Seems to be some 'everyone is good' feelings from site staff here.

I guess the ar15.com brand got too big to say what you really feel at that level.

Thank God I am not at that level and can say what I really feel until a ban.

I musta missed something


lol, ok

Shake the sand out, rinse liberally, repeat as necessary.

No, just want some site staff to grow a pair and post like it sometimes.

LOL

Post 'I agree, there are bad men from the Middle East that follow Islam'

The NBC Brian Williams 'I was there and saw peaceful Muslims' shit gets old.

They are peaceful until a majority, my contention.

Not all Germans were Nazis, but enough were

And how many Nazis are we dealing with today?

There's still a Nazi party or types like it, in European elections. Just sayin.....

Zhukov wears tampon earrings when he's angry.

All it takes for evil to succeed is good men do nothing.

I'm just here to see if a lifer is nuking his account.

Because some Nazis were bad people doesn't mean they all were. Judging all Nazis on the acts of the extremist Nazi minority is prejudicial, and should be condemned by reasonable men. The vast majority of them were simply peaceful followers and did not condone the actions of the "extremists."

lol, no

But I still want a sticky of the muslim majority town tacked up top and see how it goes 3 to 5 years from now.

My guess, all Christian stuff banned so as not to 'offend' our rich, vibrant muslim brothers.

<Removed - T7> not many like you here.

Leaving the thread up in the interest of promoting an open discussion, but CoC 6 still applies.

Thanks

Ok, now I'm tagging this, it may get interesting.

This is the problem with ignorant people learning one part of history without understanding the full context.

Dresden was 320 square kilometers in size, the firestorm destroyed 6.5 sq. km,m concentrating on the portions which housed railways. About 2% of the city was destroyed during those raids, that's it.

The only thing that made it a notable raid was not its effectiveness in crushing German resistance (which it didn't do) but because of the number of non-combatant it killed, rationalized away by the British because the bombing raid took up valuable German govt resources to contain the fire. The only reason the raid was even authorized in the first place was to serve as a spoiling attack in conjunction with a massive Soviet offensive, Dresden could be used as a transportation hub to ferry troops to resist the Soviet attack, the fire bombing took out the Dresdan transportation system and rerouted govt emergency services to contain the devastation.

Throughout the war the majority of the Allied command staff were against using strategic bombing for nighttime area terror bombing, it was done out of desperation because the British bombers were unable to target accurately during the day and they were unwilling to suffer casualties during raids. Area bombing to break morale was proven not to work and was a waste of resources when those bombs could be used against actual targets, like factories, POL storage, or large troop concentrations, which absolutely would and did shorten the war. It was largely discarded in the ETO by 1944 but the Brits started it up again at the end of the war as strategic bombers had few legitimate targets anymore so jackoffs like Bomber Harris were able to plan and execute missions directed against civilian targets designed to break the German will. The US needed British cooperation in the air force so they went along with it to keep the Brits happy. But we know for a fact that it didn't work. The Germans were already ready to surrender to the Americans and Brits, they just wanted the right conditions. Bombing their cities didn't change that, Hitler dying and being replaced by a more competent leader ready and motivated to surrender to the Americans, not the Russians, that's what ended the war. The Germans never lost the will to fight, see the battle of Berlin as an example.

If' you're going to bring up history, as least do it correctly.  

lol

Yes, like Brian Williams, Aimless has been everywhere and seen everything.

Well that escalated quickly.

Ok, how did we completely destroy Nazi Germany and Japan at the same time?

Touchy feely pin prick air strikes?

lol

OPNI

Some of us interact with Muslim Turks, Arabs and Persians on a regular
basis. Almost all of them dress and act "western". One of them is even a
lesbian.





None
of my Muslim colleagues have blown me up yet. I don't think it is
likely they will ever wage jihad. I don't think it would be wise or
right to expel them, concentrate them in camps or shoot them. But I
might be in the minority with that opinion.
 

wut

OP rambling, and senior site staff monitoring...

Nothing new

ah ok. Cool.

We did it by drafting 70% of the people who fought, and allowing the government to take over the private sector.

Yes, and we won.

Would you be free to post that if we lost?

This is like showing a hipster how to change a tire, suddenly he feels he's a mechanic. You have no clue what you're talking about.

We didn't win WWII by bombing them, we won by destroying our enemies means of making war, by destroying military units in battle, destroying their manufacturing means, their POL storage, by maneuvering and threatening the mother country. You think Hitler or Hirohito gave a fuck that some civilians died in a bombing raid? Were the Brits ready to throw in the towel after the Blitz? Did Germans stop fighting after Dresden?

Norden Bomb Sight. Google it. It was the WWII version of precision bombing, daylight precision bombing was our SOP and it worked. Google a guy named Albert Speer, read what he said about the Allied targeting of German manufacturing and infrastructure and how it affected German war efforts.  

Clearly you decided to get shitfaced pretty early for Thanksgiving but alcoholism is no excuse for being shitty at history.

Posting it now gets me on a list.

So edgy, so cool, trim the beard hipster.

Good quote.

Thank you.  There are your typical Muslims who are just normal people born into whatever life they have and there are those who want to see the world burn.  

I don't see why we can't give every individual a chance until they prove to us otherwise, regardless of who they are.

So they're not saying hat you want them to say?

I really don't understand it either. How many Muslim members do we even have on this site?

Ya. Good thing

Bro, this is a business and there is an image to protect.

Pick up that can. Be gone with your free thoughts.

I didn't mean the arfcom list. I meant the there is no Santa Claus list.

I understand that, but come on, how many members of the gun-obsessed public are going to be like "OMG, they let them say bad stuff about Islam on that site, fuck guns, fuck the second amendment, I'm never spending another dime on that site and heading down to the county clerk's office to change my voter registration to Democrat."

lol, and here we go.

I will take a ban like a man, but I am really tired of PC opinions from site staff here, your mileage may vary.

Grow a sack site staff, and not post what you think goat boy will give an approving nod over.

So you are saying they might be capable of waging jihad. Nice friends college boy.

You didn't post how a russian in the heartland would have framed this post.

Probably less than the members that would quit if we were allowed to post tits bikini photos Dresses from the Grammy's in GD.