User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 7:14:45 PM EDT
[#1]
They can be impeached the same as a president or other government official.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 7:15:54 PM EDT
[#2]
Obama really wishes she would step down so he could replace her.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 7:16:58 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: They can be impeached the same as a president or other government official. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 7:26:01 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
They can be impeached the same as a president or other government official. What would the charge be? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 7:29:41 PM EDT
[#5]
Ruth, hang on and stay in there, hopefully an R wins and gets to replace you.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 7:35:47 PM EDT
[#6]
For reference,
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 7:37:23 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
For reference, http://freedomoutpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Ginsburg-e1423837794882.jpg Well that's scary. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 7:38:57 PM EDT
[#8]
Move the supreme court and don't tell them where.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 7:39:26 PM EDT
[#9]
Congress could pass a law changing the size and composition of the court. And of eligibility for it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 7:58:34 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Move the supreme court and don't tell them where. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 7:59:59 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Ruth, hang on and stay in there, hopefully an R wins and gets to replace you. +1 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 8:00:50 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: What would the charge be? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: They can be impeached the same as a president or other government official. What would the charge be? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 8:01:18 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
For reference, http://freedomoutpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Ginsburg-e1423837794882.jpg So, you want to remove Sotomayor and kagan? Personally I would throw Roberts in as well. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 8:04:09 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Well that's scary. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
For reference, http://freedomoutpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Ginsburg-e1423837794882.jpg Well that's scary. Hell, she's probably just texting.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 8:11:23 PM EDT
[#15]
Pray that she hangs in there until you get a Republican president.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 8:16:44 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Pray that she hangs in there until you get a Republican president. The Republicans control the senate tho, right? Surely they won't fuck us by confirming another bad Obama appointee, right? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 8:17:51 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Well that's scary. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
For reference, http://freedomoutpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Ginsburg-e1423837794882.jpg Well that's scary. Just wait till Bernies elected. We will have to start taking bets on who kicks it first. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 8:29:25 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What would the charge be? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
They can be impeached the same as a president or other government official. What would the charge be? Criminal acts only. SCOTUS makes their own internal rules. Like congress or the executive branch. Except theirs isn't written down, public or even any known history of disciple. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 8:34:06 PM EDT
[#19]
Practically speaking no
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 8:35:53 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Being unfit due to senility. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
They can be impeached the same as a president or other government official. What would the charge be? Or farting. House can invent whatever it wants to invent. Senate can convict on whatever it wants regardless of the proof of lack thereof. Impeachment is purely political. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 8:38:28 PM EDT
[#21]
Edit: I was wrong.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 8:39:28 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You don't need w charge to impeach, except for the President. You don't need a true charge to impeach the president. House and Senate can do what they want. There is no oversight or appeal for impeachment. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 8:40:58 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You don't need w charge to impeach, except for the President. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 8:44:40 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yup, the indictment could simply be "This fucker has probably never read the constitution." We probably should have whipped that one out more than a few times over the last hundred years. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
You don't need w charge to impeach, except for the President. Yes in practice. There is no recourse to an impeachment. It's a political action more so than legal. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 8:55:51 PM EDT
[#25]
Congress could pass a law changing the size and composition of the court. And of eligibility for it. FDR tried expanding the Court to 12 so he could pack it with libs and get his way. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 9:31:36 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
FDR tried expanding the Court to 12 so he could pack it with libs and get his way. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Congress could pass a law changing the size and composition of the court. And of eligibility for it. FDR tried expanding the Court to 12 so he could pack it with libs and get his way. Yep. It would have been perfectly constitutional to do so, too. Turns out, he didn't need to. I think 8 out of the 9 USSC Justices were FDR appointees by the time Truman took office. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 9:52:32 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Well that's scary. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
For reference, http://freedomoutpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Ginsburg-e1423837794882.jpg Well that's scary. It's OK, she's on ball watch. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 9:59:17 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
For reference, http://freedomoutpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Ginsburg-e1423837794882.jpg <---------- 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 10:00:39 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Just wait till Bernies elected. We will have to start taking bets on who kicks it first. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
For reference, http://freedomoutpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Ginsburg-e1423837794882.jpg Well that's scary. Just wait till Bernies elected. We will have to start taking bets on who kicks it first. Bernie? Just think of the conservative justice Arkancides if Hillary is elected. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 10:05:34 PM EDT
[#30]
Well here's the text...
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office. So I read that as they get fired for anything a normal citizen gets fired for. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 10:06:57 PM EDT
[#31]
Yes, but we don't want to do it until there is a Republican in the White House.
A lot of liberals are still pissed Ruth Buzzi Ginsburg didn't retire before the 2014 election.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 10:26:02 PM EDT
[#32]
Quoted:
Is there a process to remove a senile SCOTUS justice against their will? you mean like Thomas and Scalia? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2016 11:23:22 AM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: you mean like Thomas and Scalia? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Is there a process to remove a senile SCOTUS justice against their will? you mean like Thomas and Scalia? DU ------> |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2016 11:25:14 AM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Pray that she hangs in there until you get a Republican president. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2016 11:29:01 AM EDT
[#35]
I throw up just a little when I hear them called justices. They should be called bozos or politicos.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2016 11:32:17 AM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
DU ------> Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Is there a process to remove a senile SCOTUS justice against their will? you mean like Thomas and Scalia? DU ------> <------ I think you meant this |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/11/2016 11:48:38 AM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
DU ------> Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Is there a process to remove a senile SCOTUS justice against their will? you mean like Thomas and Scalia? DU ------> <----- DU is to the left. Noob.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
