Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Posted: 5/26/2017 9:20:41 PM EDT
How accurate is it?
It was entertaining.

Its on Netflix now

60 million dollar movie with Brad Pitt
Link Posted: 5/26/2017 9:34:04 PM EDT
[#1]
Trailer:
War Machine Trailer #1 (2017) | Movieclips Trailers

(I don't know - to answer your query - but it seems slanted politically)
Link Posted: 5/26/2017 9:41:40 PM EDT
[#2]
I'm watching it now and laughing at parts.

Yes, it's liberal slanted, it's a Netflix movie. Netflix hates America and most of the movies available are shit.
Link Posted: 5/26/2017 9:45:39 PM EDT
[#3]
I thought we were going to chat about the MMA star who beat the dog piss out of his porn star girlfriend when he caught her in the sack with another dude. 
Link Posted: 5/26/2017 11:12:06 PM EDT
[#4]
Quoted:
How accurate is it?
It was entertaining.

Its on Netflix now

60 million dollar movie with Brad Pitt
View Quote


Entertaining. But it is a movie.
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 12:43:06 AM EDT
[#5]
20 minutes in and bored.

It's so obvious that Pitt is supposed to be McChrystal. Why not just make a movie about him instead of this pseudocomedy BS?

Plus, this movie is driven by expositional narration. Which is a lazy way to move a plot.
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 1:50:49 AM EDT
[#6]
It was definitely bias. But Pitt did a pretty Job making me think he didn't just want scalps:
Worth watching once.
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 1:56:24 AM EDT
[#7]
I planned on watching it, understanding from the get go it wasn't a documentary

More likely a satire of the waste of blood and treasure AFG was. No disrespect intended to those who went, I wish you didn't.

The fact that you did brings dustiness to the room.
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 2:38:37 AM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
20 minutes in and bored.

It's so obvious that Pitt is supposed to be McChrystal. Why not just make a movie about him instead of this pseudocomedy BS?

Plus, this movie is driven by expositional narration. Which is a lazy way to move a plot.
View Quote
Movie was shit.  Par for netflix.  Probably didn't name him for legal reasons.  Weak ass liberal cunts.
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 2:42:21 AM EDT
[#9]
Wrong thread... lol

I have no Netflix, but would watch.
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 2:46:40 AM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Movie was shit.  Par for netflix.  Probably didn't name him for legal reasons.  Weak ass liberal cunts.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
20 minutes in and bored.

It's so obvious that Pitt is supposed to be McChrystal. Why not just make a movie about him instead of this pseudocomedy BS?

Plus, this movie is driven by expositional narration. Which is a lazy way to move a plot.
Movie was shit.  Par for netflix.  Probably didn't name him for legal reasons.  Weak ass liberal cunts.
They should have just bought the movie rights to My Share of the Task and went with it lol
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 2:48:02 AM EDT
[#11]
I keep seeing advertisements for it, but I doubt I'll actually watch it. 3 more days until House of Cards though
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 3:00:34 AM EDT
[#12]
It wasn't bad IMO.  Pitt was silly and such an obvious characature it was very unfunny.  The message is a good one though, and it is fairly historically accurate.  For those saying it's biased towards a liberal audience, they sure didn't portray Obummer in a flattering light.
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 3:10:38 AM EDT
[#13]
Struck me as a liberal feel good movie. I was busy so I didn't catch every second of it but that was what I got from it.
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 3:12:58 AM EDT
[#14]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I planned on watching it, understanding from the get go it wasn't a documentary

More likely a satire of the waste of blood and treasure AFG was. No disrespect intended to those who went, I wish you didn't.

The fact that you did brings dustiness to the room.
View Quote
It's ok. I wish I hadn't.
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 3:51:54 AM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I thought we were going to chat about the MMA star who beat the dog piss out of his porn star girlfriend when he caught her in the sack with another dude. 
View Quote
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 3:57:04 AM EDT
[#16]
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 6:58:01 AM EDT
[#17]
Brad Pitt's cool, but before I see this someone please assure me it's not him doing the same thing he did in Inglourious Basterds?

Looking forward to the second World War Z movie, BTW.
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 7:27:28 AM EDT
[#18]
Don't read this if you're a spoiler hater.

On the left-right scale, I thought it to be surprisingly even.  It slammed the previous president hard, while taking the narrator's perspective of a Rolling Stone writer.  They should have added Edward Norton though, as much of the movie was trying to be snarky, in a comedic attempt to be cute.  The war over there was more serious than they portrayed- it could have been far more slanted left than the result.

Entertaining, but not a real war movie by any means.
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 7:34:28 AM EDT
[#19]
People still have netflix? Nothing but garbage that nobody wanted to watch to begin with.
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 8:56:28 AM EDT
[#20]
It was funny how they made Obama look like some kinda ghetto pimp the way he walked the reception line at Air Force One. They also made McChyrstal look bizarre as all hell. Strange movie....almost satirical.
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 1:06:02 PM EDT
[#21]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
It was definitely bias. But Pitt did a pretty Job making me think he didn't just want scalps:
Worth watching once.
View Quote
Kinda my take.
They tried to make the Democrats look more intelligent then they are.
But the movie made Obama look like a smuck.
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 1:08:58 PM EDT
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Don't read this if you're a spoiler hater.

On the left-right scale, I thought it to be surprisingly even.  It slammed the previous president hard, while taking the narrator's perspective of a Rolling Stone writer.  They should have added Edward Norton though, as much of the movie was trying to be snarky, in a comedic attempt to be cute.  The war over there was more serious than they portrayed- it could have been far more slanted left than the result.

Entertaining, but not a real war movie by any means.
View Quote
Thanks
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 1:11:30 PM EDT
[#23]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Brad Pitt's cool, but before I see this someone please assure me it's not him doing the same thing he did in Inglourious Basterds?

Looking forward to the second World War Z movie, BTW.
View Quote
funny you should say that

I saw this was available last night but watched IB instead
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 1:29:17 PM EDT
[#24]
Weird movie.

Had all the elements to be a quirky satire, but they relied on the same joke/set up for 2 fucking hours. It needed to be a hell of a lot tighter...chop off 20-30 minutes of the filler.

As Netflix stepped in and paid $60 million for distribution rights in 2015 (effectively funding the whole project), I guess they wanted their money's worth in run time.
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 9:48:33 PM EDT
[#25]
Stopped watching when the Marine ran out of his compound away from his platoon. As a guy that actually fought in Helmand, Kandahar and Kabul province it pissed me off how the Marines where portrayed to be unwilling pussies.
Link Posted: 5/27/2017 9:58:16 PM EDT
[#26]
Link Posted: 5/28/2017 12:11:51 AM EDT
[#27]
Watching it now and honestly kinda bored.

Seems weird to have a 34 y/o guy playing a colonel.

Here's the 'War Machine' referenced above who beat up his porn star girlfriend.

Attachment Attached File
Link Posted: 5/28/2017 5:45:04 AM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Watching it now and honestly kinda bored.

Seems weird to have a 34 y/o guy playing a colonel.

Here's the 'War Machine' referenced above who beat up his porn star girlfriend.

https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/123535/IMG-4905-218039.JPG
View Quote
I would put that dipshit down.

The movie was good.
Link Posted: 5/28/2017 6:07:34 AM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
This was what I was expecting
Link Posted: 5/28/2017 7:01:05 AM EDT
[#30]
Brad Pitt was terrible. It was like he was playing a caricature of a comic book character based on an impersonation. Never once did Pitt's character seem like a real person.
Link Posted: 5/28/2017 7:17:09 AM EDT
[#31]
That trailer alone irked the shit out of me. Between brads voice, his facial grins, and the joke appearance of this movie.. I will not be watching it
Link Posted: 5/28/2017 7:27:38 AM EDT
[#32]
It was 60 million best spent elsewhere.
Link Posted: 5/28/2017 8:04:29 AM EDT
[#33]
Tried to watch it. Worst thing I have seen in a long time. Its just bad. The acting is beyond bad. Its like a bunch of good actors were told to act like really bad actors playing their roles. Also any narrative film with more voice over than a documentary just means the writers and director suck. I made it forty minutes in and just couldn't fade the suck anymore.

Pretty obvious now how a Brad Pitt movie ended up going straight to Netflix. Its just that shitty.
Link Posted: 5/28/2017 8:18:17 AM EDT
[#34]
LOL at people angry at facts.
Yes, movie with humor, taken lightly and a couple bleeding heart liberaloid sparks here and there.
But the key parts about invading people and them never going to be ok with it other than asking you time and again to please GTFO, the rolling stone interview and the part were Obama says exactly when they are leaving, all very much true.
Link Posted: 5/28/2017 8:20:45 AM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Watching it now and honestly kinda bored.

Seems weird to have a 34 y/o guy playing a colonel.

Here's the 'War Machine' referenced above who beat up his porn star girlfriend.

https://www.AR15.Com/media/mediaFiles/123535/IMG-4905-218039.JPG
View Quote
What a POS this guy is. The definition of stupid dumb fuck right there.
But what can you expect from someone so stupid that legally changes his name to  "War Machine."
Link Posted: 5/29/2017 7:26:19 AM EDT
[#36]
I didn't think it was that good.  Can't say I'll watch it again.
Link Posted: 5/29/2017 8:36:03 AM EDT
[#37]
Really like Brad Pitt but he's terribly miscast in this.

They needed somebody with some more gravitas. More presence.

Don't know if he's going to find his niche in the movies again. 52 years old with a boyish face is off-putting. Tom Cruise has a similar problem.
Link Posted: 5/29/2017 8:43:13 AM EDT
[#38]
I liked the movie. It was entertaining.
Link Posted: 5/29/2017 8:44:44 AM EDT
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Really like Brad Pitt but he's terribly miscast in this.

They needed somebody with some more gravitas. More presence.

Don't know if he's going to find his niche in the movies again. 52 years old with a boyish face is off-putting. Tom Cruise has a similar problem.
View Quote
I'd say more horribly mis-directed.  Whoever directed this stinker has to suck mightily.
Link Posted: 5/29/2017 9:11:51 AM EDT
[#40]
Yes, you're right. Bad job all around.

Ben Kingsley was funny, though.
Link Posted: 5/29/2017 9:27:58 AM EDT
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Brad Pitt was terrible. It was like he was playing a caricature of a comic book character based on an impersonation. Never once did Pitt's character seem like a real person.
View Quote
No one seemed like a real person.  The movie had to make every character one-dimensional dipshits in order to make the subject matter semi-work as a dark comedy.  Even then, the comedy only works on the most basic physical and gag levels.  Then they decide to develop McMahon by introducing his wife, and it takes away even more from the comedy.  They just convince you that the man doesn't deserve to be laughed at for, you know, actually giving a shit and sacrificing everything.

Bad execution all the way around.
Link Posted: 5/29/2017 9:30:36 AM EDT
[#42]
I think the movie sucked. I struggled to get through it.

OTH I can't believe Anthony Michael Hall grew up to be such a big gnarly asshole.

Link Posted: 5/29/2017 9:33:17 AM EDT
[#43]
I've tried watching it two nights in a row and am maybe 1/4 of the way into it.

I just can't watch it.
Link Posted: 5/29/2017 9:39:53 AM EDT
[#44]
Boring movie that had its moments but they were few and far in between. Kind of like watching someone try and start a lawnmower with a bad carburetor. A lot of effort, pulling, sweat, and just enough coughing and sputtering to make you think something was about to happen and then.... back to more effort, pulling, and sweat. Not to mention the characters were so one dimensional they could have easily done the movie with chess pieces and have their moves narrated as they cross the board.


An actual serious movie about McChrystal and his time in Iraq and Afghanistan would have been much better even with Brad Pitt playing the lead role. But that would have required them to tell the truth, and the truth wouldn't have fit the narrative.
Link Posted: 5/29/2017 9:48:03 AM EDT
[#45]
Link Posted: 5/29/2017 10:13:34 AM EDT
[#46]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Really like Brad Pitt but he's terribly miscast in this.

They needed somebody with some more gravitas. More presence.

Don't know if he's going to find his niche in the movies again. 52 years old with a boyish face is off-putting. Tom Cruise has a similar problem.
View Quote
Mickey Rooney did ok.
Link Posted: 5/29/2017 10:18:17 AM EDT
[#47]
Watch BLOODLINE.
Link Posted: 5/29/2017 10:25:13 AM EDT
[#48]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Really like Brad Pitt but he's terribly miscast in this.

They needed somebody with some more gravitas. More presence.

Don't know if he's going to find his niche in the movies again. 52 years old with a boyish face is off-putting. Tom Cruise has a similar problem.
View Quote
If you haven't seen him in the World War II movie "Allied" you should check it out. He does a good job playing a Canadian OSS officer working undercover in Casablanca. Pretty much a love story but there are some good action scenes.

Link Posted: 5/29/2017 10:29:13 AM EDT
[#49]
I couldn't finish it.  It was like a live action cartoon and the narrator was an idiot.  I had to stop when the narrator stated as fact that you can't win hearts and minds by invading a country.  Apparently he missed WW II where Germany, Japan, Italy and a number of other countries are now our allies.  I suppose you can argue about "allies", but they are certainly no longer a threat.
Link Posted: 5/29/2017 10:40:47 AM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


If you haven't seen him in the World War II movie "Allied" you should check it out. He does a good job playing a Canadian OSS officer working undercover in Casablanca. Pretty much a love story but there are some good action scenes.

http://www.movietard.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Allied-2016.png
View Quote
Funny thing is I thought he was too old for the role in Allied. Great movie, anyway.

He's 10 or 12 years older than Marion Cottiliard. Also, way too old to be an RAF/RCAF pilot.
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top