User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 8:26:43 AM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You are competing with Extorris and dmnoid for the .gif title!!  Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
................................... "Trumps big win in South Carolina is meaningless because he's widely expected to win; and likewise, Cruz's big loss in South Carolina is also meaningless because he's been expected to lose".....yours truly : The Internet Messageboard Bots. 
http://i1240.photobucket.com/albums/gg485/pixie__princess/amusant/gypsy.png You are competing with Extorris and dmnoid for the .gif title!! I'm going to win and it's going to be really huge. I'm going to make gifs great again. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 8:27:48 AM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You are competing with Extorris and dmnoid for the .gif title!! Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
................................... "Trumps big win in South Carolina is meaningless because he's widely expected to win; and likewise, Cruz's big loss in South Carolina is also meaningless because he's been expected to lose".....yours truly : The Internet Messageboard Bots.
http://i1240.photobucket.com/albums/gg485/pixie__princess/amusant/gypsy.png You are competing with Extorris and dmnoid for the .gif title!! It would be better if it was Cruz or Yeb rubbing that globe......... |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 8:28:06 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
................. I'm going to win and it's going to be really huge. I'm going to make gifs great again.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 8:37:01 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It would be better if it was Cruz or Yeb rubbing that globe......... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
................................... "Trumps big win in South Carolina is meaningless because he's widely expected to win; and likewise, Cruz's big loss in South Carolina is also meaningless because he's been expected to lose".....yours truly : The Internet Messageboard Bots.
http://i1240.photobucket.com/albums/gg485/pixie__princess/amusant/gypsy.png You are competing with Extorris and dmnoid for the .gif title!! It would be better if it was Cruz or Yeb rubbing that globe......... Or better yet; the guy, who, having already made that very same sort of assertion, is going to post that bullshit right here on GD. And you know he will.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 8:51:58 AM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It was a SLAUGHTER. He's predicted to win Nevada and South Carolina next. What has me puzzled is how the fuck does Hillary have 392 delegate votes already!!?? Has she bribed that many super delegates already? You have to remember that the D Super Delegates are all the elected D's in Congress and (I think) the D governors. They aren't completely suicidal and know that a Sanders presidency would be the end of their phoney baloney jobs. Socialism never works - and Sanders wants to go full retard with it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 8:54:55 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Or better yet; the guy, who, having already made that very same sort of assertion, is going to post that bullshit right here on GD. And you know he will. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 11:08:38 AM EDT
[#7]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 11:14:03 AM EDT
[#8]
So Boosh and Rugay-o haven't gone away.
Clinton hasn't gone away. Everyone who lost has doubled down and said that their distant second, third, or fourth place finish means something. The Boosh and Clinton networks are spinning things their way. Yeb? is recruiting his retarded brother to help him campaign in SC. The Clintons are making sure the black vote stays with them, since they spent decades keeping them impoverished and dependent on the Democrats. Nothing has changed. We still have to see Guacabowle and Hillcunt--because the establishment does not want to give up the election to the will of the people. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 11:14:54 AM EDT
[#9]
Trump's sure a go getter...
With a beautiful family! 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 11:18:43 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: As of this point, I would take any Republican who did not support and fund the Clintons... That eliminates Trump. I would take any Republican who did not support and endorse De Blasio... That eliminates Trump. So much for ideological purity... Trump certainly is not ideologically pure. He is all over the map. And that is just from Monday to Tuesday in a given week... Yeah, as of this point, I would take any Republican who was not recently a formal card-carrying liberal Democrat... That eliminates Trump. Yeah... That is my litmus test right now. "Who here relatively recently formally registered to be a member of the Democrat Party as a liberal." Trump raises his hand. Not voting for *that* guy. My bar is really not that high... Trump is just really that bad. Yeah, I think who did and did not support De Blasio's "sanctuary city" and anti-gun platform is a good litmus test for conservatives right now. Trump fails it. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I think he's pushing that creepy, bible thumping, Canadian pussy again. Ignoring the fact that he'll never win the nomination, something about maintaining his ideological virginity. As of this point, I would take any Republican who did not support and fund the Clintons... That eliminates Trump. I would take any Republican who did not support and endorse De Blasio... That eliminates Trump. So much for ideological purity... Trump certainly is not ideologically pure. He is all over the map. And that is just from Monday to Tuesday in a given week... Yeah, as of this point, I would take any Republican who was not recently a formal card-carrying liberal Democrat... That eliminates Trump. Yeah... That is my litmus test right now. "Who here relatively recently formally registered to be a member of the Democrat Party as a liberal." Trump raises his hand. Not voting for *that* guy. My bar is really not that high... Trump is just really that bad. Yeah, I think who did and did not support De Blasio's "sanctuary city" and anti-gun platform is a good litmus test for conservatives right now. Trump fails it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 11:21:34 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Here is a news flash for you..New York is an anti gun state..and has been for many years..So because Trump says hey hope this new guy does good for us, and the guy doesn't it's all Trumps fault? So if Cruz gets elected, and doesn't on the first day in office eliminate every single gun control law in the land..you and everyone else on this forum are responsible right? you all are going to open your wallets and pay all of us that wanted someone else all your worldly goods to make up for the fact the guy you picked didn't do what you thought he would right? It's just as stupid as "he supports a AWB ban" ..He said that shit years ago during the AWB... duh what did most everybody say at the time? Most everyone figured that ban was going to be with us forever..we got lucky it went away...jesus, such a twisted fact to fit a stupid OPINION.......... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I see the Trump in office being the same Trump who supported De Blasio two years ago. The danger with Trump is that he was a registered Democrat not too long ago. He supported De Blasio not too long ago... Hmm, maybe you need to do some research............ Sure doesn't sound like it was more then a casual good luck to him.....straight from the horses mouth..... JOHN DICKERSON: The de Blasio quote I mentioned, was you said, 'I think pretty strongly that he'll end up being a good mayor, maybe a very good mayor.' DONALD TRUMP: Well I did say that, I wished he was a good mayor, he's turned out to be a terrible mayor. Video of it............ Wait... De Blasio put his cards on the table when Trump supported him, everyone knew he was a sanctuary-city Mayor. Everyone knew he was anti-gun. De Blasio ran on a racist platform. That was when Trump supported him. De Blasio didn't become anti-gun *after* he was elected. That is what he ran on. That was what Trump supported. Of course Trump is going to switch gears *now* to fit his *current* agenda... That does not bother you? Here is a news flash for you..New York is an anti gun state..and has been for many years..So because Trump says hey hope this new guy does good for us, and the guy doesn't it's all Trumps fault? So if Cruz gets elected, and doesn't on the first day in office eliminate every single gun control law in the land..you and everyone else on this forum are responsible right? you all are going to open your wallets and pay all of us that wanted someone else all your worldly goods to make up for the fact the guy you picked didn't do what you thought he would right? It's just as stupid as "he supports a AWB ban" ..He said that shit years ago during the AWB... duh what did most everybody say at the time? Most everyone figured that ban was going to be with us forever..we got lucky it went away...jesus, such a twisted fact to fit a stupid OPINION.......... So Trump couldn't spend 5 seconds on Wikipedia to check if the guy he was endorsing was a communist? Would that have even mattered to him a few years ago? Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 11:25:44 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Actually, us Cruz fans use something called "logic" and "reasoning". Given New Hampshire's past votes for moderate and establishment candidates, we knew what the result was going to be. We're waiting for South Carolina and the SEC Primary. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Any Cruzbot conspiracies yet? Actually, us Cruz fans use something called "logic" and "reasoning". Given New Hampshire's past votes for moderate and establishment candidates, we knew what the result was going to be. We're waiting for South Carolina and the SEC Primary. Never mind historically, whoever wins Iowa doesn't win New Hampshire. Let's see how New York values do in the south. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 11:26:57 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You have to remember that the D Super Delegates are all the elected D's in Congress and (I think) the D governors. They aren't completely suicidal and know that a Sanders presidency would be the end of their phoney baloney jobs. Socialism never works - and Sanders wants to go full retard with it. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
It was a SLAUGHTER. He's predicted to win Nevada and South Carolina next. What has me puzzled is how the fuck does Hillary have 392 delegate votes already!!?? Has she bribed that many super delegates already? You have to remember that the D Super Delegates are all the elected D's in Congress and (I think) the D governors. They aren't completely suicidal and know that a Sanders presidency would be the end of their phoney baloney jobs. Socialism never works - and Sanders wants to go full retard with it. Clinton has dominated among the super delegates of which, Bill Clinton is one of the 8 super delegates chosen from party celebrities. She's already got a huge delegate lead right out of the gate, 394 delegates to Sanders' 42......the huge majority of which are super delegates. http://www.google.com/search?q=who+are+the+democratic+superdelegates+2016&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&client=safari#eob=m.09c7w0/D/2/short/m.09c7w0/ |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 11:48:36 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Hugh is borderline psychotic. Ive never seen anyone here hate obama, hillary, or sanders as much. I dont care what Trump stands for anymore. I just want him to win to watch hugh get wrapped in a straight jacket. go ahead and click hugh lol 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 11:51:05 AM EDT
[#15]
How do you define BORDERLINE???
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 11:51:50 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So Trump couldn't spend 5 seconds on Wikipedia to check if the guy he was endorsing was a communist? Would that have even mattered to him a few years ago? Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I see the Trump in office being the same Trump who supported De Blasio two years ago. The danger with Trump is that he was a registered Democrat not too long ago. He supported De Blasio not too long ago... Hmm, maybe you need to do some research............ Sure doesn't sound like it was more then a casual good luck to him.....straight from the horses mouth..... JOHN DICKERSON: The de Blasio quote I mentioned, was you said, 'I think pretty strongly that he'll end up being a good mayor, maybe a very good mayor.' DONALD TRUMP: Well I did say that, I wished he was a good mayor, he's turned out to be a terrible mayor. Video of it............ Wait... De Blasio put his cards on the table when Trump supported him, everyone knew he was a sanctuary-city Mayor. Everyone knew he was anti-gun. De Blasio ran on a racist platform. That was when Trump supported him. De Blasio didn't become anti-gun *after* he was elected. That is what he ran on. That was what Trump supported. Of course Trump is going to switch gears *now* to fit his *current* agenda... That does not bother you? Here is a news flash for you..New York is an anti gun state..and has been for many years..So because Trump says hey hope this new guy does good for us, and the guy doesn't it's all Trumps fault? So if Cruz gets elected, and doesn't on the first day in office eliminate every single gun control law in the land..you and everyone else on this forum are responsible right? you all are going to open your wallets and pay all of us that wanted someone else all your worldly goods to make up for the fact the guy you picked didn't do what you thought he would right? It's just as stupid as "he supports a AWB ban" ..He said that shit years ago during the AWB... duh what did most everybody say at the time? Most everyone figured that ban was going to be with us forever..we got lucky it went away...jesus, such a twisted fact to fit a stupid OPINION.......... So Trump couldn't spend 5 seconds on Wikipedia to check if the guy he was endorsing was a communist? Would that have even mattered to him a few years ago? Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Haven't seen the link to the "endorsement". |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 11:53:00 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So Trump couldn't spend 5 seconds on Wikipedia to check if the guy he was endorsing was a communist? Would that have even mattered to him a few years ago? Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Maybe he did, I sure don't know.. maybe you should tweet him and ask.. Now just to prove a point...here is Cruz, doing more sneaky shit...this time to a Paul supporter... Ted Cruz announced on Sunday the endorsements of six state representatives who had previously supported Rand Paul. At least one representative was surprised to see his name. The representative, J.R. Hoell, had met with Mr. Cruz, senator from Texas, on Friday, he said. “I made it clear I could not support him,” Mr. Hoell said in a phone interview on Sunday evening, citing Mr. Cruz’s foreign policy positions. But Mr. Hoell added that he had given the campaign permission to publish narrow praise from him, relating to Mr. Cruz’s work on Second Amendment rights. Instead, a news release from the campaign and an article from the New Hampshire Union Leader identified Mr. Hoell as a full-fledged supporter. In fact, the release included quotations from only Mr. Cruz and Mr. Hoell. http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/02/07/ted-cruz-in-new-list-of-endorsements-includes-lawmaker-who-didnt-endorse-him/ |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 11:53:23 AM EDT
[#18]
Meh, just nonsense talking points they pick up from DU
The whole Cruz bunch do it with no shame, prattling on abt horseshit nonsense, continuously... They can't accept, as far as the nomination go, Cruz is finished -wrapped up... Their denial is amazing... |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 11:53:31 AM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
New Hampshire to me seems like an anomaly. Not because trump won, I was expecting that, but because of how well bush and kasich did. agree. I thought the same thing. Kasich? Bush? Really, New Hampshire? What happened to "live free or die". 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 11:56:11 AM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
agree. I thought the same thing. Kasich? Bush? Really, New Hampshire? What happened to "live free or die". Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
New Hampshire to me seems like an anomaly. Not because trump won, I was expecting that, but because of how well bush and kasich did. agree. I thought the same thing. Kasich? Bush? Really, New Hampshire? What happened to "live free or die". Wait until the vote in SC, NH is silly putty in comparison... |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 11:59:27 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Wait until the vote in SC, NH is silly putty in comparison... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
New Hampshire to me seems like an anomaly. Not because trump won, I was expecting that, but because of how well bush and kasich did. agree. I thought the same thing. Kasich? Bush? Really, New Hampshire? What happened to "live free or die". Wait until the vote in SC, NH is silly putty in comparison... By the 20th, this will have shifted a bit. Cruz will be off five or more, Trump up a couple. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 12:03:45 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So Trump couldn't spend 5 seconds on Wikipedia to check if the guy he was endorsing was a communist? Would that have even mattered to him a few years ago? Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile To build buildings in NYC, you have to endorse Sandinista Communists. It's just business. To build buildings, you have to make your golf course in California gun free. It's just business. To build buildings in NJ, you have to abuse eminent domain laws. It's just business. To build buildings in NY, you have to donate to Schumer, Reid, and Pelosi. It's just business. To build buildings, you have to think your pro-Partial Birth abortion sister would be a good SCOTUS justice. It's just business. To build buildings, you can't donate any money to fight the SAFE Act. It's just business. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 12:06:00 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This said- No one can beat Sanders... Because he has a License to PROMISE... Moar FREE SHIT Than any other candidate 
And get away with it! Look at his POPULARITY
Any candidate who does not have an answer does not deserve the position. Here's a morsel of reality: every candidate promises "free shit." Sometimes it's money, sometimes influence, sometimes a change in policy or direction. We're a BIG country with a third of a billion people, all with their own ideas and agendas and solutions. We can't even agree what the problems are, let alone the solutions. And in truth there are NO blanket solutions. If there were we wouldn't be talking about the issue--it would be solved. Sanders has identified what he feels are a set of critical issues and has proposed some solutions. Millions of Americans, people just like you and me, agree with him enough to lend him their support. Now I happen to disagree with his opinion on both problem and solution, but I am intelligent enough to understand that my opinion is not the final word, and that those who disagree with me are neither ignorant nor unamerican. And more, I understand that politics is the art of the possible. Every victory carries a cost. Nothing is accomplished without a series of DEALS. Sanders or Clinton will make their promises, our guy will counter and make his, the voters will evaluate the merits of the issues presented and the viability and cost of the solutions. They will decide which candidate best (if imperfectly) represents their interests, and that's how they will vote. That's reality. Everything else, this ironclad inflexible extremism, is the screeching hyperbolic echo inside a cognitive dissonance bubble. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 12:06:15 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
By the 20th, this will have shifted a bit. Cruz will be off five or more, Trump up a couple. http://s30.postimg.org/hqf364u81/image.png Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
New Hampshire to me seems like an anomaly. Not because trump won, I was expecting that, but because of how well bush and kasich did. agree. I thought the same thing. Kasich? Bush? Really, New Hampshire? What happened to "live free or die". Wait until the vote in SC, NH is silly putty in comparison... By the 20th, this will have shifted a bit. Cruz will be off five or more, Trump up a couple. http://s30.postimg.org/hqf364u81/image.png Oh sweet, I might have to take a vacation from this place for a few days then..I can't stand the twisted half truths and BS from some members..just seems so wrong to constantly try to force your opinions on others..I could care less who anyone votes for..If my guy is as good as I think he is , he will win the damn thing on his own... |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 12:12:02 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Oh sweet, I might have to take a vacation from this place for a few days then..I can't stand the twisted half truths and BS from some members..just seems so wrong to constantly try to force your opinions on others..I could care less who anyone votes for..If my guy is as good as I think he is , he will win the damn thing on his own... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
New Hampshire to me seems like an anomaly. Not because trump won, I was expecting that, but because of how well bush and kasich did. agree. I thought the same thing. Kasich? Bush? Really, New Hampshire? What happened to "live free or die". Wait until the vote in SC, NH is silly putty in comparison... By the 20th, this will have shifted a bit. Cruz will be off five or more, Trump up a couple. http://s30.postimg.org/hqf364u81/image.png Oh sweet, I might have to take a vacation from this place for a few days then..I can't stand the twisted half truths and BS from some members..just seems so wrong to constantly try to force your opinions on others..I could care less who anyone votes for..If my guy is as good as I think he is , he will win the damn thing on his own... ....and the anger, and the hatred, and the pure bile, and the relentless hectoring directed at those they're unable to shove around on the Internet. However; I'm hanging around for the whining and the butthurt. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 12:12:34 PM EDT
[#26]
Don't worry...
SC will be a friggin BLOODBATH The GlenBeckettes will be going nutz when Cruz drops out!!! |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 12:15:02 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Any candidate who does not have an answer does not deserve the position. Here's a morsel of reality: every candidate promises "free shit." Sometimes it's money, sometimes influence, sometimes a change in policy or direction. We're a BIG country with a third of a billion people, all with their own ideas and agendas and solutions. We can't even agree what the problems are, let alone the solutions. And in truth there are NO blanket solutions. If there were we wouldn't be talking about the issue--it would be solved. Sanders has identified what he feels are a set of critical issues and has proposed some solutions. Millions of Americans, people just like you and me, agree with him enough to lend him their support. Now I happen to disagree with his opinion on both problem and solution, but I am intelligent enough to understand that my opinion is not the final word, and that those who disagree with me are neither ignorant nor unamerican. And more, I understand that politics is the art of the possible. Every victory carries a cost. Nothing is accomplished without a series of DEALS. Sanders or Clinton will make their promises, our guy will counter and make his, the voters will evaluate the merits of the issues presented and the viability and cost of the solutions. They will decide which candidate best (if imperfectly) represents their interests, and that's how they will vote. That's reality. Everything else, this ironclad inflexible extremism, is the screeching hyperbolic echo inside a cognitive dissonance bubble. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
This said- No one can beat Sanders... Because he has a License to PROMISE... Moar FREE SHIT Than any other candidate
And get away with it! Look at his POPULARITY
Any candidate who does not have an answer does not deserve the position. Here's a morsel of reality: every candidate promises "free shit." Sometimes it's money, sometimes influence, sometimes a change in policy or direction. We're a BIG country with a third of a billion people, all with their own ideas and agendas and solutions. We can't even agree what the problems are, let alone the solutions. And in truth there are NO blanket solutions. If there were we wouldn't be talking about the issue--it would be solved. Sanders has identified what he feels are a set of critical issues and has proposed some solutions. Millions of Americans, people just like you and me, agree with him enough to lend him their support. Now I happen to disagree with his opinion on both problem and solution, but I am intelligent enough to understand that my opinion is not the final word, and that those who disagree with me are neither ignorant nor unamerican. And more, I understand that politics is the art of the possible. Every victory carries a cost. Nothing is accomplished without a series of DEALS. Sanders or Clinton will make their promises, our guy will counter and make his, the voters will evaluate the merits of the issues presented and the viability and cost of the solutions. They will decide which candidate best (if imperfectly) represents their interests, and that's how they will vote. That's reality. Everything else, this ironclad inflexible extremism, is the screeching hyperbolic echo inside a cognitive dissonance bubble. Keep dreaming... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 12:23:15 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Haven't seen the link to the "endorsement". Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:[/b]
So Trump couldn't spend 5 seconds on Wikipedia to check if the guy he was endorsing was a communist? Would that have even mattered to him a few years ago? [span style='font-style: italic;']Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Haven't seen the link to the "endorsement". I don't know why I'm bothering since you"ll just continue to ignore it or rationalize it away. This stuff isn't hard to find. http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/donald-trump-bill-de-blasio-new-york-city-099177 Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 12:24:11 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Pretty much this. Never mind historically, whoever wins Iowa doesn't win New Hampshire. Let's see how New York values do in the south. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Any Cruzbot conspiracies yet? Actually, us Cruz fans use something called "logic" and "reasoning". Given New Hampshire's past votes for moderate and establishment candidates, we knew what the result was going to be. We're waiting for South Carolina and the SEC Primary. Never mind historically, whoever wins Iowa doesn't win New Hampshire. Let's see how New York values do in the south. Yeah, because "condescending Canadian" plays so much better. I hate to be the voice of reality, but your boy needed a runoff to win in his home state. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 12:31:45 PM EDT
[#30]
Trump is in the lead in SC.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 12:32:25 PM EDT
[#31]
I love waking up to butthurt in the morning
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 12:33:33 PM EDT
[#32]
Fox News after Trump wins
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 12:34:50 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryThanks for posting up those sad GOP faces. LOL |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 12:35:21 PM EDT
[#34]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 12:41:55 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: This has nothing to do with what I want or don't want. Simply stated, Cruz will lose. That's my one and only prediction this cycle. You're looking, tonight, at his ceiling. He may get Paul's two or three percent, if he and his supporters haven't already poisoned that well. But that's it. His message is OK, his delivery is suicidal. Cruz is my first choice and I agree somewhat with your statement. This isn't his ceiling though. He will do ok in the southern states, but won't get enough support to win the nomination. He'll stay in the race long enough to win in Texas and use his support to win concessions from the actual winner. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 12:43:37 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
How do you define BORDERLINE??? Not quite ready for the Funny Farm is how most people understand it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 12:44:42 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The sad thing is the Commie has got twice the votes as Trump. Sanders 30,852 Trump 16,750 17% reporting. This sure ain't my America. 
Remember, also, that undeclared voters can vote on either party's ticket. I'd guess a lot of independents voted Democrat just so they could vote AGAINST Hilary. Operation Chaos in action. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 12:53:17 PM EDT
[#38]
 |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 1:06:35 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote History"Will people be surprised at the rate that you pay?" "I think you'll be surprised at how little I pay. I fight like hell not to pay taxes. I hate the way the government spends my money" His honesty is a breath of fresh air compared to the usual mealymouthed politician BS |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 1:41:13 PM EDT
[#40]
Has targettarget, Cinncinnatus, rapracing been in to show us their feelz yet?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 1:55:32 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Wait until the vote in SC, NH is silly putty in comparison... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
New Hampshire to me seems like an anomaly. Not because trump won, I was expecting that, but because of how well bush and kasich did. agree. I thought the same thing. Kasich? Bush? Really, New Hampshire? What happened to "live free or die". Wait until the vote in SC, NH is silly putty in comparison... I fully believe that SC will show us who is going to be the Republican nominee. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 2:14:12 PM EDT
[#42]
I heard Kasich won, are you guys sure?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 3:44:09 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Tcrpe: I knew that about the republicans just never followed democrat rules much because I NEVER vote for those fucking commie assholes. Needless to say, I DO NOT like that super delegate shit. ETA: Oh, I haven't seen any numbers where GOP super delegates have pledged their vote yet, maybe they don't allow that?? I believe some of those GOP super delegates are required by state law to vote for the state winning candidate on the first convention vote. Not all states but some. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 4:10:42 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I believe some of those GOP super delegates are required by state law to vote for the state winning candidate on the first convention vote. Not all states but some. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Tcrpe: I knew that about the republicans just never followed democrat rules much because I NEVER vote for those fucking commie assholes. Needless to say, I DO NOT like that super delegate shit. ETA: Oh, I haven't seen any numbers where GOP super delegates have pledged their vote yet, maybe they don't allow that?? I believe some of those GOP super delegates are required by state law to vote for the state winning candidate on the first convention vote. Not all states but some. Out of a total of 712 super delegates....so far the count is already; 359 Clinton 8 Sanders https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Democratic_Party_superdelegates,_2016 |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 5:11:13 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Has targettarget, Cinncinnatus, rapracing been in to show us their feelz yet? Last I heard they were HOLDING NADS... Virtually... With Glen Beck... Wiping each others' tears away... And collecting GlenBeckette TALKING POINTS To annoy ARMCOM with 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 5:27:17 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Out of a total of 712 super delegates....so far the count is already; 359 Clinton 8 Sanders https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Democratic_Party_superdelegates,_2016 Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Tcrpe: I knew that about the republicans just never followed democrat rules much because I NEVER vote for those fucking commie assholes. Needless to say, I DO NOT like that super delegate shit. ETA: Oh, I haven't seen any numbers where GOP super delegates have pledged their vote yet, maybe they don't allow that?? I believe some of those GOP super delegates are required by state law to vote for the state winning candidate on the first convention vote. Not all states but some. Out of a total of 712 super delegates....so far the count is already; 359 Clinton 8 Sanders https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Democratic_Party_superdelegates,_2016 Those are democrats, my response concerned GOP super delegates, not democrats |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 5:38:39 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Do you understand how elections work? You have to win the primaries to win the nomination. If you don't win the majority of delegates you don't get a chance to be the party nominee. How do you expect Cruz to win the nomination and become the nominee to run in the General election if he isn't able to win the blue states which also have some of the highest delegate counts? Red states are often those with smaller populations which works out to lower delegate counts. Sure, Texas has a large delegate count but it also has proportional division of delegates. Most early states like those on Super Tuesday are proportional states. Many proportional states also will have a vote threshold that you must meet to get any delegates. 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% vote threshold must be met in different states to get any delegates. If New Hampshire was a 20% threshold state Trump would get all the delegates. It's not, but some states coming up have threshold percentages which will result in the winner get 2 delegates for each voting region, the 2nd place person getting 1 delegate in each voting region they meet the threshold in and anyone not meeting the threshold will get no delegates. If one candidate only meets the threshold percentage and no one else does that candidate will get all delegates. If a candidate can not win blue states in the primary or place high enough to accumulate delegates they will not ever gain enough delegates to win the primary. Whether you like it or not, a hard core conservative who can not win the republican primary in blue states will never become the nominee. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
All of those for the exception of FL are solidly blue (dem) states. Assuming you're only talking primaries here, yeah Trump has a better shot than Cruz. Why? C'mon, you're not stupid.....think it through. In the general a canidate Trump will be behind and at a disadvantage at every one of those states (except FL,) against Hillary. Traditional election trends still apply in the general and I see none of those states for expect maybe PA going red regardless the nominee. Take your GD blinders off dude..... Do you understand how elections work? You have to win the primaries to win the nomination. If you don't win the majority of delegates you don't get a chance to be the party nominee. How do you expect Cruz to win the nomination and become the nominee to run in the General election if he isn't able to win the blue states which also have some of the highest delegate counts? Red states are often those with smaller populations which works out to lower delegate counts. Sure, Texas has a large delegate count but it also has proportional division of delegates. Most early states like those on Super Tuesday are proportional states. Many proportional states also will have a vote threshold that you must meet to get any delegates. 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% vote threshold must be met in different states to get any delegates. If New Hampshire was a 20% threshold state Trump would get all the delegates. It's not, but some states coming up have threshold percentages which will result in the winner get 2 delegates for each voting region, the 2nd place person getting 1 delegate in each voting region they meet the threshold in and anyone not meeting the threshold will get no delegates. If one candidate only meets the threshold percentage and no one else does that candidate will get all delegates. If a candidate can not win blue states in the primary or place high enough to accumulate delegates they will not ever gain enough delegates to win the primary. Whether you like it or not, a hard core conservative who can not win the republican primary in blue states will never become the nominee. I absolutely know how elections work, I also know how primaries work. If you're intent is to nominate the most electable over Hillary that's Marco Rubio, the national polls reflect this.As for your point about Blue State delegates; go back and re-read that load of shit you typed? So you want a nominee that won in a liberal blue state that will get destroyed in the same state. Hillary will destroy Trump in all those states except FL and *maybe* PA. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 5:55:54 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I absolutely know how elections work, I also know how primaries work. If you're intent is to nominate the most electable over Hillary that's Marco Rubio, the national polls reflect this.As for your point about Blue State delegates; go back and re-read that load of shit you typed? So you want a nominee that won in a liberal blue state that will get destroyed in the same state. Hillary will destroy Trump in all those states except FL and *maybe* PA. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
All of those for the exception of FL are solidly blue (dem) states. Assuming you're only talking primaries here, yeah Trump has a better shot than Cruz. Why? C'mon, you're not stupid.....think it through. In the general a canidate Trump will be behind and at a disadvantage at every one of those states (except FL,) against Hillary. Traditional election trends still apply in the general and I see none of those states for expect maybe PA going red regardless the nominee. Take your GD blinders off dude..... Do you understand how elections work? You have to win the primaries to win the nomination. If you don't win the majority of delegates you don't get a chance to be the party nominee. How do you expect Cruz to win the nomination and become the nominee to run in the General election if he isn't able to win the blue states which also have some of the highest delegate counts? Red states are often those with smaller populations which works out to lower delegate counts. Sure, Texas has a large delegate count but it also has proportional division of delegates. Most early states like those on Super Tuesday are proportional states. Many proportional states also will have a vote threshold that you must meet to get any delegates. 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% vote threshold must be met in different states to get any delegates. If New Hampshire was a 20% threshold state Trump would get all the delegates. It's not, but some states coming up have threshold percentages which will result in the winner get 2 delegates for each voting region, the 2nd place person getting 1 delegate in each voting region they meet the threshold in and anyone not meeting the threshold will get no delegates. If one candidate only meets the threshold percentage and no one else does that candidate will get all delegates. If a candidate can not win blue states in the primary or place high enough to accumulate delegates they will not ever gain enough delegates to win the primary. Whether you like it or not, a hard core conservative who can not win the republican primary in blue states will never become the nominee. I absolutely know how elections work, I also know how primaries work. If you're intent is to nominate the most electable over Hillary that's Marco Rubio, the national polls reflect this.As for your point about Blue State delegates; go back and re-read that load of shit you typed? So you want a nominee that won in a liberal blue state that will get destroyed in the same state. Hillary will destroy Trump in all those states except FL and *maybe* PA. Hot Damn, There are going to be alot of surprised sumbitches 11/08 Edited to say fuck marco rubio |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 7:13:02 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Last I heard they were HOLDING NADS... Virtually... With Glen Beck... Wiping each others' tears away... And collecting GlenBeckette TALKING POINTS To annoy ARMCOM with
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Has targettarget, Cinncinnatus, rapracing been in to show us their feelz yet? Last I heard they were HOLDING NADS... Virtually... With Glen Beck... Wiping each others' tears away... And collecting GlenBeckette TALKING POINTS To annoy ARMCOM with
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/10/2016 7:16:12 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Tcrpe: I knew that about the republicans just never followed democrat rules much because I NEVER vote for those fucking commie assholes. Needless to say, I DO NOT like that super delegate shit. ETA: Oh, I haven't seen any numbers where GOP super delegates have pledged their vote yet, maybe they don't allow that?? I believe they are bound for the first ballot, then all bets are off. That is, if no candidate receives a majority of delegate votes on the first ballot, the superdelegates may sell their votes however they wish. That would be a brokered convention. Correct me if I'm wrong boys, it won't be the first time.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
