Site Notices
7/23/2014 4:06:00 PM
  Previous Page
Page:  / 2
Author
Message
Thatdude333
I like where this is going...
Offline
Posts: 4537
Feedback: 100% (6)
Posted: 12/30/2009 7:47:52 PM
Back when I was in college, one of my aeronautical engineering professors showed us this journal article written by John McMasters, which was about very large transport aircraft that could be built with existing technology.

One of the more interesting designs he he talked about was for a 1,200 passenger tri-fuselage seaplane, the "Super Clipper"

The 2 mid-wing fuselages are as big as a 747, and it would be sea-based due to the size.






Pretty interesting designs, if anyone has access to journals, I believe this is the article -
McMasters, J.H. and Kroo, I.M., ”Advanced Configurations for Very Large Transport Airplanes”, Aircraft Design, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1998, pp. 217-42.
Drama, thy name is GD.
justsayin
*%#& you, I'm a kittycat!
Offline
Posts: 4991
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 7:51:10 PM
It would take an hour and a half to board/deboard.

Hell no.
Alabama: That the great, general and essential principles of liberty and free government may be recognized and established, we declare....That every citizen has a right to bear arms in defense of himself and the state. (Art. I, § 26)
SevenMMmag
Offline
Posts: 3556
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 7:52:19 PM
I'm not flying in an airplane that has mimes in it

LibertyShip
Member
Offline
Posts: 1463
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 7:52:42 PM
Where is the shooting range?
Strykewolf
Member
Offline
Posts: 8087
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 7:53:37 PM
mimes?








No.
In the end it only matters who is left, not who started it.
myitinaw
Men for Others
Offline
Posts: 9507
Feedback: 100% (17)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 7:54:04 PM


never happen....

A socialist may indeed be academically superior, And yet, most certainly emotionally retarded…
myitinaw 2006
Natron11
Hates Stupid
Offline
Posts: 946
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 7:55:03 PM
dats big
"Life is hard...
..Life is harder if you're stupid."
John Wayne
Shadowhawk
Member
Offline
Posts: 1187
Feedback: 100% (15)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 7:55:31 PM
That design has large quantities of dutch roll airsickness written all over it.
jcarrel
Llama Master
Offline
Posts: 6728
Feedback: 100% (5)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 7:56:50 PM
Ditch the mimes and I would consider it.
"America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." - Abraham Lincoln
macro
Bitter Pennsylvanian clinging to his guns
Offline
Posts: 10989
Feedback: 100% (17)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 7:57:45 PM
In this modern world that thing would be a target of opportunity like no other.
Cool engineering....fairly impractical for the average traveller.

A ballroom?
At 40,000 feet elevation?

Hopefully Obama doesnt ever learn of this or he will demand that one be built to become the 'new and improved' AF1
'Green' is the new 'Red' - The_Macallan 9/12/2009
Fletchette
Offline
Posts: 4538
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 7:58:11 PM
[Last Edit: 12/30/2009 8:00:45 PM by Fletchette]
Originally Posted By Thatdude333:
Back when I was in college, one of my aeronautical engineering professors showed us this journal article written by John McMasters, which was about very large transport aircraft that could be built with existing technology.

One of the more interesting designs he he talked about was for a 1,200 passenger tri-fuselage seaplane, the "Super Clipper"

The 2 mid-wing fuselages are as big as a 747, and it would be sea-based due to the size.

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/1039/clipper1f.jpg

http://img685.imageshack.us/img685/3223/clipper2.jpg


Pretty interesting designs, if anyone has access to journals, I believe this is the article -
McMasters, J.H. and Kroo, I.M., ”Advanced Configurations for Very Large Transport Airplanes”, Aircraft Design, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1998, pp. 217-42.



Hydrogen/electric fans are "existing technology"? Really?

While I really like amphibous aircraft, I suspect that this airplane would have serious finacial problems. For one, how do you get 1200 passengers onto / off of such a plane without taking more time than the flight itself? I suspect boarding times of 2 hrs would be realistic. Consider the fact that people would get on, sit down, wait, wait some more, get up to go to the bathroom, get bored, check their luggage for something to entertain them...etc.

Maintainence would be another problem. Unless this plane is truly amphibious (it could roll up onto a tarmack instead of a dedicated seaplane that is always in the water) getting equipment out to the plane in order to maintain it would be difficult.

Also, what is the market for such a plane? It cannot land at inland airports, so many destinations are out of consideration.

I like unconventional designs, though. If the above questions could be answered I'd be all for it.
SouthHoof
Member
Offline
Posts: 6455
Feedback: 100% (99)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 7:59:15 PM
[Ron White] "all the way to the scene of the biggest fucking crash in modern history" [/Ron White]

Badass03
Offline
Posts: 6530
Feedback: 100% (5)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 8:00:12 PM
Get rid of all the extra shit and you could fit another 1000 people in it.
JohnnyP
Member
Offline
Posts: 1319
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 8:00:36 PM

Originally Posted By SevenMMmag:
I'm not flying in an airplane that has mimes in it



Wayne Newton would keep me off! That would be like landing a aircraft carrier....one big splash.
dbmers
Offline
Posts: 1277
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 8:02:50 PM
Jogging track? Begs the question.....sooooo if you're on a treadmill IN an airplane how fast are you actually jogging?
CarlosG
Offline
Posts: 990
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 8:07:03 PM
oh hell no
Merrell
Quantity is Job #1
Offline
Posts: 32470
Feedback: 100% (8)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 8:07:31 PM
Originally Posted By dbmers:
Jogging track? Begs the question.....sooooo if you're on a treadmill IN an airplane how fast are you actually jogging?


If you were on a treadmill in an airplane, facing backwards, would you age slower than your fellow passengers?
Who be John Galt?

This business will get out of control. It will get out of control and we'll be lucky to live through it.
Thatdude333
I like where this is going...
Offline
Posts: 4538
Feedback: 100% (6)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 8:08:08 PM
[Last Edit: 12/30/2009 8:12:56 PM by Thatdude333]

Originally Posted By Fletchette:
Originally Posted By Thatdude333:
Back when I was in college, one of my aeronautical engineering professors showed us this journal article written by John McMasters, which was about very large transport aircraft that could be built with existing technology.

One of the more interesting designs he he talked about was for a 1,200 passenger tri-fuselage seaplane, the "Super Clipper"

The 2 mid-wing fuselages are as big as a 747, and it would be sea-based due to the size.

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/1039/clipper1f.jpg

http://img685.imageshack.us/img685/3223/clipper2.jpg


Pretty interesting designs, if anyone has access to journals, I believe this is the article -
McMasters, J.H. and Kroo, I.M., ”Advanced Configurations for Very Large Transport Airplanes”, Aircraft Design, Vol. 1, No. 4, 1998, pp. 217-42.



Hydrogen/electric fans are "existing technology"? Really?

While I really like amphibous aircraft, I suspect that this airplane would have serious finacial problems. For one, how do you get 1200 passengers onto / off of such a plane without taking more time than the flight itself? I suspect boarding times of 2 hrs would be realistic. Consider the fact that people would get on, sit down, wait, wait some more, get up to go to the bathroom, get bored, check their luggage for something to entertain them...etc.

Maintainence would be another problem. Unless this plane is truly amphibious (it could roll up onto a tarmack instead of a dedicated seaplane that is always in the water) getting equipment out to the plane in order to maintain it would be difficult.

Also, what is the market for such a plane? It cannot land at inland airports, so many destinations are out of consideration.

I like unconventional designs, though. If the above questions could be answered I'd be all for it.

The 2nd picture was taken from a more humorous PDF overview of all the things he's written about, so take the mimes ans stuff with a grain of salt.

As for the engines, the GE 90-115B puts out 115,000 lbs of thrust, more than the 100,000 lb engines needed. Not sure why he put in the "Hydrogen/electric fans" note though, but a 100,000 lb thrust engine is existing technology.


Drama, thy name is GD.
Walther22lr
Offline
Posts: 401
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 8:08:20 PM
What with the new "rules" about no wandering around, no going to the restroom and keeping your hands visible, this aircraft won't see the light of day. It looks like it was designed for a different time..... the past.
Zippy_The_Wonderdog
Yip! Yip! Yip!
Offline
Posts: 10099
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 8:11:09 PM
When I fly, I don't care too much about amenities. I just want to get from A to B, fast.
"No Ace, just you."
Thatdude333
I like where this is going...
Offline
Posts: 4539
Feedback: 100% (6)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 8:12:09 PM

Originally Posted By Walther22lr:
What with the new "rules" about no wandering around, no going to the restroom and keeping your hands visible, this aircraft won't see the light of day. It looks like it was designed for a different time..... the past.

I'd love to see a blended-wing (flying wing) aircraft, you could have something the same wingspan as a 747 and have tons more interior space... but people don't like being more than X feet away from a window, so not sure if we'll ever see those either.
Drama, thy name is GD.
hd_pancho
I swear by my pretty floral bonnet, I will end you
Offline
Posts: 1088
Feedback: 100% (26)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 8:15:49 PM
Originally Posted By SevenMMmag:
I'm not flying in an airplane that has mimes in it



+1

Dan! Dismatle the tittie corner and set up a poker table!

How does Hearst hope to defeat me? ... Allied as I am with the imbecile, the contemptible, and the promiscuous fucking insane.
Spade
Online
Posts: 15991
Feedback: 100% (5)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 8:18:31 PM

Originally Posted By Thatdude333:

Originally Posted By Walther22lr:
What with the new "rules" about no wandering around, no going to the restroom and keeping your hands visible, this aircraft won't see the light of day. It looks like it was designed for a different time..... the past.

I'd love to see a blended-wing (flying wing) aircraft, you could have something the same wingspan as a 747 and have tons more interior space... but people don't like being more than X feet away from a window, so not sure if we'll ever see those either.

Boeing has a design for that too.

I think they had something like a ceiling display to try to take care of that. The project was canned in favor of the Dreamliner I believe.

dirtface
PALIN 2012!
Offline
Posts: 1091
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 8:21:29 PM
No. Fuck no, and no way. I don't want to be that close to 1200 people. EVER
SeanR
Newb
Offline
Posts: 39
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 8:31:15 PM
Where the fuck would you land it?
Bozone (n.): The substance surrounding stupid people that stops bright ideas from penetrating. The bozone layer, unfortunately, shows little sign of breaking down in the near future.
Spade
Online
Posts: 15992
Feedback: 100% (5)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 8:33:52 PM

Originally Posted By SeanR:
Where the fuck would you land it?


seaplane.
realwar
Silence!!!! I keel you!!!
Offline
Posts: 10099
Feedback: 100% (17)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 8:36:11 PM
That would be a terrorist magnet. No thanks...
Kalahnikid
No-Till Farmer
Offline
Posts: 20308
Feedback: 100% (112)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 8:37:43 PM
Yes I would, but it wouldnt be economical to operate.
Is this decade over yet?
RDP
Another JBT!
Offline
Posts: 6543
Feedback: 100% (11)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 8:41:55 PM
Originally Posted By Kalahnikid:
Yes I would, but it wouldnt be economical to operate.


Seaplanes and economical rarely go together
Kalahnikid
No-Till Farmer
Offline
Posts: 20311
Feedback: 100% (112)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 8:45:19 PM
Originally Posted By RDP:
Originally Posted By Kalahnikid:
Yes I would, but it wouldnt be economical to operate.


Seaplanes and economical rarely go together


Hell, flying and economical dont go together very well.

Ask me how I know.
Is this decade over yet?
DarkCharisma
I can't tell if I am serious.
Online
Posts: 6748
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 8:46:47 PM
Whatever happened to going from point A to point B in a few hours, in relative comfort?

What the fuck is the point of a ballroom and mimes?
DoubleFeed
Terrorist Exhaler
Offline
Posts: 40364
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 8:49:15 PM
That would likely have to directly compete with ships in order to do anything profitably.
People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use.
"out with you, foolish vulcan. it's funner to shoot them."-S8S
mhoffman
I don't trust a single one of you fuckers
Offline
Posts: 10235
Feedback: 100% (20)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 8:51:12 PM
Originally Posted By DarkCharisma:
Whatever happened to going from point A to point B in a few hours, in relative comfort?

What the fuck is the point of a ballroom and mimes?


Personally, I was trying to figure out the point of Wayne Newton long before this thread ever came up.

And no, I will not ride on your flying cruise ship.

_MaH
"The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people. This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments and affections of the people was the real American Revolution." - John Adams
Dumpster_Baby
Offline
Posts: 3003
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 9:01:15 PM
I'd rather get there FAST.


flyfishnepa
Member
Offline
Posts: 10426
Feedback: 100% (7)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 9:04:53 PM

depends.....


cmjohnson
Master Luthier and flight sim junkie
Offline
Posts: 35068
Feedback: 100% (17)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 9:05:22 PM
The luxury features would never be found on a production model. Airlines are out to pack 'em in, as many as possible, and still get acceptable
customer satisfaction ratings. That 1200 passenger capacity as designed would turn out to be 2400 in beast class, 200 in business class, and 50 in super luxury class.

The engines, no problem. Several engine types are in regular service now that are in the 100,000 pound plus thrust category. Such a large plane would carry very
adequate fuel reserves as well. This could easily hit any point on the globe from any other point without stopping to refuel. Its range could be around the world, easily,
and not even need to take the shortest route possible (Which is a great circle route).

Right now, the highest capacity variant of the 747 is capable of packing in 800 plus passengers. That's actually more than the Scarebus 380 in any configuration that
has yet been flown.

If a single 747 fuselage is good for 800 passengers, that design could be tweaked to top 4000 passengers if you went to full length double deck profiles on all three
fuselages. Assume 1200 each for the outboard pair and 50 percent more, or 1800, for the central pair.


Economy of scale works well for this. If you could fly a 4000 passenger plane at just HALF capacity and the passengers pay a very reasonable 500 dollars per ticket,
you're looking at a cool million in tickets per flight. Operating costs would be low per passenger mile, as here and now today, a Boeing 777 equipped with GE90
engines can achieve fuel economy of 86 passenger miles per gallon. A monster aircraft like this design would be even cheaper per passenger mile to operate,so long as Airbus didn't design it.
"Now they will know why they are afraid of the dark.
Now they will learn why they fear the night."....Thulsa Doom

"My body is a temple."
"No, it's an amusement park. Have a beer."...Hellboy
txsgar15a2
Offline
Posts: 338
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 9:10:23 PM
A neat idea. I am wondering however that what would happen if everyone crowded into one of the highly modified 747 outriggers in flight? Will it become unstable in flight?
Drsalee
E pluribus unum
Offline
Posts: 6506
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 9:18:05 PM
I would only fly in that thing if I was allowed a blanket.
Remember democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.

John Adams, 1814
Ameshawki
Online
Posts: 4752
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 9:18:09 PM
The problem is not getting that thing to fly; I have no doubt Boeing could do it. The problem is finding a terminal big enough for it.
Aloxite
Group W Bench
Offline
Posts: 4006
Feedback: 100% (70)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 9:20:28 PM
Originally Posted By SevenMMmag:
I'm not flying in an airplane that has mimes in it



Don't talk back. Mime is money.
They call us "civilized" because we're easy to sneak up on.

If a little is good, a lot is better and too much is just right.
PaintItBlack
Offline
Posts: 2494
Feedback: 100% (13)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 9:24:04 PM
Originally Posted By Ameshawki:
The problem is not getting that thing to fly; I have no doubt Boeing could do it. The problem is finding a terminal big enough for it.


I don't doubt they could build it but how many major air terminals have docking facilities for water craft?

The only thing that plane is good for is ferrying Indians and Pakistanis to and from London.
DragoMuseveni
Defective Corporate Drone
Offline
Posts: 9128
Feedback: 100% (6)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 9:24:11 PM
Uh, no.

But I would fly on something that offers a sleeper cabin.
elgat0l0c0
Offline
Posts: 61
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 9:27:25 PM
How long would it take to pat down that many passengers? I won't fly as it is now.
ftldrben
Member
Offline
Posts: 4361
Feedback: 100% (5)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 9:45:54 PM
Put me in the fuselage with hookers and blow!
"Is it 2012 yet?"
jblomenberg16
Offline
Posts: 347
Feedback: 100% (33)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 9:56:52 PM
Originally Posted By Merrell:
Originally Posted By dbmers:
Jogging track? Begs the question.....sooooo if you're on a treadmill IN an airplane how fast are you actually jogging?


If you were on a treadmill in an airplane, facing backwards, would you age slower than your fellow passengers?


Is the plain flying with or against the rotation of the Earth?

Ridge_Runner_5
Only person not killed by use of NcStar products
Offline
Posts: 13773
Feedback: 100% (37)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 10:00:19 PM
Boeing 314 Clipper? Hell fucking yes
Boeing Super Clipper? Fuck no
If ignorance is bliss, why aren't there more happy people?
BBB999
Offline
Posts: 3
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 10:30:05 PM
The plane would have to make long, huge, very flat, very wide turns or the passengers in the outboard cabins would be really uncomfortable with the degree of banking. With that kind of arrangement, it would probably spend as much time turning as flying to the destination.
togadelic
Offline
Posts: 41
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 10:33:42 PM
only if george kennedy is a pilot of some sort on the plane
ppknut
Member
Offline
Posts: 986
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 10:58:05 PM
Originally Posted By myitinaw:


never happen....



This.

Ever heard of the Spruce Goose. Giant Plane, flew once. Waste of $$. Absolutely no need for a plane of this size. JMO
Decimals are pointless
Sharpshooter
Offline
Posts: 1571
Feedback: 100% (36)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 11:05:49 PM
Hell yes in a heartbeat but I always wanted to fly on a 314 Clipper.
Mxpatriot51

Offline
Posts: 11179
Feedback: 100% (14)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/30/2009 11:08:29 PM
Originally Posted By dbmers:
Jogging track? Begs the question.....sooooo if you're on a treadmill IN an airplane how fast are you actually jogging?


Now you've fuckin' done it.

That'll spawn a thread of its own, guaranteed.
Posted by Aimless:

"Do we let you guys look at women's belly buttons? I'm going to go dig out the handbook so you better masturbate quickly."
  Previous Page
Page:  / 2