User Panel
[#1]
Quoted:
What we actually know: The MSM colluded with the DNC to attempt to influence the 2016 presidential election. They did it numerous times in many different ways up to and including giving debate questions to Hillary Clinton before a presidential debate. Everyone needs to take a deep breath and think about that before spouting off about how nefarious Russia leaking the above is. The Russia Russia Russia "hacking" is why we know there was collusion....... ......between the MSM and the DNC View Quote |
|
[#2]
Quoted:
What we actually know: The MSM colluded with the DNC to attempt to influence the 2016 presidential election. They did it numerous times in many different ways up to and including giving debate questions to Hillary Clinton before a presidential debate. Everyone needs to take a deep breath and think about that before spouting off about how nefarious Russia leaking the above is. The Russia Russia Russia "hacking" is why we know there was collusion....... ......between the MSM and the DNC View Quote |
|
[#4]
Well why not? Hillary would have gotten mad and blown up the world. Everybody that is smart knows that.
|
|
[#5]
|
|
[#8]
Quoted:
"Bias" was written in 2001. The media working with the Dems is only news to the lowest information voters. Russia working with Republicans is new. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
What we actually know: The MSM colluded with the DNC to attempt to influence the 2016 presidential election. They did it numerous times in many different ways up to and including giving debate questions to Hillary Clinton before a presidential debate. Everyone needs to take a deep breath and think about that before spouting off about how nefarious Russia leaking the above is. The Russia Russia Russia "hacking" is why we know there was collusion....... ......between the MSM and the DNC And, if you don't think the media picking sides and actively covering for criminal activity for one party while completely losing their shit over rumor and innuendo with no evidence presented at all when it involves the other major party is a big deal, then you don't understand what the media's job is supposed to be. Again, we KNOW the DNC and MSM colluded to alter the 2016 election. We know exactly how they did it. It is undisputed fact. That said collusion is being ignored is story. And it's what matters to a whole lotta Americans. |
|
[#10]
Quoted:
The point, while obviously lost on you, is clear to many. And, if you don't think the media picking sides and actively covering for criminal activity for one party while completely losing their shit over rumor and innuendo with no evidence presented at all when it involves the other major party is a big deal, then you don't understand what the media's job is supposed to be. Again, we KNOW the DNC and MSM colluded to alter the 2016 election. We know exactly how they did it. It is undisputed fact. That said collusion is being ignored is story. And it's what matters to a whole lotta Americans. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What we actually know: The MSM colluded with the DNC to attempt to influence the 2016 presidential election. They did it numerous times in many different ways up to and including giving debate questions to Hillary Clinton before a presidential debate. Everyone needs to take a deep breath and think about that before spouting off about how nefarious Russia leaking the above is. The Russia Russia Russia "hacking" is why we know there was collusion....... ......between the MSM and the DNC And, if you don't think the media picking sides and actively covering for criminal activity for one party while completely losing their shit over rumor and innuendo with no evidence presented at all when it involves the other major party is a big deal, then you don't understand what the media's job is supposed to be. Again, we KNOW the DNC and MSM colluded to alter the 2016 election. We know exactly how they did it. It is undisputed fact. That said collusion is being ignored is story. And it's what matters to a whole lotta Americans. |
|
[#11]
Quoted:
It's not the story. The media has always picked a side. If you haven't figured that out by now you've been in a coma. The story is that Putin decided that it was a good decision to back the Republican party and Donald Trump in order to further his interests. Trump even admits that the Russians interfered and you still cry out "no evidence." Even worse he's probably known since last year. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What we actually know: The MSM colluded with the DNC to attempt to influence the 2016 presidential election. They did it numerous times in many different ways up to and including giving debate questions to Hillary Clinton before a presidential debate. Everyone needs to take a deep breath and think about that before spouting off about how nefarious Russia leaking the above is. The Russia Russia Russia "hacking" is why we know there was collusion....... ......between the MSM and the DNC And, if you don't think the media picking sides and actively covering for criminal activity for one party while completely losing their shit over rumor and innuendo with no evidence presented at all when it involves the other major party is a big deal, then you don't understand what the media's job is supposed to be. Again, we KNOW the DNC and MSM colluded to alter the 2016 election. We know exactly how they did it. It is undisputed fact. That said collusion is being ignored is story. And it's what matters to a whole lotta Americans. |
|
[#12]
Quoted:
It's not the story. The media has always picked a side. If you haven't figured that out by now you've been in a coma. The story is that Putin decided that it was a good decision to back the Republican party and Donald Trump in order to further his interests. Trump even admits that the Russians interfered and you still cry out "no evidence." View Quote Because I'm pretty fucking sure EVERYONE does that. Now show me evidence that Trump and Russia did anything even close to what the DNC and MSM did. Oh, wait, you can't, because there's no EVIDENCE. And, FWIW, acting like collusion between the media and a political party is no big deal is funny. People like you denied bias until Podesta fucked up and allowed everyone to confirm what the suspected all along. Until last year, the MSM and the DNC accused anyone who suggested they were doing what we now know they were doing of being a conspiracy theorist. |
|
[#13]
Quoted:
They interfered? Like what we do all the time? Like with Israel? Because I'm pretty fucking sure EVERYONE does that. Note show me evidence that Trump and Russia did anything even close to what the DNC and MSM did. Oh, wait, you can't, because there's no EVIDENCE. And, FWIW, acting like collusion between the media and a political party is no big deal is funny. People like you denied bias until Podesta fucked up and allowed everyone to confirm what the suspected all along. Until last year, the MSM and the DNC accused anyone who suggested they were doing what we now know they were doing of being a conspiracy theorist. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
It's not the story. The media has always picked a side. If you haven't figured that out by now you've been in a coma. The story is that Putin decided that it was a good decision to back the Republican party and Donald Trump in order to further his interests. Trump even admits that the Russians interfered and you still cry out "no evidence." Because I'm pretty fucking sure EVERYONE does that. Note show me evidence that Trump and Russia did anything even close to what the DNC and MSM did. Oh, wait, you can't, because there's no EVIDENCE. And, FWIW, acting like collusion between the media and a political party is no big deal is funny. People like you denied bias until Podesta fucked up and allowed everyone to confirm what the suspected all along. Until last year, the MSM and the DNC accused anyone who suggested they were doing what we now know they were doing of being a conspiracy theorist. |
|
[#14]
|
|
[#15]
Quoted:
So, you're saying the DNC and the MSM admitted their bias before Podesta fucked up?!??!!?? Really? That's what you're going with? It must really suck to be so wrong, so often. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
[#16]
More likely Putin was behind an effort to promote Hillary. How else do you explain her winning the popular vote?
|
|
[#17]
Quoted:
The only people who didn't think the MSM was biased to the DNC in 2016 were idiots. What "bombshell" came out of those emails? View Quote So, from your replies, I gather you don't mind the media abandoning it's actual purpose and becoming a wing of the DNC? |
|
[#19]
Quoted:
You are an uneducated retard whose reading and comprehension level is probably sufficient for reading comic books. You are good at posting memes,however, Sadly you are unable to post an intelligent response and instead resort to making a personal attack.That is expected from someone with a low I.Q. and limited education so you are excused. View Quote |
|
[#20]
That there is funny. True, and funny
|
|
[#21]
Quoted:
Quoted:
You are an uneducated retard whose reading and comprehension level is probably sufficient for reading comic books. You are good at posting memes,however, Sadly you are unable to post an intelligent response and instead resort to making a personal attack.That is expected from someone with a low I.Q. and limited education so you are excused. I love it when they get to the last refuge of libtardedness. The education card. This isn't the first time that poster has pulled it btw. |
|
[#22]
Quoted:
Ha. I love it when they get to the last refuge of libtardedness. The education card. This isn't the first time that poster has pulled it btw. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You are an uneducated retard whose reading and comprehension level is probably sufficient for reading comic books. You are good at posting memes,however, Sadly you are unable to post an intelligent response and instead resort to making a personal attack.That is expected from someone with a low I.Q. and limited education so you are excused. I love it when they get to the last refuge of libtardedness. The education card. This isn't the first time that poster has pulled it btw. |
|
[#23]
Let's assume it's legit for a minute, the Obama administration was too incompetent to do any thing about it; Trump was just a candidate.
I think they(MSM, leftists) realize the whole Rooskie fantasy is imploding and they are trying to dial things back. |
|
[#24]
|
|
[#25]
Ah yes, it's been a while (at least 24 hours) since we had a flaming butthurt libtard Russian collosion "explosive report" thread on ARFCOM. No surprise to see the same cast of Killery-fans spewing their mental masturbatory emmisions ad nauseam ....
|
|
[#27]
Quoted:
Looking at other countries and attempting to prove their non involvement is clearly a diversion away from Russia. But it is a good try to divert attention. The evidence from CIA,FBI,and others points at Russia. As to what they did-it will become apparent as details of the investigations are released,so stay tuned. View Quote Are you telling me that Russians flipped Dem votes to Republican? Are you telling me that I would have voted for Hillary otherwise? Edited ~ medicmandan |
|
[#28]
I'm loving this! Russia Russia Russia is moving voters away from dems and the MSM.
|
|
[#30]
As sick of this bullshit as I am I am now a firm believer we should encourage them to keep running with this shit. 64% of the public now knows how stupid the Dems are and what they are doing. If they keep going we might get that number to 87%
|
|
[#31]
1 HOUR OF HILLARY COUGHING |
|
[#32]
Quoted:
Looking at other countries and attempting to prove their non involvement is clearly a diversion away from Russia. But it is a good try to divert attention. The evidence from CIA,FBI,and others points at Russia. As to what they did-it will become apparent as details of the investigations are released,so stay tuned. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
What did Russia do. Prove there is no evidence of other countries. But it is a good try to divert attention. The evidence from CIA,FBI,and others points at Russia. As to what they did-it will become apparent as details of the investigations are released,so stay tuned. From What I can tell the DNI report was based on the crowdstrike report and the piss dossier. And the NSA gave a 60% likelihood that Trump was favored by the Russians in whatever activities that did take place. that And botnets and RT are all that I have seen. |
|
[#34]
Quoted:
Provide it. From What I can tell the DNI report was based on the crowdstrike report and the piss dossier. that And botnets and RT are all that I have seen. View Quote http://nypost.com/2017/06/24/inside-the-shadowy-intelligence-firm-behind-the-trump-dossier/ |
|
[#36]
Quoted:
Sketchy firm behind Trump dossier is stalling investigators http://nypost.com/2017/06/24/inside-the-shadowy-intelligence-firm-behind-the-trump-dossier/ View Quote http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4376628/New-questions-claim-Russia-hacked-election.html |
|
[#38]
Quoted:
Sketchy firm behind Trump dossier is stalling investigators http://nypost.com/2017/06/24/inside-the-shadowy-intelligence-firm-behind-the-trump-dossier/ View Quote |
|
[#39]
Quoted:
The Obama appointed Soros Shill that Runs Crowdstrike has also refused testimony. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4376628/New-questions-claim-Russia-hacked-election.html View Quote |
|
[#40]
|
|
[#42]
|
|
[#43]
Quoted:
This report is saying that the order came from Putin himself, which is new. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
There is nothing new in this report, it is just repackaged stuff we knew before the Donald ever even took office. Obama was saying this stuff publicly in late 2016, and he publicly announced the sanctions and that he was directing the intel community to investigate it. All this is is repackaging to try and keep the story in the headlines. NOTHING in it suggests any collusion. |
|
[#44]
Quoted:
So he's guilty because he's not playing the game of Russia, Russia, Russia. Maybe he's seen the evidence that amounts to nothing more than what all the other countries do in the cyber world. View Quote |
|
[#45]
I like the way "damage Klinton" gets twisted into "elect Trump".
|
|
[#46]
Quoted:
Maybe you are right-but maybe he is aware of Russia's involvement and is complicit in it.We will know as investigation unfolds and one of these maybes is proven as being correct. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So he's guilty because he's not playing the game of Russia, Russia, Russia. Maybe he's seen the evidence that amounts to nothing more than what all the other countries do in the cyber world. This is not the American way. |
|
[#47]
Quoted:
There is no evidence of any crime. There is only an investigation searching for evidence. This is not the American way. View Quote The truth will come out one way or the other.If criminal acts are found,the guilty will be prosecuted or at least exposed as such to the American people. |
|
[#48]
Quoted:
An investigation is used to search for the truth(search for evidence)That is what this is about.It is the hallmark of a democratic society and is clearly the American way. The truth will come out one way or the other.If criminal acts are found,the guilty will be prosecuted or at least exposed as such to the American people. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
There is no evidence of any crime. There is only an investigation searching for evidence. This is not the American way. The truth will come out one way or the other.If criminal acts are found,the guilty will be prosecuted or at least exposed as such to the American people. Crimes lead to investigations. Wild baseless accusations without evidence of a crime shouldn't lead to an investigation. |
|
[#49]
Quoted:
An investigation is used to search for the truth(search for evidence)That is what this is about.It is the hallmark of a democratic society and is clearly the American way. The truth will come out one way or the other.If criminal acts are found,the guilty will be prosecuted or at least exposed as such to the American people. View Quote Just say'n |
|
[#50]
Quoted:
Putting the cart before the horse. Crimes lead to investigations. Wild baseless accusations without evidence of a crime shouldn't lead to an investigation. View Quote |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.