User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:08:09 AM EDT
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:09:22 AM EDT
[#1]
Mmm those thighs
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:09:40 AM EDT
[#2]
Well, she is the first female nominee.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:11:01 AM EDT
[#3]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:12:10 AM EDT
[#4]
Just like many, many blacks are now ashamed of Obama, so too will women be ashamed of the first woman president.
It'll set womens progress back 100 years. Hell, women may get so desperate for income after a Hillary presidency, prostitution may make a big comeback again. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:13:26 AM EDT
[#5]
Together! Together! Together! Together! Together! Together! Together! Together! Together!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:15:03 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Well, she is the first female nominee. No, she is not, there have been many other women that have been nominated by their parties over the years. The first female nominated by her party occurred in 1872 and her name was Victoria Woodhull. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:15:09 AM EDT
[#7]
Fuck that soldiers Dad. The Constitution applies to citizens, not people on the other side of the planet.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:16:42 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No, she is not, there have been many other women that have been nominated by their parties over the years. The first female nominated by her party occurred in 1872 and her name was Victoria Woodhull. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Well, she is the first female nominee. No, she is not, there have been many other women that have been nominated by their parties over the years. The first female nominated by her party occurred in 1872 and her name was Victoria Woodhull. For President? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:18:30 AM EDT
[#9]
"All americans"
lol |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:18:56 AM EDT
[#10]
Actually the Green Party already had Stein way before the DNC love fest.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:19:40 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
For President? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Well, she is the first female nominee. No, she is not, there have been many other women that have been nominated by their parties over the years. The first female nominated by her party occurred in 1872 and her name was Victoria Woodhull. For President? Yep. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:20:25 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
For President? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Well, she is the first female nominee. No, she is not, there have been many other women that have been nominated by their parties over the years. The first female nominated by her party occurred in 1872 and her name was Victoria Woodhull. For President? Yup, she sure was, she was nominated by a recognized party to run for the President, if you look at history, a lot of woman have actually been nominated and appeared on ballots in history. The parties have waxed and waned over the years as to whether they are major or minor parties. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:20:26 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted: For President? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Well, she is the first female nominee. No, she is not, there have been many other women that have been nominated by their parties over the years. The first female nominated by her party occurred in 1872 and her name was Victoria Woodhull. For President? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:21:07 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
For President? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Well, she is the first female nominee. No, she is not, there have been many other women that have been nominated by their parties over the years. The first female nominated by her party occurred in 1872 and her name was Victoria Woodhull. For President? lol |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:21:29 AM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Well, she is the first female nominee. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:22:26 AM EDT
[#16]
they're couching it with the modifier "first female major party nominee"
MSM doesn't consider Green and whoever did the 1872 one to be "major parties" |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:22:37 AM EDT
[#17]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:23:44 AM EDT
[#18]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:24:00 AM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No, she is not, there have been many other women that have been nominated by their parties over the years. The first female nominated by her party occurred in 1872 and her name was Victoria Woodhull. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Well, she is the first female nominee. No, she is not, there have been many other women that have been nominated by their parties over the years. The first female nominated by her party occurred in 1872 and her name was Victoria Woodhull. ETA: Nope |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:26:11 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
they're couching it with the modifier "first female major party nominee" MSM doesn't consider Green and whoever did the 1872 one to be "major parties" Actually the "Equal Rights Party" at the time was considered a pretty influential party, the Democrats and Republicans have not always been the most dominant parties in our country. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:30:09 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
And she was a black lady to wasn't she? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Well, she is the first female nominee. No, she is not, there have been many other women that have been nominated by their parties over the years. The first female nominated by her party occurred in 1872 and her name was Victoria Woodhull. No, she was not black, but her choice for VP was a very famous black American, Fredrrick Douglass. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:43:40 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Well, she is the first female nominee. No, she is not, there have been many other women that have been nominated by their parties over the years. The first female nominated by her party occurred in 1872 and her name was Victoria Woodhull. For President? That was a hilarious read. She announced that she was running but she was under 35 so not eligible? Is that correct? She sounds nearly as insufferable as the current candidate. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 12:59:06 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That was a hilarious read. She announced that she was running but she was under 35 so not eligible? Is that correct? She sounds nearly as insufferable as the current candidate. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Well, she is the first female nominee. No, she is not, there have been many other women that have been nominated by their parties over the years. The first female nominated by her party occurred in 1872 and her name was Victoria Woodhull. For President? That was a hilarious read. She announced that she was running but she was under 35 so not eligible? Is that correct? She sounds nearly as insufferable as the current candidate. She was indeed a colorful personality in the history of our country. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 6:49:04 AM EDT
[#24]
Does Bill have a uni-brow? Or is that coke left on his forehead after motor boating?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 7:01:04 AM EDT
[#25]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 7:12:18 AM EDT
[#26]
Wow.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 7:28:35 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Well, she is the first female nominee. That's debatable. I'm not even sure she's human. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 7:35:41 AM EDT
[#28]
All she is missing is a white hood
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 7:38:14 AM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Does Bill have a uni-brow? Or is that coke left on his forehead after motor boating? Dude you gave me a good laugh this morning! Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 7:42:42 AM EDT
[#30]
cnn = clinton news network
It's been that way since billyboy was president. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 7:43:16 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No, she is not, there have been many other women that have been nominated by their parties over the years. The first female nominated by her party occurred in 1872 and her name was Victoria Woodhull. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Well, she is the first female nominee. No, she is not, there have been many other women that have been nominated by their parties over the years. The first female nominated by her party occurred in 1872 and her name was Victoria Woodhull. Take your truth and get out of here! 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 7:52:01 AM EDT
[#32]
LOL, virgin white Pants Suit, sexy.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 7:57:22 AM EDT
[#33]
She wore white?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 8:00:53 AM EDT
[#34]
President Snow anyone?
ETA: Fuck CNN, and giving them clicks, old lady watching CNN when I'm not around, I turn that shit off FUCK CNN backstabbing lying media whores |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 8:02:38 AM EDT
[#35]
gross
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 8:03:26 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No, she is not, there have been many other women that have been nominated by their parties over the years. The first female nominated by her party occurred in 1872 and her name was Victoria Woodhull. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Well, she is the first female nominee. No, she is not, there have been many other women that have been nominated by their parties over the years. The first female nominated by her party occurred in 1872 and her name was Victoria Woodhull. Equal rights party, not democratic party. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 8:04:29 AM EDT
[#37]
Save your eyes. Shut off the television.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 8:05:37 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Actually the "Equal Rights Party" at the time was considered a pretty influential party, the Democrats and Republicans have not always been the most dominant parties in our country. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
they're couching it with the modifier "first female major party nominee" MSM doesn't consider Green and whoever did the 1872 one to be "major parties" Actually the "Equal Rights Party" at the time was considered a pretty influential party, the Democrats and Republicans have not always been the most dominant parties in our country. No. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 8:07:33 AM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Fuck that soldiers Dad. The Constitution applies to citizens, not people on the other side of the planet. Trump says stuff that sounds like he wants to round up muslims in this country and deport them. It would be easy for him to make the good points he makes without sounding crazy. I don't know why he won't knock off the crazy stuff. He could win this election easy if he would just calm the fuck down for a while. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/29/2016 8:13:47 AM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Mmm those thighs Full of thunder |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
