User Panel
Evan McMullin must have been jealous that another gay dude was getting more attention than him.
|
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Christ that guy's head is enormous. I'll bet he has unlimited memory. |
|
|
Every time I see Penis McMuffin I wanna just take a knike and cut the top his head ala Preacher.
|
|
Quoted:
He talked about sexual relationships between "young boys" and "older men", about his own relationship with a priest, and about the fact that he lost his virginity at 13. Depending on your pre-existing bias, those comments could be taken as excusing or even supporting ephebophilia, which is typically lumped in with pedophilia in popular culture. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Did Milo say what he said about having sex with children or did he not say it? If he said it, then it's a problem and ACU/CPAC did the right thing, regardless of whether or not this is a #NeverTrumper trying to undermine Trump supporters. View Quote |
|
That asshole isn't a conservative. RINO endorsed to enter presidential race too late to short circuit Trump. By neocon Bill Kristol. He's ex-CIA. So dirty tricks/ gaslighting is his thang.
|
|
Quoted:
Just cause McMullin is in his 40's, has no female girlfriends, and has never been married; does not mean he is a closeted homosexual. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You would think McMullin and Milo would get along as McMullin looks/acts like a fag. Just cause McMullin is in his 40's, has no female girlfriends, and has never been married; does not mean he is a closeted homosexual. One is accepting of who he is. The other worked for government. |
|
Quoted:
Did Milo say what he said about having sex with children or did he not say it? If he said it, then it's a problem and ACU/CPAC did the right thing, regardless of whether or not this is a #NeverTrumper trying to undermine Trump supporters. View Quote The words "child" or "children" were not said. The implication is that when he spoke of "young boys" he meant "boys under the age of consent". Whether or not that implication is warranted is a matter of your own biases. |
|
|
Quoted:
He talked about relationships. He never mentioned anything about sex when he was talking about these relationships. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
He talked about sexual relationships between "young boys" and "older men", about his own relationship with a priest, and about the fact that he lost his virginity at 13. Depending on your pre-existing bias, those comments could be taken as excusing or even supporting ephebophilia, which is typically lumped in with pedophilia in popular culture. Without listening to it again or re-reading a transcript, if the relationships of which he was speaking were not sexual, then bringing them up in a conversation about consent would make little sense. |
|
|
Quoted:
Milo joked about pedophilia, it was dark humor. On the other hand Lena Dunham actually admitted to being a pedophile and yet no one is complaining. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Did Milo say what he said about having sex with children or did he not say it? If he said it, then it's a problem and ACU/CPAC did the right thing, regardless of whether or not this is a #NeverTrumper trying to undermine Trump supporters. that's pretty fuckin' binary. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
In regard to Gavin M. he used to be on Sean Hannity's TV show at night and I believe on Red Eye also. I haven't seen him in a while on Fox has he been black balled for being too hard core? View Quote He left them. I don't watch him but do follow him on Instagram,his pancake skills are solid. |
|
Quoted:
Did Milo say what he said about having sex with children or did he not say it? If he said it, then it's a problem and ACU/CPAC did the right thing, regardless of whether or not this is a #NeverTrumper trying to undermine Trump supporters. View Quote Course I don't doubt that his political opponents have been looking for dirt on him. Unfortunately he gave them some. |
|
Quoted:
Trump's people need to take a note from their enemy's book and begin "opposition research" in depth RFN. Every speech, every letter to the editor and blog post needs to be dug into until they find something that will damage. Every never Trumper needs a Colonoscopy looking for dirt. View Quote He knows all the shit and tactics of the left. He knows. He's always a step ahead of everyone. Here is what's coming... Failed To Load Title |
|
Quoted:
Milo joked about pedophilia, it was dark humor. On the other hand Lena Dunham actually admitted to being a pedophile and yet no one is complaining. View Quote priest was a joke. Who knows with Milo, he may be able to bullshit his way out of this. Be interesting to see if Breitbart boots him |
|
Quoted:
The words "child" or "children" were not said. The implication is that when he spoke of "young boys" he meant "boys under the age of consent". Whether or not that implication is warranted is a matter of your own biases. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Milo pretty clearly said that he was okay with boys under 16 having sexual relations with adult men under some circumstances. I think you really have to jump through a lot of illogical hoops to get to "but when he said young boys he meant 19 year olds" Course I don't doubt that his political opponents have been looking for dirt on him. Unfortunately he gave them some. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
The part with him talking about consent doesn't sound like a joke. I agree his comment about learning to give blow jobs from some priest was a joke. Who knows with Milo, he may be able to bullshit his way out of this. Be interesting to see if Breitbart boots him View Quote The Democrat were losing one of their weapons so they used the media to silence him. |
|
Milo was "taken down" by Milo. No crazy conspiracy theories required...
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
I think collusion between journalists and a political faction is a long way from a "shadow government". Depends on who's paying for it. Shadow government on my part might have been a little extreme, but no matter how you slice it we have a dedicated group wanting to take down the current President and his administration and his path for this country. The people voted, could give 2 shits about popular vote, since we all know there was voter fraud, and not on some little scale of a voter here and there, we saw wholesale districts with over 100% voting only one way, illegals voting and we know the Chicago machine used walkers to vote. To think that a soft coup is not happening is hiding their head in the sand. Krystol was a Fox mouthpiece for a while, odd he is embraced by MSNBC now. Pretty easy to start connecting dots. |
|
Quoted:
That theoretical statement is a very long ways from claiming he's an advocate of pedophilia. View Quote I really haven't listened to Milo much, maybe his mouth got away with him, he likes to provoke and admits he's a troll and maybe deep down he'd be the first guy to slug some guy who was trying to have sex with a high school boy, a maybe he really meant " when I was 14 I would have had sex with a hot guy and so what." I don't really know. |
|
Quoted:
That theoretical statement is a very long ways from claiming he's an advocate of pedophilia. View Quote If you have to get into the technical definition of pedophilia, you're losing. He defended underage boys being in sexual relationships with adult men. And its hardly surprising that a group called "The Reagan Battalion" is allied with conservatives like McMullin. Trump is not carrying the banner of Reagan-style conservatism, explicitly. http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/307462-trump-adviser-tells-house-republicans-youre-no-longer-reagans-party |
|
Quoted:
He never once said "older men should fuck young boys" he made some questionable comments that he should be questioned back on then he followed it up with some dark humor. Personally I don't play the Democrat's game. From what I am hearing they literally had teams of people on him waiting for him to slip up and say anything they could twist into a political assassination. Milo is a provocateur it's what he does, he says provocative things to piss people off, he has been doing this for a long time. Don't think this is anything different then the left shutting down a pro-Trump right wing celebrity before he recruits more gays to the Republican party. The Democrat were losing one of their weapons so they used the media to silence him. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
That theoretical statement is a very long ways from claiming he's an advocate of pedophilia. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Milo pretty clearly said that he was okay with boys under 16 having sexual relations with adult men under some circumstances. I think you really have to jump through a lot of illogical hoops to get to "but when he said young boys he meant 19 year olds" Course I don't doubt that his political opponents have been looking for dirt on him. Unfortunately he gave them some. Milo is my guy. McMullin is a piece of shit Hillary guy. Pick sides guys. You're either with Trump/Milo or you're with the globalist pussyhat fucktards. So who do you want to be? "Literally Hitler" or a pussy hat wearing retard? |
|
|
Quoted:
If you have to get into the technical definition of pedophilia, you're losing. He defended underage boys being in sexual relationships with adult men. And its hardly surprising that a group called "The Reagan Battalion" is allied with conservatives like McMullin. Trump is not carrying the banner of Reagan-style conservatism, explicitly. http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/307462-trump-adviser-tells-house-republicans-youre-no-longer-reagans-party View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Milo is my guy. McMullin is a piece of shit Hillary guy. Pick sides guys. You're either with Trump/Milo or you're with the globalist pussyhat fucktards. So who do you want to be? "Literally Hitler" or a pussy hat wearing retard? View Quote What if you think they both suck? Life is not often binary. |
|
|
Quoted:
Milo is my guy. McMullin is a piece of shit Hillary guy. Pick sides guys. You're either with Trump/Milo or you're with the globalist pussyhat fucktards. So who do you want to be? "Literally Hitler" or a pussy hat wearing retard? View Quote My guys don't defend child sexual abuse. YMMV I guess. |
|
|
Quoted:
I think Reagan would probably be a little bit more alarmed about a gay guy talking about having sex with kids being a leading conservative than someone undermining him. View Quote I am astonished how quickly some of you are accepting such a blatantly false narrative. Milo's comments have been taken wholly out of context. |
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Christ that guy's head is enormous. I'll bet he has unlimited memory. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Lol yeah "oh but ass fucking a 14 year old isn't....". That's an argument for dumbasses or creepers View Quote I wanted to say "no way anyone on the right defends this nonsense" but then I remembered plenty of people make that same "well actually pedophilia is defined as..." argument here all the time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Huh. . . I may have just figured it out?
Timing seems about right. http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1966228_When-did-criticism-of-the-LDS-Church-become-so-widespread-.html |
|
Quoted:
If you read the transcript he was arguing that some boys under 16 can consent to gay sex with older men and that this is part of gay culture. You really have to disregard everything he said a few seconds before to believe he meant 18/19 year olds. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The words "child" or "children" were not said. The implication is that when he spoke of "young boys" he meant "boys under the age of consent". Whether or not that implication is warranted is a matter of your own biases. Again, I think what you get out of what he said depends on your pre-existing biases. There were a lot of ideas and arguments flying around in a short time, and I don't think it's at all clear what he was trying to convey when you get right down to it. At best, he was defending "young boy/older man" couples when the boy is able to give legal consent while simultaneously arguing that there is a difference between legal and ethical consent. At worst, he was arguing in support of those same relationships involving boys under the age of consent in those cases where he deems that the boy is capable of giving consent from an ethical perspective. Based on my having listened to him speak in the past about this and similar topics, I really don't think he was advocating for statutory rape. I do acknowledge however that I'm coming into this conversation as a fan of his, and I realize that others have neither the context of his previous statements nor my initial reaction of "that can't be right, that isn't consistent with what he's said before..." The bottom line for me though is that Milo has in fact unmasked actual pedophiles, and that he himself has claimed to have been molested as a 13-year-old. In light of that, I see his positions on this subject to be at least partially driven by a need to reconcile the fact that he was molested with his (perhaps unconscious) desire to not cast his molester as a predator. |
|
Quoted:
Evan McMullin is a fucking douche bag. He wanted Hillary to win. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Some people here are quick to say things along the lines of "fuck that guy, I didn't like him anyway". Divide and conquer is an age old tactic. It works well. Stand by for the next victim. He wanted Hillary to win. How many did we have here saying they would support Hillary Clinton over Trump ("because Trump is just so awful!")? I'm surprised so many here can't see the tactics being used by the Left here and elsewhere. It's so transparent. |
|
Oh FFS.
Read the damn transcript. This is the most damning part: Milo: “The law is probably about right, that’s probably roughly the right age. I think it’s probably about okay, but there are certainly people who are capable of giving consent at a younger age, I certainly consider myself to be one of them, people who are sexually active younger. I think it particularly happens in the gay world by the way. In many cases actually those relationships with older men…This is one reason I hate the left. This stupid one size fits all policing of culture. (People speak over each other). This sort of arbitrary and oppressive idea of consent, which totally destroys you know understanding that many of us have. The complexities and subtleties and complicated nature of many relationships. You know, people are messy and complex. In the homosexual world particularly. Some of those relationships between younger boys and older men, the sort of coming of age relationships, the relationships in which those older men help those young boys to discover who they are, and give them security and safety and provide them with love and a reliable and sort of a rock where they can’t speak to their parents. Some of those relationships are the most -” View Quote Followed, after some crosstalk, by: Another man said, “You are advocating for cross generational relationships here, can we be honest about that?” Milo: “Yeah, I don’t mind admitting that. I think particularly in the gay world and outside the Catholic church, if that’s where some of you want to go with this, I think in the gay world, some of the most important, enriching and incredibly life affirming, important shaping relationships very often between younger boys and older men, they can be hugely positive experiences for those young boys they can even save those young boys, from desolation, from suicide (people talk over each other)… providing they’re consensual.” View Quote He's not talking about 18 or 19 year olds. It's clear from both context and the words he uses (note that he says "younger boys" and not "young men"). I get that everybody here likes Milo because he drives the left crazy. I found it amusing how he trolls them and how they hate him. But what he was saying here is pretty clear. |
|
Quoted:
Just cause McMullin is in his 40's, has no female girlfriends, and has never been married; does not mean he is a closeted homosexual. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You would think McMullin and Milo would get along as McMullin looks/acts like a fag. Just cause McMullin is in his 40's, has no female girlfriends, and has never been married; does not mean he is a closeted homosexual. God, even the NeverTrumps are doubling down on the derp. McMullin, take a good look at the life you have now, you're about to piss it all away. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.