Page:  / 3
Author
Message
Diogenes_the-Cynic
Offline
Posts: 74
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/20/2009 10:38:09 PM

THE IMAGE ABOVE IS A PAID ADVERTISEMENT
Originally Posted By luvpilot:
If it flies, floats, or fucks.....



This X 1,000,000,000,000
trwoprod
Offline
Posts: 11555
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/20/2009 10:38:23 PM
Originally Posted By Dave_A:

Originally Posted By trwoprod:
Originally Posted By AtomicPunk09:
Cessna 182. Lots more balls than the 172. You can find one used under $100,000.


That would work –– the R models still had the Conti 6 which you could get a mogas STC for. Add Flint tip tanks, wing extensions, Sportsman cuffs, and VGs, and you should have a nice, easy-flying aircraft that can't be crippled by leaded fuel going away overnight any time soon.

So, what engines CAN'T you get a mogas STC for?

Lyco 320 can (all the birds I flew in Korea had one, they don't put booze in their gas)....

P.S. Remember that at this time, a 'mogas STC' does NOT work with Ethanol 'enhanced' (er contaminated) fuel...




Anything with a turbo, most post-1980s engines, and so on. You have to check each one, really. And I am well aware of the ethanol issues, but if Obama's folks decide to pull lead from avgas it will probably be with very little notice. At that time, there will be a five year backlog at any place that can detune the engines. So keeping the ability to use lower octane fuel in mind from the start could make that possibility a lot less stressful.
fadedsun
Wanted war criminal from texas
Online
Posts: 14208
Feedback: 100% (9)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/20/2009 10:39:21 PM
Buy a T-55 with spare parts.

Posted from my iPhone


Confucious say:"Do not break into house of man who have gun for every occasion"
trwoprod
Offline
Posts: 11556
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/20/2009 10:39:43 PM
Originally Posted By SnoopisTDI:

Originally Posted By Dave_A:

Originally Posted By trwoprod:
Originally Posted By AtomicPunk09:
Cessna 182. Lots more balls than the 172. You can find one used under $100,000.


That would work –– the R models still had the Conti 6 which you could get a mogas STC for. Add Flint tip tanks, wing extensions, Sportsman cuffs, and VGs, and you should have a nice, easy-flying aircraft that can't be crippled by leaded fuel going away overnight any time soon.

So, what engines CAN'T you get a mogas STC for?

Lyco 320 can (all the birds I flew in Korea had one, they don't put booze in their gas)....

P.S. Remember that at this time, a 'mogas STC' does NOT work with Ethanol 'enhanced' (er contaminated) fuel...


Good point. My roommate in college had an old Stinson 108 with an STC for auto gas, which made flying pretty cheap considering gas was under a dollar a gallon at the time ('99?). But with all the ethanol in gas today, I don't think it would do him much good.


Mogas sold at airports is supposed to not have ethanol in it.
Dave_A
SPC/ARNG
Offline
Posts: 58198
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/20/2009 10:41:21 PM
[Last Edit: 12/20/2009 10:43:06 PM by Dave_A]

Originally Posted By valheru21:
Originally Posted By Walkure:
Originally Posted By thatjonguy:
Originally Posted By Walkure:
Originally Posted By thatjonguy:
Edit: They are not like a Cessna, they have fold up wings and are considered a light-sport aircraft. And they can land on pavement or WATER. Win!


LSA can be pretty crippling, though - limited capacity, limited range.


That they can, but I can't find a reason (for me) to own my own Cessna (lets say) 172. I would rather have a share in one and own my own light aircraft. It is only about 80 miles (on land) to the lake I go to so the A5 would be perfect.

Now, if I had lots of cash I would have a A5, share in a Cessna, some sort of Jet and a Bell Helicopter.


Just reminding the OP (and possibly others) to take the restrictions of LSA into account. If you just want to be flying around, without the need for longer flights or the capcity to hold more people or luggage, then LSA can be a very good option, especially since then you can just maintain Sport Pilot with its lesser requirements (but higher restrictions).


LSA is a very expensive answer to a question no one asked. Seriously, an underpowered high-maintenance airplane for $130k?!? How the hell is that supposed to save General Aviation?

It won't...

Tort Reform - real tort reform, and less FAA over-regulation (Seriously, a 1930s flat-4 tractor motor with 1950s mechanical fuel injection should NOT cost more than most complete CARS to purchase - but that's exactly what a new Lycoming is, and what it costs) is what is needed...

'Course, that will never happen...

The only thing 'good' about the Light Sport category, is for older pilots who want to keep flying without keeping a current med cert...

"Why has government been instituted at all? Because the passions of man will not conform to the dictates of reason and justice without constraint."

-Alexander Hamilton

6 Less Trolls... Next?
Husky79
Member
Offline
Posts: 127
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/20/2009 10:41:31 PM
I'd highly recommend American Champion 7 or 8GCBC Citabria, those things are fun to fly decent airspeed, can do some simple easy aerobatics, can be float rated, has flaps, tail draggers are the best with tundra tires! theyre STOL rated too (49mph stall!! at full flap )140mph max, 112mph cruise 400+ something range. But theyre only 2 seat tandem. Probably not something your looking at... but just thought I'd drop a suggestion. Yes 172 182 are great planes, 172 is best to start with. I started on 172 and 170B. Love the 170B that one had 220shp!!! 20 or 30 percent flap (i forget) and its off the ground in few feet! STOL kit on too.

Citabria's, Cub, SuperCubs, Huskies, and Maules are so much fun for this area, low level slow speed flying around lakes, rivers, fields etc just enjoying the scenery at sunset is just amazing!
1Andy2
Evil, Anti-American, Free Market Capitalist
Online
Posts: 26924
Feedback: 100% (69)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/20/2009 10:42:43 PM
Originally Posted By fadedsun:
Buy a T-55 with spare parts.



Those don't land very well.
Taboot
Big Member
Offline
Posts: 2042
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/20/2009 10:50:36 PM
Originally Posted By thatjonguy:
Icon A5

About $130,000 new and production should start in 2011.

I have my sights set on one later in life.

Edit: They are not like a Cessna, they have fold up wings and are considered a light-sport aircraft. And they can land on pavement or WATER. Win!


oh man. This, I want. What a cool plane.
If you gotta shoot, shoot. Don't talk. -Tuco
copterdoctor
Offline
Posts: 671
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/20/2009 10:52:17 PM
First, shop around your local flight schools here
http://flighttraining.aopa.org/magazine/2002/July/200207_Commentary_Presidents_Perspective.html
and see if they honor the discount intro flight.
Then take a few lessons paid by the hour. Avoid a large prepayment for future instruction. Flight schools DO go out of business and you would probably lose your money. It is also not uncommon for people to take a few lessons and then decide that flying is really not what they want to do. You may not be able to get your prepayment back.
If you decide to buy an airplane, it is now a buyer's market. The economy has depressed used aircraft prices. You want to do a title search on the aircraft you intend to buy. Have a trusted mechanic do a pre purchase inspection. Do a title search. Investigate costs for insurance, storage, annual inspections, routine maintenance. In case I forgot to mention it, I don't care if you are buying an aircraft from your mother, do a title search.
Cavu
Proud Hillbilly and novice Banjer Picker
Offline
Posts: 3899
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/20/2009 10:54:30 PM
Back in the early 90's I purchased a Piper Warrior shortly after starting lessons. At that time, I purchased it for about $20K.

I did a lease back with the flight school and I found myself flying less because when I flew it the plane didn't make money, it cost me money. I wanted others to fly the thing so I could pay the bills. It was more of a distraction than it was a money saver. From my personal experience, I would recommend renting. When the hour meter stops, so does your expenses. Owning that plane was a never ending drain on my finances.

Now if you have that much excess cash on hand, then by all means, buy yourself a plane. But I would still wait until I had my ratings and a little time. Just my opinion.

As for the plane, if I had to purchase a plane for instruction today, it would be a 172.
""The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and left untried." -G.K. Chesterton
كافر
valheru21
There can be only one.
Offline
Posts: 8374
Feedback: 100% (8)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/20/2009 11:04:01 PM
I will also mention this to you. I went to Hawaii with my wife for an anniversary. She booked this aerial tour in a trike. When we got to the airport, I was VERY skeptical. After an hour flight, I wanted to buy one. It was an absolute blast. Some of the most fun flying I've done. They're like motorcycles for the air. Very cheap (when bought used) to buy and operate... and, they fold up to fit on a small trailer. They can have floats, too.
The only thing that can stop a bad guy with a gun... is a good guy with a gun.
Dave_A
SPC/ARNG
Offline
Posts: 58200
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/20/2009 11:10:39 PM

Originally Posted By valheru21:
I will also mention this to you. I went to Hawaii with my wife for an anniversary. She booked this aerial tour in a trike. When we got to the airport, I was VERY skeptical. After an hour flight, I wanted to buy one. It was an absolute blast. Some of the most fun flying I've done. They're like motorcycles for the air. Very cheap (when bought used) to buy and operate... and, they fold up to fit on a small trailer. They can have floats, too.

And they're 103 legal IF you get a single-seater...

For those who don't know, a 'Trike' is essentially a hang glider wing attached to a prop-driven go-kart

The simplest possible form of ultralight...
"Why has government been instituted at all? Because the passions of man will not conform to the dictates of reason and justice without constraint."

-Alexander Hamilton

6 Less Trolls... Next?
Winn
Ready aye Ready
Offline
Posts: 2416
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/20/2009 11:22:01 PM

interesting thread ...


Poznai Sebia ... Know Yourself
AeroE
Member
Offline
Posts: 24443
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/20/2009 11:30:16 PM
Originally Posted By Phil_A_Steen:
I think I'm going to pursue my lifelong dream next summer and get my pilot's license.

I'd like to buy an aircraft to learn on. Nothing too fancy, something reliable and nice, with maybe enough range to fly 200 or 300 miles comfortably.

What kind of planes am I looking at?


That's a question bettered answered over ice tea and a stroll around the airport.

A good place to start getting a sense of what airplanes cost is www.barnstormers.com. You should also get a subscription to Trade-A-Plane.

The place to get an idea about what airplanes will be useful to you is to start reading everything you can get your hands on. Join AOPA. Unfortunately there is no really good periodical magazine that can help educate you quickly.

If you want to be a flyer, read "A Gift of Wings" by Richard Bach. This will help you learn what type of airplane you want. If you want to be a pilot, buy a Cessna 172, or if you're small, a Cessna 150 or 152. Boring airplanes that you won't lose money on if you stay in aviation and decide you want something else. A flyer might want something a little different, maybe a Cessna 140, Luscombe 8A or 8E, Champ, or Citabria. You'll also want to learn about the EAA and the annual convention in Oshkosh.

The buy in is simple and cheap. Keeping the airplane is another story, although you can mitigate the expense with your own sweat.

I got a little chuckle about 200 or 300 mile trips. In most light airplanes, that can be an evening trip for dinner or to see the folks. In the right airplane you can fly the length of the Oregon trail in a day.

One more thing. In general I prefer high wing airplanes, mostly for the shade while flying in the summer, but also for the unobstructed view of the ground. Most high wing airplanes with side by side seating have a door on each side. Most low wing airplanes have a single cockpit door on the passenger's side, so access requires a little more organization to load passengers.

My preference runs to classic and antique airplanes, and tail wheels. But I also like fast airplanes, so I'm willing to be seen in a nose dragger as a concession.

If you are serious about learning to fly, I think you should start and worry about buying an airplane later after you have a chance to enter the culture and get an idea of what you'll want and how you will use an airplane.

It's true, Obama is the Leader of Fools deluded to believe, "Everything is going to change now".
As for me, I will embrace what is Right more tightly than ever.


1 lbf = 32.174 lbm-ft/sec^2
kmrtnsn
Offline
Posts: 32
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/20/2009 11:31:00 PM
Learn first; buy later. It would be silly to buy and start paying costs on a training plane that you do not own. Annuals, insurance, tie-down, etc., have the flight school eat these costs. Once you have your license and have some time in different types you'll have a much better idea of what you can afford and what you want.

Me, I'd find a nice, well maintained and hangared Cessna TU206. It will have the legs and hauling capacity you will need later when you are flying for business and pleasure. Better speed and comfort than a 172 or 182 and the utility configuration is nice for loading large bags should you decide to take it skiing, hunting, etc (roughly 1,000 lbs for a 1,000 miles, try that in a 172/182). Look for a three bladed Hartwell.
trwoprod
Offline
Posts: 11557
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/20/2009 11:37:07 PM
Originally Posted By kmrtnsn:
Learn first; buy later. It would be silly to buy and start paying costs on a training plane that you do not own. Annuals, insurance, tie-down, etc., have the flight school eat these costs. Once you have your license and have some time in different types you'll have a much better idea of what you can afford and what you want.

Me, I'd find a nice, well maintained and hangared Cessna TU206. It will have the legs and hauling capacity you will need later when you are flying for business and pleasure. Better speed and comfort than a 172 or 182 and the utility configuration is nice for loading large bags should you decide to take it skiing, hunting, etc (roughly 1,000 lbs for a 1,000 miles, try that in a 172/182). Look for a three bladed Hartwell.


Sierra down in Uvalde has an STC for 50+ gallons more fuel in wing tanks.
www-glock19-com
bad chicken, mess you up
Offline
Posts: 17982
Feedback: 100% (55)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/20/2009 11:39:08 PM
My grandfather had a 310 no clue what it cost though


so yeah this is pretty much a bump
Originally Posted By BillofRights: Complete with piss and Ninjas
1911SFOREVER
Part time instructor, full time student
Offline
Posts: 853
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/21/2009 8:17:03 AM
Originally Posted By thatjonguy:
Icon A5

About $130,000 new and production should start in 2011.

I have my sights set on one later in life.

Edit: They are not like a Cessna, they have fold up wings and are considered a light-sport aircraft. And they can land on pavement or WATER. Win!


HOLY SHIT THAT IS ONE SEXY AIRPLANE!
Owner/Instructor, www.fpftraining.com
whiskerz
bad example
Offline
Posts: 3661
Feedback: 100% (17)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/21/2009 8:33:15 AM
2 pages and let me be the first to say dibs on guns and ammo and hot ex girlfriends
A Deagle without beams is like a Caprice without 24's
eric496
Member
Offline
Posts: 354
Feedback: 100% (36)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2009 7:33:44 PM
[Last Edit: 12/25/2009 8:00:25 PM by eric496]
Originally Posted By The_Alchemist:
Cessna 162 SkyCatcher



They are being made in China and branded with Cessna's name. The first two prototypes crashed.

My first plane was a 38 year old Cessna 150. I'd be very surprised to see 30 year old Skycatchers flying in the future.

OP: I don't know how big you are. But if you're about the same size as me (about 160lbs), I'd recommend training and putting 100 hours or so in a small plane like a 150/152. Then move up to a bigger plane.

The larger planes are much more stable. My old 150 handled like a dream, but demanded full attention during the maneuvers. If you can perform a power-on stall in that, and you will to get your license, you're ready for anything. And I've performed them in a T-6 as well. The 172 I now own a fraction of is incredibly stable by comparison. I think it is better to learn in a plane that doesn't almost fly by itself.

Good luck!

ETA:

One important thing to remember: DO NOT buy an airplane without having a pre-purchase inspection performed by a mechanic who does not work for the seller. It is best if it is done at a different airport by a mechanic who has never worked on the plane before.
NRA Life Endowment member
Rumrunner358
Offline
Posts: 1098
Feedback: 100% (23)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2009 8:09:03 PM
Originally Posted By www-glock19-com:
My grandfather had a 310 no clue what it cost though


so yeah this is pretty much a bump


310 is one of cessna's nicest planes. Little out of the price range, and a good cross country plane but not really for learning.

Best bet IMO, is an older 182, fixed gear, etc. with cont. 0-470. Drinks the mogas nicely, easy to fly, forgiving, not to thirsty (relatively), and a good x-country plane. Parts are cheap too.
MattyMattel
Offline
Posts: 6380
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2009 8:23:27 PM
El Paso Int'l had a Convair 990 for sale,less than $100k,it's not too big,and it'll do 200-300 miles rather nicely.
Gone_Shootin
CAPITALIST
Offline
Posts: 4185
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2009 9:14:01 PM
I don't have a pilot's liscense, but I always figured if I was gonna buy a plane I would look for a Piper Cub.
"For one thing is quite certain, if You simply sit still, in the belief that the fire is still far from Your borders: Your lands will become the theatre on which the tragedy is played out."
- Friedrich Wilhelm I, Elector of Brandenburg, 1667
SpankD
Keep away from sharp objects
Offline
Posts: 509
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2009 9:26:05 PM
Get this for it

http://www.airsoftarms.com/Echo-1-Minigun-Airsoft-Electric-Gun––-Long-Version

poop
03PSD
Member
Offline
Posts: 1306
Feedback: 100% (51)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2009 9:28:56 PM

Originally Posted By SuperSixOne:
http://www.aopa.org

ARFCOM isn't too good at such questions

what do planes have to do with Alpacas?
skeeters65
Kool Aid Drinker
Offline
Posts: 8231
Feedback: 100% (155)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/25/2009 11:59:33 PM
[size=6reliable][/size=6]

That is the most important part..
If it will get your teeth knocked out in real life, you'll get banned for it.
HK_SHOOTER_03
elkmontarms
Offline
Posts: 700
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 12:19:21 AM
[Last Edit: 12/26/2009 12:22:52 AM by elkmontarms]
Just rent for a while until you get you license. The GA market is a disaster and prices are still falling. I feel there is still a long way to go before we hit bottom. There are so many folks trying to sell their airplanes right now it is unreal, the market is flooded with good used GA aircraft and more are coming up for sale every day.

I wish I had the right answers for you, the sad fact is GA in the USA is dying a slow death. I love avaiation and I make my living in the business, it hurts me to say that GA is on the way out. FBO's are going out of business, fuel is still expensive and OEM replacement parts for many older aircraft are becoming near impossible to get. It's like the perfect storm of problems that are killing the industry.

I wish I had a better outlook for the future for GA, this is just my 2 cents.
Gibsonn
Offline
Posts: 139
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 12:52:02 AM
[Last Edit: 12/26/2009 1:01:40 AM by Gibsonn]
One thing that really hasn't been mentioned too much here is maintenance. Buying a airplane is easy. The expensive part is the upkeep. They are not like cars where you can do all the work yourself whenever something breaks. The FAA regulates all maintenance done to these aircraft. Every 50 hours on the meter there is a scheduled maintenance that has to be done. Every 100 hours there is maintenance that has to be done. All this has to be logged and kept with the aircraft. All maintenance has to be done buy a A&P mechanic. You think car mechanics charge a lot per hour, wait to you get a quote from a A&P. Parts on a plane are incredibly expensive. Take for instance the 172 people are talking about. Average 50 hour is about 300-500. 100 Hours are about 800-1200. Annuals can be up to 10k, each and every year of ownership. Now everything on that plans is only good for so many hours. The engine if I can remember right is only good for about 10-15k hours. So when you buy one look at the Hobbs meter and see how many hours on on the aircraft. When its time to replace the engine, expect about a 15k cost. If you ever owned a boat....double to triple the cost of upkeep and that's about what it would cost to own a plane.

My father is a A&P, with his inspectors license. Ive spent many hours helping him and around aircraft.

EDIT: sorry the TBO (TIme Before Overhaul) on a 172 is around 2000 hours. Depending on year and engine type and cost will range 15K-25k also depending on engine type.
Mazawakhan
Offline
Posts: 2094
Feedback: 100% (7)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 1:48:37 AM
Originally Posted By 1Andy2:
What's the minimum you'd expect to spend on a decent plane with a max speed over 300 mph?

Hey, I'm allowed to dream...


300+? You are delving into the realm of turbine powered aircraft!
Dave_A
SPC/ARNG
Offline
Posts: 58419
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 1:59:27 AM
[Last Edit: 12/26/2009 2:02:08 AM by Dave_A]

Originally Posted By Gibsonn:
One thing that really hasn't been mentioned too much here is maintenance. Buying a airplane is easy. The expensive part is the upkeep. They are not like cars where you can do all the work yourself whenever something breaks. The FAA regulates all maintenance done to these aircraft. Every 50 hours on the meter there is a scheduled maintenance that has to be done. Every 100 hours there is maintenance that has to be done. All this has to be logged and kept with the aircraft. All maintenance has to be done buy a A&P mechanic. You think car mechanics charge a lot per hour, wait to you get a quote from a A&P. Parts on a plane are incredibly expensive. Take for instance the 172 people are talking about. Average 50 hour is about 300-500. 100 Hours are about 800-1200. Annuals can be up to 10k, each and every year of ownership. Now everything on that plans is only good for so many hours. The engine if I can remember right is only good for about 10-15k hours. So when you buy one look at the Hobbs meter and see how many hours on on the aircraft. When its time to replace the engine, expect about a 15k cost. If you ever owned a boat....double to triple the cost of upkeep and that's about what it would cost to own a plane.

My father is a A&P, with his inspectors license. Ive spent many hours helping him and around aircraft.

EDIT: sorry the TBO (TIme Before Overhaul) on a 172 is around 2000 hours. Depending on year and engine type and cost will range 15K-25k also depending on engine type.

100hr inspections are only required for commercial/flight-school use aircraft...

Personal birds only require annuals & scheduled overhauls.

Light Sports (and homebuilts built by the current owner) can be owner-maintained without an A&P.
"Why has government been instituted at all? Because the passions of man will not conform to the dictates of reason and justice without constraint."

-Alexander Hamilton

6 Less Trolls... Next?
dropbass
Offline
Posts: 3589
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 2:13:29 AM
Originally Posted By Dave_A:

Originally Posted By thatjonguy:
Icon A5

About $130,000 new and production should start in 2011.

I have my sights set on one later in life.

Edit: They are not like a Cessna, they have fold up wings and are considered a light-sport aircraft. And they can land on pavement or WATER. Win!

Landing on water requires a separate rating (seaplane rating) from landing on land...

If you want folding wings, there are plenty of 'full private' Experimental models that offer this feature....


Icon's claim to fame on this one is the FAA seaplane rating does not apply since the aircraft is a LSA.
retgarr
Still not an AK.
Offline
Posts: 5208
Feedback: 100% (5)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 2:42:31 AM

Originally Posted By valheru21:
Originally Posted By Dave_A:
Personally, I'll be happy (for now) with a VNE of 170, if I can just get the time to finish the damn thing without other more pressing projects popping up...

Well, that and I have a Lyco (that's older than I am, by at least a decade) on an engine stand in my living room...


What kind of plane are you building again? It's not an RV is it?

What's wrong with RV's
Support a VZ58 subforum here! http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=2&t=899608&page=1
I grade dinner picks harshly and fairly.
SmilingBandit
Damn these electric sex pants!
Online
Posts: 13272
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 2:45:19 AM
Originally Posted By dropbass:
Originally Posted By Dave_A:

Originally Posted By thatjonguy:
Icon A5

About $130,000 new and production should start in 2011.

I have my sights set on one later in life.

Edit: They are not like a Cessna, they have fold up wings and are considered a light-sport aircraft. And they can land on pavement or WATER. Win!

Landing on water requires a separate rating (seaplane rating) from landing on land...

If you want folding wings, there are plenty of 'full private' Experimental models that offer this feature....


Icon's claim to fame on this one is the FAA seaplane rating does not apply since the aircraft is a LSA.


And even if it didn't a PPL seaplane add on is only around $1000 and a day and a half of work.
"Upon further review, we have determined that the string itself is not a machinegun" -BATFE
Tony-Ri
Student w/BRD, AKA Broke
Offline
Posts: 3416
Feedback: 100% (28)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 2:47:03 AM
[Last Edit: 12/26/2009 2:47:43 AM by Tony-Ri]
Well kept, used 172.
Home schooling doesn't make you socially inept, it just makes you awesome enough to do shit people remember centuries later. ~ Frost7
Kalahnikid
No-Till Farmer
Offline
Posts: 20181
Feedback: 100% (98)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 2:48:30 AM
Buy a 172 if you want to fly something reliable, efficient, fairly comfortable, and boring as hell.
Is this decade over yet?
ProfGAB101
2 Arms and Dangerous.
Offline
Posts: 3713
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 4:36:04 AM
I still harbor this insane dream of building a BD-5.

I took all my dual instruction in low wing Beechcraft. Flying out of Colorado Springs on a rainy summer afternoon - a turbo really helps.

anything less than 800rnds wasn't worth getting the gun dirty.

April 6, 2006 - Has now past... Time to Lawyer up again.
Kalahnikid
No-Till Farmer
Offline
Posts: 20193
Feedback: 100% (98)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 4:43:13 AM
Originally Posted By ProfGAB101:
I still harbor this insane dream of building a BD-5.

I took all my dual instruction in low wing Beechcraft. Flying out of Colorado Springs on a rainy summer afternoon - a turbo really helps.



Building one isnt insane, flying it is.
Is this decade over yet?
MiG-21
Not a JBT (by much)
Offline
Posts: 2466
Feedback: 100% (6)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 4:50:10 AM
[Last Edit: 12/26/2009 4:50:44 AM by MiG-21]
Bah! Boring stuff so far. Try this! And it's under 100K.

http://www.raptoraviation.com/aircraft%20spec%20pages/Mig21UM.html
From each according to his ability. To each according to his lack thereof.
Frost7
Lead Farmer
Offline
Posts: 16396
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 5:17:31 AM
Originally Posted By Dave_A:
P.S. For the OP and the 300mph guy (I am not going to give flying advice to Mr SuperBug Driver - he allready knows) learning to fly in too fast of a plane (one with too high of a stall speed) makes learning to land harder...

Hell with that, man. Learn to land and stall in an F4U-1.

After that, either you'll be dead (in which case it won't matter), or literally everything will be easy in comparison.
trwoprod
Offline
Posts: 11612
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 11:52:47 AM
Originally Posted By Rumrunner358:
Originally Posted By www-glock19-com:
My grandfather had a 310 no clue what it cost though


so yeah this is pretty much a bump


310 is one of cessna's nicest planes. Little out of the price range, and a good cross country plane but not really for learning.

Best bet IMO, is an older 182, fixed gear, etc. with cont. 0-470. Drinks the mogas nicely, easy to fly, forgiving, not to thirsty (relatively), and a good x-country plane. Parts are cheap too.


Put VGs, Sportsman cuffs, wing extensions, and tip tanks on and you have a nice long range cruiser.
DesignatedMarksman
To the everlasting glory of the Infantry...
Offline
Posts: 1635
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 11:58:58 AM
RESIST
"Fiber One Bars are forged in the smithy of Mount Doom by a team of sadistic Keebler Orcs." - Cheesebeast
Magoo6541
We'll never forget - 343 - Charleston Nine
Offline
Posts: 2728
Feedback: 100% (12)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 12:12:30 PM
[Last Edit: 12/26/2009 1:33:42 PM by Magoo6541]
It depends on what you plan on doing with the plane. I'd look for a nicer fractional ownership in a Diamond 40XLS or a Cirrus. If you plan on doing some serious traveling in your plane those 2 would suit your needs. If you plan on getting your ME, look into a nicer twin fractional ownership. Light twins can bite hard if you don't do your part. Single pilot IFR in a twin puts a lot on a pilot.

If you plan on just cruising the friendly skies on short hops and staying close to your base airport, look into an older but nicely equiped 172. I wouldn't get an 182 unless you'll really need the extra performance. And if you really do need the extra performance then, I'd rather have the fractional in a Diamond/Cirrus/Light Twin.

My $.02
IYAOYAS
LesBaer45
Offline
Posts: 1074
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 4:14:11 PM
Originally Posted By AeroE:
Originally Posted By Phil_A_Steen:
I think I'm going to pursue my lifelong dream next summer and get my pilot's license.

I'd like to buy an aircraft to learn on. Nothing too fancy, something reliable and nice, with maybe enough range to fly 200 or 300 miles comfortably.

What kind of planes am I looking at?


That's a question bettered answered over ice tea and a stroll around the airport.

A good place to start getting a sense of what airplanes cost is www.barnstormers.com. You should also get a subscription to Trade-A-Plane.




Man there are some nice planes on BarnStormers. Several twin engine jobbies and a really nice commanche.

Oh to be rich.
RDP
Another JBT!
Offline
Posts: 6493
Feedback: 100% (11)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 4:23:19 PM
Insurance will SUCK for you just learning.

Higher rates may end up being more than what a rental would cost.
EarlBypass
Servo vestri auris pessum. Three sentio. NRALM
Offline
Posts: 2228
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 4:27:04 PM
[Last Edit: 12/26/2009 4:30:44 PM by EarlBypass]
You might want to see if you like flying and can pass the medical, first. Then, a Cessna 180 or a Super Cub!

http://www.aerotrader.com/

http://motors.shop.ebay.com/items/Aircraft__W0QQ_sacatZ63676
"The public cannot be too curious concerning the characters of public men." - Samuel Adams, November 4, 1775

Load up on guns and bring your friends, It's fun to lose and to pretend...
Belfry_Express
Aerospace Guru
Offline
Posts: 4508
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 4:37:57 PM
you can get a nice Cessna 182 skylane RG for well under that and have a plane that can cruise relatively quickly and have some good comfort
"Guard thy airspeed, lest the ground arise to smite thee"
CITADELGRAD87
Offline
Posts: 4459
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 4:52:46 PM
Originally Posted By retgarr:
Kit built is easily the best bang for the buck.



RV––Van's Aircraft FTW!

My dad built an RV6, cruised at 200 mph, he had to watch overruning the cessnas if they took off ahead of him. Liability lawsuits largely froze civilian factory AC development, the basic 172 is a 60s era plane at best.
Mxpatriot51

Offline
Posts: 11148
Feedback: 100% (14)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/26/2009 4:54:22 PM
Get your license first so you can learn for yourself what you want/need and if you still want to own a plane.

Posted by Aimless:

"Do we let you guys look at women's belly buttons? I'm going to go dig out the handbook so you better masturbate quickly."
Phil_A_Steen
Posing a clear and present danger to propane tanks
Offline
Posts: 11536
Feedback: 100% (9)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/27/2009 8:04:11 PM
Are there any good WW2 warbirds that would be worth looking into?
Some people like seven grain bread . . . I like 55 grain lead.
Sique
Member
Offline
Posts: 2042
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/27/2009 8:21:25 PM
Get a G550. You'll probably have to get it used, and/or possibly crashed to get it in that price range though.
Page:  / 3