User Panel
Quoted: Sadly true, Wiith 82nd gone, maybe someone in this tread is gunning for a chance at a Senior Staff slot. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: For those that didn't have the old version memorized it might be helpful to post specifically what has changed so people don't inadvertently overlook changes. Actually . . . Nothing has changed . . . and that is the saddest part of the entire debacle. Sadly true, Wiith 82nd gone, maybe someone in this tread is gunning for a chance at a Senior Staff slot. |
|
The rules are barely changed and it is all of a sudden a travesty? What rules are missing that some of y'all feel we need? I love the shoot the messenger attitude too.
|
|
Quoted:
It shouldn't be that hard to figure out. Detailed descriptions of sexual encounters are not allowed. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
still nuthin bout rich and vibrant huh that's what i was expecting... I'm kinda curious what the line is on pornographic type stories and i feel this should probably be elaborated on further. I mean we can't have a member fo and then come back and tell us he had a lovely time with a very nice lady we at least need some info as to how far it went or if a friend got involved... Maybe to make the rule be specifically describing anatomy or something a little more clearly defined. Euphemisms still OK? Like i got a rusty trombone and leave it at that without describing what that actually is? It shouldn't be that hard to figure out. Detailed descriptions of sexual encounters are not allowed. lol. You said hard. |
|
Quoted: As to "working something out," you're wrong there also. You're being deliberately antagonistic and making a veiled accusation. View Quote Actually no accusation now. I did a little digging and see my snarky comment was prophetic. Seeing how you have had several previous usernames, which one would you like me to call you? |
|
Quoted: Actually no accusation now. I did a little digging and see my snarky comment was prophetic. Seeing how you have had several previous usernames, which one would you like me to call you? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: As to "working something out," you're wrong there also. You're being deliberately antagonistic and making a veiled accusation. Actually no accusation now. I did a little digging and see my snarky comment was prophetic. Seeing how you have had several previous usernames, which one would you like me to call you? And someone alert Mrsmiley to update his list. |
|
Quoted: This is why computers were invented. Here's the diff output: https://www.diffchecker.com/hi54wzel View Quote Get out of here with that nerd stuff, there is poo fling around. |
|
Quoted:
Get out of here with that nerd stuff, there is poo fling around. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
This is why computers were invented. Here's the diff output: https://www.diffchecker.com/hi54wzel Get out of here with that nerd stuff, there is poo fling around. That was fucking awesome. |
|
Quoted:
Actually no accusation now. I did a little digging and see my snarky comment was prophetic. Seeing how you have had several previous usernames, which one would you like me to call you? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
As to "working something out," you're wrong there also. You're being deliberately antagonistic and making a veiled accusation. Actually no accusation now. I did a little digging and see my snarky comment was prophetic. Seeing how you have had several previous usernames, which one would you like me to call you? |
|
Quoted:
This is why computers were invented. Here's the diff output: https://www.diffchecker.com/hi54wzel View Quote I had no idea that website existed, thank you! |
|
Quoted: All of them. And someone alert Mrsmiley to update his list. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: As to "working something out," you're wrong there also. You're being deliberately antagonistic and making a veiled accusation. Actually no accusation now. I did a little digging and see my snarky comment was prophetic. Seeing how you have had several previous usernames, which one would you like me to call you? And someone alert Mrsmiley to update his list. I haven't checked all of them, but I believe his first one was FNBrowning. |
|
Next thing you know, talking about guns will be prohibited since it offends some people.
|
|
|
Can we still make fun of lawyers and penguins? (and make jokes about geese?)
|
|
Quoted:
I had no idea that website existed, thank you! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
This is why computers were invented. Here's the diff output: https://www.diffchecker.com/hi54wzel I had no idea that website existed, thank you! If you have a *nix box, diff is built in. But the website is handy for sharing. |
|
Quoted:
Actually no accusation now. I did a little digging and see my snarky comment was prophetic. Seeing how you have had several previous usernames, which one would you like me to call you? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
As to "working something out," you're wrong there also. You're being deliberately antagonistic and making a veiled accusation. Actually no accusation now. I did a little digging and see my snarky comment was prophetic. Seeing how you have had several previous usernames, which one would you like me to call you? |
|
|
Quoted: This is why computers were invented. Here's the diff output: https://www.diffchecker.com/hi54wzel View Quote Learning about this website is, perhaps, the only positive and interesting thing to come out of this whole damned thread. Thank you, my life is bettered. |
|
|
Quoted:
Strictly speaking, the legality is dependent on whether or not the individual is an SOT-paying FFL. I'm assuming this has to do with MG technical info, yes? If you interpret that rule the way I think it is being interpreted, then information on how to make a rifle integrally suppressed would be a CoC violation as well, right? It is illegal by default. The exception being for those who do the paperwork that makes it legal. Not really looking for a hill to die on here. I just think it's a shame that the government has people (rightly) afraid of allowing even technical information to be shared on their web forums. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
3) Posting or linking to information on how to make illegal modifications to firearms Strictly speaking, the legality is dependent on whether or not the individual is an SOT-paying FFL. I'm assuming this has to do with MG technical info, yes? If you interpret that rule the way I think it is being interpreted, then information on how to make a rifle integrally suppressed would be a CoC violation as well, right? It is illegal by default. The exception being for those who do the paperwork that makes it legal. Not really looking for a hill to die on here. I just think it's a shame that the government has people (rightly) afraid of allowing even technical information to be shared on their web forums. It drives me crazy in the Form 1 suppressor threads. Some idiots always chime in and crap in a good tech thread with "how that's illegal" or they just assume the person is breaking the law. I don't have to spell out or prove that I have all required paperwork and stamps just to post a picture or talk about a can I am making. Just assume I have done everything legally and everything will be hunky dory. You worry about you and ill worry about me and lets have an intelligent tech discussion instead of talking about the law. Rant over. |
|
Quoted:
This is why computers were invented. Here's the diff output: https://www.diffchecker.com/hi54wzel View Quote Thank you! |
|
Quoted: I haven't checked all of them, but I believe his first one was FNBrowning. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: As to "working something out," you're wrong there also. You're being deliberately antagonistic and making a veiled accusation. Actually no accusation now. I did a little digging and see my snarky comment was prophetic. Seeing how you have had several previous usernames, which one would you like me to call you? And someone alert Mrsmiley to update his list. I haven't checked all of them, but I believe his first one was FNBrowning. |
|
Please define the detailed in "detailed pornographic stories". Where's the line going to be drawn?
|
|
What was the ruling when it comes to porn and the courts, "You'll know it when you see it"?
|
|
|
Quoted: I haven't checked all of them, but I believe his first one was FNBrowning. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: As to "working something out," you're wrong there also. You're being deliberately antagonistic and making a veiled accusation. Actually no accusation now. I did a little digging and see my snarky comment was prophetic. Seeing how you have had several previous usernames, which one would you like me to call you? And someone alert Mrsmiley to update his list. I haven't checked all of them, but I believe his first one was FNBrowning. |
|
Quoted: Did he run away like a little girl or did you kick him to the curb? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: As to "working something out," you're wrong there also. You're being deliberately antagonistic and making a veiled accusation. Actually no accusation now. I did a little digging and see my snarky comment was prophetic. Seeing how you have had several previous usernames, which one would you like me to call you? And someone alert Mrsmiley to update his list. I haven't checked all of them, but I believe his first one was FNBrowning. I gave him the boot. I didn't want him to have the chance to bomb the thread with porn. |
|
Quoted:
Actually no accusation now. I did a little digging and see my snarky comment was prophetic. Seeing how you have had several previous usernames, which one would you like me to call you? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
As to "working something out," you're wrong there also. You're being deliberately antagonistic and making a veiled accusation. Actually no accusation now. I did a little digging and see my snarky comment was prophetic. Seeing how you have had several previous usernames, which one would you like me to call you? Without a page to NorCal, he will be so disappoint |
|
Quoted: I gave him the boot. I didn't want him to have the chance to bomb the thread with porn. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: I gave him the boot. I didn't want him to have the chance to bomb the thread with porn. |
|
|
Quoted: Damn that's an old account how many might he have. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I haven't checked all of them, but I believe his first one was FNBrowning. I don't normally worry about it, as they usually out themselves sooner or later. |
|
Quoted: Without a page to NorCal, he will be so disappoint View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: As to "working something out," you're wrong there also. You're being deliberately antagonistic and making a veiled accusation. Actually no accusation now. I did a little digging and see my snarky comment was prophetic. Seeing how you have had several previous usernames, which one would you like me to call you? Without a page to NorCal, he will be so disappoint Meh, NorCal likes a challenge. If I can figure out who they are, then it's not a worthy challenge. |
|
Quoted: New user account created at 7:42 Pacific time - erizial. May want to look at it just in case. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: I gave him the boot. I didn't want him to have the chance to bomb the thread with porn. He probably had a couple stashed away for when he was caught again. |
|
|
|
Quoted: I think ARFCOM is going to turn into a cooking forum because everything else will be censored or banned. P.S. Chilie with beans and peppers View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Next thing you know, talking about guns will be prohibited since it offends some people. I think ARFCOM is going to turn into a cooking forum because everything else will be censored or banned. P.S. Chilie with beans and peppers Fuck. I can't cook. |
|
|
Quoted:
Actually no accusation now. I did a little digging and see my snarky comment was prophetic. Seeing how you have had several previous usernames, which one would you like me to call you? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
As to "working something out," you're wrong there also. You're being deliberately antagonistic and making a veiled accusation. Actually no accusation now. I did a little digging and see my snarky comment was prophetic. Seeing how you have had several previous usernames, which one would you like me to call you? |
|
Quoted: I haven't checked all of them, but I believe his first one was FNBrowning. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: As to "working something out," you're wrong there also. You're being deliberately antagonistic and making a veiled accusation. Actually no accusation now. I did a little digging and see my snarky comment was prophetic. Seeing how you have had several previous usernames, which one would you like me to call you? And someone alert Mrsmiley to update his list. I haven't checked all of them, but I believe his first one was FNBrowning. Bookmarked and tagged. |
|
Quoted:
Changes COC 2 - ADDITION: "Detailed pornographic stories are also not allowed." COC 5 - ADDITION "Also sharing any image of another member or their family, that the member did not share on this site first is forbidden." COC 6 - ADDITION: "This rule also includes posting disparaging remarks about a member's family." Also "member" has been changed to "person" COC 7 - Added "and or replies" plus minor grammatical changes. Hourglassing prohibition removed. GIF prohibition now defined as excessive rather than numerous. Repetitive is now spelled correctly. ADDITION: "It can also be the posting of threads or replies, in which it appears that the sole purpose is to provoke other members, or to damage the image and/or reputation of the site." COC 10 - 10% rule changed to attribution to original site. ADDITION: "While not a requirement, it is considered a courtesy that you only post a small excerpt of the original article here." View Quote Seems reasonable. |
|
Quoted:
Latter half of this seems fairly important. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
7) Posting topics or discussions that do the site or community harm. More specifically creating topics and or replies meant to disrupt the Site's day to day management, disrupt member's resources, or the ability of the Site to function normally. This can include but is not limited to posting overly large photos, excessive GIF animations, or the use of repetitive or overly long text strings. It can also be the posting of threads or replies, in which it appears that the sole purpose is to provoke other members, or to damage the image and/or reputation of the site. Latter half of this seems fairly important. Honestly, the excessive gif animations part caught my eye [img]http://www.ar15.com/images/smilies/icon_smile_dissapprove.gif[/ ETA: question about this rule. Is this intended for singular massive gif threads, a singular user posting a ton of gifs in different replies inside a single thread or an individual user who just uses gifs a lot as a reply as a general practice? No smart Alec intent...I just use pictures and gifs a ton and don't want to get into hot water. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: As to "working something out," you're wrong there also. You're being deliberately antagonistic and making a veiled accusation. Actually no accusation now. I did a little digging and see my snarky comment was prophetic. Seeing how you have had several previous usernames, which one would you like me to call you? And someone alert Mrsmiley to update his list. I haven't checked all of them, but I believe his first one was FNBrowning. Bookmarked and tagged. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Actually no accusation now. I did a little digging and see my snarky comment was prophetic. Seeing how you have had several previous usernames, which one would you like me to call you? And someone alert Mrsmiley to update his list. I haven't checked all of them, but I believe his first one was FNBrowning. Bookmarked and tagged. Saw that. Good looking out |
|
Quoted:
It shouldn't be that hard to figure out. Detailed descriptions of sexual encounters are not allowed. View Quote Damn you mods! I can't post stories of lubing my hard long erect bolt with vegetable oil errr fire clean, and sliding it firmly inside her receiver, followed by a 60,000 PSI explosion in her chamber ? |
|
Quoted:
Hey, it's the pillow on which I cry myself to sleep every night, over the injustice in the world. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I ripped the tag off my mattress and encourage others to do the same. You can't keep this animal in a cage. I still have the tag on my pillow. You'll never be sheepdog, brah. Hey, it's the pillow on which I cry myself to sleep every night, over the injustice in the world. Probably just the tag poking you in the eye. |
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.