User Panel
previous emails show a very friendly personal connection between the Sandlers and JP
Quoted:
It seems to go deeper. The Aussie seems real concerned about having to testify on where they get their money. The Sandlers are the former execs of a massive bank that got sold in the early 2000's and give to lots of liberal causes. Odd tie in with Podesta though. Maybe money washing through the CF? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Not sure what to make of this one.... Anyone want to take a quick look and break it down? https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18938 Not sure other than it sounds like they are whining about Commonwealth countries (Australia in particular) having stronger laws against "charities" being used for other purposes and that someone thinks they may have violated those rules and got caught. How this links to HRC's campaign I don't know. Any one else know more? It seems to go deeper. The Aussie seems real concerned about having to testify on where they get their money. The Sandlers are the former execs of a massive bank that got sold in the early 2000's and give to lots of liberal causes. Odd tie in with Podesta though. Maybe money washing through the CF? |
|
Quoted: That is unbelievable. This should be a huge story. Do they have the emails to back up the dialogue sequence at the beginning? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: FYI - Since this audience is interested in things like this. This is how the DNC is dragging Assange's name through the mud currently. http://i.imgur.com/0PqPOiH.jpg That is unbelievable. This should be a huge story. Do they have the emails to back up the dialogue sequence at the beginning? Yeah, Wikileaks sent them out either yesterday or the day before. ETA: Here they are with a full report: https://www.wikileaks.org/Background-and-Documents-on-Attempts-to-Frame-Assange-as-a-Pedophile-and.html |
|
|
|
|
|
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18353
Neera Tanden: Why did she call herself a moderate? John Podesta: I pushed her on this on Sunday night. She claims she didn't remember saying it. Not sure I believe her. Neera Tanden: It worries me more that she doesn't seem to know what planet we are all living in at the moment. |
|
I'm sure every campaign, group, PAC, foundation, committee, and think tank are just as rotten, through and through.
.... but I have an amazing smile on my face watching this one unravel. Run, you fuckin' worms, run ...... |
|
Everything you ever wanted to know about Susan Rice, right down to her SF86...
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17367 |
|
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17343#efmAFHAHJARzATdAeFAfj
"Strengthen bribery laws to ensure that politicians don’ change legislation for political donations-- idea is a favorite of mine, as you know, but REALLY dicey territory for HRC, right?" "This is a jump ball. She may be so tainted she's really vulnerable = if so, maybe a message of I've seen how this sausage is made, it needs to stop, I'm going to stop it will actually work." |
|
Quoted:
It seems to go deeper. The Aussie seems real concerned about having to testify on where they get their money. The Sandlers are the former execs of a massive bank that got sold in the early 2000's and give to lots of liberal causes. Odd tie in with Podesta though. Maybe money washing through the CF? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Not sure what to make of this one.... Anyone want to take a quick look and break it down? https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18938 Not sure other than it sounds like they are whining about Commonwealth countries (Australia in particular) having stronger laws against "charities" being used for other purposes and that someone thinks they may have violated those rules and got caught. How this links to HRC's campaign I don't know. Any one else know more? It seems to go deeper. The Aussie seems real concerned about having to testify on where they get their money. The Sandlers are the former execs of a massive bank that got sold in the early 2000's and give to lots of liberal causes. Odd tie in with Podesta though. Maybe money washing through the CF? Regarding Sandlers: Donating $1m to a "nextgen climate" and being asked if they prefer to give to a superPAC or a C4 etc... https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17919 |
|
Quoted:
Who is Ron Klain? Is he part of the debate commission? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17734 CAN SOMEONE check this one out..make it hot if us want Who is Ron Klain? Is he part of the debate commission? The administration’s point man on a solar fraud is now in charge of Ebola. Ron Klain is a sharp-elbowed Democratic political operative with no medical expertise. Tapping him as “Ebola czar” may not be the president’s best move when, as it is, no one can believe a word the Obama administration says. And that’s not just because Mr. Klain is yet another lobbyist recruited despite Mr. Obama’s vow that his administration would shun lobbyists. Klain was also a central player in the president’s Solyndra fraud, which soaked taxpayers for over half a billion dollars for the benefit of Obama cronies. In Faithless Execution, I recount the So Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/390677/ron-klain-and-solyndra-andrew-c-mccarthy |
|
Quoted:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17734 CAN SOMEONE check this one out..make it hot if us want View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17734 CAN SOMEONE check this one out..make it hot if us want From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2015-12-13 02:10 Subject: Re: Top 10 Answers
I might add one more which is the social media stuff around ISIS, but generally looks good. On Saturday, December 12, 2015, Ron Klain <[email protected]> wrote: > Per our post-debate prep conversation, here is a first stab at a cheat > sheet pointing her to the answers we most want her to learn and prepare > rigorously. > > > > Let me know what you think. > |
|
No she's retarded. |
|
Is anyone else amazed at the view from inside the heads of these people? It makes sense why conservatives lose against them; conservatives have at least some set of principles.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Did they put these emails into a date randomizer? That's sorta what I was trying to ask...who's sorting the releases? And on what basis? Saving best for last. Stop short-stroking already and put up the money shot! |
|
Quoted:
Is anyone else amazed at the view from inside the heads of these people? It makes sense why conservatives lose against them; conservatives have at least some set of principles. View Quote Exactly. They have a complete disregard for laws, ethics and morals. They simply do anything and everything they want to win and maintain power. |
|
From: "Kendall, David" <[email protected]>
I would prefer not to use the "March 18, 2009" date, because we know there were other emails using the her clintonemail.com address prior to that date. Could we make this more vague, like "early in her term as SOS"? Or would this change provide a "gotcha" target--if so, not worth it, since this is the date of the earliest email in the PST of her emails, as I understand it. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17937#efmACjAIa So email resides in the server and PST? |
|
|
Quoted:
Everything you ever wanted to know about Susan Rice, right down to her SF86... https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17367 View Quote |
|
Quoted:
Everything you ever wanted to know about Susan Rice, right down to her SF86... https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17367 View Quote Owns a lot of stock in Transcanada oil pipeline. Also her husband is an executive producer at ABC for This Week with George Stepanoupolos. No conflict there. And her husband is Canadian, a registered alien who is married to the National Security Advisor. Plenty more in there. And she did some weed at Oxford and Stanford. |
|
|
View Quote Man, I really can't stand Juan Williams. |
|
Quoted:
https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18755 SEIU paying for busses http://i.imgur.com/OOo0hDz.png View Quote Americans United For Change Connect the dots, la da la da laaaa. You want diamonds? This is diamonds. This is Hillary's main manager, John Podesta, knowing about SEIU and Americans For Change financing busing activities and "pump priming". |
|
Quoted:
Someone has done some back-digging on the SEIU bussing of Voters and linked it to Woodhouse. http://i.imgur.com/2ZdJ1Fb.png View Quote Are they admitting to voter fraud? |
|
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/9181
Re: So...<header id="header" style="box-sizing: inherit; border-bottom: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); border-top: 5px solid rgb(0, 0, 0); padding-bottom: 5px; font-family: monospace; font-size: 16px; white-space: pre-line; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"> From:[email protected] To: [email protected] Date: 2015-12-20 23:39 Subject: Re: So... </header> Honestly - and I think Jake may recall - my reaction in the room as it was happening was the same as what you wrote below, and what Ben related. That she says no backdoor, which is good, but then says we need a way in, and then the bad line about not understanding technology. The latter two points make the first one seem vulnerable. But in terms of wanting a way to break in - couldn't we tell tech off the record that she had in mind the malware/key strokes idea (insert malware into a device that you know is a target, to capture keystrokes before they are encrypted). Or that she had in mind really super code breaking by the NSA. But not the backdoor per se? I don't understand why the Manhattan project or Bletchley park are bad references? Just seems very dated? On Dec 20, 2015, at 7:49 PM, Teddy Goff <[email protected]> wrote: adding john too, a fellow crypto hobbyist. (john may be something more than a hobbyist.) i think it was fine, a solid B/B+. john tells me that he has actually heard nice things from friends of ours in SV, which is rare! i do think that "i would not want to go to that point" got overshadowed in some circles by the "some way to break in" thing -- which does seem to portend some sort of mandate or other anti-encryption policy, and also reinforces the the ideological gap -- and then, more atmospherically, by the manhattan project analogy (which we truly, truly should not make ever again -- can we work on pressing that point somehow?) and the cringe-y "i don't understand all the technology" line, which i also think does not help and we should avoid saying going forward. speaking of not understanding the technology, there is a critical technical point which our current language around encryption makes plain she isn't aware of. open-source unencrypted messaging technologies are in the public domain. there is literally no way to put that genie back in the bottle. so we can try to compel a whatsapp to unencrypt, but that may only have the effect of pushing terrorists onto emergent encrypted platforms. i do think going forward it will be helpful to be able to refer to her having pledged not to mandate a backdoor as president. but we've got to iron out the rest of the message. i actually do believe there is a way to thread the needle here, which i am happy to discuss; it requires us to quickly pivot from encryption to the broader issue of working with tech companies to detect and stop these people, and not getting into the weeds of which app they happen to use and that sort of thing. On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Sara Solow <[email protected]> wrote: |
|
Quoted: Someone has done some back-digging on the SEIU bussing of Voters and linked it to Woodhouse. http://i.imgur.com/2ZdJ1Fb.png View Quote |
|
|
Quoted: Quoted: Someone has done some back-digging on the SEIU bussing of Voters and linked it to Woodhouse. http://i.imgur.com/2ZdJ1Fb.png Are they admitting to voter fraud? Not outright. Note that some of that text is explaining the posters back-digging, and not in the actual email. |
|
View Quote That motherfucker has been ignoring the Wikileaks shit for two weeks now. Ignore, deflect, change the subject to pussy on fox and friends. That piece of shit. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Everything you ever wanted to know about Susan Rice, right down to her SF86... https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17367 |
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Someone put in an order for a few dozen of these with lifetime service contract. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzJcvtDPqec |
|
Quoted:
Everything you ever wanted to know about Susan Rice, right down to her SF86... https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17367 View Quote This is crazy. It has her: SF86 SF278 SR Questionnaire Other things |
|
|
|
Quoted: This is crazy. It has her: SF86 SF278 SR Questionnaire Other things View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Everything you ever wanted to know about Susan Rice, right down to her SF86... https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/17367 This is crazy. It has her: SF86 SF278 SR Questionnaire Other things |
|
Quoted:
Not outright. Note that some of that text is explaining the posters back-digging, and not in the actual email. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Someone has done some back-digging on the SEIU bussing of Voters and linked it to Woodhouse. http://i.imgur.com/2ZdJ1Fb.png Are they admitting to voter fraud? Not outright. Note that some of that text is explaining the posters back-digging, and not in the actual email. Is the 50.000 people or $$$? Can't tell by reading this can we. |
|
View Quote Cruz would earn a lot of my respect back if he did something about it. He's in a much better position than I am. |
|
View Quote |
|
Quoted:
That is the difference between Cruz and Ryan/Mittens/Katshit/GOPe View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
I'd love for Cruz and other GOP leaders to hold a press conference and kick and scream about this as much as the Dems would be doing if the shoe was on the other foot. They could help make this more public than it is right now. |
|
Quoted:
Man, I really can't stand Juan Williams. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Man, I really can't stand Juan Williams. Call him and tell him. |
|
Quoted:
Exactly. They have a complete disregard for laws, ethics and morals. They simply do anything and everything they want to win and maintain power. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Is anyone else amazed at the view from inside the heads of these people? It makes sense why conservatives lose against them; conservatives have at least some set of principles. Looking at this stuff- holy shit. It's not a question of would they give those orders, only a question of how many minions would follow and execute the orders. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Man, I really can't stand Juan Williams. Call him and tell him. I sent the info to a friend of mine, waiting to hear back from him now. |
|
Quoted:
Man, I really can't stand Juan Williams. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Man, I really can't stand Juan Williams. Call him and express your displeasure. ETA: Beaten numerous times. |
|
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18219
More communication with John Hardwood |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Man, I really can't stand Juan Williams. Call him and tell him. You can hear his voice in his voicemail, which is full. |
|
Quoted:
They should have asked Cam Newton's Dad for advice View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
A beautiful illustration of academic corruption in black and white. The Clinton-controlled, Soros-funded Center for American Progress ("CAP") provides a $15K grant to Danny Yagan at UC Berkeley. He's the type of person they want to "fund and cultivate." Yagan refuses the check from CAP because he doesn't want to appear to be partisan. Not that he won't take the money. He will take the money as long as it is sheep-dipped, obscuring its and his connection to the CAP. To wit: "Danny is (as best as I can tell, at least) 'on our side.' In other words, my sense is that he's not someone who takes issue with what CAP does or the positions they take. He's just very wary of the implications of the affiliation for his professional career, given that he is an early-career academic, with a great deal of potential in elite academic economic circles. In other words, he's got a lot to lose, and sees CAP as a risk..." The email thread that follows describes proposed schemes for getting Yagan the money while keeping him "clean" in the eyes of the academic world (and anyone else who might question his biases!). Here's the email: https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/18897 They should have asked Cam Newton's Dad for advice FIFY |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.