User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 6/26/2017 11:46:05 PM EDT
[#1]
Page 3 says you're next RBG
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/26/2017 11:46:21 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Good point, maybe if we just start hanging people for being witches again we'll be back in the golden age in no time!  The way you tackled that straw man was totally epic. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/26/2017 11:48:07 PM EDT
[#3]
I heard some liberal woman whining that he's the Third Horseman of the Apocalypse.....I guess he is for them.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/26/2017 11:49:35 PM EDT
[#4]
Quoted:
On Monday, Justice Neil Gorsuch revealed himself to be everything that liberals had most feared: pro-gun, pro–travel ban, anti-gay, anti–church/state separation. He is certainly more conservative than Justice Samuel Alito and possibly to the right of Justice Clarence Thomas. He is an uncompromising reactionary and an unmitigated disaster for the progressive constitutional project. And he will likely serve on the court for at least three more decades. Although Gorsuch has barely been on the bench for two months, he has already had an opportunity to weigh in on some of the most pressing constitutional issues of our time. In each case, he has chosen the most conservative position. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/the_breakfast_table/features/2017/supreme_court_june_2017/neil_gorsuch_is_everything_liberals_feared_and_more.html 2 or 3 more like him on SCOTUS would be epic. Quoted:
Still. Not. Tired. Of. Winning. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 12:00:20 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Well, you are only 1 of 300 or so million other people who love to deny another group fundamental rights, so you are in good company!  |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 12:08:02 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Well, you are only 1 of 300 or so million other people who love to deny another group fundamental rights, so you are in good company! Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
That is clearly a matter of perception, IMO he's 100% not broken Obergefell was a travesty for objective law second only to RvW. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 12:09:18 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I think what they meant to say is that he isn't going to advocate giving out special carve out 'rights' to people who are LGBT, nor should he or any other SCJ. To a liberal, this makes him anti gay because liberals are stupid. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 12:12:03 AM EDT
[#8]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 12:13:11 AM EDT
[#9]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 12:13:21 AM EDT
[#10]
Come on Ginsburg!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 12:19:07 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No, actually its more the opposite. They want the same right as you even though you eat vagina. You are referencing the very vocal very polarized 1% to justify completely denying a large majority of them the simple, simple right that you enjoy. Equal legal protections in marriage. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 12:48:25 AM EDT
[#12]
If Pres. Trump does get several more SC appointments (and it sure looks like he will) and succeeds in moving the court to a more originalist constitutional footing, I have no doubt that the next time the democrats have the senate and presidency they will try to pack the court as FDR threatened to do, and add enough justices to dilute the conservative majority.
It's all about power with the left. The only way to prevent it is with a constitutional amendment setting the Supreme Court to nine justices. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:01:04 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If Pres. Trump does get several more SC appointments (and it sure looks like he will) and succeeds in moving the court to a more originalist constitutional footing, I have no doubt that the next time the democrats have the senate and presidency they will try to pack the court as FDR threatened to do, and add enough justices to dilute the conservative majority. It's all about power with the left. The only way to prevent it is with a constitutional amendment setting the Supreme Court to nine justices.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:05:08 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
what has gorsuch done to homosexuals? tell me what he has done. Am I to assume you will support Democrats in the future, because they havent banned guns, only the previous Democrats have? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:05:28 AM EDT
[#15]
Saw the slanted verbiage in the first sentence, saw "slate.com" in the URL, and stopped right there.
MAGA, baby! |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:07:31 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Are you speaking of the "fundamental right" to Other People's Stuff? Like Healthcare, Income, etc.?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:12:02 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No, try Equal protection under the Law. You know, stuff that even in the 1860s people could agree on but for some reason some arfcommers want to deny / ignore. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Are you speaking of the "fundamental right" to Other People's Stuff? Like Healthcare, Income, etc.? What right in particular (beyond 2nd Amendment and slavery) was freely practiced in 1860 and no longer allowed today? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:12:03 AM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
...So fundalmental it didn't exist for 99% for the country's history, and the underlying behavior was criminalized for 95% of that. Yet you're so shortsighted you're ok with letting 5 unelected bureaucrats suddenly find a right buried in an ancient legal document(that somehow everyone else had missed for a quarter millennia)and unilaterally impose a massive shift in social mores on the nation. Obergefell was a travesty for objective law second only to RvW.
Yep, I totally see where you are coming from. Obergefell is definitely the rock on which the crumbling of society sits. Its too bad America isnt founded on the principles of equality and fair treatment, and more a shame its population is so supportive of discrimination. Keep fighting the good fight to keep those fucking gays oppressed. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:15:53 AM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What rights do they not have? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
No, actually its more the opposite. They want the same right as you even though you eat vagina. You are referencing the very vocal very polarized 1% to justify completely denying a large majority of them the simple, simple right that you enjoy. Equal legal protections in marriage. Hopefully though states wont waste time on unimportant things like....I dont know.....Immigration, gun rights, taxes, property rights.....And get back to trying to challenge something as important and devastating as gay marriage. Cause thats what matters, whether 2 people can get married. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:16:50 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm afraid you will have to spell it out for me. What right in particular (beyond 2nd Amendment and slavery) was freely practiced in 1860 and no longer allowed today? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:18:03 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Equal protection under the law. Not a hard concept. Go research that one. Although today they have it better than in 1860.....But onyl as long as Republicans dont get the chance to change that. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I'm afraid you will have to spell it out for me. What right in particular (beyond 2nd Amendment and slavery) was freely practiced in 1860 and no longer allowed today? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:18:48 AM EDT
[#22]
Lets replace Ruthie now.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:20:13 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Two more, give us two more. http://2xkcvt35vyxycuy7x23e0em1a5g.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Ruth-Bader-Ginsburg-Sleeping.jpg |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:25:47 AM EDT
[#24]
There is no place for Snowflake Justice on the bench. I pray the Lord will make provisions to solidify the court for another generation.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:27:20 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The nevertrumpers owe the voters an apology... |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:32:24 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Do you realize how many cases that covers? Which equal protection are you referring to? The Slaughterhouse case? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:34:48 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Ha! Nothing....yet. Am I to assume you will support Democrats in the future, because they havent banned guns, only the previous Democrats have? The SC serves a very important role, to make sure the legislative branch does not violate the constitution. It's also very important that Justices do not overstep that role. It's not a Justice's job to use their authority to advance causes and agendas that they agree with. The legislative branch is there to represent ideological agendas and to try to influence the law to reflect people's views. The exclusive reason the Supreme Court exists is to ensure that they don't violate our founding documents while they do it. So a Justice should rule on things based purely on whether or not it violates the constitution, regardless of their own views on the subject. Not influence law to reflect what they think it should be. That's not their job. That's Congress' job. I agree with you that gay couples should be treated exactly the same as straight couples under the law in every conceivable way. But there is an appropriate path to advance such an agenda, and that path does not involve the Supreme Court. Appologies if this response is a little long winded. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:35:39 AM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Lets replace Ruthie now. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:39:56 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The equal protection as listed on something as basic as the declaration of independence..... All men are equal. You can argue scemantics all you want to justify unequal treatment. LOL!!! |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:41:32 AM EDT
[#30]
I want to see that empty bag of bones gone as much as everyone else does. However, I truly think that RBG will never step down. She is hanging on hard because she doesn't want the court to go ultra hardcore conservative.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:42:36 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Two more, give us two more. http://2xkcvt35vyxycuy7x23e0em1a5g.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Ruth-Bader-Ginsburg-Sleeping.jpg 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:46:31 AM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The equal protection as listed on something as basic as the declaration of independence..... All men are equal. You can argue scemantics all you want to justify unequal treatment. You're on the wrong side of history. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:52:06 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The equal protection as listed on something as basic as the declaration of independence..... All men are equal. You can argue scemantics all you want to justify unequal treatment. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Do you realize how many cases that covers? Which equal protection are you referring to? The Slaughterhouse case? You still haven't stated one damn thing about why you think this is bad. My only conclusion is that you are a bitter Bernie supporter or something, for reasons unknown. If I go through the list of "common issues" from 1860 to today: Slavery - Banned in 1800s Abortion - Only possible in very recent times Homosexuality - only existed in recent times, earlier times resulted in death Transexual - Not possible in earlier times. Healthcare - Only available in recent times Income - Work for what you get, not doing so, 19th century again. I seriously can not come up with ANYTHING that was commonplace in 1860 that is banned today beyond slavery and burning of witches. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:58:43 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
...So fundalmental it didn't exist for 99% for the country's history, and the underlying behavior was criminalized for 95% of that. Yet you're so shortsighted you're ok with letting 5 unelected bureaucrats suddenly find a right buried in an ancient legal document(that somehow everyone else had missed for a quarter millennia)and unilaterally impose a massive shift in social mores on the nation. Obergefell was a travesty for objective law second only to RvW. Acceptance of inter-racial marriage was around 17% at the time. 
Something Southern Baptists also protested (inter-racial marriage, along with having to give up slavery, etc., etc., etc.) |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 2:00:13 AM EDT
[#35]
“I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and Constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.” - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 2:03:15 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia#Decision Something Southern Baptists also protested (inter-racial marriage, along with having to give up slavery, etc., etc., etc.) Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
...So fundalmental it didn't exist for 99% for the country's history, and the underlying behavior was criminalized for 95% of that. Yet you're so shortsighted you're ok with letting 5 unelected bureaucrats suddenly find a right buried in an ancient legal document(that somehow everyone else had missed for a quarter millennia)and unilaterally impose a massive shift in social mores on the nation. Obergefell was a travesty for objective law second only to RvW. Something Southern Baptists also protested (inter-racial marriage, along with having to give up slavery, etc., etc., etc.) |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 2:05:18 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
“I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and Constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.” - Thomas Jefferson |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 2:11:04 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Slavery was abolished by the 12th Amendment. Tell me, which amendment mandated all states to recognize Edited ~ medicmandan? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 2:12:14 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Tough shit. Elections have consequences and Trump won. After 8 years of Obama's gloating, we President now! Eat it and smile, Leftists. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 2:16:02 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Try again Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Slavery was abolished by the 12th Amendment. Tell me, which amendment mandated all states to recognize Edited ~ medicmandan? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 2:18:48 AM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Slavery was abolished by the Why did "God" change his mind about this and slavery? Southern Baptists were founded in order to defend slavery. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 2:18:52 AM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The nevertrumpers owe the voters an apology... Hmmmm....have they seen the light or just snowflaking it? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 2:22:20 AM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Translation: "the law should be what FlyWire55 believes is right." You actually need to think. Not just pass the buck unto someone else. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 2:23:56 AM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
“I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and Constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.” - Thomas Jefferson "progress of the human mind" FORWARD! Debauchery! PIZZA!!! lol! |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 2:27:01 AM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What amendment mandated all states recognize race-mixers "marriage"? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Slavery was abolished by the Why did "God" change his mind about this and slavery? Southern Baptists were founded in order to defend slavery. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 2:29:16 AM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
"progress of the human mind" FORWARD! Debauchery! PIZZA!!! lol! |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 2:29:57 AM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
"progress of the human mind" FORWARD! Debauchery! PIZZA!!! lol! |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 2:30:49 AM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Translation: You actually have to think about things yourself. Jefferson also had slaves (like it or not). This need to worship something/someone absolutely dogmatically (and putting one's fingers in their ears to criticism) is odd and troubling. You actually need to think. Not just pass the buck unto someone else. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 2:31:04 AM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Constitution is a Living Document, just like the Bible. It needs to change with the times, y'know. I'm glad we don't think slavery is permissible anymore, despite what the Bible says, too .......... and what Southern Baptists literally schism'ed over. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/27/2017 2:32:54 AM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
None. Liberal judicial activism started in earnest with the Warren Court of the 1950s and was the general modus operandi of the Court until the 80s when it started to be challenged by Originalist/textualist justices. Loving was decided in what, '67? Some would argue that the 14th Amendment applies to interracial marriages. And while I disagree, it's definitely a stronger argument than saying the 14th applies to homo " marriages." When the 14th was drafted interracial marriages were actually a thong and a topic of legal discourse. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
