Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Log In

A valid email is required.
Password is required.
Site Notices
Posted: 12/16/2001 10:05:31 AM EDT
[url]http://www.capgv.org/index.asp[/url] I'm sure they could use your suggestions. [}:D]
Link Posted: 12/16/2001 10:11:16 AM EDT
Sometimes I just sit and think about how there are too many liberal arts majors in the world...
Link Posted: 12/16/2001 10:13:31 AM EDT
Here's their email: alliance@capgv.org
Link Posted: 12/16/2001 10:42:44 AM EDT
I'm so glad I go to a community college in western Virginia. We don't have to put with this kind of crap at my school because most of the students (and quite a few of the professors) are pro-gun, hunters, etc.
Link Posted: 12/16/2001 10:50:24 AM EDT
They are in ARIZONA! WTF is up with that. Did you check out their links, all from anti groups or atf. Real balanced picture. What a bunch of ultra maroons.
Link Posted: 12/16/2001 5:58:18 PM EDT
To make matters worst the site is probably paid for with our tax $ [puke]
Link Posted: 12/16/2001 7:47:07 PM EDT
Link Posted: 12/16/2001 7:50:01 PM EDT
Link Posted: 12/16/2001 8:14:46 PM EDT
Someone needs to Hack this pathetic site....
Link Posted: 12/16/2001 8:21:01 PM EDT
oh, that's funny, let's 'regulate guns like we regulate (teddy) bears' When we start making guns intended for 3 YEAR OLDS, then they should be regulated. Puh LEEZE. These people probably STILL fail to realize the problem is a BEHAVIOR, not a device.
Link Posted: 12/16/2001 8:23:40 PM EDT
Link Posted: 12/16/2001 8:27:32 PM EDT
Wow, I am gettin' ed-u-cated: Handguns are designed to be fired with one hand, while long guns, such as rifles and shotguns, require two hands to operate. Handguns generally fall into two categories: Revolvers store cartridges in a revolving cylinder. Semiautomatic pistols store cartridges in a magazine in the grip. They are generally more dangerous than revolvers because they hold more ammunition and require less skill to achieve a rapid rate of fire. They are also less reliable because they jam if the shooter holds them incorrectly.
Link Posted: 12/16/2001 8:28:15 PM EDT
Originally Posted By DoubleFeed: Course they realize it. They realize it in the back of their mind and it terrifies them, and they feel powerless. Whats more, they also feel powerless against their own negative emotions. That webpage is the result of it.
View Quote
Well, we all know that a fear of weapons is a sign of retarded emotional and sexual maturity... hehehe
Link Posted: 12/16/2001 8:38:06 PM EDT
Link Posted: 12/16/2001 8:59:44 PM EDT
Most anti's that I have met get angry when you suggest to them that banning guns or gun control will not solve the problem, but rather make it worse. They get really upset when you start explaining the peculiarities of human behavior. They do this because their political viewpoints are a defense mechanism against their feelings of helplessness. They feel helpless because they do not believe that they can handle life on their own. They want to remake society into something that will protect them from what they perceive poses a danger. They perceive symbols of violence as posing a danger, not the violence itself. This is the framework for the beliefs of most neo-socialists, as well. I decided to experiment on some antigun friends of mine, and I haven't found a good solution. Either you leave the misconceived notions in place, or you rip them away violently. There is no in-between, and if you challenge the misconceived notions, you will be demonized in their mind. Go figure.
View Quote
So true. I used to visit politics.com and grill some of the liberals there to back up their views. I would challenge them to defend the statements they made. Not a single one ever made an intelligible defense but I got a TON of heated replies. Even when I took out the sarcasm and asked them nicely they couldn't justify their opinions with facts. My purpose was solely to understand how so many people could share the same errant ideals. I still do not understand them. Liberals are the most dangerous threat to the Constitution. They have absolutely no regard for it unless it suits their current situation. Most of them don't know history but will quickly revise what parts they do know. They can regurgitate every sound bite they are fed with a passion. Maybe they just watched too much television growing up and can't think for themselves anymore? On CSPAN the other night some Dem. Senator openly praised the FDR administration as the "good ole' days." Specifically citing the huge federal government of that time. Let's face the facts. If we don't keep active, stay in the NRA, and vote conservative every time the polls are open WE WILL LOSE OUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS. Despite Bush's very high approval rating.
Link Posted: 12/16/2001 9:53:48 PM EDT
Ya know, if I don't get a job soon, I will be forced to start my own business: "Gun Control Technical Consultant". Seeing how these groups are getting huge multi-million dollar donations from international bankers the likes of George Soros and NON-FDCGH Andrew McKelvey, I could make money helping the anti-gun weenies not make these gun inaccuracies. If "gun owner" Tom Diaz can do it, then by golly so can I.
Link Posted: 12/17/2001 4:26:45 AM EDT
Originally Posted By DoubleFeed: . They do this because their political viewpoints are a defense mechanism against their feelings of helplessness. They feel helpless because they do not believe that they can handle life on their own. They want to remake society into something that will protect them from what they perceive poses a danger. Go figure.
View Quote
"Will you be our father?" Question asked of willyklinton at one of the forum/debates 1991.
Link Posted: 12/17/2001 4:29:34 AM EDT
Originally Posted By Imbroglio: Ya know, if I don't get a job soon, I will be forced to start my own business: "Gun Control Technical Consultant". Seeing how these groups are getting huge multi-million dollar donations from international bankers the likes of George Soros and NON-FDCGH Andrew McKelvey, I could make money helping the anti-gun weenies not make these gun inaccuracies. If "gun owner" Tom Diaz can do it, then by golly so can I.
View Quote
LMAO
Link Posted: 12/17/2001 4:49:00 AM EDT
Originally Posted By realist: Someone needs to Hack this pathetic site....
View Quote
...RBAD? sic'ck'um
Link Posted: 12/17/2001 6:19:37 AM EDT
Originally Posted By Imbroglio: Ya know, if I don't get a job soon, I will be forced to start my own business: "Gun Control Technical Consultant". Seeing how these groups are getting huge multi-million dollar donations from international bankers the likes of George Soros and NON-FDCGH Andrew McKelvey, I could make money helping the anti-gun weenies not make these gun inaccuracies. If "gun owner" Tom Diaz can do it, then by golly so can I.
View Quote
Why not take their money and give them bad info? They'd never know the difference. [}:D]
Link Posted: 12/17/2001 3:16:34 PM EDT
I'm busy reading everything on their site so I can write a lenghty angry email to them.
Link Posted: 12/17/2001 3:27:45 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 12/17/2001 3:31:43 PM EDT by M4Real]
E-BOMB THEM!!!!!! Send them as many emails as you can. Be sure to attach large pictures. This will eat up thier server space. Don't make any threats, just give them "constructive critisism". Oh, be sure to change your "identity" in your mail program before you send. Try this site for more info: [url]www.geocities.com/RainForest/Vines/1243/ebomb.html[/url]
Link Posted: 12/17/2001 3:34:56 PM EDT
"This image shows a military M-16 automatic rifle. The 1994 assault weapons law required modifications to the civilian semi-automatic version of this design - but that law will sunset in 2004 unless Congress reauthorizes it. Please be careful to avoid using this image in a misleading way." [:E] [url]http://www.capgv.org/resources/art/index.asp[/url]
Link Posted: 12/17/2001 3:50:20 PM EDT
M4Real: E-BOMB THEM!!!!!!
View Quote
I wonder what that "Unibomber E-mail Program" is....[:\] "-Mail Bomb... No, it's not what you think. We aren't going to be sending explosives to animal/human exploiters, nor are we going to be doing anything illegal on this page. The concept of an email bomb is quite simple. You find out the email address for someone whom you think deserves a wake-up call (ex. Proctor & Gamble), and you email that person as many times as your little fingers will allow you to. The best thing to do is to write your message to the person and then highlight the text with your mouse and hit control-c. This puts the text into your computer's clipboard. Send the message to the person and bring up another email window to send the next one. In the text field, hit control-v. This should empty the original text into the field. Now keep sending these messages to the people until your fingers fall off. Remember to try and be civilized with these people and let them know that you are strongly against what they are doing. Try and educate the person on the subject. Sometimes these people don't even know what they are contributing to, so again, try and be civilized. If you want, you can use an anonymous remailer to do this. That is if you don't want the person mailing you back. Below are a list of email addresses associated with companies that have been known to exploit animals, humans, and/or the earth. If you know of any other organizations/people that deserve an email bomb email us. We will try to update this page as soon as possible. There are also a couple programs out there that will perform amazing email bombs. I've only seen these programs work with American Online. If you are using AOL and you want to use one of these programs, let us know. -Unabomber Mail-Bomb Program- Make sure you read the FRONTLINE.txt file!" [url]http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/Vines/1243/ebomb.html[/url]
Top Top