Author
Message
sdwornicki
Offline
Posts: 200
Feedback: 100% (2)
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:10:09 AM EST
I was perusing through the interweb last night and found this gem. Is it for real? Has anybody ever seen one? Have one? The best of both worlds - lightweight, 5.56, plentiful 30 rounders, stonecold reliability, adjustable gas system, BAH! I WANT ONE!

"Sometimes figuring out the origins of a particular item isn't very simple. This FAL with aluminum receiver and a Galil barrel takes AR15 magazines. That works out to a light, handy mutt. Tamara brought that one in one day."





Images/info from http://www.olegvolk.net/olegv/newsite/gungames/gungames.html


nacrotek
Offline
Posts: 1116
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:17:55 AM EST
ouch! My boner!
Armed_Scientist
Offline
Posts: 1890
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:18:42 AM EST
Isn't that basically an FNC then?
mjohn3006
Software Tester Extraordinaire. Your code is crap!
Offline
Posts: 8023
Feedback: 100% (78)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:21:06 AM EST
I'd hit it.
Sic Semper Tyrannis
Pslam 37
7 Be still before the LORD and wait patiently for Him; do not fret when men succeed in their ways,
when they carry out their wicked schemes.
13 but the Lord laughs at the wicked, for He knows their day is coming
EricTheHun
Offline
Posts: 31487
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:22:10 AM EST
I had a Springfield Armory SAR 4800 in .223 cal that had all the attributes that you mentioned except the 'Galil' barrel.

It was a 'match' barrel which I assumed was simply of SA manufacture.

The weapon itself is called a Imbel M-2 in Brazil where it came from...IIRC.

It was 'way too heavy' for a .223 cal weapon...much like the H&K Model 93...so I got rid of it!

Eric The(Sound)Hun
'Don't worry if you don't have full-auto weapons on Day One of the Revolution. You will on Day Two!' ~ Eric The(Revolutionary)Hun
fight4yourrights
IF you aren't Angry, you aren't paying attention
Offline
Posts: 27738
Feedback: 100% (14)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:22:29 AM EST
[Last Edit: 12/6/2005 10:45:46 AM EST by fight4yourrights]
No thanks.


- unprotected rear sight

- no optics mounting rail

- no accessory mounting rail

- large clunky carry handle

- adjustable gas system that can be misadjusted and cause operational failures

- no bayonet lug

- no ejection port cover
Either Grow a Pair, or get on the Cattle Car
mayday
Offline
Posts: 1234
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:23:06 AM EST
I'd rather have FAL magazines; much better and about $4 a piece. In addition, what makes you think a Galil barrel is good? The FAL barrels now days can be had from MOA match precision to basic battle-rifle quality.
FMJshooter
Peace is dead. Guess whos next
Offline
Posts: 426
Feedback: 100% (16)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:24:50 AM EST
Meh still heavy.
"It is the unconquerable nature of man and not the nature of the weapon he uses that ensures victory." -- George Patton
Lon_Moer
Offline
Posts: 4043
Feedback: 100% (15)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:29:04 AM EST
Short gas system!
Dolomite
Baby take my hand...
Offline
Posts: 9658
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:31:27 AM EST

Originally Posted By nacrotek:
ouch! My boner!

“When you're in Texas look behind you, 'cause that's where the ranger’s gonna be.” – Chuck Norris, ©1993, All rights reserved
macman37
Arfcom pointer-outer
Offline
Posts: 9401
Feedback: 100% (27)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:31:48 AM EST

Originally Posted By fight4yourrights:
No thanks.


- unprotected rear sight

- no optics mounting rail

- no accessory mounting rail

- large clunky carry handle

- adjustable gas system that can be misadjusted and cause operational failures

- no bayonet lug



But it shore is purdy though!
Join the NRA It's for the children.

Let's Go Red Wings!
xinflt
Remember New Orleans! Molon Labe!
Offline
Posts: 1651
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:32:35 AM EST
Except for the adjustable gas system... how is this setup any better than an AR15 ?
All my weapons are black.
Alumni of:
B co, 2/187th, 193rd INF Bde Panama
HHC, 4/187th, 101st (Air Assault) Ft. Campbell
E co, 2/127th INF (Mech), 32nd Inf Bde WIARNG
Det 1, HHC, 2/127th INF (Mech), 32nd Inf Bde WIARNG
CFII
Got Thrust?
Offline
Posts: 4300
Feedback: 100% (34)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:34:23 AM EST
Not for me. I think FAL's feel like crap, and have shitty irons to boot.
Shit was falling from the sky, the dead were walking the streets.......My head hurt and it was cold outside, I took an aspirin and put on a coat
Sukebe
Offline
Posts: 8135
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:36:25 AM EST

Originally Posted By fight4yourrights:
No thanks.


- unprotected rear sight

- no optics mounting rail

- no accessory mounting rail

- large clunky carry handle

- adjustable gas system that can be misadjusted and cause operational failures

- no bayonet lug



And the chick in the picture is fat.
sdwornicki
Offline
Posts: 201
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:36:52 AM EST

Originally Posted By mayday:
I'd rather have FAL magazines; much better and about $4 a piece. In addition, what makes you think a Galil barrel is good? The FAL barrels now days can be had from MOA match precision to basic battle-rifle quality.



Which FAL barrels are the most accurate? What parts kits are the best?

I just think it's cools because for me, I really don't have the money to get into a whole other caliber right now, and I've already got 12 AR mags and a beta, and this would be a sweet little shooter that would last forever with minimal cleaning, it'd be the KISS of sport utility rifles (excluding AKs) for me.
JIMBEAM
Offline
Posts: 5562
Feedback: 100% (19)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:37:11 AM EST

Originally Posted By xinflt:
Except for the adjustable gas system... how is this setup any better than an AR15 ?



It has a gas piston.
SirDrinksAlot
Harmonicists are Great Kissers
Offline
Posts: 2931
Feedback: 100% (26)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:37:26 AM EST

Originally Posted By Sukebe:

Originally Posted By fight4yourrights:
No thanks.


- unprotected rear sight

- no optics mounting rail

- no accessory mounting rail

- large clunky carry handle

- adjustable gas system that can be misadjusted and cause operational failures

- no bayonet lug



And the chick in the picture is fat.



http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=130&t=410399&page=2


R.I.P Bill - I'll never forget you, and I hope that you finally found happiness.

-Love,
Your Future USMC Friend
Alien
Offline
Posts: 3999
Feedback: 100% (8)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:40:12 AM EST

Originally Posted By SirDrinksAlot:

Originally Posted By Sukebe:

Originally Posted By fight4yourrights:
No thanks.


- unprotected rear sight

- no optics mounting rail

- no accessory mounting rail

- large clunky carry handle

- adjustable gas system that can be misadjusted and cause operational failures

- no bayonet lug



And the chick in the picture is fat.






DUDE! I'd hit it! Seriously.
fight4yourrights
IF you aren't Angry, you aren't paying attention
Offline
Posts: 27744
Feedback: 100% (14)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:46:30 AM EST

Originally Posted By xinflt:

Except for the adjustable gas system... how is this setup any better than an AR15 ?




How is an adjustable system better? My system works, and I don't have to dick with it.
Either Grow a Pair, or get on the Cattle Car
xinflt
Remember New Orleans! Molon Labe!
Offline
Posts: 1652
Feedback: 100% (3)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:49:45 AM EST

Originally Posted By fight4yourrights:

Originally Posted By xinflt:

Except for the adjustable gas system... how is this setup any better than an AR15 ?




How is an adjustable system better? My system works, and I don't have to dick with it.



You are correct. I should have said "different" instead of "better."
All my weapons are black.
Alumni of:
B co, 2/187th, 193rd INF Bde Panama
HHC, 4/187th, 101st (Air Assault) Ft. Campbell
E co, 2/127th INF (Mech), 32nd Inf Bde WIARNG
Det 1, HHC, 2/127th INF (Mech), 32nd Inf Bde WIARNG
CitySlicker
This membership was graciously sponsored by w4klr.
Offline
Posts: 3961
Feedback: 100% (9)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:55:53 AM EST
Hmmm.
You want the Sporting Purposes Clause and the '89 Import Ban repealed? Support H.R. 1703 and call the Judiciary Committe @ (202) 225-3951 and the Ways and Means Committee @ (202) 225-3625
Galland
Offline
Posts: 476
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 10:57:48 AM EST
I fired an Israeli 5.56mm FAL when I was a boy. As you might guess, the recoil was all but cancelled out by the weight of the firearm. It would make a nice range toy, but I'd rather have an AR or FNC for long walks in the woods. I think this is why we don't see more of them being made. A lighter gun like the AR15 or FNC is more practical.

Galland
Max_Mike
Offline
Posts: 8784
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 11:00:42 AM EST
FAL aluminum receivers made in the last few years have a very bad and dangerous reputation.
fight4yourrights
IF you aren't Angry, you aren't paying attention
Offline
Posts: 27745
Feedback: 100% (14)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 11:07:59 AM EST
If you like this, buy a STONER
Either Grow a Pair, or get on the Cattle Car
sdwornicki
Offline
Posts: 202
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 11:09:50 AM EST
Thanks for busting my bubble guys.

Ahh, just kiddin. I guess not everybody can think alike. I can see its limitations and how there are many other rifles that are better for "long walks in the woods" but as of now the only thing I walk any long distance with is my Mossberg 500 and my Ruger .30-06. But what's the deal with Aluminum receivers on FALs getting a bad rap? Do they kaboom? Crack, split, spew pea soup or what? Please don't say "they have a bad reputation" but fail to say why or from whom - you're just leaving me hanging!
DK-Prof
Psychopolitical MASTER
Offline
Posts: 21429
Feedback: 100% (8)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 11:10:48 AM EST

Originally Posted By SirDrinksAlot:

Originally Posted By Sukebe:

Originally Posted By fight4yourrights:
No thanks.


- unprotected rear sight

- no optics mounting rail

- no accessory mounting rail

- large clunky carry handle

- adjustable gas system that can be misadjusted and cause operational failures

- no bayonet lug



And the chick in the picture is fat.






DzlBenz: What if Napoleon had a B-52 flown by nuclear mutants at Waterloo?
ClayP
Road Warrior
Offline
Posts: 1965
Feedback: 100% (7)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 11:12:47 AM EST
There is a guy on the FALfiles who makes these with quick interchange front ends so you can switch to 5.56, 9mm, 7.62.
Maxxx
Offline
Posts: 401
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 11:14:30 AM EST

Originally Posted By fight4yourrights:
No thanks.


- unprotected rear sight

- no optics mounting rail

- no accessory mounting rail

- large clunky carry handle

- adjustable gas system that can be misadjusted and cause operational failures

- no bayonet lug

- no ejection port cover




In other words, it is not an AR.
TacticalStrat
Member
Offline
Posts: 1525
Feedback: 100% (52)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 11:14:40 AM EST

Originally Posted By Armed_Scientist:
Isn't that basically an FNC then?




FNC is more of a AK design than a FAL design.
Max_Mike
Offline
Posts: 8788
Feedback: 0% (0)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 11:25:23 AM EST

Originally Posted By sdwornicki:
But what's the deal with Aluminum receivers on FALs getting a bad rap? Do they kaboom? Crack, split, spew pea soup or what?



All of the above

They was a lot of excitement a couple of years ago when aluminum receivers became available a couple of years ago… until people started building rifles with them.

The bolt on a AR locks to the barrel steel to steel. Unlike an AR the bolt locks to the receiver on an FAL so you have aluminum to steel. The aluminum receivers could not handle the stress.
jblachly
Offline
Posts: 5004
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 11:27:33 AM EST

Originally Posted By DK-Prof:

Originally Posted By SirDrinksAlot:

Originally Posted By Sukebe:

Originally Posted By fight4yourrights:
No thanks.


And the chick in the picture is fat.









Did it ever occur to you guys that since the photographer of said picture is a member of the Internet gun-board community-at-large, it's not impossible that pictured lady visits here and could see this thread?
swingset
Captain of the short bus
Offline
Posts: 6445
Feedback: 100% (52)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 11:31:28 AM EST
That's one of Oleg's photos (founder of thehighroad.org), I'd guarantee it....and he's no stranger to ARFcom, I'm sure he appreciates the ridicule of his model, many of whom are friends of his.

Real classy.

BTW, if anyone thinks she is fat, god help you when you're married. Karma will kick you in the sack, hard.
The earth is 4 Billion years old, dinosaur bones were not planted by the Devil to fool us, there is no hell, and penis enlargement pumps do not work. I'm 100% certain about a couple of those.
Dolomite
Baby take my hand...
Offline
Posts: 9662
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 11:31:40 AM EST
[Last Edit: 12/6/2005 11:32:11 AM EST by Dolomite]

Originally Posted By jblachly:
it's not impossible that pictured lady visits here and could see this thread?



Is it that thief from FAL Files?

If so - could you please let her know that I still haven't got my FAL polo shirt.
“When you're in Texas look behind you, 'cause that's where the ranger’s gonna be.” – Chuck Norris, ©1993, All rights reserved
chapperjoe
And I will bless them that bless ME :-)
Offline
Posts: 9187
Feedback: 100% (346)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 11:37:06 AM EST
there were 556 fals you know, think brazil made em.
I'm lookin' for a nice Jewish virgin...............ian
JIMBEAM
Offline
Posts: 5566
Feedback: 100% (19)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 11:40:34 AM EST

Originally Posted By Dolomite:

Originally Posted By jblachly:
it's not impossible that pictured lady visits here and could see this thread?



Is it that thief from FAL Files?

If so - could you please let her know that I still haven't got my FAL polo shirt.



Jen?
Dolomite
Baby take my hand...
Offline
Posts: 9664
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 11:45:37 AM EST

Originally Posted By JIMBEAM:
Jen?


Polo?
“When you're in Texas look behind you, 'cause that's where the ranger’s gonna be.” – Chuck Norris, ©1993, All rights reserved
K2QB3
Online
Posts: 1050
Feedback: 100% (14)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 11:46:49 AM EST
[Last Edit: 12/6/2005 11:50:20 AM EST by K2QB3]
The aluminum receivers were dangerous in a 7.62, not necessarily in a 5.56.

That's why these are available, lots of aluminum FAL receivers you can't do anything else with.

The FAL system uses a steel replacable locking shoulder behind the bolt, it's that locking shoulder that would bear on the aluminum, not the bolt itself, lots more surface area.

With an aluminum upper, aluminum lower, light barrel, short gas system, etc. they can be built right around the same weight as an AR, somebody has a sub-6lb build, don't remember who but I've seen pics of it, it was sweet.

Rails are available.

I want one.
daemon734
Offline
Posts: 371
Feedback: 100% (48)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 11:47:14 AM EST
[Last Edit: 12/6/2005 11:50:15 AM EST by daemon734]

Originally Posted By xinflt:
Except for the adjustable gas system... how is this setup any better than an AR15 ?



piston operated.

IIRC, the aluminum reciever are used mainly because the serial numbers arent located on the magwell, which gets chopped a tad.

ive been planning on building one in 7.62 tokarev here pretty soon.
fight4yourrights
IF you aren't Angry, you aren't paying attention
Offline
Posts: 27746
Feedback: 100% (14)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 11:59:38 AM EST
[Last Edit: 12/6/2005 12:00:50 PM EST by fight4yourrights]

Originally Posted By sdwornicki:

Thanks for busting my bubble guys.





Join the FAL board instead. I'm sure they'd all sing the praises (well, probably bash the caliber)




Originally Posted By Maxxx:

In other words, it is not an AR.




Let's see, where am I?
Either Grow a Pair, or get on the Cattle Car
MuRDoC
Member
Offline
Posts: 3435
Feedback: 100% (1)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 12:06:28 PM EST

Originally Posted By Max_Mike:
FAL aluminum receivers made in the last few years have a very bad and dangerous reputation.




yea they blow up, dsa won't make one and they won't match one to their lower kit
"We herd sheep, we drive cattle, we lead people. Lead me, follow me, or get out of my way.." General George S. Patton

"May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't." General George S. Patton
sdwornicki
Offline
Posts: 203
Feedback: 100% (2)
Link To This Post
Posted: 12/6/2005 12:12:20 PM EST

Originally Posted By fight4yourrights:

Originally Posted By sdwornicki:

Thanks for busting my bubble guys.





Join the FAL board instead. I'm sure they'd all sing the praises (well, probably bash the caliber)






Maybe you didn't read the rest of that post - I'm not looking for sympathy, I'm more interested in hearing from people who have them, or know something about them, and I guess the consensus is that aluminum receivers are crap. So I guess apparently it's not an AR (even though we do discuss other firearms here )

One more question - somebody said they actually made 5.56 FALs - were any imported? Can parts kits be had? What mags do they take?