best accuracy results that we have seen so far have been with Hornady 150 Grain SST and Federal 175 Grain GMM Seirra Match Kings. Both have been capable of Sub MOA with the right optic, shooter, and weather conditions. |
|
[#3]
Quoted:
I'm seeing around 2 MOA accuracy with cheap stuff (PWC mostly). Sub MOA with Federal Gold Medal 175. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Would a magpul UBR gen 1 be able to fit on the DD5? I don't believe we've tried this internally, but in theory it should work. While the buffer tube on the UBR is proprietary, it's the same length as a carbine buffer tube which is what our DD5 Buffer and Spring were designed for. Thank you! Will you be offering the rifle with different rail configurations? I would ideally like a 12" MLOK version. What kind of accuracy can I expect out of the rifle with standard ammo? Good enough to engage gongs out to 600 yards? I'm seeing around 2 MOA accuracy with cheap stuff (PWC mostly). Sub MOA with Federal Gold Medal 175. Thank you! What range are you taking it out to? |
|
[#4]
Quoted:
http://imgur.com/psvlvf2 http://i.imgur.com/psvlvf2.jpg Has anyone had any issues with the new charging handle design? For the first few range visits, I was mostly doing some 100 yard+ shooting (less than 50-75 rounds per visit, higher grade ammo). On my last visit, I threw on my ACOG and ran it a little harder, putting a couple hundred PMC 308 rounds down range. I know a lot has been made about the ball detent becoming loose over time - I was running suppressed and found that the ball was getting a lot of carbon build up that was causing it to not want to engage (the crud was keeping the ball from going down). Simple fix by wiping the ball clean with a little solvent, but wondering if this is a design flaw DD needs to address? Still love the rifle - wondering if I'm alone in seeing this issue. View Quote Someone earlier said the ball detent type charging handle was used by Bushmaster once and had similar issues with carbon build up and eventually durability. It sounds like an issue with the design itself and not necessarily DD's QC. The advantage is that it is ambidextrous. Will your rifle work with a Bravo Company charging handle? Good to hear your rifle is running well, especially supprssed. I may pick one up this spring. |
|
[#5]
Quoted:
Someone earlier said the ball detent type charging handle was used by Bushmaster once and had similar issues with carbon build up and eventually durability. It sounds like an issue with the design itself and not necessarily DD's QC. The advantage is that it is ambidextrous. Will your rifle work with a Bravo Company charging handle? Good to hear your rifle is running well, especially supprssed. I may pick one up this spring. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
http://imgur.com/psvlvf2 http://i.imgur.com/psvlvf2.jpg Has anyone had any issues with the new charging handle design? For the first few range visits, I was mostly doing some 100 yard+ shooting (less than 50-75 rounds per visit, higher grade ammo). On my last visit, I threw on my ACOG and ran it a little harder, putting a couple hundred PMC 308 rounds down range. I know a lot has been made about the ball detent becoming loose over time - I was running suppressed and found that the ball was getting a lot of carbon build up that was causing it to not want to engage (the crud was keeping the ball from going down). Simple fix by wiping the ball clean with a little solvent, but wondering if this is a design flaw DD needs to address? Still love the rifle - wondering if I'm alone in seeing this issue. Someone earlier said the ball detent type charging handle was used by Bushmaster once and had similar issues with carbon build up and eventually durability. It sounds like an issue with the design itself and not necessarily DD's QC. The advantage is that it is ambidextrous. Will your rifle work with a Bravo Company charging handle? Good to hear your rifle is running well, especially supprssed. I may pick one up this spring. I believe the charging handle is a proprietary length so Bravo (or other brands) won't work...will check this weekend to confirm. |
|
[#6]
|
|
[#7]
Quoted:
I believe the charging handle is a proprietary length so Bravo (or other brands) won't work...will check this weekend to confirm. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
http://imgur.com/psvlvf2 http://i.imgur.com/psvlvf2.jpg Has anyone had any issues with the new charging handle design? For the first few range visits, I was mostly doing some 100 yard+ shooting (less than 50-75 rounds per visit, higher grade ammo). On my last visit, I threw on my ACOG and ran it a little harder, putting a couple hundred PMC 308 rounds down range. I know a lot has been made about the ball detent becoming loose over time - I was running suppressed and found that the ball was getting a lot of carbon build up that was causing it to not want to engage (the crud was keeping the ball from going down). Simple fix by wiping the ball clean with a little solvent, but wondering if this is a design flaw DD needs to address? Still love the rifle - wondering if I'm alone in seeing this issue. Someone earlier said the ball detent type charging handle was used by Bushmaster once and had similar issues with carbon build up and eventually durability. It sounds like an issue with the design itself and not necessarily DD's QC. The advantage is that it is ambidextrous. Will your rifle work with a Bravo Company charging handle? Good to hear your rifle is running well, especially supprssed. I may pick one up this spring. I believe the charging handle is a proprietary length so Bravo (or other brands) won't work...will check this weekend to confirm. Any update on this? I have been on the fence on this rifle for a few months .... I don't care for the charging handle design .... If it wil accept a BCM or another type that would be awesome |
|
[#8]
I tried IMing him but no response. Maybe he is on a business trip. Does anyone else know about the charging handle? Can one use a BCM?
I am on the fence about buyng this rifle as well. It sounds like a great package, but I want some more info before I spend $2800. I rather not spend $4k on a Knights if the Daniel Defense works as well. |
|
[#9]
Quoted:
Does anyone else know about the charging handle? Can one use a BCM? View Quote Having seen the DD5's charging handle in person, ( good quality pics of it are out around the 'net, too )I doubt BCM has a charging handle that's compatible with the DD5, at least at this time. Even if somebody else's charging handle would fit inside a DD5 upper, how will it lock into/onto the receiver? |
|
[#10]
I really wonder how long it will take before the charging handle starts wearing out the detent in the upper receiver, the conventional latch usually means less wear on the latch.
|
|
[#11]
I'm a little upset with the DDM5V1, should have done my research that it's only compatible for the most part with their proprietary shit.
Hoping to offload the rifle soon. |
|
[#12]
Quoted:
I'm a little upset with the DDM5V1, should have done my research that it's only compatible for the most part with their proprietary shit. Hoping to offload the rifle soon. View Quote That's what kinda pushed me away .... PA was running them for $2245 and I still passed Would be nice to at least have the ability to run a different charging handle |
|
[#13]
Quoted:
That's what kinda pushed me away .... PA was running them for $2245 and I still passed Would be nice to at least have the ability to run a difference charging handle View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm a little upset with the DDM5V1, should have done my research that it's only compatible for the most part with their proprietary shit. Hoping to offload the rifle soon. That's what kinda pushed me away .... PA was running them for $2245 and I still passed Would be nice to at least have the ability to run a difference charging handle I'm a confirmed DD fanboy and even I stayed away from this rifle for that reason. Too many proprietary parts for my liking. Now if they come out with one with a more standard pattern.... |
|
[#14]
Now, I know people have money in this country. But is there really a lot of people out there throwing down 3 grand for a Ar-10 that cost $1 round to shoot ? I'm just curious ?
I paid $1250 for a Windham. Same 15" keymod rail. It can use a Bcm charge handle. Is practically the smallest and lightest on the market and shoots great with any ammo. $3 grand for a rifle seems extreme. But then again, I'm not a doctor or lawyer either |
|
[#15]
do you people complain about proprietary parts on any other rifle that isnt an AR? i think you all seem to be missing the fact this isnt an AR15 where theres a mil spec...would you complain about your rem700 parts not fitting on a winchester too?
|
|
[#16]
|
|
[#17]
Quoted:
Quoted:
do you people complain about proprietary parts on any other rifle that isnt an AR? i think you all seem to be missing the fact this isnt an AR15 where theres a mil spec...would you complain about your rem700 parts not fitting on a winchester too? Exactly. Exactly? Lol that's not even close to a good analogy. I don't think anyone is "complaining" anyway. Most are simply explaining why they chose not to buy this rifle. If that hurts your feelings that's on you. And yes, since there's a standard of parts out there for the AR10, I expect my rifle to have some interchangeability in that space.....since that's one of the big pros of having a standard pattern rifle. Since you like analogies, it's akin to buying a car almost exactly like any other car (it drives, runs on gasoline, etc) except it takes a special kind of wheel that no other car uses, needs a special type of oil that no other car uses, etc. So instead of being able to go to any shop and buy some oil and some wheels/tires, you have no choice but to go to the manufacturer for those parts and you have no option to change to anything else. That's a much more accurate analogy. |
|
[#18]
Quoted:
Exactly? Lol that's not even close to a good analogy. I don't think anyone is "complaining" anyway. Most are simply explaining why they chose not to buy this rifle. If that hurts your feelings that's on you. And yes, since there's a standard of parts out there for the AR10, I expect my rifle to have some interchangeability in that space.....since that's one of the big pros of having a standard pattern rifle. Since you like analogies, it's akin to buying a car almost exactly like any other car (it drives, runs on gasoline, etc) except it takes a special kind of wheel that no other car uses, needs a special type of oil that no other car uses, etc. So instead of being able to go to any shop and buy some oil and some wheels/tires, you have no choice but to go to the manufacturer for those parts and you have no option to change to anything else. That's a much more accurate analogy. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
do you people complain about proprietary parts on any other rifle that isnt an AR? i think you all seem to be missing the fact this isnt an AR15 where theres a mil spec...would you complain about your rem700 parts not fitting on a winchester too? Exactly. Exactly? Lol that's not even close to a good analogy. I don't think anyone is "complaining" anyway. Most are simply explaining why they chose not to buy this rifle. If that hurts your feelings that's on you. And yes, since there's a standard of parts out there for the AR10, I expect my rifle to have some interchangeability in that space.....since that's one of the big pros of having a standard pattern rifle. Since you like analogies, it's akin to buying a car almost exactly like any other car (it drives, runs on gasoline, etc) except it takes a special kind of wheel that no other car uses, needs a special type of oil that no other car uses, etc. So instead of being able to go to any shop and buy some oil and some wheels/tires, you have no choice but to go to the manufacturer for those parts and you have no option to change to anything else. That's a much more accurate analogy. So if the DD5 was closer to a SCAR then an AR-10, do you think you would still be unhappy with it? Plenty of companies support the SCAR now, but at first it was slim pickings, just like the DD5 is now. I love how DD didn't restrain themselves with their offering. Just like how LWRC did when they designed the Six-Eight rifle, the built the gun around the cartridge. DD designed their 308 rifle the way they wanted to. |
|
[#19]
Quoted:
Now, I know people have money in this country. But is there really a lot of people out there throwing down 3 grand for a Ar-10 that cost $1 round to shoot ? I'm just curious ? I paid $1250 for a Windham. Same 15" keymod rail. It can use a Bcm charge handle. Is practically the smallest and lightest on the market and shoots great with any ammo. $3 grand for a rifle seems extreme. But then again, I'm not a doctor or lawyer either View Quote Plenty of people buying expensive rifles really. You don't have to make a ton of money, some people save money for a long time to get what they want. |
|
[#20]
Quoted:
Exactly? Lol that's not even close to a good analogy. I don't think anyone is "complaining" anyway. Most are simply explaining why they chose not to buy this rifle. If that hurts your feelings that's on you. And yes, since there's a standard of parts out there for the AR10, I expect my rifle to have some interchangeability in that space.....since that's one of the big pros of having a standard pattern rifle. Since you like analogies, it's akin to buying a car almost exactly like any other car (it drives, runs on gasoline, etc) except it takes a special kind of wheel that no other car uses, needs a special type of oil that no other car uses, etc. So instead of being able to go to any shop and buy some oil and some wheels/tires, you have no choice but to go to the manufacturer for those parts and you have no option to change to anything else. That's a much more accurate analogy. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
do you people complain about proprietary parts on any other rifle that isnt an AR? i think you all seem to be missing the fact this isnt an AR15 where theres a mil spec...would you complain about your rem700 parts not fitting on a winchester too? Exactly. Exactly? Lol that's not even close to a good analogy. I don't think anyone is "complaining" anyway. Most are simply explaining why they chose not to buy this rifle. If that hurts your feelings that's on you. And yes, since there's a standard of parts out there for the AR10, I expect my rifle to have some interchangeability in that space.....since that's one of the big pros of having a standard pattern rifle. Since you like analogies, it's akin to buying a car almost exactly like any other car (it drives, runs on gasoline, etc) except it takes a special kind of wheel that no other car uses, needs a special type of oil that no other car uses, etc. So instead of being able to go to any shop and buy some oil and some wheels/tires, you have no choice but to go to the manufacturer for those parts and you have no option to change to anything else. That's a much more accurate analogy. yeah. its nothing like that. also what dont you get about there NOT being a STANDARD. |
|
[#21]
Had a few days to cool down about the difference in size for upper/lower. My only real gripe so far, and I haven't shot it yet - is the charging handle. Wish you'd done something better in this part DD, at least in reading the complaints of carbon buildup. Overall however I am beginning to feel a little more excitement about this rifle now.
|
|
[#23]
Quoted:
http://i1331.photobucket.com/albums/w584/somedude72/Work%20Stuff/BLT_7462_zpswrm4svgq.jpg 900 rounds of 150 gr. Hornady SST + 150 gr. blaster stuff (forgot brand). 0 malfunctions, solid first round hits from 30 - 550 m BCM Keymod Rail Panels, BCM KAG, KAC 34mm Scope Mount, Leupold Mk6 1-6 w/ CMR-W, Blueforce Gear Padded Vickers Sling, Daniel Defense Bipod Mount, Harris Bipod (don't remember exact model). View Quote Sure is sexy Tom! |
|
[#24]
Quoted:
Quoted:
http://i1331.photobucket.com/albums/w584/somedude72/Work%20Stuff/BLT_7462_zpswrm4svgq.jpg 900 rounds of 150 gr. Hornady SST + 150 gr. blaster stuff (forgot brand). 0 malfunctions, solid first round hits from 30 - 550 m BCM Keymod Rail Panels, BCM KAG, KAC 34mm Scope Mount, Leupold Mk6 1-6 w/ CMR-W, Blueforce Gear Padded Vickers Sling, Daniel Defense Bipod Mount, Harris Bipod (don't remember exact model). Sure is sexy Tom! I'd put up other photos, but due to a wardrobe malfunction, it is not PG rated. |
|
[#25]
Quoted:
I'd put up other photos, but due to a wardrobe malfunction, it is not PG rated. View Quote Dude -- wardrobe malfunction aside, it was great seeing you this weekend and you kicked ass. I was prepared to give you grief but you really nailed it. Props on completing that last exercise and the DD gun looks like a shooter! |
|
[#26]
Quoted:
Dude -- wardrobe malfunction aside, it was great seeing you this weekend and you kicked ass. I was prepared to give you grief but you really nailed it. Props on completing that last exercise and the DD gun looks like a shooter! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I'd put up other photos, but due to a wardrobe malfunction, it is not PG rated. Dude -- wardrobe malfunction aside, it was great seeing you this weekend and you kicked ass. I was prepared to give you grief but you really nailed it. Props on completing that last exercise and the DD gun looks like a shooter! It was a great time and good to hang out with some buds and shoot guns. I'm really proud of the DD5. That 5 round group (fluke!) was flawless. |
|
[#27]
I don't see what the big deal is about the charging handle.
Isn't the detent/ball bearing spring loaded? Is it even a ball bearing? Doesn't the upper have a chamfer where the detent travels? I don't see it wearing the upper any faster than a standard charging handle and I'd even wager that the wear to be even less |
|
[#28]
Kind of off topic. I like the new furniture. But does anyone like the small grip ? I just can't believe a Tech made that and everyone in the meeting room said, yeah that's perfect !
Maybe next year Daniel makes a Gen 2 grip for a Mans hand ! |
|
[#29]
Quoted:
Kind of off topic. I like the new furniture. But does anyone like the small grip ? I just can't believe a Tech made that and everyone in the meeting room said, yeah that's perfect ! Maybe next year Daniel makes a Gen 2 grip for a Mans hand ! View Quote The angle and size of the grip really shine when firing from the prone position. I personally would prefer a Magpul grip and stock. |
|
[#30]
Yes. I love the Magpul K2 grip. Plus it has storage.
Sure wish Daniel would hire someone else to make a better grip. |
|
[#31]
Quoted:
I don't see what the big deal is about the charging handle. Isn't the detent/ball bearing spring loaded? Is it even a ball bearing? Doesn't the upper have a chamfer where the detent travels? I don't see it wearing the upper any faster than a standard charging handle and I'd even wager that the wear to be even less View Quote My earlier post on the ball isn't wear related, but more around the ball becoming depressed/stuck due to carbon build up. I shoot mostly suppressed and found that the ball got stuck in the down position, causing the charging handle to not stay engaged. It is a simple fix (just wipe the ball off with a rag or some solvent) but not a huge fan of the design. I confirmed that you can not use 3rd party charging handles, like a BCM. Not a deal breaker and I still like the rifle, but wish they had not messed with the proven design of the AR platform handles. |
|
[#32]
Quoted:
I tried IMing him but no response. Maybe he is on a business trip. Does anyone else know about the charging handle? Can one use a BCM? I am on the fence about buyng this rifle as well. It sounds like a great package, but I want some more info before I spend $2800. I rather not spend $4k on a Knights if the Daniel Defense works as well. View Quote Better late than never?? I did not take pictures but did try to take my charging handle from my Larue (PredatOBR 7.62) and use it on the DD5 - no luck. The lack of side detents/slots makes a standard AR10 style handle non-compatible with the DD5. As I said above, the charging handle isn't a deal breaker for me but its definitely a black eye on an otherwise awesome rifle. |
|
[#33]
Quoted:
Better late than never?? I did not take pictures but did try to take my charging handle from my Larue (PredatOBR 7.62) and use it on the DD5 - no luck. The lack of side detents/slots makes a standard AR10 style handle non-compatible with the DD5. As I said above, the charging handle isn't a deal breaker for me but its definitely a black eye on an otherwise awesome rifle. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I tried IMing him but no response. Maybe he is on a business trip. Does anyone else know about the charging handle? Can one use a BCM? I am on the fence about buyng this rifle as well. It sounds like a great package, but I want some more info before I spend $2800. I rather not spend $4k on a Knights if the Daniel Defense works as well. Better late than never?? I did not take pictures but did try to take my charging handle from my Larue (PredatOBR 7.62) and use it on the DD5 - no luck. The lack of side detents/slots makes a standard AR10 style handle non-compatible with the DD5. As I said above, the charging handle isn't a deal breaker for me but its definitely a black eye on an otherwise awesome rifle. Lol. No worries. |
|
[#34]
I ordered mine today from a local dealer! Of course I'll be out of town on business when it comes in.
|
|
[#35]
Quoted:
My earlier post on the ball isn't wear related, but more around the ball becoming depressed/stuck due to carbon build up. I shoot mostly suppressed and found that the ball got stuck in the down position, causing the charging handle to not stay engaged. It is a simple fix (just wipe the ball off with a rag or some solvent) but not a huge fan of the design. I confirmed that you can not use 3rd party charging handles, like a BCM. Not a deal breaker and I still like the rifle, but wish they had not messed with the proven design of the AR platform handles. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't see what the big deal is about the charging handle. Isn't the detent/ball bearing spring loaded? Is it even a ball bearing? Doesn't the upper have a chamfer where the detent travels? I don't see it wearing the upper any faster than a standard charging handle and I'd even wager that the wear to be even less My earlier post on the ball isn't wear related, but more around the ball becoming depressed/stuck due to carbon build up. I shoot mostly suppressed and found that the ball got stuck in the down position, causing the charging handle to not stay engaged. It is a simple fix (just wipe the ball off with a rag or some solvent) but not a huge fan of the design. I confirmed that you can not use 3rd party charging handles, like a BCM. Not a deal breaker and I still like the rifle, but wish they had not messed with the proven design of the AR platform handles. My ask to Daniel Defense is how do they plan to remedy this? New upper designed? Can some of us send and and get it replaced with a new receiver? Probably none of that. |
|
[#36]
Here's what I found out about the charging handle after owning a rifle for a while.
When you break the upper receiver at the rear pivot pin and open the rifle. The charging handle does not keep the bolt carrier assembly in the upper receiver so if there is any downward angle the bolt/carrier just falls out on the ground. It's happened to me at least three times. To say that I hate to design is an understatement! |
|
[#37]
As long as they took getting this rifle to the market, you would think it would be perfect for the price.
|
|
[#38]
https://danieldefense.com/firearms/7-62-x-51mm/daniel-defense-ambush-308-kryptec-highlander.html
Looks like they made a rifle-length 18" 308, it just has an Ambush color scheme. 8.6 pounds is definitely a lot, I wonder if they could get it any closer to 8 pounds. The charging handle design looks to be unchanged. I have to wonder whether going to a small frame design and a 12" handguard would cut the weight needed, although it could just be that the barrel profile is just too heavy for good balance with that length. |
|
[#39]
Quoted:
That's what kinda pushed me away .... PA was running them for $2245 and I still passed Would be nice to at least have the ability to run a different charging handle View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm a little upset with the DDM5V1, should have done my research that it's only compatible for the most part with their proprietary shit. Hoping to offload the rifle soon. That's what kinda pushed me away .... PA was running them for $2245 and I still passed Would be nice to at least have the ability to run a different charging handle I currently run Raptor Charging Handles on all of my AR15 and AR 308/AR10 rifles. The fact that the DDM5V1 can't run anything other then their proprietary one is a deal killer for me. Too bad since I love DD rifles (currently have MK18 Pistol, DDM4V5, & DDM4V9) |
|
[#40]
The more proprietary guns and parts they have the more money they make. A few years from now if someone breaks a charge handle, you can't buy a bcm or another raptor. You have to buy theirs. Smart move on the business end, even if it cost them a few customers
|
|
[#41]
Quoted:
The more proprietary guns and parts they have the more money they make. A few years from now if someone breaks a charge handle, you can't buy a bcm or another raptor. You have to buy theirs. Smart move on the business end, even if it cost them a few customers View Quote I'm not really sure that makes a ton of sense over a charging handle. It's more just a design flaw than anything else. Everything else is proprietary, but there are actual reasons behind it. |
|
[#42]
Quoted:
I'm not really sure that makes a ton of sense over a charging handle. It's more just a design flaw than anything else. Everything else is proprietary, but there are actual reasons behind it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The more proprietary guns and parts they have the more money they make. A few years from now if someone breaks a charge handle, you can't buy a bcm or another raptor. You have to buy theirs. Smart move on the business end, even if it cost them a few customers I'm not really sure that makes a ton of sense over a charging handle. It's more just a design flaw than anything else. Everything else is proprietary, but there are actual reasons behind it. dont mind maxbob, hes the the arfcom equivalent of stoop kid |
|
[#44]
|
|
[#46]
Quoted:
Like knowing the difference between your and you're..... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Rssxy - good input, seems like your full of knowledge ! Like knowing the difference between your and you're..... FIFY If you are going to nit pick someone else's grammar, then do it correctly. |
|
[#48]
Quoted:
dont mind maxbob, hes the the arfcom equivalent of stoop kid View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The more proprietary guns and parts they have the more money they make. A few years from now if someone breaks a charge handle, you can't buy a bcm or another raptor. You have to buy theirs. Smart move on the business end, even if it cost them a few customers I'm not really sure that makes a ton of sense over a charging handle. It's more just a design flaw than anything else. Everything else is proprietary, but there are actual reasons behind it. dont mind maxbob, hes the the arfcom equivalent of stoop kid I haven't noticed the DD website selling replacement parts for the DD5 yet. |
|
[#49]
Quoted:
I haven't noticed the DD website selling replacement parts for the DD5 yet. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The more proprietary guns and parts they have the more money they make. A few years from now if someone breaks a charge handle, you can't buy a bcm or another raptor. You have to buy theirs. Smart move on the business end, even if it cost them a few customers I'm not really sure that makes a ton of sense over a charging handle. It's more just a design flaw than anything else. Everything else is proprietary, but there are actual reasons behind it. dont mind maxbob, hes the the arfcom equivalent of stoop kid I haven't noticed the DD website selling replacement parts for the DD5 yet. why would they when they're proprietary and it has a lifetime warranty? |
|
[#50]
What if someone wanted a spare bolt for their toolbox and didn't want to wait to send the BCG back to DD? Makes sense to me..
Maybe I misread and you're only referring to the charging handle? |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.