'F. Lee' Levin as Rush calls him, the resident legal scholar of the EIB Network and frequent contributor to Rush's show:
[size=4]Trying Walker[/size=4]
[b]What to do about John Walker.[/b]
By Mark R. Levin December 10, 2001 8:35 a.m.
Boy, what passes for "expert" legal commentary these days! From ex-judges and law professors, to ex-federal prosecutors and "constitutional scholars," one after another asserts that the United States government must have formally declared war against the Taliban regime for John Walker to be subject to treason charges.
Well, their copy of the Constitution must be a different version than mine. Article III, Section 3, Clause 1, states:
"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in [u]levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort[/u]. No person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in Court."
The issue, therefore, is [u]not[/u] whether the U.S. has declared war, but whether Walker has waged war against the U.S., or whether he has given aid and comfort to the enemy. And the analysis doesn't end here.
A charge of treason can only be brought against natural born or naturalized citizens. Moreover, Title 8, Section 1481 of the U. S. Code provides that citizenship is lost by voluntarily performing certain acts with the intention of relinquishing U.S. nationality, including "entering in, or serving in, the armed forces of a foreign state if ... such armed forces are engaged in hostilities against the United States .…"
Clearly Walker was born a U.S. citizen, but he also served in the armed forces of the Taliban government when that regime was engaged in hostilities against America. Therefore, it appears that Walker has renounced his U.S. citizenship by his own actions and, accordingly, would not be subject to treason charges.
But if Walker is not a U.S. citizen, he could be tried before a military commission, which President George Bush's military order has reestablished for alien and non-citizen combatants. The problem for Walker, however, is that the full array of constitutional rights available to U.S. citizens/defendants would not be available to him as a non-citizen combatant. And although Walker couldn't be charged with treason, he could well be charged with, and more easily convicted of, other war crimes. Of course, Bush's order reserves for the administration the discretion to decide whether Walker or any combatant will face a military commission.
- continued -