User Panel
|
Quoted:
I figured, what other job would care if some dork ass shows up and bitches to your boss about a rifle review. Plus the guy who wrote the blog was a cop so I figure it's really him, not a buddy, or another cop buddy and that's why he's so vague about where the reviewer works. Particularly shitty tactic, wtf justification is there for going to some cop's boss over a rifle review, fucking ass pirate View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Bet the reviewer was a cop He is. Particularly shitty tactic, wtf justification is there for going to some cop's boss over a rifle review, fucking ass pirate This ^^^^^^^ |
|
Quoted:
I figured, what other job would care if some dork ass shows up and bitches to your boss about a rifle review. Plus the guy who wrote the blog was a cop so I figure it's really him, not a buddy, or another cop buddy and that's why he's so vague about where the reviewer works. Particularly shitty tactic, wtf justification is there for going to some cop's boss over a rifle review, fucking ass pirate View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Bet the reviewer was a cop He is. Particularly shitty tactic, wtf justification is there for going to some cop's boss over a rifle review, fucking ass pirate The person that wrote the P&S blog post in my OP isn't the person that did the review. They're both cops however. |
|
Quoted:
The person that wrote the P&S blog post in my OP isn't the person that did the review. They're both cops however. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Bet the reviewer was a cop He is. Particularly shitty tactic, wtf justification is there for going to some cop's boss over a rifle review, fucking ass pirate The person that wrote the P&S blog post in my OP isn't the person that did the review. They're both cops however. I wish someone would go to my boss about some shit I did on the internet. |
|
Quoted: That's what I don't get. Hell, I can't even bring myself to skim over the emails Aim and Primary Arms send out because they're constantly hawking that Radical shit. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: and now no one will buy their firearms. morons. Were people buying them before? That's what I don't get. Hell, I can't even bring myself to skim over the emails Aim and Primary Arms send out because they're constantly hawking that Radical shit. |
|
Have 2 of their uppers. A 16" .300blk with their BCG. Is absolutely fine. Built a .223 pistol with one of their 10.5 uppers (with a RRA BCG). First time out it had "issues". 1st one was it wouldn't go into battery after every shot without using the forward assist. After using the forward assist for a full mag, it ran normal. Ironically my Bushmaster did the same thing new back in 99 so it really didn't concern me a lot, just was irritating. Same day it stopped ejecting the empty cases. Got home and found the gas block loosened up and moved. Put locktite on the screws and took it out to the range again. Works fine now. What I don't like about their uppers is the stupid torx screws they use on the handguards. When I went to duracoat my .300blk's handguard the torx head stripped on one screw. Ended up using a drill and ez out to get it out. Contacted them to see if they had replacements, they wanted $5 for 10 screws. Ended up just going to the hardware store and getting one from them (hex key one). Probably will replace all the torx ones with hex key ones anyways. The torx screws to start with. Never had luck with them. Will I buy another one? Dunno, probably not. May be more to the story than whats being told. |
|
Making a bad product and getting a crappy online review = cost a few dozen or so customers.
Making a bad product and behaving like this after an online review = thousands of customers. Too many good companies in business now to try to pull crap like this and hope to survive. |
|
Quoted:
https://primaryandsecondary.com/candid-and-unbiased/ Wow. "I was notified today the sales manager for Radical Firearms visited our staff member’s place of employment to complain about the review which P&S was conducting. After he was called into the office of his boss, our staff member will no longer conduct the review. He decided he would stop. He will no longer have anything to do with Radical Firearms." View Quote Kinda short on details. Could easily go either way. Was radical pissed because they didn't like an honest review. Or were they pissed because they were getting a dishonest review. Never heard of this PS company |
|
Quoted:
Kinda short on details. Could easily go either way. Was radical pissed because they didn't like an honest review. Or were they pissed because they were getting a dishonest review. Never heard of this PS company View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
https://primaryandsecondary.com/candid-and-unbiased/ Wow. "I was notified today the sales manager for Radical Firearms visited our staff member’s place of employment to complain about the review which P&S was conducting. After he was called into the office of his boss, our staff member will no longer conduct the review. He decided he would stop. He will no longer have anything to do with Radical Firearms." Kinda short on details. Could easily go either way. Was radical pissed because they didn't like an honest review. Or were they pissed because they were getting a dishonest review. Never heard of this PS company P&S is mainly a network that kind of took over when Lightfighter went off the rails, and most of the SMEs and industry figures migrated over to it. They're mostly straight up folks. |
|
I wrote it (hi Erin), one of the staff attempted the review.
|
|
|
Quoted:
I bought one RF barrel for a pistol build. It had the worst accuracy I'd ever seen. 12" groups at 50 meters. It made the Mini 14 look like a damn match grade rifle. Never again...even for a "just for fun" gun. View Quote Barrel extension was probably loose. RF barrels seems to have a problem with that happening. |
|
Quoted:
Kinda short on details. Could easily go either way. Was radical pissed because they didn't like an honest review. Or were they pissed because they were getting a dishonest review. Never heard of this PS company View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
https://primaryandsecondary.com/candid-and-unbiased/ Wow. "I was notified today the sales manager for Radical Firearms visited our staff member’s place of employment to complain about the review which P&S was conducting. After he was called into the office of his boss, our staff member will no longer conduct the review. He decided he would stop. He will no longer have anything to do with Radical Firearms." Kinda short on details. Could easily go either way. Was radical pissed because they didn't like an honest review. Or were they pissed because they were getting a dishonest review. Never heard of this PS company RF is well known for absolute shit products. I'm willing to bet the story, as told, is accurate. |
|
I had a RF 8.5 inch 300 blk upper. Key word, HAD. I also had the barrel extension unscrew from the receiver, they "fixed" it (must have been a re-torque with rocksett) b/c I got the same upper back.
I know they "repaired" it but I couldn't trust the brand after that incident so I let it go dirt cheap. It was fairly accurate though, for the VERY few rounds I put through it. They are now a NO-GO company for me, so are ALL the budget brands (KG, bear creek arsenal, PSA). And I know there's TONS of PSA fans, but look up bad reviews, there's plenty. They lack quality control, so yes 1000 good uppers go out, but a dozen bad ones also. I bought one with out of spec parts, and can't believe they even mailed me something that you couldn't cycle the action NEW. I'll stick to BCM, DD, Noveske, and seekins for now. They seem to know what they are doing. |
|
Rob Ski ran one for 5000 rounds. The cam broke in the bolt. But, easy $20 fix.
Not bad for people that shoot only a few hundred rounds a year and put it back in tbe safe. |
|
Quoted: I wrote it (hi Erin), one of the staff attempted the review. View Quote So I find it odd that RF went to the place of employment over a review that isn't even on P&S's website... In fact, the only RF tagged article in the entire website is the one you wrote - https://primaryandsecondary.com/tag/radical-firearms/ Can you shed some light on this? Also, you say that a Facebook exchange went down. May we please see that discussion? There are a lot of vague claims with your article and I'm sure everyone would like some facts to back this up. And telling us to sign up for a Facebook discussion group to boost P&S numbers is not the correct answer. Side note - wouldn't buy RF if they were the last manufacturer on earth. Edit: The original email from "marketing" is also odd. Who sends an email begging for a review prior to introducing yourself or your company? And what marketing person advertises their product for the "financially burdened" (again, even before saying who they are)? |
|
Have a 10.5"upper from them and it's been reliable. Needed some "fitting" with a file to fit my lower build. I've since switched the rail from keymod to mlok. Still working after rebuild. Won't be buying anymore of their products, but also don't see the need to buy completed uppers/ lowers/ or rifles anymore. They're going to need help after this fiasco.
|
|
|
My brother had a horrible experience with their piece of shit rifles. It was my bro's first rifle, and he didn't know much about AR's, so I handled the technical aspects of the shitty rifle. Bottom line was this: Brand new RF received from FFL by my bro. He brings it to me so I can check out the internals and such. As soon as I separate the upper from the lower, a huge pile of aluminum shavings falls out of the upper. Shavings in the trigger unit, buffer tube, etc...it was a fucking mess. BCG was rubbing one of the inner walls of the upper.
After some back and forth with RF, they have bro ship it back to them on bro's dime. They tell him they fixed it and send it back out to bro. I meet with bro, manually cycle the rifle and watch as this pile of ass continues making aluminum confetti. Bro emails back with one of the guys, want to say his name was Tim, but whatever. Bro is told that they test fired the rifle and it functioned/shot fine. Bro was then told the clincher: this was normal break in for an AR. After some more back and forth, RF had bro ship POS back to them (on his dime again), and they finally refunded his money. Stay the hell away from Radical Firearms. I obviously question anyone who tells a customer that upper receiver shavings in your rifle is a part of an AR's "break in process." This ARock move is not surprising. Gotta' salvage the garbage somehow. That's how damage control works. |
|
|
This whole time I thought radical firearms was andro Corp from our EE.
Glad I'm wrong! |
|
Quoted:
I have 15k through a fucking Delton without a hiccup. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Rob Ski ran one for 5000 rounds. The cam broke in the bolt. But, easy $20 fix. Not bad for people that shoot only a few hundred rounds a year and put it back in tbe safe. I have 15k through a fucking Delton without a hiccup. What was the price? Under $500? |
|
I have one barrel and upper from them but I used a high quality bcg and have not had any issues.
|
|
|
Quoted:
So I find it odd that RF went to the place of employment over a review that isn't even on P&S's website... In fact, the only RF tagged article in the entire website is the one you wrote - https://primaryandsecondary.com/tag/radical-firearms/ Can you shed some light on this? Also, you say that a Facebook exchange went down. May we please see that discussion? There are a lot of vague claims with your article and I'm sure everyone would like some facts to back this up. And telling us to sign up for a Facebook discussion group to boost P&S numbers is not the correct answer. Side note - wouldn't buy RF if they were the last manufacturer on earth. Edit: The original email from "marketing" is also odd. Who sends an email begging for a review prior to introducing yourself or your company? And what marketing person advertises their product for the "financially burdened" (again, even before saying who they are)? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I wrote it (hi Erin), one of the staff attempted the review. So I find it odd that RF went to the place of employment over a review that isn't even on P&S's website... In fact, the only RF tagged article in the entire website is the one you wrote - https://primaryandsecondary.com/tag/radical-firearms/ Can you shed some light on this? Also, you say that a Facebook exchange went down. May we please see that discussion? There are a lot of vague claims with your article and I'm sure everyone would like some facts to back this up. And telling us to sign up for a Facebook discussion group to boost P&S numbers is not the correct answer. Side note - wouldn't buy RF if they were the last manufacturer on earth. Edit: The original email from "marketing" is also odd. Who sends an email begging for a review prior to introducing yourself or your company? And what marketing person advertises their product for the "financially burdened" (again, even before saying who they are)? Join date: Check Post count : Check Is it just me or is it getting a bit shilly in here |
|
Quoted:
So I find it odd that RF went to the place of employment over a review that isn't even on P&S's website... In fact, the only RF tagged article in the entire website is the one you wrote - https://primaryandsecondary.com/tag/radical-firearms/ Can you shed some light on this? Also, you say that a Facebook exchange went down. May we please see that discussion? There are a lot of vague claims with your article and I'm sure everyone would like some facts to back this up. And telling us to sign up for a Facebook discussion group to boost P&S numbers is not the correct answer. Side note - wouldn't buy RF if they were the last manufacturer on earth. Edit: The original email from "marketing" is also odd. Who sends an email begging for a review prior to introducing yourself or your company? And what marketing person advertises their product for the "financially burdened" (again, even before saying who they are)? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I wrote it (hi Erin), one of the staff attempted the review. So I find it odd that RF went to the place of employment over a review that isn't even on P&S's website... In fact, the only RF tagged article in the entire website is the one you wrote - https://primaryandsecondary.com/tag/radical-firearms/ Can you shed some light on this? Also, you say that a Facebook exchange went down. May we please see that discussion? There are a lot of vague claims with your article and I'm sure everyone would like some facts to back this up. And telling us to sign up for a Facebook discussion group to boost P&S numbers is not the correct answer. Side note - wouldn't buy RF if they were the last manufacturer on earth. Edit: The original email from "marketing" is also odd. Who sends an email begging for a review prior to introducing yourself or your company? And what marketing person advertises their product for the "financially burdened" (again, even before saying who they are)? Away we go |
|
Yeah but P&S never posted a review of RF on their website...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160825022922/https://primaryandsecondary.com/tag/radical-firearms/
There's NO BAD REVIEW for RF to hunt someone down over. |
|
I prefer Totally Tubular Firearms, anyway.
Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
RF is shit. BUT I do question when P&S comes out of nowhere and provides vague click bait.
|
|
I really hate that for RF. I spoke on the phone with the owner a couple of years ago and he seemed like a real nice guy.
|
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Rob Ski ran one for 5000 rounds. The cam broke in the bolt. But, easy $20 fix. Not bad for people that shoot only a few hundred rounds a year and put it back in tbe safe. I have 15k through a fucking Delton without a hiccup. What was the price? Under $500? $550 iirc. |
|
|
What about their suppressors that I'm sure a few bought before the panic????
|
|
Can someone please link the bad review that RF supposedly got upset over? Or maybe provide screen shots of the Facebook group that's referenced in the article? Anyone? More details?
I've been a member since the 12th, so it's not like I created this account because of an article posted today and I've used this handle elsewhere online. |
|
Quoted:
I'm trying to think how that would get more than a "fuck off" from the Chief to Radical Firearms once it's realized they're being little bitches. Maybe (hopefully) it did. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I wish someone would go to my boss about some shit I did on the internet. I'm trying to think how that would get more than a "fuck off" from the Chief to Radical Firearms once it's realized they're being little bitches. Maybe (hopefully) it did. I think my boss would invite them in for coffee, and then hit them in the face with the hot carafe. |
|
Quoted:
Can someone please link the bad review that RF supposedly got upset over? Or maybe provide screen shots of the Facebook group that's referenced in the article? Anyone? More details? I've been a member since the 12th, so it's not like I created this account because of an article posted today and I've used this handle elsewhere online. View Quote Can you do your own internet? |
|
Quoted:
I really hope PA drops them. I don't know why Marsh would be associated with them in the first place View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
and now no one will buy their firearms. morons. Were people buying them before? That's what I don't get. Hell, I can't even bring myself to skim over the emails Aim and Primary Arms send out because they're constantly hawking that Radical shit. The last time I was at PA picking up my order, I noticed a bin with over a dozen RF barrels being sent back for return to RF. Many had "no gas port" written on the boxes. Sounds like a headache if those went out to customers and then had to be returned through PA. It's possible PA caught them first but still...what a pain in the ass. They probably wanted to help out a local business and work out some deals, but IMHO RF isn't doing them any favors. They do make AR's at s low price point, but seems to be a gamble if you get a good one. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Can someone please link the bad review that RF supposedly got upset over? Or maybe provide screen shots of the Facebook group that's referenced in the article? Anyone? More details? I've been a member since the 12th, so it's not like I created this account because of an article posted today and I've used this handle elsewhere online. Can you do your own internet? The bad review that P&S claims they did isn't on their website and I'm not hunting all over facebook for a conversation. If someone can immediately find it, that would be great. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Crap, I bought two of their barrels for 99 bucks each from Primary Arms a week ago. Wonder if they will hold up? Hold up a hood, prop open a door. No shit. Looks like I'll be calling Primary Arms when I get home to do a return. |
|
My favorite part is the part where Radical says that they accidentally sent one of their normal quality guns, instead of a special review gun made with better parts and checked by a gunsmith after assembly to find any errors...
|
|
I've come for the fuckery, fuck bucketness, and all around assholery.
But no really, I got a RF FGS Upper on a PSA lower, only issue I've had with the rifle so far is the gas rings in the PSA BCG go bad under 800 rounds. But yea thats a bit of a move only a class act fuck bucket would pull.... |
|
A buddy of mine won some contest they did for local LEOs on the book of faces. I told him to be vary and I'd gladly check it out for him before he qualifies with it. Its still in his safe...
As tempting as their prices are, no thanks. |
|
|
Quoted:
Can someone please link the bad review that RF supposedly got upset over? Or maybe provide screen shots of the Facebook group that's referenced in the article? Anyone? More details? I've been a member since the 12th, so it's not like I created this account because of an article posted today and I've used this handle elsewhere online. View Quote It appears the review was never posted, the reviewer tried to run his complaints by RF first. RF tried to pull a fast one and switch out the sketchy rifle with another to avoid a bad review. Going after the reviewer in person at their workplace was way over the line. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.