User Panel
|
Quoted:
160gr Round Nose 6.5mm projectiles are meant to expand at slower speeds and not be driven by high working pressure cartridges. .30 caliber 220-240gr projectiles are meant to be driven by magnums working in the 64,000-65,000psi range. As a result, their jackets are extremely tough and thick. This presents a major problem for the .300 Whisper, and is one of the nemesis's of the cartridge. Funny thing though is that Alexander Arms make .300 Blackout subsonic ammunition with very soft, pistol-like projectiles in the heavy weights that will actually expand at subsonic speeds. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xy82nZGYji4 View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Not bad. So now Im wondering if 6.5g suppressed is more effective ballistically than 300 blk suppressed. Edited to say using subsonic ammunition. Regardless, you're still looking at a 140-160gr bullet compared to a 220-240gr with a slightly larger face. I guess it depends on deployment. The .300 is probably better as a sub-slinger, and okay at SS, while the grendel excels at SS, and is an okay sub-slinger. .30 caliber 220-240gr projectiles are meant to be driven by magnums working in the 64,000-65,000psi range. As a result, their jackets are extremely tough and thick. This presents a major problem for the .300 Whisper, and is one of the nemesis's of the cartridge. Funny thing though is that Alexander Arms make .300 Blackout subsonic ammunition with very soft, pistol-like projectiles in the heavy weights that will actually expand at subsonic speeds. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xy82nZGYji4 |
|
Quoted:
That's because they don't exist. It took 7 years going back and forth with Barnaul to get the dimensions and everything right with them for 6.5 Grendel. The 6.5 Grendel chamber was also designed from the start to work with steel cased ammo in the future, while also being very accurate. It does this by using a .300" diameter neck, and a compound throat-another reason to go with the SAAMI chamber. View Quote |
|
@LRRPF52
What do you think about the Odin Works barrels, specifically the 20" DMR? They say SAAMI spec chamber and .136 boltface depth, i just dont see a lot of reviews. I'm trying to build a nice rifle so if they're good i'll grab one, but if not i'll go elsewhere? |
|
Side note, the dangerously out of spec issue he's referring too has been addressed from my understanding.
But that's the basis of the Grendel II chamber. The only way to fix the mistake was extend the leade. So they did that and called it an improvement because you can fit really long round nose hunting bullets in there and even go over mag length and single load. Now that's not really an issue if you KNOW what you're getting and WHY you're getting it, but they should just call it like .264 Saturn Improved or something and not make things confusing. Much like the 223 Wylde, arguably a better chamber for .223 if you can take advantage of it, but he didn't call it .223 Remington II because he didn't screw things up and accidentally make that chamber trying to fix it. ETA that's not the best comparison as 223 Wylde is without a doubt a better chamber but you get the idea of what I'm getting at |
|
Any particular muzzle device work better than others for 6.5g in an ar?
|
|
|
Quoted:
No suppressors yet, waiting on the HPA to pass View Quote JP Compensator |
|
Quoted:
Side note, the dangerously out of spec issue he's referring too has been addressed from my understanding. But that's the basis of the Grendel II chamber. The only way to fix the mistake was extend the leade. So they did that and called it an improvement because you can fit really long round nose hunting bullets in there and even go over mag length and single load. Now that's not really an issue if you KNOW what you're getting and WHY you're getting it, but they should just call it like .264 Saturn Improved or something and not make things confusing. Much like the 223 Wylde, arguably a better chamber for .223 if you can take advantage of it, but he didn't call it .223 Remington II because he didn't screw things up and accidentally make that chamber trying to fix it. ETA that's not the best comparison as 223 Wylde is without a doubt a better chamber but you get the idea of what I'm getting at View Quote Why anyone would want a long freebore in a COL restriction based on the AR15 magwell in a semi-auto escapes logic, as you already beat the 90gr SMK single load COL in the .223 Rem with 2.260" or less in 6.5 Grendel. |
|
|
Quoted:
Fuck that Buy a can now If you're waiting, better to wait with something pending Dead Air, Rugged, SiCO, Griffin, Q View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
|
|
|
For a gun that won't be "high volume" shooting the Gemtech tracker is inexpensive and very light ...11'ish oz.
Retail is around $450-500 I think. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Any particular muzzle device work better than others for 6.5g in an ar? View Quote If you go 9/16 have mercy on your soul... |
|
|
Quoted:
Funny thing is you can still load to mag length the 160gr Round Nose from Hornady in a SAAMI chamber. Why anyone would want a long freebore in a COL restriction based on the AR15 magwell in a semi-auto escapes logic, as you already beat the 90gr SMK single load COL in the .223 Rem with 2.260" or less in 6.5 Grendel. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Side note, the dangerously out of spec issue he's referring too has been addressed from my understanding. But that's the basis of the Grendel II chamber. The only way to fix the mistake was extend the leade. So they did that and called it an improvement because you can fit really long round nose hunting bullets in there and even go over mag length and single load. Now that's not really an issue if you KNOW what you're getting and WHY you're getting it, but they should just call it like .264 Saturn Improved or something and not make things confusing. Much like the 223 Wylde, arguably a better chamber for .223 if you can take advantage of it, but he didn't call it .223 Remington II because he didn't screw things up and accidentally make that chamber trying to fix it. ETA that's not the best comparison as 223 Wylde is without a doubt a better chamber but you get the idea of what I'm getting at Why anyone would want a long freebore in a COL restriction based on the AR15 magwell in a semi-auto escapes logic, as you already beat the 90gr SMK single load COL in the .223 Rem with 2.260" or less in 6.5 Grendel. Some people are weird and some people just like to tinker with things I guess. I think I remember popnfresh(sp?) got one so he could run some 140-160 range high BC bullets with hybrid ogives like Berger's to try and best .308 out to 1000. But again if I remember correctly he got closer but ultimately wasn't able to do that, due to bullet weight /case capacity /working pressure restrictions. Which circles back to exactly what you're saying, what's the point? The 85-130gr range is where Grendel earns its keep and loaded properly will do more than 99% of users even need or are capable of shooting. And the SAAMI spec chamber will function perfectly with all commercial ammunition including steel case and all bullets in the range I mentioned loaded to mag length or greater. Where this cartridge really shines to me though as a novice long range shooter / semi-experienced hunter and in part why I think it's going to continue to grow is that it's simply a better caliber to invest in for the future. Grendel to creedmoor/260rem to 6.5 swede to 6.5-06 to .264 win mag. It's flat out a better family of calibers to chamber your rifles in than 6.8 or .30. |
|
Quoted:
Question: mil spec firing pin, good to go? View Quote I finished my build a few weeks ago, and found a case of Wolf for $220 locally. With Wolf it's a 50/50 chance it will fail to fire. I filed down the inside of the stop on a firing pin, and cut down the taper on the tip, and it works. Though I do get random pierced primers on non-wolf ammo. I ordered an enhanced firing pin for a 7.62x39 build, it'll be here tomorrow and I'll see how that goes. Hopefully it works, as I would prefer not to have to change pins every time I wanted to plink or shoot reloads and factory ammo. |
|
Quoted:
Not for Wolf. But everything else a standard pin is fine. I finished my build a few weeks ago, and found a case of Wolf for $220 locally. With Wolf it's a 50/50 chance it will fail to fire. I filed down the inside of the stop on a firing pin, and cut down the taper on the tip, and it works. Though I do get random pierced primers on non-wolf ammo. I ordered an enhanced firing pin for a 7.62x39 build, it'll be here tomorrow and I'll see how that goes. Hopefully it works, as I would prefer not to have to change pins every time I wanted to plink or shoot reloads and factory ammo. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Question: mil spec firing pin, good to go? I finished my build a few weeks ago, and found a case of Wolf for $220 locally. With Wolf it's a 50/50 chance it will fail to fire. I filed down the inside of the stop on a firing pin, and cut down the taper on the tip, and it works. Though I do get random pierced primers on non-wolf ammo. I ordered an enhanced firing pin for a 7.62x39 build, it'll be here tomorrow and I'll see how that goes. Hopefully it works, as I would prefer not to have to change pins every time I wanted to plink or shoot reloads and factory ammo. |
|
|
Isnt a light primer strike one of the issues with the different bolts/different chambers? I.E. "type 2 bolt, type 1 chamber".
In my research on this caliber, I seem to remember reading of a problem with this. Just a suggestion, as I do not own anything in this caliber yet |
|
|
Quoted:
If you go with a 5/8 threaded barrel, VG6 makes a comp/brake that's supposed to be excellent specifically for 6.5/6.8. I've ordered one and I'll let you know, I really like their 5.56 brake. If you go 9/16 have mercy on your soul... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Any particular muzzle device work better than others for 6.5g in an ar? If you go 9/16 have mercy on your soul... |
|
|
Quoted:
I've shot 600 rounds of Wolf so far. Zero failures to fire. What options do I have in 1/2x36 for a Grendel muzzle brake? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes |
|
Quoted:
Where did you get a 1/2-36 barrel? View Quote To answer the question, any brake that's of good construction in 9mm should work all though inefficiently since 9mm is .355 and 6.5 is .264. I'd say get a 3lug mount in 1/2x36 and put a suppressor on it that can take .308. |
|
Quoted:
The deal that was posted earlier for barrels from DSC was because they were blems cut to 1/2x36. To answer the question, any brake that's of good construction in 9mm should work all though inefficiently since 9mm is .355 and 6.5 is .264. I'd say get a 3lug mount in 1/2x36 and put a suppressor on it that can take .308. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
It's a new AA bolt and barrel. The Wolf ammo definitely wasn't getting hit hard enough. Had normal strikes on reloads and factory brass, but wouldn't get even as deep strikes with the Wolf. I just got an "enhanced firing pin" this morning made for 7.62x39, and ran through 75 rounds of Wolf, and 20 rounds of reloaded brass. No fails to fire, not one pierced round. The reloaded brass had harder strikes than a standard pin gave but no pierced primers, and the Wolf definitely had harder strikes. Here is before and after with the Wolf. http://i.imgur.com/EA4mZuC.jpg The two rounds on the left were from a standard pin that actually fired. The two on the right were with the new pin. Definitely a difference. Here is before and after with brass reloads. http://i.imgur.com/Kl2v2eK.jpg The one of the left was from a standard pin, the one on the right with the new pin. The pin definitely has more area on the tip, and it looks like more of the primer is getting hit harder, and more square. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
It's a new AA bolt and barrel. The Wolf ammo definitely wasn't getting hit hard enough. Had normal strikes on reloads and factory brass, but wouldn't get even as deep strikes with the Wolf. I just got an "enhanced firing pin" this morning made for 7.62x39, and ran through 75 rounds of Wolf, and 20 rounds of reloaded brass. No fails to fire, not one pierced round. The reloaded brass had harder strikes than a standard pin gave but no pierced primers, and the Wolf definitely had harder strikes. Here is before and after with the Wolf. http://i.imgur.com/EA4mZuC.jpg The two rounds on the left were from a standard pin that actually fired. The two on the right were with the new pin. Definitely a difference. Here is before and after with brass reloads. http://i.imgur.com/Kl2v2eK.jpg The one of the left was from a standard pin, the one on the right with the new pin. The pin definitely has more area on the tip, and it looks like more of the primer is getting hit harder, and more square. View Quote 2: That primer on the right looks pretty gnarly. |
|
@LRRPF52
@clausewitz8 @gunwritr What about the Anderson barrels and bolts? Are they safe to use? They say .135 bolt face and Grendel I chamber, is that ok? I'd like a cheap blaster/carbine for hunting in addition to the heavy DMR I'm building, and their barrel seems to fill the bill... |
|
Quoted:
@LRRPF52 @clausewitz8 @gunwritr What about the Anderson barrels and bolts? Are they safe to use? They say .135 bolt face and Grendel I chamber, is that ok? I'd like a cheap blaster/carbine for hunting in addition to the heavy DMR I'm building, and their barrel seems to fill the bill... View Quote |
|
|
Quoted:
@LRRPF52 @clausewitz8 @gunwritr What about the Anderson barrels and bolts? Are they safe to use? They say .135 bolt face and Grendel I chamber, is that ok? I'd like a cheap blaster/carbine for hunting in addition to the heavy DMR I'm building, and their barrel seems to fill the bill... View Quote |
|
|
|
Quoted:
1: Have you checked your springs? 2: That primer on the right looks pretty gnarly. View Quote I've noticed a lot of the primers of wolf are set in farther than others. Which may have led to my problems. With the the brass, I've spent all day figuring out why the bulge happens. The new pin has a larger face and it pushes the primers out more. I've struck already detonated primers and the bulge happens. And I've chronod rounds with no loss. The new pin is definitely smashing more of the primer. As long as it isn't piercing, or leaking, I'm not worried. No loss in accuracy or fps. If anything, I'm now getting more consistent groups out of steel than before. Not sure if it's because of the pin, or that I'm not worried if the round will go off or not. I've noticed with the wolf that does go off with a standard pin that there is a fraction of a second hang. I'm definitely not getting that now. I shot < moa groups with wolf out to 500 yards today. And my groups at 100 are way tighter. If the primers look like shit but function with no problems elsewhere. I'm not worried. The main reason I did a grendel build was the availability of cheaper long distance plinking ammo and the availability to reload with the same bullets I do with my Creedmoor ar10 and bolt gun. I'm super happy now to have a cheap shooting longer range cal8ber to compliment other calibers I have. |
|
|
Quoted:
Used a mil spec trigger. Larue MBT and a Geissele SSA. I've used different weight hammer and trigger springs on the mil spec and MBT triggers. Same problems. View Quote Never seen that before, but in theory... |
|
Quoted:
If your bolt length was ever so slightly out of spec (too long) it would effectively shorten the FP protrusion. Never seen that before, but in theory... View Quote I've measured how much the firing pin goes though the bolt and it's definitely less of a protrusion that other ar bolts and pins I have. Possibly the inner channel wasn't cut deep enough for a standard pin to protrude. Or not as much of s chamfer if there is any. I'll have to measure the inner lengths. But the 7.62x39 enhanced pin was 100% reliable today. |
|
Quoted:
Which springs? I've tried different combos and weights on the trigger and hammer. I'm running a larue MBT and even switched it with a mil spec trigger and ssa and had the same problem. Even with an extra power spring. I've noticed a lot of the primers of wolf are set in farther than others. Which may have led to my problems. With the the brass, I've spent all day figuring out why the bulge happens. The new pin has a larger face and it pushes the primers out more. I've struck already detonated primers and the bulge happens. And I've chronod rounds with no loss. The new pin is definitely smashing more of the primer. As long as it isn't piercing, or leaking, I'm not worried. No loss in accuracy or fps. If anything, I'm now getting more consistent groups out of steel than before. Not sure if it's because of the pin, or that I'm not worried if the round will go off or not. I've noticed with the wolf that does go off with a standard pin that there is a fraction of a second hang. I'm definitely not getting that now. I shot < moa groups with wolf out to 500 yards today. And my groups at 100 are way tighter. If the primers look like shit but function with no problems elsewhere. I'm not worried. The main reason I did a grendel build was the availability of cheaper long distance plinking ammo and the availability to reload with the same bullets I do with my Creedmoor ar10 and bolt gun. I'm super happy now to have a cheap shooting longer range cal8ber to compliment other calibers I have. View Quote As for the bulged primer, my wild, hairy-assed guess, given that it happens with already fired cases as well, would be that the larger impingement of the new firing pin is doing a bit of swaging of the primer's softish metal body, and since the excess has no place else to go, it pushes out of the pocket. |
|
Quoted:
It's a new AA bolt and barrel. The Wolf ammo definitely wasn't getting hit hard enough. Had normal strikes on reloads and factory brass, but wouldn't get even as deep strikes with the Wolf. I just got an "enhanced firing pin" this morning made for 7.62x39, and ran through 75 rounds of Wolf, and 20 rounds of reloaded brass. No fails to fire, not one pierced round. The reloaded brass had harder strikes than a standard pin gave but no pierced primers, and the Wolf definitely had harder strikes. Here is before and after with the Wolf. http://i.imgur.com/EA4mZuC.jpg The two rounds on the left were from a standard pin that actually fired. The two on the right were with the new pin. Definitely a difference. Here is before and after with brass reloads. http://i.imgur.com/Kl2v2eK.jpg The one of the left was from a standard pin, the one on the right with the new pin. The pin definitely has more area on the tip, and it looks like more of the primer is getting hit harder, and more square. View Quote |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.