Fighting World War II with Today's Mentality
I've been worried if our commitment to the Afghan campaign would develop any cracks. It seems we already started off with a disadvantages we didn't have in previous wars. Ever since the Vietnam war, there been a growing sensitivity to the negative results of warfare.
This week I ran across a humorous news story that detailed how World War II would most likely be conducted if it occurred today. It's amusing, but it also presents a very sober message about the social trend towards vacillation:
BOMBING RESUMES OVER GERMANY
Allied bombers returned to the sky today after a month-long suspension of operations out of respect for the German holiday of Oktoberfest. Waves of B-17s, B-24s, B-25s once again pounded German anti-aircraft sites and Luftwaffe training basis in what Pentagon sources called a "precision attack" designed to weaken the war-fighting capabilities of the Hitlerite regime.
"Slowly but surely, we are going to smoke Adolph out of his bunker," asserted President Truman during last night's fireside chat. Military analysts say that the continued aerial bombardment is taking its toll on the Nazi war machine.
The Pentagon refused to confirm or deny whether the controversial B-29 "Superfortress" was used in today's bombing. The B-29 has been the subject of Congressional inquiry into cost over-runs as well as its safety record.
Responding to German accusations that women and children continue to be killed in the 5-year long air campaign, a military spokesman said, "While we are taking every conceivable precaution, it is an unfortunate fact of war that sometimes a small amount of collateral damage is unavoidable. America sincerely regrets any inconvenience to the German people this campaign to rid the world of totalitarianism may cause."
INVASION OF GERMANY NOT IN THE WORKS, SAY MILITARY EXPERTS
Despite the success of the air war over Germany, the United States is a long way from sending ground troops into Europe. Military experts agree that doing so would only play into Hitler's strength.
"The Hitlerites are well armed, they have a formidable panzer force, and they know the terrain. US forces would only risk being bogged down in death-traps like the Ardennes and the Ruhr Valley," said one ex-military officer interviewed.
US troops setting foot on German soil would also risk breaking up the fragile alliance that Roosevelt and his successor Truman have worked so hard to keep together. "Most of the Allied countries, including Great Britain, have large populations of people with Germanic ancestry. Nobody knows how they might react to a direct invasion of the Aryan homeland by a mongrel race of mud people."
Instead of sending ground troops, most experts agree, the US should concentrate on knocking out the Hitlerite command and control elements, and continuing to support German opposition parties both inside and outside the Reich. "There's a growing resistance movement in Bavaria, and direct involvement by Switzerland cannot be ruled out."