User Panel
Quoted:
Nope....I was born the year that was filmed and though I can tell myself it's fake, it indelibly etched a visceral fear into my head and to this day, I just can't watch it. It just creeps the hell out of me. It's easy to pick it apart now, but it was pretty well done in that "Blair Witch" way for its time, and very effectively traumatized this suburban 8 year old back in the 70s. View Quote Then as an adult, you read about the cop who actually ran a bicycle into a grizzly bear in the exact same way you feared running into a bigfoot. |
|
|
|
Shit. Just working, earning money, traveling a lot. A lot. Shoot me a PM sucka
|
|
Quoted:
You mean other than the pathological lying? View Quote But I'd rather be around my friend and not be concerned whether I am laughing my ass off due to fact, embelishment, or fantasy. I don't know where some of the wilder shit comes from, but you take a certain amount of throwaways. Certainly, I would rather listen to him rather than some bro dozer type whose 600 hp duallly get's 30 mpg while hauling 5 yeti's full of 50lb largemouths. |
|
Quoted:
I like the guy who says it can't be man because the proportions of arms to legs in the film are wrong. I'm guessing the guy has never seen the joke werewolf hands mounted on stick that you hold in your own hands? View Quote Sure you can do that! But how does it increase the length of your humerus to match? I remember reading somewhere about the arm proportions are not human like. |
|
|
Quoted:
I just love all the experts in here know for certain this is a man in a fucking suit walking across a dry creek bed. Something that science has neither proved nor disproved in 50 years, lol. Where's the suit? Where's the asshole who wore the suit? How are you so certain? http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r249/RTUtah/BigFoot.gif What's up, brother?! Long time, no talk. @Bettendorf View Quote The guy was Rob Heronius. Theres a youtube video linked thst shows him walking, and the torso superimposed on that film. Its undeniably him. He has said it was him. What, if they burned the suit, that makes it real? |
|
Quoted:
RIF. The guy was Rob Heronius. Theres a youtube video linked thst shows him walking, and the torso superimposed on that film. Its undeniably him. He has said it was him. What, if they burned the suit, that makes it real? View Quote But why on earth would they burn the suit? That simply doesn't add up. All the top-tier movie studios across the world tried to reproduce a suit that performed the same way and they all failed. That's pretty telling to me. Anyone can come out and claim they were the guy in the suit. But, for me, I need to SEE the suit. THE suit. Just say'n. |
|
Quoted:
Dunno what RIF means... But why on earth would they burn the suit? That simply doesn't add up. All the top-tier movie studios across the world tried to reproduce a suit that performed the same way and they all failed. That's pretty telling to me. Anyone can come out and claim they were the guy in the suit. But, for me, I need to SEE the suit. THE suit. Just say'n. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
And I need to SEE THE Bigfoot. All I see is a guy in a poorly made suit. You can clearly see the suit joins at the waist. You can see the boots. You can see the soles of the boots. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Dunno what RIF means... But why on earth would they burn the suit? That simply doesn't add up. All the top-tier movie studios across the world tried to reproduce a suit that performed the same way and they all failed. That's pretty telling to me. Anyone can come out and claim they were the guy in the suit. But, for me, I need to SEE the suit. THE suit. Just say'n. |
|
Quoted:
Dunno what RIF means... But why on earth would they burn the suit? That simply doesn't add up. All the top-tier movie studios across the world tried to reproduce a suit that performed the same way and they all failed. That's pretty telling to me. Anyone can come out and claim they were the guy in the suit. But, for me, I need to SEE the suit. THE suit. Just say'n. View Quote I didnt say they burned it, i asked you, assuming they burned it, if nobody can show you the suit, therefore its real? Seriously? None of the top tier studios "tried and failed", that absolutely false. They got one, unnamed idiot to say it wasnt possible, and a guy at disney to say they couldnt do it. But it is possible. Planet of the apes was released the same year as this film, amd it wasnt made by disney. Those apes look way better. The unnamed execs were not makeup specialists. Real special effects wizards like rich baker say its a guy in a bad hair suit. The guys who did the apes for 2001 and planet of the apes also said they could do it. If i filmed something fake, and tried to make money off it being real, i wouldnt get caught with the props i used. |
|
Quoted:
I just love all the experts in here know for certain this is a man in a fucking suit walking across a dry creek bed. Something that science has neither proved nor disproved in 50 years, lol. Where's the suit? Where's the asshole who wore the suit? How are you so certain? http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r249/RTUtah/BigFoot.gif What's up, brother?! Long time, no talk. @Bettendorf View Quote That, plus the almost absurd unlikelihood that a giant hominid has gone without leaving verifiable evidence behind in spite of tens of thousands of sightings and crappy video in nearly every state in this very populated nation. These are pretty slam dunk pieces of no-shit-sherlock. Unless, of course, you want to believe. |
|
I admit, I used to believe.
Now, I'd say I'm skeptical at best. But, they find shit all the time that was thought to be extinct...coelacanth I'm looking at you. And me, myself, I'm 100% positive I saw an ivory billed woodpecker this past duck season on the White River Refuge in AR. POSITIVE. |
|
Quoted:
Well, we have the admission of the guy who was in the suit, and film of him walking and it's a damned match. That, plus the history of Patterson as a Bigfoot proponent (BEFORE) filming something he had a HUGE financial interest in substantiating, and his nearly serial habit of defrauding people....and well..... That, plus the almost absurd unlikelihood that a giant hominid has gone without leaving verifiable evidence behind in spite of tens of thousands of sightings and crappy video in nearly every state in this very populated nation. These are pretty slam dunk pieces of no-shit-sherlock. Unless, of course, you want to believe. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Of course I want to believe. But I need facts and evidence. Then again, I'm not about to tell someone what they did or didn't see when I wasn't there. So there's that. Basically, I don't know what to believe, lol. View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
I will gladly tell someone they didnt see bigfoot, the tooth fairy, santa clause or RePp having a soul. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Of course I want to believe. But I need facts and evidence. Then again, I'm not about to tell someone what they did or didn't see when I wasn't there. So there's that. Basically, I don't know what to believe, lol. |
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Truth is frequently stranger than fiction. View Quote But large bipedal animals existing without evidence like a body, hair, scat, or some other hard evidence despite the encroachment of their territory for four hundred years, not so much. Who goes in the woods? Lots and lots of guys with guns. And bows. And traps. Nobody ever bagged one? Nobody? Nobody ever found one drowned, crushed bu a tree, burned in a forest fire? No effing way. |
|
Quoted:
Well, we have the admission of the guy who was in the suit, and film of him walking and it's a damned match. That, plus the history of Patterson as a Bigfoot proponent (BEFORE) filming something he had a HUGE financial interest in substantiating, and his nearly serial habit of defrauding people...and well..... That, plus the almost absurd unlikelihood that a giant hominid has gone without leaving verifiable evidence behind in spite of tens of thousands of sightings and crappy video in nearly every state in this very populated nation. These are pretty slam dunk pieces of no-shit-sherlock. Unless, of course, you want to believe. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I just love all the experts in here know for certain this is a man in a fucking suit walking across a dry creek bed. Something that science has neither proved nor disproved in 50 years, lol. Where's the suit? Where's the asshole who wore the suit? How are you so certain? http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r249/RTUtah/BigFoot.gif What's up, brother?! Long time, no talk. @Bettendorf That, plus the almost absurd unlikelihood that a giant hominid has gone without leaving verifiable evidence behind in spite of tens of thousands of sightings and crappy video in nearly every state in this very populated nation. These are pretty slam dunk pieces of no-shit-sherlock. Unless, of course, you want to believe. I think even the place he rented the camera from was written a bad check and went after him for it. In 100 years of bigfoot lore theres been no proof. In the last 20yrs of digital cameras theres been no photos or film. Bigfoot, or some upright north american ape like creature...... DOES NOT EXIST. |
|
Yep, Patterson film is very real.
If I ever see one I will beat the living shit out of it. Bigfoot is a 7-8 foot tall piece of chicken shit garbage. This fucker RUNS from 7 year old children and 80 year old grannies! All he does is hide!!! What a crock of.......Oh shit!!! I just saw one!!! My little kitty just ass raped him! |
|
|
Quoted:
Not really. Strange things happen, coincidences, etc. events line up funny after the fact. Sure. But large bipedal animals existing without evidence like a body, hair, scat, or some other hard evidence despite the encroachment of their territory for four hundred years, not so much. Who goes in the woods? Lots and lots of guys with guns. And bows. And traps. Nobody ever bagged one? Nobody? Nobody ever found one drowned, crushed bu a tree, burned in a forest fire? No effing way. View Quote I am not going to sit here and say that Bigfoot is real, because I honestly doubt that there is anything like Bigfoot, as described and imagined in the popular mind, precisely for the reasons you lay out. However, that doesn't mean that there is nothing behind all this crap, either. Day after tomorrow, some guy could pull something out of a river, and we'll all be going "Damn... There is something that looks like a Bigfoot... How the hell did we miss that, all these years...?". Because, that's how this shit winds up happening--Go look at a lot of the so-called "scientific consensus" crap down the years, and marvel at the arrogance of the various people who've pronounced the conventional wisdom about things like the channeled scablands in Eastern Washington or continental drift. Hell, the evidence could be right in front of us, and we've just missed the significance of it all. I mean, how many times do we run DNA analysis on what we find in the woods? You say "Well, where are they shitting...?", and the answer might well be that their scat is pretty close to indistinguishable from bear scat, without doing the actual analysis. And, how many times do the guys in the labs go "Hey, this sample isn't normal... Let's throw it out..."? If you're keyed up to look for something you expect, how open are you likely to be to noticing stuff that's completely out of left field, evidence-wise? Whether it's just some weird little tic of the human mind that turns anomalies of sight and sound into interpretations of large, hairy bipeds, or there actually are such things, there's enough continuity to these stories to make it reasonable that there is something behind them all--Even if it is only a mental tic we've all got that goes "Hey, that branch moving over there... Bigfoot!!!". Either way, the question is interesting, if only as an aspect of human psychology and behavior. |
|
|
Just look at the muscle and tendon on the thigh, and knee cap!
they did not posses the capabilities to dupe that in the late sixties. second! WTF would anyone strap boobs on an ape costume? dont care what people said, even the filmaker on his deathbead! just doesnt make sense. that shit is real!! |
|
Quoted:
Just look at the muscle and tendon on the thigh, and knee cap! they did not posses the capabilities to dupe that in the late sixties. second! WTF would anyone strap boobs on an ape costume? dont care what people said, even the filmaker on his deathbead! just doesnt make sense. that shit is real!! View Quote |
|
Quoted:
The film maker was a life long con man and big foot obsessed. The film is so shitty ya can't see anything. The fact that for hundreds of years with millions of people in the woods and recently with trail cams, spotting scopes, guns etc. Not one piece of evidence. Just think of how much food one would have to eat. How people can believe this shit boggles my mind. View Quote thats "Planet Of The Apes" era of hollywood special effects there! and explain the boobs man! |
|
Quoted:
I want to believe. ThinkerThunker has some good YT videos. The IMAX camera crew that captured the running ape in Canada is perhaps the best "Bigfoot" video evidence ever. View Quote |
|
|
Gorillas were just a myth untill the 1930's!
Right now its unexplainable! but! You can look at known facts of that time period! as I already stated, they were just not capable of creating a suite to that level of detail. and no one can explain the boobs! without going into detail, I spent a few years about the same time as that film, about 50 miles east; of The films lication. And can say strange things happened in the woods that I cant explain! |
|
|
Who goes in the woods? Lots and lots of guys with guns. And bows. And traps. Nobody ever bagged one? Nobody? Nobody ever found one drowned, crushed bu a tree, burned in a forest fire?
No effing way. View Quote Not only that, but someone would have caught one on a game cam by now. |
|
Quoted:
Gorillas were just a myth untill the 1930's! Right now its unexplainable! but! You can look at known facts of that time period! as I already stated, they were just not capable of creating a suite to that level of detail. and no one can explain the boobs! without going into detail, I spent a few years about the same time as that film, about 50 miles east; of The films lication. And can say strange things happened in the woods that I cant explain! View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Gorillas were just a myth untill the 1930's! Right now its unexplainable! but! You can look at known facts of that time period! as I already stated, they were just not capable of creating a suite to that level of detail. and no one can explain the boobs! without going into detail, I spent a few years about the same time as that film, about 50 miles east; of The films lication. And can say strange things happened in the woods that I cant explain! View Quote And, of course, deepest darkest Africa is nowhere near as densely populated as the American Northwest. Theres STILL no civilization near the habitat of the mountain gorilla. Why wont you believe a guy who was known to associate with a known Bigfoot huckster, who showed people the suit and admitted to wearing it as early as 1968? He walks EXACTLY like the thing that was filmed. Ask yourself why you discount his confession in favor of the far more unlikely explanation. Youre discounting Occams razor simply because you want to. |
|
Quoted:
In, I love these threads. View Quote "Anybody seen a UFO?" There's a huge chorus of "Yeah! I saw one! Let me tell you all about it!!!" "Anybody think Bigfoot exists?" The masses of the enlightened shout "What the hell you think we are, a bunch of ignorant, inbred hillbillies???" For the record, I haven't seen either. I just find Arfcom's differing reactions fascinating. I am scared by OP checking out Bigfoot's ass though. |
|
View Quote Attached File Attached File |
|
Let me get this right. We have a breeding population of 7 to 8 foot tall apes spread over a large part of the US and out foraging for food every day. The human population density and road density is such the the furthest road miles you can get in the US from a McDonalds is 145 miles (and that was a few years ago) but not one of these apes has ever been run over, captured, shot, a carcass found or an unambiguous picture taken. Hmmmmm.....
How many game cams, security cams, traffic cams, dash cams and other cams are recording 24 hours a day in this country? 10s of thousands? 100s of thousands? How many people are wandering around the woods with a cell phone for the last 10 to 15 years but not one clear picture even though that picture or pictures would be worth a fortune. |
|
Patterson copied (stole) this 1960 True magazine artwork for his own 1966 bigfoot book. Look Familiar? Its a female with breasts, just like in his movie.
http://orgoneresearch.com/2012/01/11/roger-patterson%E2%80%99s-plagiarism/ |
|
|
Quoted:
Gorillas were just a myth untill the 1930's! Right now its unexplainable! but! You can look at known facts of that time period! as I already stated, they were just not capable of creating a suite to that level of detail. and no one can explain the boobs! without going into detail, I spent a few years about the same time as that film, about 50 miles east; of The films lication. And can say strange things happened in the woods that I cant explain! View Quote If you were making a Sasquatch suit, would you want to sew up a 2' long dick and stuff it with something to make it hang naturally? Would you want to handle that thing day after day to get it right? Or would you want to make some large hanging titties, and get to handle them while stuffing them with material? I'd take my time with those babies. |
|
Quoted:
Patterson copied (stole) this 1960 True magazine artwork for his own 1966 bigfoot book. Look Familiar? Its a female with breasts, just like in his movie. http://orgoneresearch.com/2012/01/11/roger-patterson%E2%80%99s-plagiarism/ http://s.mlkshk.com/r/75DU View Quote |
|
To those saying it was impossible to make a costume that good.
1. Its a blurry as fuck video. "good" lol 2. watch this video, made at the same time, the lips even peel back on the masks and have facial expressions. they absolutely DID have the ability to make good ape costumes back then 2001: A Space Odyssey - The Dawn of Man |
|
Quoted:
I'd totally shoot bigfoot in his hairy face. I know a lot of people say he has magical powers over people with guns, but I think that's bullshit. Ripping trees up and putting them back in the ground upside down? Bullshit. Try that with my 44 MAG GUN. I'd totally shoot that asshole, and end the bigfoot debate for once and for all. Arfcom would come into my mom's basement, try to pick me up and carry me out on their shoulders like a hero, give up, and call the Fire Dept. to break out a wall to get me out with a crane, and it would be great. GREAT! It's either a bigfoot, and I'd be a hero, or its a guy in a monkey suit and I'd be charged with murder, but at least we'd all KNOW for sure. View Quote |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.