As to a definition of shotgun, that is omitted from the revised code. Similarly omitted is the definition of a rifle.
However, Ohio Courts routinely turn to common use definitions and use those when a statutory definition is lacking. For instance, the U.S. Code definition of shotgun everyone points to in order to argue it isn't a shotgun would be given great weight. The Ohio Supreme Court has certainly upheld the convictions.
The law will not be interpreted into an absurd result. The common use of shotgun in Ohio is a smooth bore (probably of less than 60 caliber) without regard to shoulder firing or overall length.
View Quote
Yes, the U.S. Code definition of a shotgun will probably be given great weight, as well as the definitions found in almost any dictionary.
The only thing being interpreted in to an absurd result is this author's definition of a shotgun.
"Probably"???
Since when does the law operate on probably, especially when the term is well defined in other Official sources?
".60 caliber"???
Does the learned author realize that a
10-gauge shotgun is .790
12-gauge shotgun is .748
16-gauge shotgun is .683
20-gauge shotgun is .628 caliber?
Gauges don't drop below .60 until you go past the 23-gauge at .601 caliber.
The crucial question is, what was it listed on the 4473 as? Handgun, Long gun or Other?
I'm wondering how any solicitor in Ohio is going to ask for a conviction based upon something that's not defined in the Ohio Revised Code and in the only official source where it IS defined it's not what the author thinks it is.