Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Log In

A valid email is required.
Password is required.
Site Notices
6/25/2017 7:35:25 PM
6/21/2017 8:25:40 PM
Posted: 11/24/2000 2:48:20 PM EDT
History channel poll http://www.historychannel.com/
Link Posted: 11/24/2000 3:45:15 PM EDT
ummm...no... [>:/] Chris
Link Posted: 11/24/2000 4:38:19 PM EDT
That was easy. [^]
Link Posted: 11/24/2000 6:30:23 PM EDT
Just like the demoncrats in Florida who are going to count until Algore gets enough votes, these pollsters will never quit. They want to be able to sneek in a poll or two that conservatives miss so they can parade around their BS results, and of course never mention their previous trouncings.
Link Posted: 11/24/2000 6:48:22 PM EDT
Definetly not, I think laws are already too strict and restictive. It makes me sick to hear about laws that ban or restrict guns that I've owned for over fifteen years [:|]
Link Posted: 11/24/2000 6:50:12 PM EDT
Done, 74% say no!
Link Posted: 11/25/2000 12:08:39 AM EDT
Hell no. [sniper] Kyle
Link Posted: 11/25/2000 4:47:48 AM EDT
Stricter gun control? Well, I am in favor of tightening up my groups if thats what you mean by stricter gun control.[pistol]
Link Posted: 11/25/2000 8:21:50 AM EDT
Voted....77.7% say no. Our gun laws got stricter, now I don't have any handguns or semi auto rifles. Are we safer ? no because for some reason the criminals didn't hand there illegal wpns in now the bad guys and police have guns and the police as sure as hell can't protect us. simon
Link Posted: 11/26/2000 9:11:48 AM EDT
Done. Yes-22.3% NO-77.7%
Link Posted: 11/26/2000 10:45:30 AM EDT
Gun laws are in violatin of our rights to fredom. I hope we can stop the commy gun laws, And kick the socker moms and non belivers, Out of this country befor they distroy our country any further. - - It is up to us.
Link Posted: 11/26/2000 1:43:54 PM EDT
Kick them out? Remember they are our brothers, sisters, mom's etc. Don't allow yourself to be as rigid and out of control as they are FALCON2. We just have to get our people to start thinking in a rational independent manner again, instead of being led about by the nose by the liberal/media nazi's. Deep down I feel that many are good people who want to do something about the problems we see in our society. They just haven't thought it all the way through and are either too busy or perhaps too lazy to put enough effort into it. They are a problem, they are also "us". We need to find ways to keep them from destroying our rights until they can be taught.
Link Posted: 11/26/2000 2:10:51 PM EDT
NO NO NO!!!!!! [puke] I think 22,000 are plenty. Devin
Link Posted: 11/26/2000 9:20:23 PM EDT
I voted! [b]NO![/b] [>]:)]
Link Posted: 11/26/2000 10:54:53 PM EDT
More laws? [:\] NO! [:(!] Roll the laws back to what they were before The Brady Bill and enforce those? [:\] YES! [^]
Link Posted: 11/27/2000 12:07:03 PM EDT
Gibby: So you support the '89 assault weapons ban? The '86 class III ban? The GCA and NFA? I sure as hell don't. Repeal them all.
Link Posted: 11/27/2000 2:14:38 PM EDT
Thanks for the heads-up on this! The answer no should be a no brainer!!!!
Link Posted: 11/30/2000 1:55:58 PM EDT
Sure, I am in favor of strict gun control, as long as I get to define it. Noone should own a machinegun if he (or she) is unwilling to feed it. Noone should own an "assault rifle" unless he can produce hits at combat distances. If this is not the case, the government shall provide ammunition surplus to the army's needs to enable the individual to gain proficientcy with his weapon. Private citizens should not be able to purchase handguns they are not willing to own. As far as scatterguns and 416 Weatherbys', f*** them.
Top Top