Well, the last time around the guy who "stopped the killing" was Colin Powell. And look where he is now.

At this point, I have to agree with you, we have to go in and kill a bunch of terrorists. We have to get in close, and get our hands durty doing it. We have to go in both deep and wide.

But in the end, this will not end terrorism. No matter how many we kill, there will always be more.

Not interviening in other countries was the best plan in the beginning. At this point, that seems no longer possible. So now, we will have to kill lots of people, and still live with terrorism.

Conspiracy theories?

I haven't seen anyone posting any, excpt to comment on the conspirasy that resulted in the attack on the WTC and DC.

Certainly, at this point it will be hard for rational politicians to oppose "anti-terrorism legislation". And certainly, such legislation will contain restrictions on our rights, including restrictions that effect us as gunowners.

Yet I haven't seen anyone who claimed that the war on terrorism was simply an excuse to crack down on gunowners.



I don't think anyone on this board is saying it's "all our fault". The terrorists are responsible for their actions. But they hate us in part--probably in large part--due to our interventionist policies.

i hate to break it to ya, pal, but as long as his posts remain within the rules of the board, he can post as many conspiracy theories as he damn well pleases.  and you may disagree with him all you want.  but you may not get into a pissing match with him.  you can debate the "facts" of the case, you can debate the validity of his conclusions, hell, you can even cite your own "facts" as to why his argument is ridiculous.  what you cannot do is turn this into a pissing match every time he says something that you don't like.  stop with the insults.

from your esteemed self:


is that not the pot calling the kettle black?  you are as guilty of rant and raving to YOUR heart's content when someone disagrees with your viewpoint.  you are a guest in this house.  either abide by the rules or excuse yourself.

Is saying the theories he is espousing are looney and he is doing the country a disservice buy disseminating them insulting him?  I think not. Because that is the only thing I said to him before HE started flaming me.  



ARLady, no it is not and I am very disappointed that you don't understand that.  Yes, I comment freely when someone says something with which I disagree, AS DOES IMBROGLIO.  The difference is, I never complained that Imbroglio shouldn't have the right to voice his disagreement with me, he tried to shut ME up, just as you seem to be doing.



I haven't broken those rules...or at least if I have (which I don't believe), Imbroglio has as well and you should be publically chiding him too.  I think you need to rethink your position.