User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 2:15:02 PM EDT
[#1]
Either we're free, or not.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 2:16:37 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No. You missed my point. Om NO way was I even remotely placing CP with any illicit drug. I'd invite a cocaine trafficker to dinner before I'd ever gave the time a day to a perv in to kids. At least there is a level of honor amongst dealers and traffickers. But CP is the best example to show, even though the mere possession of CP is illegal and a person will not get a break if caught, they still go after it. And other traffic it. And more so now because it's far more and easily available. Here in the US no one questions prohibiting that item. But the similarity between the two is at some point someone is victimize due to it's existence. And CP pervs will say they didn't victimize anyone on CP stuff and they need help. Hence they should receive treatment, JUST LIKE IT WAS A DRUG to which the are addicted. And if you don't think there is a victim at some level with drug addiction, you need some education. Drugs destroy lives and families. The reality is the US doesn't have a drug problem. It has a self-control and arrogance problem. And for FYI, in some of these countries which will put to death a drug trafficker, are silently ok with child porn or even child prostitution. Funny how that plays out. You have conflated drug use and drug addiction. You have conflated drug addiction in a society in which drugs are illegal and relatively difficult to obtain with addiction in a society in which drugs are legal and readily obtainable. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 2:18:19 PM EDT
[#3]
Hell yeah. My friends tell me its a lot of fun used in moderation on special occasions.
Powder cocaine isn't all that dangerous or addictive. Freebasing is another story. I'll patiently wait in this thread for someone to prove to me that powered cocaine is more dangerous that Valium, Xanax, Riddilin, and Adderal. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 2:19:23 PM EDT
[#4]
I think so
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 2:19:29 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You are 100% correct. The war on drugs IS a joke and a scam....... "we" are being played while the connected get rich... no doubt. Funny, most want to talk about the fake "war on drugs" but many fail to mention the utter havoc and chaos drug use causes on society and families. It isn't just about the money spent on the fake war on drugs...... it is also about the destruction of the family, the abused children, the BILLIONS in medical costs/care, insurance rates, health care rates, etc. etc. Yeah, legalize that shit. If you believe legalization would not open up an entirely different set of problems and/or greatly increase the problems we already have I think you have not thought the problem through very well. I've seen several families utterly destroyed by drug addicted members...... legalize it, make it readily available, take the stigma away, condone it, etc. and see what happens. Yeah, you can stop the war on drugs and then get to enjoy living in a society that WILL see drug use skyrocket and all the problems associated with it greatly multiply. All of those evil things happen now. Plus incarceration. Plus dynamic entries and no-knocks. Plus the Carroll Doctrine. Plus the rise of federal power and of the police state. It may be true that legalization would mean addiction and ruined families. The current regime means the same thing, plus a whole lot more. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 2:24:02 PM EDT
[#6]
I would whole heartedly support legalization of cocaine as long as I could get a dealer's license. And the .gov would do the dirty work of rooting out unlicensed dealers. I'm a man of simple needs so I'm thinking I wouldn't need an exclusive sales territory much larger than 500K population or so. Legalization would be great under that scenario. At least it would be for me. I'd be willing to give unlimited free samples to all my state legislators so they could monitor my quality control. Think about it boys, free cocaine for life or at least as long as you stay in office.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 2:27:37 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I want to know how much money it saved the taxpayers by not putting druggies in jail. I want to know how many less people got their doors kicked in. I want to know about the violent crime rates. The rest is just fluff that has no real bearing on a society that values personal responsibility. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 2:34:48 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I want to know how much money it saved the taxpayers by not putting druggies in jail. I want to know how many less people got their doors kicked in. I want to know about the violent crime rates. The rest is just fluff that has no real bearing on a society that values personal responsibility. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I want to know how much money it saved the taxpayers by not putting druggies in jail. I want to know how many less people got their doors kicked in. I want to know about the violent crime rates. The rest is just fluff that has no real bearing on a society that values personal responsibility. The answer to your questions is more times than not It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.-Upton Sinclair |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 2:42:10 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The answer to your questions is more times than not Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: I want to know how much money it saved the taxpayers by not putting druggies in jail. I want to know how many less people got their doors kicked in. I want to know about the violent crime rates. The rest is just fluff that has no real bearing on a society that values personal responsibility. The answer to your questions is more times than not It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.-Upton Sinclair 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 2:43:21 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You and Exxtoris know the deal. Difficult, but not impossible. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 2:44:07 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
A friend of mine from Bolivia managed to bring back to the States a box of tea, the tea looks just like 'Lipton's" tea bag with a string and paper tag. The tag reads COCA and has a drawing of the coca leaf. This is quite legal THERE and the Customs Cop (in Bolivia) did not think twice about letting it through customs. It's THEIR tea used at high altitudes to open the lungs. I would be open for the tea, not the man made drug. I keep the bags as conversation items. The tea has a "green" taste, bitter  . It does seem to open the lungs and help with breathing deeply.It's also good for the stomach. I may, or may not, have a box of it in a cupboard. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 3:10:50 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't have an issue with Marijuana. Liqour etc and they just pretty much kill ambition.....but abuse of coke and smack kills. Kills the mind, the body, the spirit and much of the family that has to deal with these type of junkies. and I'll ask again to all the "libertarian" pro drug folks.. we have and will always have a form of welfare state as part of a Representative Republican government. we take care of those who cant help themselves as both a free society and a moral society. BUT the current level of abuse of this system is rampant...with little optimism of change...so how. once legalizing drugs that do debilitate. do you not support the addiction and eventual death of what is now a useless member of society.? Remember, prohibition of drugs and alcohol was initiated by the Progressive movement over 100 years ago. Support of prohibition by "Conservatives" is nothing more than conserving the socialist progress of the "Progressive" movement I'm sorry people destroy their lives and the lives of others with their usage of drugs and alcohol. I'm also sorry that people are killed by vehicle crashes, mechanical failures, swimming pools, insufficient/defective safety devices, falls, over eating, and firearms. However I don't believe it is the governments responsibility to keep the stupid from removing themselves from the gene pool. The facts of the WoD do not support your claims. Drugs are now cheaper and more plentiful than ever before. As a percentage of the population, the amount of drug users in American society has remained stable for over 100 years. Answer the following question and you might be able to see the WoD for what it really is. The government is unable to keep drugs out of PRISON, the MOST restrictive society known to mankind. How do you propose the exact same government will be able to keep drugs out of a FREE society??? I've got another question for anyone who cares to answer. What would you prefer? Having your door kicked in at 3am by a group of druggies shouting "Police!" and looking for a fix, OR having your door kicked in at 3am by a group of cops shouting "Police" and looking for drugs? Which one of the two previous scenarios is 100% preventable? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 3:44:33 PM EDT
[#13]
Funny how people want to blame the drug instead of the person. Most people do coke and the worst thing that happens is they won't shut up. Then you get some scumbag with no morals to begin with and as soon as they start doing coke its the drug at fault.
Those junkies everyone is worried about aren't that way because of drugs, the drugs are a symptom, not the cause. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:43:55 PM EDT
[#14]
there is no talking sense on this board anymore. go a head, fry your fucking brain, no loss anyways. I'll sit back and laugh at you suffer from mental and nervous breakdowns. Shit I'll even buy it for everybody, just for the entertainment of watching the meltdown. This place is like Caligula's Rome, self destruction in the name of freedom.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:45:06 PM EDT
[#15]
Cocaine is already "legal"
It's a Class II drug per the DEA. We have it in stock in the hospital pharmacy |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:56:22 PM EDT
[#16]
Sure. No one has ever been hurt under the influence of cocaine. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:57:56 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yes. The War on Drugs Citizens isn't worth the squeeze. It doesn't work. No one who wants to snort coke, isn't just because it is illegal. What does that tell you? Sam e with imagination. Stop wasting time "securing" boarders and just treat them like anyone else. If they work and pay taxes, let them stay and vote. If they commit a crime, send them to jail. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 4:58:50 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Cocaine is nearly 600% cheaper now than it was in 1981. Prohibition isn't working. Lol |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:00:33 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I would so fuck a hooker on a large pepperoni pizza while high on cocaine. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Yes. Hookers and blow should be as readily available as delivery pizza. clearly you know how to party  I would so fuck a hooker on a large pepperoni pizza while high on cocaine. Sigline material right there... just as soon as I get around to re-upping my team membership. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:02:18 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You know like EVERYONE is on prescription drugs right? My one ex took speed in the morning, antidepressants mid morning, booster after lunch, Xanax in the afternoon and a sleep aid at night. All government funded and approved. Paid for by tax monies. But some roofer who wants to drop a hundred bucks on a ball on Friday is the problem. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Yes legalize it and all drugs. We don't have enough addicted , numb, high/stoned, people amongst us. It's no one's business what someone else does..... until they kill you or a loved one in an accident or while committing a robbery to support their habit. We should have the government supply the drugs, that way we can cut down on the associated negative behavior the drug addicted embrace. We should also stop any law suit that may arise when a drug addicted doctor, nurse, etc. fucks up and kills someone. We don't have enough addicted, abused, hungry, forgotten children out there. Yes, we should remove ALL stigma of drug abuse..... all drugs should be legalized and in effect have the government and society condone and encourage their use. AND, in a perfect world, we could all stop working and remain high and in a state of bliss. We could reach the utopia so many of us want...... we could become a country where no one works and money falls from the sky....... those of us that do work wouldn't mind our health care premiums going up by a factor of 10 to pay for the health problems so many of the drug addicted experience. Yes, lets legalize it and take away any and all stigma of drug use...... let's promote the use of drugs and condone it. All the problems that would arise can be easily dealt with. My one ex took speed in the morning, antidepressants mid morning, booster after lunch, Xanax in the afternoon and a sleep aid at night. All government funded and approved. Paid for by tax monies. But some roofer who wants to drop a hundred bucks on a ball on Friday is the problem. Why is she your ex? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:05:04 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No. Druggies are one of the scourges of society. Someone who needs drugs like that is better served by walking off a cliff with waiting carnivores at the bottom. And exactly what does that have to do with the question? The druggy is still getting his coke, only we're having to pay fror drug task forces, pay to build prison, to feed and cloth the ones that are caught etc. yet Cocaine is cheaper and easier to get than ever. Fuck that.... the war on drugs isn't stopping shit, it's just getting too damn costly. with no benefit to the taxpayer. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:06:07 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Sam e with imagination. Stop wasting time "securing" boarders and just treat them like anyone else. If they work and pay taxes, let them stay and vote. If they commit a crime, send them to jail. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Yes. The War on Drugs Citizens isn't worth the squeeze. It doesn't work. No one who wants to snort coke, isn't just because it is illegal. What does that tell you? Sam e with imagination. Stop wasting time "securing" boarders and just treat them like anyone else. If they work and pay taxes, let them stay and vote. If they commit a crime, send them to jail. We can declare war on illegal immigrants. i'm fine with that. I believe there will be a tangible benefit for the tax dollars spent. If we have no difference in illegal immigration and less civil liberties in 50 years of that war, I will reconsider my position. Show me or anyone else for that matter how after 50 years of a "war on drugs" that there has been a benefit? There has been a hell of a lot of costs involved. What is the benefit? Less drug users? Less drugs? Less people in jail for drug charges? Any of those thing happen? Tell me how we win a war on drugs if we can't keep prison drug free? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:22:57 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Legalize all drugs. Prohibition is stupid. This is one of the issues I changed my mind over time. I used to fervently support the drug war but now I realize just how foolish it is. Of course, it's hard to win on a "legalize everything" platform in the GOP. This. Prohibition of alcohol didn't work and gave rise to the mafia. Prohibition of drugs doesn't work and gave rise to the street gangs and cartels. Time to say it doesn't work. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:31:05 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Sure. No one has ever been hurt under the influence of cocaine. You are thinking of alcohol. No one is ever hurt from anyone under the influence of alcohol.That's why alcohol is legal and the other drugs aren't. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:32:10 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
there is no talking sense on this board anymore. go a head, fry your fucking brain, no loss anyways. I'll sit back and laugh at you suffer from mental and nervous breakdowns. Shit I'll even buy it for everybody, just for the entertainment of watching the meltdown. This place is like Caligula's Rome, self destruction in the name of freedom. We will all drink to that! A case of beer and a bottle of whiskey for everyone! |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:34:44 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Oh wait, that's a fantastic point. Please let me know when food or overeating is listed as the cause of car or industrial accidents. Let me know when food or overeating or obesity is listed as the reason someone sold there child to a pervert, or mistreated and abused them, etc. Hey wait! Lets point out other bad behavior to justify another..... that always works. Let's just throw another log on the fire, sit back and watch all the fun. I think the point is, it's a slippery slope. By all means, enforce laws where one individual actually violates, or threatens to violate another individuals natural rights. But don't micromanage individuals. If a person violates another's natural rights it doesn't matter if they were stone cold sober, drunk, or high. It just doesn't matter. Because what happens when you try to enforce these kinds of prohibitions you'll turn a lot of people who wouldn't violate other's natural rights into criminals. Not everyone who get's drunk, beats their wife, loses their job, or drives drunk. Not everyone who uses other intoxicants commits crimes. It's really not a question of whether or not cocaine, or any other intoxicant should be legal, it's a question of whether or not government should be involved in these progressive prohibitions at all. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:36:49 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I want to know how much money it saved the taxpayers by not putting druggies in jail. I want to know how many less people got their doors kicked in. I want to know about the violent crime rates. The rest is just fluff that has no real bearing on a society that values personal responsibility. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted: I want to know how much money it saved the taxpayers by not putting druggies in jail. I want to know how many less people got their doors kicked in. I want to know about the violent crime rates. The rest is just fluff that has no real bearing on a society that values personal responsibility. IIRC, the Rand Corp said it was something like $20 saved in other related social costs for every dollar spent on treatment, and an additional $7 in related social costs for every dollar spent on enforcement. So a better approach would save about $27 for every dollar spent. Also, from what I understand, there wasn't any real drug crime prior to the laws against it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:37:48 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I would whole heartedly support legalization of cocaine as long as I could get a dealer's license. And the .gov would do the dirty work of rooting out unlicensed dealers. I'm a man of simple needs so I'm thinking I wouldn't need an exclusive sales territory much larger than 500K population or so. Legalization would be great under that scenario. At least it would be for me. I'd be willing to give unlimited free samples to all my state legislators so they could monitor my quality control. Think about it boys, free cocaine for life or at least as long as you stay in office. If it was legal, it wouldn't be any different than offering them free cigarettes for life. So what? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:39:10 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I`d like to see our gov. and industry partner up to produce the purest highest quality heroin, cocaine and other drugs of choice and GIVE IT AWAY FREE to those that want it. It would be given away in "special" centers where the user agreed to check in and NEVER leave. No more cartel billionaires because of the profit being removed from the drug trade. No more burglaries, armed robberies,theft etc. because the people in the centers would be there for life. I`m talking unlimited free supply to the druggies. Of course many would die from overdose but I`m good with that. They are going to die anyway,,,better that they die without harming the rest of us. I did some easy math and decided that the "war" on drugs costs appx. thirty times what this new program would cost. Actually, there are places that have done that. No disaster happened. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:40:03 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Anyone answering YES to the poll just needs to talk with any ER doc about the effects of coke. Damn straight! That shit is almost as bad as alcohol! |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:54:15 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
there is no talking sense on this board anymore. go a head, fry your fucking brain, no loss anyways. I'll sit back and laugh at you suffer from mental and nervous breakdowns. You tell those dopers!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 5:56:23 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You tell those dopers! Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
there is no talking sense on this board anymore. go a head, fry your fucking brain, no loss anyways. I'll sit back and laugh at you suffer from mental and nervous breakdowns. You tell those dopers! I have it on good authority that everyone on this board is planning to get blasted on coke as soon as the law changes. Except me and CB1, of course. We are better than the rest of you. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:11:53 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Sure. No one has ever been hurt under the influence of cocaine. Yup. Making it illegal stopped that from happening. America was a living hell in 1913 before we banned it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:23:53 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't have an issue with Marijuana. Liqour etc and they just pretty much kill ambition.....but abuse of coke and smack kills. Kills the mind, the body, the spirit and much of the family that has to deal with these type of junkies. and I'll ask again to all the "libertarian" pro drug folks.. we have and will always have a form of welfare state as part of a Representative Republican government. we take care of those who cant help themselves as both a free society and a moral society. BUT the current level of abuse of this system is rampant...with little optimism of change...so how. once legalizing drugs that do debilitate. do you not support the addiction and eventual death of what is now a useless member of society.? Yes, I absolutely support having the government let people sink if they can't swim. That applies to drug users and non-drug users alike. And I'm not "pro-drug." I'm against making the government so big and powerful people can use it to tell other people what they can and cannot do with their own life. The argument that the government should be able to interfere in individual life choices because of how those choices might affect society as a whole is a huge, sweeping grant of power to the government to dictate how you live. Once granted, that exact same argument can be used to justify government intrusion into all kinds of private decisions. From who you marry, to what you eat (and how much), to what you drink, ingest, smoke, or even how you recreate or what kind of car you drive. Let's take that grant of power to a ridiculous extreme. Let's pretend its 20 years in the future and scientists have gotten REALLY good at identifying genes that cause horrible diseases or disability. Should the government have the power to forbid you from procreating if it decides it's in society's best interest that you don't, based on the chances that you might inadvertently perpetuate one of those bad genes? Honestly, that's not even that ridiculous of a hypothetical. The same Progressives who first clamored for laws against drugs like cocaine and marijuana also supported eugenics laws, for the same reason. They knew what was best for society. They knew what was best for individuals. So they did their best to codify their rules for your life into law. For your own good and with the best of intentions, no less. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:30:10 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
We could have some really awesome energy drinks if it were legal. Except you couldn't taste them and you'd spill them all over your shirt. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:47:03 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yes, I absolutely support having the government let people sink if they can't swim. That applies to drug users and non-drug users alike. And I'm not "pro-drug." I'm against making the government so big and powerful people can use it to tell other people what they can and cannot do with their own life. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I don't have an issue with Marijuana. Liqour etc and they just pretty much kill ambition.....but abuse of coke and smack kills. Kills the mind, the body, the spirit and much of the family that has to deal with these type of junkies. and I'll ask again to all the "libertarian" pro drug folks.. we have and will always have a form of welfare state as part of a Representative Republican government. we take care of those who cant help themselves as both a free society and a moral society. BUT the current level of abuse of this system is rampant...with little optimism of change...so how. once legalizing drugs that do debilitate. do you not support the addiction and eventual death of what is now a useless member of society.? Yes, I absolutely support having the government let people sink if they can't swim. That applies to drug users and non-drug users alike. And I'm not "pro-drug." I'm against making the government so big and powerful people can use it to tell other people what they can and cannot do with their own life. If you are against arresting homosexuals then you are obviously a homosexual. If you are against arresting people for snorting a little blow in their home then -- obviously -- you are a cocaine addict. And so forth. So fess up you faggot crackhead! GD knows the truth. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 6:52:35 PM EDT
[#37]
It's not just drugs, until we are willing as a .gov controlled society to let people fall
to the wayside because of their decisions and actions and let the citizenship decide who they want to help through their own compassion and effort we will never be free again. We used to do that. People in the past times in this country had cocaine problems in this country and if you were an addict and couldn't take care of yourself most people didn't care. Having the .gov taking money from you at the point of a gun would have been seen as ridiculous. Not being barbarians and the caring people that the American people were and are, the church groups and others took it apon themselves to help the "unfortunates". Each community knew who they were dealing with because this person lived amongst them and the community could make a personal judgment on their character and motives. What we have now is the fed .gov telling that community from 2000+ miles away what to think about your next door neighbor and their behavior and motivation in your community and how they should take your money to take care of them. You have to love man made utopia and it's failure. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 7:12:52 PM EDT
[#38]
my mother was on coke so fuck no
heroin and cocaine are just awful evil stuff, shit should just be eradicated off the face of the earth 
and 66% really ugh screw you guys 
and i dont care about this drug war is a failure excuse, its the way we are fighting it that is going no ware, if it was me i would have napalm boomed the fields in Colombia, mexico, or anywhere else, i dont give a danm about there sovereignty, stop sending this shit in!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 7:14:27 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
my mother was on coke so fuck no Apparently the law wasn't much of a barrier. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 7:15:23 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
my mother was on coke so fuck no heroin and cocaine are just awful evil stuff, shit should just be eradicated off the face of the earth
and 66% really ugh screw you guys
and i dont care about this drug war is a failure excuse, its the way we are fighting it that is going no ware, if it was me i would have napalm boomed the fields in Colombia, mexico, or anywhere else, i dont give a danm about there sovereignty, stop sending this shit in! Sorry to hear that. So prohibition made your situation better, you are saying? Just FYI, they did "bomb" the fields in Colombia, just not with napalm. Cocaine production increased. Is that the result you wanted? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 7:16:14 PM EDT
[#41]
Don't criminalize things. Criminalize behavior.
I also don't think drunk driving should be illegal. It's already illegal to cause accidents, run red lights, speed, etc. Just punish that behavior. Why does a DWI cost $18,000? Stupid. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 7:16:46 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yes, stop wasting money on the war on drugs, if people want to kill themselves thats their problem. I agree as long as they are not driving high on coke. Who cares what they do in their homes. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 7:19:05 PM EDT
[#43]
Yes.
You wann'a sit at home and blow your brains out on some stupid shit? THAT'S on you. Go out and hurt someone WHILE blowing your brains out? We can fix that  |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 7:41:58 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
my mother was on coke so fuck no heroin and cocaine are just awful evil stuff, shit should just be eradicated off the face of the earth
and 66% really ugh screw you guys
and i dont care about this drug war is a failure excuse, its the way we are fighting it that is going no ware, if it was me i would have napalm boomed the fields in Colombia, mexico, or anywhere else, i dont give a danm about there sovereignty, stop sending this shit in! I don't know how to put this gently, your mother may have used cocaine but the drug didn't make her who she was. That's one of the biggest problems we have today. It's a symptom of a society that we will do whatever it takes to shift personal responsibility away from ourselves. We try to shift it to other people (government), and things (drugs). "The devil made me do it" nor "drugs made me do it" is a legitimate excuse. If your mother behaved badly, that was her. Her drug use was incidental. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 7:45:52 PM EDT
[#45]
They should give it away free for the taking. It would be just like chlorine in the pool.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 7:46:52 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
They should give it away free for the taking. It would be just like chlorine in the pool. Some places have done that. Deaths actually went down. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 7:48:58 PM EDT
[#47]
No, buy it should be legal to purchase and chew small quantities of coca leaves. Peruvians have been using it for centuries with little to no ill effects. Tax it and use the revenue to fund interdiction of refined cocaine and rehab.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 7:50:19 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No, buy it should be legal to purchase and chew small quantities of coca leaves. Peruvians have been using it for centuries with little to no ill effects. Tax it and use the revenue to fund interdiction of refined cocaine and rehab. Why spend any money on things that clearly don't work? |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 8:17:55 PM EDT
[#49]
Yes……and every other "illegal" drug too.
It's not like people aren't using them and it's about personal choice and responsibility. The .Gov shouldn't be involved. *I'll pass on partaking in it's use though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 2/8/2016 8:25:04 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
my mother was on coke so fuck no heroin and cocaine are just awful evil stuff, shit should just be eradicated off the face of the earth
and 66% really ugh screw you guys
and i dont care about this drug war is a failure excuse, its the way we are fighting it that is going no ware, if it was me i would have napalm boomed the fields in Colombia, mexico, or anywhere else, i dont give a danm about there sovereignty, stop sending this shit in! I'm going to assume cocaine was legal back when your mom was doing it, because that is the only way your post would make sense. 
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
