User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 9:09:47 AM EDT
[#1]
And not a peep about Obama interfering in Israeli elections
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 9:15:46 AM EDT
[#2]
BS, Hillary was already bought and paid for.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 9:18:33 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Podesta is ratcheting up the propaganda because Trump's thrown down the gloves. Trump's going after Lynch hard on her Hillary cover-up. Expect the fake news to reach epic proportions in the coming months. They've literally been backed into a corner. Never mind how the DNC refused help from the FBI. If there was any hacking of anything it was by the DNC. I think a lot of people have quit watching the fake news. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 9:18:47 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
His name was Seth rich. He's not Russia Russia Russian. New hotness: Obama's fault
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 9:22:51 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Old and busted: #sethrich New hotness: Obama's fault
The Leaker. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 9:35:17 AM EDT
[#6]
We know from some leak that no one mentions any more that "At least 5 state actors" had accessed the thundercunt's private email server.
If 5 state actors (probably more) were in there, and Russia is behind everything, and gave wikileaks Podesta's emails to sway the election towards Trump, why didn't they also dump thundercunt's server materials to wikileaks? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 10:06:14 AM EDT
[#7]
There seems to be credible evidence that Russia,probably at Putin;s direction ,conducted hacking into our election process.Isn't it strange that Trump has yet to acknowlege and take action against Putin and Russia ,for this tampering into our election process.
How do you explain Trump's inaction in calling out Putin.makes Trump look like he is complicit in this and in bed with Putin. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 10:10:55 AM EDT
[#8]
 Attached Filehttp://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/presidential/cnn-deletes-retracts-story-linking-trump-and-russia-20170624.html?mobi=true On Thursday evening, CNN investigative reporter Thomas Frank published a potentially explosive report involving an investigation of a Russian investment fund with potential ties to several associates of President Donald Trump. But by Friday night, the story was removed from CNN’s website and all links were scrubbed from the network’s social media accounts. “That story did not meet CNN’s editorial standards and has been retracted,” CNN said in an editors note posted in place of the story. “Links to the story have been disabled.” Lol |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 10:11:17 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
There seems to be credible evidence that Russia,probably at Putin;s direction ,conducted hacking into our election process.Isn't it strange that Trump has yet to acknowlege and take action against Putin and Russia ,for this tampering into our election process. How do you explain Trump's inaction in calling out Putin.makes Trump look like he is complicit in this and in bed with Putin. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 10:14:26 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
He's too busy calling out actual criminals here. That's much more important. that has tampered in our election process would be an actual criminal act? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 10:17:35 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Calling out in tweets or otherwise accomplishes nothing.Its mostly just for diversion,just for show. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
He's too busy calling out actual criminals here. That's much more important. Maybe he's seen the evidence that amounts to nothing more than what all the other countries do in the cyber world. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 10:24:46 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So he's guilty because he's not playing the game of Russia, Russia, Russia. Maybe he's seen the evidence that amounts to nothing more than what all the other countries do in the cyber world. Is he in bed with Putin on this?.If not go after them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 10:24:57 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Calling out in tweets or otherwise accomplishes nothing.Its mostly just for diversion,just for show.Also don;t you think that a foreign government,probably an enemy, that has tampered in our election process would be an actual criminal act? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
He's too busy calling out actual criminals here. That's much more important. that has tampered in our election process would be an actual criminal act? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 10:30:45 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Russia did it-so it is Russia,Russia,Russia-no evidence of another country attempting to do this to us.And Trump chooses to ignore it.Looks like Trump knew it and supported it,because of his inaction. Is he in bed with Putin on this?.If not go after them. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
So he's guilty because he's not playing the game of Russia, Russia, Russia. Maybe he's seen the evidence that amounts to nothing more than what all the other countries do in the cyber world. Is he in bed with Putin on this?.If not go after them. Prove there is no evidence of other countries. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 10:40:54 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
There seems to be credible evidence that Russia,probably at Putin;s direction ,conducted hacking into our election process.Isn't it strange that Trump has yet to acknowlege and take action against Putin and Russia ,for this tampering into our election process. How do you explain Trump's inaction in calling out Putin.makes Trump look like he is complicit in this and in bed with Putin. Perhaps Trump realizes that ongoing cyberwarfare attempts are part of doing business on the world stage these days, and that we should be focusing on hardening our own defenses rather than wasting time trying to stop something that we'll never be able to stop? Fighting any form of cyber crime by going after the perpetrators is a losing game, just like trying to control crime by limiting access to guns. The only answer is, again like so-called "gun violence", is to be able to better defend yourself from it. You could knock out every cyber aggressor out there today, and there'll just be a whole new crop tomorrow. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 10:42:44 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What did Russia do. Prove there is no evidence of other countries. But it is a good try to divert attention. The evidence from CIA,FBI,and others points at Russia. As to what they did-it will become apparent as details of the investigations are released,so stay tuned. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 10:46:43 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
There seems to be credible evidence that Russia,probably at Putin;s direction ,conducted hacking into our election process.Isn't it strange that Trump has yet to acknowlege and take action against Putin and Russia ,for this tampering into our election process. How do you explain Trump's inaction in calling out Putin.makes Trump look like he is complicit in this and in bed with Putin. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 10:48:14 AM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Looking at other countries and attempting to prove their non involvement is clearly a diversion away from Russia. But it is a good try to divert attention. The evidence from CIA,FBI,and others points at Russia. As to what they did-it will become apparent as details of the investigations are released,so stay tuned. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
What did Russia do. Prove there is no evidence of other countries. But it is a good try to divert attention. The evidence from CIA,FBI,and others points at Russia. As to what they did-it will become apparent as details of the investigations are released,so stay tuned. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 10:51:52 AM EDT
[#19]
The Obama administration is under fresh scrutiny for its response to Russian meddling in the election after new details emerged this week about how the White House weighed its actions against the 2016 political environment.
Then-President Obama was too cautious in the months leading up to the election, frustrated Democratic lawmakers and strategists say. “It was inadequate. I think they could have done a better job informing the American people of the extent of the attack,” said Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), a member of the House Intelligence Committee who co-chairs the Democratic Steering and Policy Committee. And even after the election was over, they say, the penalties Obama levied were too mild to appropriately punish what by all accounts was an unprecedented attack on a U.S. election. Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), another House Intelligence member, called the penalties “barely a slap on the wrist.” Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who supports tougher sanctions Russia, said in a statement Friday that the administration “abjectly failed to deter Russian aggression” and “failed to impose any meaningful costs on Russia.” Some Republicans argue the Obama administration only started to take the Russia threat seriously after President Trump had won the election. Trump has called the influence operation a “hoax” and dismissed the various inquiries into Russian interference in the election — which include looking for possible collusion between his campaign and Moscow — as a “witch hunt.” “By the way, if Russia was working so hard on the 2016 Election, it all took place during the Obama Admin. Why didn't they stop them?” Trump tweeted Thursday. http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/339236-frustrated-dems-say-obama-botched-russia-response |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 11:00:19 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The Obama administration is under fresh scrutiny for its response to Russian meddling in the election after new details emerged this week about how the White House weighed its actions against the 2016 political environment. Then-President Obama was too cautious in the months leading up to the election, frustrated Democratic lawmakers and strategists say. “It was inadequate. I think they could have done a better job informing the American people of the extent of the attack,” said Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), a member of the House Intelligence Committee who co-chairs the Democratic Steering and Policy Committee. And even after the election was over, they say, the penalties Obama levied were too mild to appropriately punish what by all accounts was an unprecedented attack on a U.S. election. Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), another House Intelligence member, called the penalties “barely a slap on the wrist.” Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who supports tougher sanctions Russia, said in a statement Friday that the administration “abjectly failed to deter Russian aggression” and “failed to impose any meaningful costs on Russia.” Some Republicans argue the Obama administration only started to take the Russia threat seriously after President Trump had won the election. Trump has called the influence operation a “hoax” and dismissed the various inquiries into Russian interference in the election — which include looking for possible collusion between his campaign and Moscow — as a “witch hunt.” “By the way, if Russia was working so hard on the 2016 Election, it all took place during the Obama Admin. Why didn't they stop them?” Trump tweeted Thursday. http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/339236-frustrated-dems-say-obama-botched-russia-response Quote HistoryQuoted:
The Obama administration is under fresh scrutiny for its response to Russian meddling in the election after new details emerged this week about how the White House weighed its actions against the 2016 political environment. Then-President Obama was too cautious in the months leading up to the election, frustrated Democratic lawmakers and strategists say. “It was inadequate. I think they could have done a better job informing the American people of the extent of the attack,” said Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), a member of the House Intelligence Committee who co-chairs the Democratic Steering and Policy Committee. And even after the election was over, they say, the penalties Obama levied were too mild to appropriately punish what by all accounts was an unprecedented attack on a U.S. election. Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), another House Intelligence member, called the penalties “barely a slap on the wrist.” Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who supports tougher sanctions Russia, said in a statement Friday that the administration “abjectly failed to deter Russian aggression” and “failed to impose any meaningful costs on Russia.” Some Republicans argue the Obama administration only started to take the Russia threat seriously after President Trump had won the election. Trump has called the influence operation a “hoax” and dismissed the various inquiries into Russian interference in the election — which include looking for possible collusion between his campaign and Moscow — as a “witch hunt.” “By the way, if Russia was working so hard on the 2016 Election, it all took place during the Obama Admin. Why didn't they stop them?” Trump tweeted Thursday. http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/339236-frustrated-dems-say-obama-botched-russia-response https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/06/us/trump-russia-cia-john-brennan.html In the briefings, the C.I.A. said there was intelligence indicating not only that the Russians were trying to get Mr. Trump elected but that they had gained computer access to multiple state and local election boards in the United States since 2014, officials said.
Although the breached systems were not involved in actual vote-tallying operations, Obama administration officials proposed that the eight senior lawmakers write a letter to state election officials warning them of the possible threat posed by Russian hacking, officials said. But Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican majority leader, resisted, questioning the underpinnings of the intelligence, according to officials with knowledge of the discussions. Mr. McConnell ultimately agreed to a softer version of the letter, which did not mention the Russians but warned of unnamed “malefactors” who might seek to disrupt the elections through online intrusion. The letter, dated Sept. 28, was signed by Mr. McConnell, Mr. Reid, Speaker Paul D. Ryan and Representative Nancy Pelosi, the ranking Democrat. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 11:41:08 AM EDT
[#21]
#fakenews
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 11:44:25 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
There seems to be credible evidence that Russia,probably at Putin;s direction ,conducted hacking into our election process.Isn't it strange that Trump has yet to acknowlege and take action against Putin and Russia ,for this tampering into our election process. How do you explain Trump's inaction in calling out Putin.makes Trump look like he is complicit in this and in bed with Putin. 
The fact that it reads like you had a stroke while typing this is just icing on the cake. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 11:45:16 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Russia did it-so it is Russia,Russia,Russia-no evidence of another country attempting to do this to us.And Trump chooses to ignore it.Looks like Trump knew it and supported it,because of his inaction. Is he in bed with Putin on this?.If not go after them. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 11:47:31 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Looking at other countries and attempting to prove their non involvement is clearly a diversion away from Russia. But it is a good try to divert attention. The evidence from CIA,FBI,and others points at Russia. As to what they did-it will become apparent as details of the investigations are released,so stay tuned. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 11:49:24 AM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Thanks, Vlad! |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 11:58:35 AM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Trump was screaming about a rigged election during that period of time. How do you think news of Russia interfering would have gone over? https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/06/us/trump-russia-cia-john-brennan.html |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 12:01:25 PM EDT
[#27]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 12:10:56 PM EDT
[#28]
The only "evidence" is that the MSM and our very own neverTrumpers really, really, really, really want it to be true.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 12:15:55 PM EDT
[#29]
Wapo special report
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 12:20:09 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The fact that it reads like you had a stroke while typing this is just icing on the cake. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
There seems to be credible evidence that Russia,probably at Putin;s direction ,conducted hacking into our election process.Isn't it strange that Trump has yet to acknowlege and take action against Putin and Russia ,for this tampering into our election process. How do you explain Trump's inaction in calling out Putin.makes Trump look like he is complicit in this and in bed with Putin.
The fact that it reads like you had a stroke while typing this is just icing on the cake. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 12:21:59 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Let us not forget, Russia wasn't an issue until they lost. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/332415/IMG-2579-237731-237771.JPG |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 12:28:12 PM EDT
[#32]
You guys are really living in denial.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 12:41:24 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Calling out in tweets or otherwise accomplishes nothing. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
He's too busy calling out actual criminals here. That's much more important. Quoted:
Also don;t you think that a foreign government,probably an enemy, that has tampered in our election process would be an actual criminal act? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 12:44:20 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The Obama administration is under fresh scrutiny for its response to Russian meddling in the election after new details emerged this week about how the White House weighed its actions against the 2016 political environment. Then-President Obama was too cautious in the months leading up to the election, frustrated Democratic lawmakers and strategists say. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 12:46:41 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Let us not forget, Russia wasn't an issue until they lost. https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/332415/IMG-2579-237731-237771.JPG |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 12:51:07 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Trump was screaming about a rigged election during that period of time. How do you think news of Russia interfering would have gone over? https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/06/us/trump-russia-cia-john-brennan.html |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 12:53:00 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
BS, Hillary was already bought and paid for. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 12:53:17 PM EDT
[#38]
so they helped Hillary win the popular vote then...?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 12:56:49 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Wow. So Obama shirking his responsibilities as POTUS is Trump's fault. You've got serious issues. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Trump was screaming about a rigged election during that period of time. How do you think news of Russia interfering would have gone over? https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/06/us/trump-russia-cia-john-brennan.html |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 1:00:44 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
How does the hypothetical scenario where Obama comes out and says Russia is actively trying to help get Donald Trump elected not turn into a partisan shitshow? So, was there russian interference, or is it like your president said above? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 1:02:07 PM EDT
[#41]
So does that mean the US Supreme Court is ordering Mr Trump to move out of the White House before Monday so they can give it all over to Hitlery?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 1:06:37 PM EDT
[#42]
If I was the leader of a civilized Western nation I have to think that I would do everything in my power to prevent a major ally from being run by Hillary Clinton. So, meh. We do it too all over the globe.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 1:06:53 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
How does the hypothetical scenario where Obama comes out and says Russia is actively trying to help get Donald Trump elected not turn into a partisan shitshow? |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 1:12:07 PM EDT
[#44]
There is nothing new in this report, it is just repackaged stuff we knew before the Donald ever even took office. Obama was saying this stuff publicly in late 2016, and he publicly announced the sanctions and that he was directing the intel community to investigate it. All this is is repackaging to try and keep the story in the headlines.
NOTHING in it suggests any collusion. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 1:13:14 PM EDT
[#45]
I love how half the Russia involvement story is that RT was putting out propaganda........ So RT maybe leaned toward Trump, what does that make ABC NBC Cnn NyTimes WaPo et al?
The gucifer 2.0 leaks I'm still a little unclear who did them, and I'm not buying most of the WikiLeaks came from non-dnc sources, especially Russia. If they want us to believe that they need to provide SOME evidence. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 1:15:52 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
There is nothing new in this report, it is just repackaged stuff we knew before the Donald ever even took office. Obama was saying this stuff publicly in late 2016, and he publicly announced the sanctions and that he was directing the intel community to investigate it. All this is is repackaging to try and keep the story in the headlines. NOTHING in it suggests any collusion. |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 1:18:41 PM EDT
[#47]
HILLARY CLINTON.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 2:10:39 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
HILLARY CLINTON. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 2:38:15 PM EDT
[#49]
What we actually know:
The MSM colluded with the DNC to attempt to influence the 2016 presidential election. They did it numerous times in many different ways up to and including giving debate questions to Hillary Clinton before a presidential debate. Everyone needs to take a deep breath and think about that before spouting off about how nefarious Russia leaking the above is. The Russia Russia Russia "hacking" is why we know there was collusion....... ......between the MSM and the DNC |
|
|
|
Posted: 6/24/2017 2:51:01 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
We already know that Russia was giving money to WikiLeaks, who used it on the Clinton and DNC emails leaks, to shift public sentiment in favor of Trump, because they thought he might be more friendly and easier to work with. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
Attached File