Thanks for the advice so far. Our union attorney said that in 99% of the probationary case they won't take them because of the difficulties with probation. Mine is in the 1% however, and they are recommending taking it. My situation is tough in that there are no reviews, no meetings with the CLEO, no dicipline, and demonstrable singling out for harrassment due to an excersise of freedom of speech prior to his election and the fact I was hired instead of him, even though he was higher on the list. My letter doens't even have justifiable cause, and he needs to show reasons here. Doesn't have to be much, but he has to have something. Plus there's past practice in the county. So we're all flabbergasted at this situation I've got. Very unusual situation to say the least...I would be greatly appreciative of any case law that deals with these issues yet, to help in my legal case and research...thanks!