Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Log In

A valid email is required.
Password is required.
Site Notices
6/25/2017 7:35:25 PM
6/21/2017 8:25:40 PM
Posted: 2/27/2001 8:46:22 AM EDT
FYI : http://www.nandotimes.com/noframes/story/0,2107,500457782-500696269-503762583-0,00.html British lawmakers debate anti-crime measures OR "What, the gun ban hasn't worked?" British lawmakers debate anti-crime measures By ROBERT BARR, Associated Press LONDON (February 26, 2001 10:41 p.m. EST http://www.nandotimes.com) - More juries may be told about criminal defendants' previous convictions, the government said Monday, announcing a batch of ideas that would aim to combat crime. Home Secretary Jack Straw also promised more money for prosecutors and suggested that private security guards could be used to help on police patrols. Opposition politicians accused the government of trying to cover up its failure to halt a rise in violent crime, a police organization attacked the plan to use private security guards and a civil liberties group condemned the idea of telling juries about previous convictions. Prime Minister Tony Blair, who is expected to call a national election within weeks, dramatized the government's crime policies earlier Monday by becoming the first serving prime minister to visit a prison. Blair visited a dyslexia center at Pentonville prison in London to underline his contention that rehabilitation programs are a key to cutting crime. "The truth is you need both the toughness and the rehabilitation," Blair said on a radio phone-in program. Straw told the House of Commons he wanted to stop repeat offenses by introducing rigorous supervision of those released after short sentences. Sixty percent of those jailed for less than a year commit new offenses within two years, the Home Office says. Conservative lawmaker Ann Widdecombe retorted that under Blair "police numbers have been slashed by more than 2,500, violent crime is rising, more than 30,000 criminals have been let out of jail early, and many of your flagship policies have been abject failures." Blair's Labor Party campaigned hard on the rising crime rate during its winning 1997 campaign, pledging to be "tough on crime, and tough on the causes of crime." British juries already hear about previous convictions in some circumstances, and widening the exceptions was being considered, the Home Office said. "It is a serious erosion of a key principle of the criminal justice system," said Roger Bingham, spokesman for the civil liberties group, Liberty. "People in criminal trials should be found guilty beyond reasonable doubt on the facts of that case. It is about proving that they did it this time, not about assumptions based on something they might have done previously." Police groups were no happier about the idea of expanding the use of private security guards. "If the government is going to invest money then why doesn't it invest money in fully trained, omnicompetent police officers?" said David French of the Police Federation. ^ Gee, I wonder why. Let's just destroy people Rights instead. ^ www.RKBA.org/antis/hci-master www.DigitalAngel.net/da_patent/index.htm Never Again, Never Forget Seek the Truth Liberate Your Mind FIXED BAYONETS VX
Link Posted: 3/29/2001 7:01:35 PM EDT
I read in one of the gun rags that a man who defended his house with an illegal firearm spent a longer time behind bars than the two punk kids who tried to rob him.
Link Posted: 3/29/2001 8:36:23 PM EDT
He was an old gentleman approxiamtely my father's age. Shot two intruders is his home with a shot gun. I heard he recieved the equivilent of a life sentence. If the british had any balls they'd start rioting in the streets. George Orwell warned 'em. Wonder what the hell happened. If I were a "subject" I'd either be in prision, in the ground, or on the lam. Absolutely disgusting.
Link Posted: 3/29/2001 9:17:56 PM EDT
Unfortunantely, Tony Martin shot one 16yr. old in the back from less than 25ft. Hence the murder part of the equation. On the other hand, the dead youth was probably in a hurry to leave after he saw Mr. Martin had a shotgun.
Link Posted: 3/29/2001 10:36:38 PM EDT
Really...I hadn't heard that version at all. Do you have any reliable links?
Link Posted: 3/30/2001 9:34:17 PM EDT
Most of these are news reports, I can't find an autopsy, police or court report if that's what you're looking for, sorry. Here's a forum pro-tony, scroll down to the thread about "Just a comment", and you'll see that no one is denying he was shot in the back... [url]http://pub14.bravenet.com/forum/show.asp?usernum=1202001130&cpv=1[/url] Some news stories mentioning it.... [url]http://www.lineone.net/express/00/04/20/news/n0100splash-d.html[/url] [url]http://www.norfolk-now.co.uk/Archive/News/2000/April/htm/000424MartinAppeal.htm[/url] These are kind of sad..... [url]http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?story=7531[/url] [url]http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?story=40465[/url]
Top Top