User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 7:50:56 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yes, that part is new. Figures you noticed that one.  Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: The part about detailed pornographic stories is new, no? I'm gonna have to change my posting habits. Yes, that part is new. Figures you noticed that one. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 7:58:08 PM EDT
[#2]
Some of the threads on here involving explicit material were fucking comedy gold.
I will miss them 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 8:17:11 PM EDT
[#3]
Can we still call Tim Pool a fag?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 8:32:00 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Can we still call Tim Pool a fag? Who? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 8:34:16 PM EDT
[#5]
can you add the list of banned words to the CoC so there's no doubt, like t*nk, din*u, etc? Make it official so there's no doubt or guessing
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 8:34:22 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Well, at least I know you read it. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Changes COC 2 - ADDITION: "Detailed pornographic stories are also not allowed." COC 5 - ADDITION "Also sharing any image of another member or their family, that the member did not share on this site first is forbidden." COC 6 - ADDITION: "This rule also includes posting disparaging remarks about a member's family." Also "member" has been changed to "person" COC 7 - Added "and or replies" plus minor grammatical changes. Hourglassing prohibition removed. GIF prohibition now defined as excessive rather than numerous. Repetitive is now spelled correctly. ADDITION: "It can also be the posting of threads or replies, in which it appears that the sole purpose is to provoke other members, or to damage the image and/or reputation of the site." COC 10 - 10% rule changed to attribution to original site. ADDITION: "While not a requirement, it is considered a courtesy that you only post a small excerpt of the original article here." |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 8:41:21 PM EDT
[#7]
5) Posting of someone else's personal contact information (home phone numbers, home addresses, unpublished e-mail addresses, and the like). This includes information obtained through WHOIS searches,etc. Also sharing any image of another member or their family, that the member did not share on this site first is forbidden. The part in red. Does this extend to group photos like Home town get together. I'm not trying to be a smartass or anything just want to understand that we won't get band for this or something similar. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 8:46:03 PM EDT
[#8]
I ripped the tag off my mattress and encourage others to do the same.
You can't keep this animal in a cage. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 8:46:54 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted: 5) Posting of someone else's personal contact information (home phone numbers, home addresses, unpublished e-mail addresses, and the like). This includes information obtained through WHOIS searches,etc. Also sharing any image of another member or their family, that the member did not share on this site first is forbidden. The part in red. Does this extend to group photos like Home town get together. I'm not trying to be a smartass or anything just want to understand that we won't get band for this or something similar. No, its meant to protect members from people who like to dig through other members photobucket, etc... This was brought up by someone else earlier, so I may have to clear it up a little in the CoC. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 8:49:51 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yea, because you said that the majority of us follow the rules so we wouldn't have noticed anything. It shouldn't have to be in the middle of the second page to actually get a list of the changes, especially from a non-staff member after staff provides many evasive non-answers. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Changes COC 2 - ADDITION: "Detailed pornographic stories are also not allowed." COC 5 - ADDITION "Also sharing any image of another member or their family, that the member did not share on this site first is forbidden." COC 6 - ADDITION: "This rule also includes posting disparaging remarks about a member's family." Also "member" has been changed to "person" COC 7 - Added "and or replies" plus minor grammatical changes. Hourglassing prohibition removed. GIF prohibition now defined as excessive rather than numerous. Repetitive is now spelled correctly. ADDITION: "It can also be the posting of threads or replies, in which it appears that the sole purpose is to provoke other members, or to damage the image and/or reputation of the site." COC 10 - 10% rule changed to attribution to original site. ADDITION: "While not a requirement, it is considered a courtesy that you only post a small excerpt of the original article here." Does not knowing the difference between the new and old set of rules, make the new ones somehow unclear? What if you were a new member, would you not be able to understand the rules as they are written now? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 8:50:52 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No, its meant to protect members from people who like to dig through other members photobucket, etc... This was brought up by someone else earlier, so I may have to clear it up a little in the CoC. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: 5) Posting of someone else's personal contact information (home phone numbers, home addresses, unpublished e-mail addresses, and the like). This includes information obtained through WHOIS searches,etc. Also sharing any image of another member or their family, that the member did not share on this site first is forbidden. The part in red. Does this extend to group photos like Home town get together. I'm not trying to be a smartass or anything just want to understand that we won't get band for this or something similar. No, its meant to protect members from people who like to dig through other members photobucket, etc... This was brought up by someone else earlier, so I may have to clear it up a little in the CoC. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 8:51:48 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted: can you add the list of banned words to the CoC so there's no doubt, like t*nk, din*u, etc? Make it official so there's no doubt or guessing Tonk and Dindu are not banned words. If a member attempts to use them in a derogatory manner do to someones race, then they are going to be sanctioned. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 8:52:10 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I ripped the tag off my mattress and encourage others to do the same. You can't keep this animal in a cage. I still have the tag on my pillow. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 8:58:56 PM EDT
[#14]
Nvm.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:00:38 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Tonk and Dindu are not banned words. If a member attempts to use them in a derogatory manner do to someones race, then they are going to be sanctioned. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
can you add the list of banned words to the CoC so there's no doubt, like t*nk, din*u, etc? Make it official so there's no doubt or guessing Tonk and Dindu are not banned words. If a member attempts to use them in a derogatory manner do to someones race, then they are going to be sanctioned. Is tonk a new term that I've just never heard before, or was it popular a while back? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:02:48 PM EDT
[#16]
what changed? TLDR
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:04:20 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Is tonk a new term that I've just never heard before, or was it popular a while back? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
can you add the list of banned words to the CoC so there's no doubt, like t*nk, din*u, etc? Make it official so there's no doubt or guessing Tonk and Dindu are not banned words. If a member attempts to use them in a derogatory manner do to someones race, then they are going to be sanctioned. Is tonk a new term that I've just never heard before, or was it popular a while back? It was a whole deal about 8 or 10 years ago. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:04:30 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Is tonk a new term that I've just never heard before, or was it popular a while back? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: can you add the list of banned words to the CoC so there's no doubt, like t*nk, din*u, etc? Make it official so there's no doubt or guessing Tonk and Dindu are not banned words. If a member attempts to use them in a derogatory manner do to someones race, then they are going to be sanctioned. Is tonk a new term that I've just never heard before, or was it popular a while back? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:05:09 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Does not knowing the difference between the new and old set of rules, make the new ones somehow unclear? What if you were a new member, would you not be able to understand the rules as they are written now? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Changes COC 2 - ADDITION: "Detailed pornographic stories are also not allowed." COC 5 - ADDITION "Also sharing any image of another member or their family, that the member did not share on this site first is forbidden." COC 6 - ADDITION: "This rule also includes posting disparaging remarks about a member's family." Also "member" has been changed to "person" COC 7 - Added "and or replies" plus minor grammatical changes. Hourglassing prohibition removed. GIF prohibition now defined as excessive rather than numerous. Repetitive is now spelled correctly. ADDITION: "It can also be the posting of threads or replies, in which it appears that the sole purpose is to provoke other members, or to damage the image and/or reputation of the site." COC 10 - 10% rule changed to attribution to original site. ADDITION: "While not a requirement, it is considered a courtesy that you only post a small excerpt of the original article here." Does not knowing the difference between the new and old set of rules, make the new ones somehow unclear? What if you were a new member, would you not be able to understand the rules as they are written now? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:05:19 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Is tonk a new term that I've just never heard before, or was it popular a while back? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: can you add the list of banned words to the CoC so there's no doubt, like t*nk, din*u, etc? Make it official so there's no doubt or guessing Tonk and Dindu are not banned words. If a member attempts to use them in a derogatory manner do to someones race, then they are going to be sanctioned. Is tonk a new term that I've just never heard before, or was it popular a while back? It was used by members of a particular HTF as a way to describe the sound of a MagLite hitting the head of an illegal alien. It then morphed into a derogatory term for all Mexicans. It caused quite a stir at one point, and it's use was temporally banned, because the children just started posting it everywhere. It's sort of like the short ban we had on Marpat and Bread threads. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:06:43 PM EDT
[#21]
The sexy time stories rule is lame, but it's not my site to run.
Bring on the beheadings, just don't talk about sex! |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:06:54 PM EDT
[#22]
After all the promises written by Goatboy in the September 1st "STOP the BS - Have respect for each other or get locked" thread, this CoC tweak is basically 
Goatboy can't even be here to present this sad little CoC tweak. If this is the only thing to come out of arfcom central after 28 days, you can pretty well toss those GB promises about new account lock policies or the unlocks of decent people GB: "I would welcome banned members, who were not banned for overly aggressive reasons (porn spammers, racist, etc need not apply), to apply for re-instatement." Yup, it looks like Goatboy, the founder and presumed head of ar15.com ran straight into the tight cohort of Senior Staff and crashed. Do you wanna know who really runs the site?? Look at the middle of the Senior Staff list. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:10:52 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Well, it's assumed that we all know and follow the rules before this change (and can't say anything when we break them and have to face the consequences). Therefore, still holding us to that standard, the changes should have been pointed out from the start. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Does not knowing the difference between the new and old set of rules, make the new ones somehow unclear? What if you were a new member, would you not be able to understand the rules as they are written now? As I stated in another post. If you (everyone) never had a problem with the CoC before, I doubt the new rules are going to cause you any problems. In the end, the lack of highlighting had nothing to do with any kind of attempts at a future "gotcha". We just wanted to make sure that everyone would read the CoC and try and figure out the changes. This way we would hopefully get more people to read it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:11:18 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: After all the promises written by Goatboy in the September 1st "STOP the BS - Have respect for each other or get locked" thread, this CoC tweak is basically Goatboy can't even be here to present this sad little CoC tweak. If this is the only thing to come out of arfcom central after 28 days, you can pretty well toss those GB promises about new account lock policies or the unlocks of decent people GB: "I would welcome banned members, who were not banned for overly aggressive reasons (porn spammers, racist, etc need not apply), to apply for re-instatement." Yup, it looks like Goatboy, the founder and presumed head of ar15.com ran straight into the tight cohort of Senior Staff and crashed. Do you wanna know who really runs the site?? Look at the middle of the Senior Staff list. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:11:35 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: After all the promises written by Goatboy in the September 1st "STOP the BS - Have respect for each other or get locked" thread, this CoC tweak is basically Goatboy can't even be here to present this sad little CoC tweak. If this is the only thing to come out of arfcom central after 28 days, you can pretty well toss those GB promises about new account lock policies or the unlocks of decent people GB: "I would welcome banned members, who were not banned for overly aggressive reasons (porn spammers, racist, etc need not apply), to apply for re-instatement." Yup, it looks like Goatboy, the founder and presumed head of ar15.com ran straight into the tight cohort of Senior Staff and crashed. Do you wanna know who really runs the site?? Look at the middle of the Senior Staff list. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:14:24 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: After all the promises written by Goatboy in the September 1st "STOP the BS - Have respect for each other or get locked" thread, this CoC tweak is basically Goatboy can't even be here to present this sad little CoC tweak. If this is the only thing to come out of arfcom central after 28 days, you can pretty well toss those GB promises about new account lock policies or the unlocks of decent people GB: "I would welcome banned members, who were not banned for overly aggressive reasons (porn spammers, racist, etc need not apply), to apply for re-instatement." Yup, it looks like Goatboy, the founder and presumed head of ar15.com ran straight into the tight cohort of Senior Staff and crashed. Do you wanna know who really runs the site?? Look at the middle of the Senior Staff list. So you're saying we should have just started being more aggressive and locking accounts without giving people a chance? Yeah that wouldn't have caused a shit storm. As to unlocking previously banned members, what was your last username, maybe we can work something out? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:14:50 PM EDT
[#27]
So can i post this jpeg or not?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:16:22 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The sexy time stories rule is lame, but it's not my site to run. Bring on the beheadings, just don't talk about sex! I doubt you'll notice much of a change. We just don't want people showing up and giving us detailed instructions how to stump break cows or the like. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:17:27 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So can i post this jpeg or not? https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/f2/c8/34/f2c834a0ba5c461ae4c4315e1aa17d08.jpg Only if you post the "I'm being oppressed" image too.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:18:20 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Only if you post the "I'm being oppressed" image too.
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
So can i post this jpeg or not? https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/f2/c8/34/f2c834a0ba5c461ae4c4315e1aa17d08.jpg Only if you post the "I'm being oppressed" image too.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:21:46 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yes. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Is the part about "Posting disparaging remarks about a member's family." new? Yes. What if someone's mother really is a 2-dollar crack-whore? Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:22:17 PM EDT
[#32]
Much better.
I'll have to remember it's repressed for the future. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:22:31 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yes it can be a fine line between entertainment and disruption. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Safe thread? What's in the box thread? Sherrik's safe thread and his best service pistol ever thread (a Nambu ) were some of the finest troll threads I've ever read. I think they absolutely qualify as troll threads, but I don't think they "did the community harm" and I'd argue they helped make GD fun in the time they were active.Yes it can be a fine line between entertainment and disruption. LOL....Guys, I was referencing the unexplained "changes" as being like a "What's in the Safe/Box" thread.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:23:24 PM EDT
[#34]
This is better than the U laugh U lose thread.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:25:53 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
For those that didn't have the old version memorized it might be helpful to post specifically what has changed so people don't inadvertently overlook changes. Actually . . . Nothing has changed . . . and that is the saddest part of the entire debacle. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:29:46 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So you're saying we should have just started being more aggressive and locking accounts without giving people a chance? Yeah that wouldn't have caused a shit storm. As to unlocking previously banned members, what was your last username, maybe we can work something out? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
After all the promises written by Goatboy in the September 1st "STOP the BS - Have respect for each other or get locked" thread, this CoC tweak is basically
Goatboy can't even be here to present this sad little CoC tweak. If this is the only thing to come out of arfcom central after 28 days, you can pretty well toss those GB promises about new account lock policies or the unlocks of decent people GB: "I would welcome banned members, who were not banned for overly aggressive reasons (porn spammers, racist, etc need not apply), to apply for re-instatement." Yup, it looks like Goatboy, the founder and presumed head of ar15.com ran straight into the tight cohort of Senior Staff and crashed. Do you wanna know who really runs the site?? Look at the middle of the Senior Staff list. So you're saying we should have just started being more aggressive and locking accounts without giving people a chance? Yeah that wouldn't have caused a shit storm. As to unlocking previously banned members, what was your last username, maybe we can work something out? I never wrote anything about being more aggressive. And to deliberately misstate that was snarky. You know DAMN WELL what Goatboy wrote about more oversight on account locks. I shouldn't have to go grab is words from Sept 1 and throw them in your face, but if you continue your attitude, I will. 
As to "working something out," you're wrong there also. You're being deliberately antagonistic and making a veiled accusation. But I'll look past your worthless snark and put it out in public. cmjohnson wrote GB, and so have other people. No replies, because it seems that the offer to reinstate people was a lie. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:32:48 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted: LOL....Guys, I was referencing the unexplained "changes" as being like a "What's in the Safe/Box" thread. http://tse1.mm.bing.net/th?&id=OIP.M370b761c1fdf484938da22b6336472d8o0&w=300&h=300&c=0&pid=1.9&rs=0&p=0&r=0 Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Safe thread? What's in the box thread? Sherrik's safe thread and his best service pistol ever thread (a Nambu ) were some of the finest troll threads I've ever read. I think they absolutely qualify as troll threads, but I don't think they "did the community harm" and I'd argue they helped make GD fun in the time they were active.Yes it can be a fine line between entertainment and disruption. LOL....Guys, I was referencing the unexplained "changes" as being like a "What's in the Safe/Box" thread. http://tse1.mm.bing.net/th?&id=OIP.M370b761c1fdf484938da22b6336472d8o0&w=300&h=300&c=0&pid=1.9&rs=0&p=0&r=0 I knew I should have worked in the rule about making fun of Site Staff.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:33:34 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Tonk and Dindu are not banned words. If a member attempts to use them in a derogatory manner do due to someone's race, then they are going to be sanctioned. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
can you add the list of banned words to the CoC so there's no doubt, like t*nk, din*u, etc? Make it official so there's no doubt or guessing Tonk and Dindu are not banned words. If a member attempts to use them in a derogatory manner do due to someone's race, then they are going to be sanctioned. FIFU |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:35:58 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I still have the tag on my pillow. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I ripped the tag off my mattress and encourage others to do the same. You can't keep this animal in a cage. I still have the tag on my pillow. You'll never be sheepdog, brah. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:36:34 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Actually . . . Nothing has changed . . . and that is the saddest part of the entire debacle. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
For those that didn't have the old version memorized it might be helpful to post specifically what has changed so people don't inadvertently overlook changes. Actually . . . Nothing has changed . . . and that is the saddest part of the entire debacle. Sadly true,
Wiith 82nd gone, maybe someone in this tread is gunning for a chance at a Senior Staff slot. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:41:56 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Sadly true, Wiith 82nd gone, maybe someone in this tread is gunning for a chance at a Senior Staff slot. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: For those that didn't have the old version memorized it might be helpful to post specifically what has changed so people don't inadvertently overlook changes. Actually . . . Nothing has changed . . . and that is the saddest part of the entire debacle. Sadly true, Wiith 82nd gone, maybe someone in this tread is gunning for a chance at a Senior Staff slot. *music stops* Where's 82nd? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:42:30 PM EDT
[#42]
Can we still make derogatory remarks about Johnny Reno? We have to be able to do that.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:45:06 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
*music stops* Where's 82nd? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
For those that didn't have the old version memorized it might be helpful to post specifically what has changed so people don't inadvertently overlook changes. Actually . . . Nothing has changed . . . and that is the saddest part of the entire debacle. Sadly true,
Wiith 82nd gone, maybe someone in this tread is gunning for a chance at a Senior Staff slot. *music stops* Where's 82nd? ?????? |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:46:25 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted: For those that didn't have the old version memorized it might be helpful to post specifically what has changed so people don't inadvertently overlook changes. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:47:35 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
In a perfect world, poop threads would be covered by #2 Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Which rule covers poop threads, and parody threads? COC#8 covers parody threads. Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile In a perfect world, poop threads would be covered by #2 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:48:07 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I never wrote anything about being more aggressive. And to deliberately misstate that was snarky. You know DAMN WELL what Goatboy wrote about more oversight on account locks. I shouldn't have to go grab is words from Sept 1 and throw them in your face, but if you continue your attitude, I will. As to "working something out," you're wrong there also. You're being deliberately antagonistic and making a veiled accusation. But I'll look past your worthless snark and put it out in public. cmjohnson wrote GB, and so have other people. No replies, because it seems that the offer to reinstate people was a lie. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: After all the promises written by Goatboy in the September 1st "STOP the BS - Have respect for each other or get locked" thread, this CoC tweak is basically Goatboy can't even be here to present this sad little CoC tweak. If this is the only thing to come out of arfcom central after 28 days, you can pretty well toss those GB promises about new account lock policies or the unlocks of decent people GB: "I would welcome banned members, who were not banned for overly aggressive reasons (porn spammers, racist, etc need not apply), to apply for re-instatement." Yup, it looks like Goatboy, the founder and presumed head of ar15.com ran straight into the tight cohort of Senior Staff and crashed. Do you wanna know who really runs the site?? Look at the middle of the Senior Staff list. So you're saying we should have just started being more aggressive and locking accounts without giving people a chance? Yeah that wouldn't have caused a shit storm. As to unlocking previously banned members, what was your last username, maybe we can work something out? I never wrote anything about being more aggressive. And to deliberately misstate that was snarky. You know DAMN WELL what Goatboy wrote about more oversight on account locks. I shouldn't have to go grab is words from Sept 1 and throw them in your face, but if you continue your attitude, I will. As to "working something out," you're wrong there also. You're being deliberately antagonistic and making a veiled accusation. But I'll look past your worthless snark and put it out in public. cmjohnson wrote GB, and so have other people. No replies, because it seems that the offer to reinstate people was a lie. Aggressive was the word I used, not you, in reference to "new account locks" and the lack thereof seemed to be upsetting you. As to reviewing old account locks, I'm not at liberty to discuss individual cases or there outcomes. Just because you may think someone deserved another chance, that doesn't mean they are going to be unlocked. I will say that Goatboy is not to blame for someone repeatedly violating the rules and ending up perma banned. Maybe if you hadn't come into the thread with an attitude, you may not have gotten such a snarky response. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:48:56 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted: FIFU Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: can you add the list of banned words to the CoC so there's no doubt, like t*nk, din*u, etc? Make it official so there's no doubt or guessing Tonk and Dindu are not banned words. If a member attempts to use them in a derogatory manner do due to someone's race, then they are going to be sanctioned. FIFU If that's all you found wrong, then I must be getting better. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:49:12 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You'll never be sheepdog, brah. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I ripped the tag off my mattress and encourage others to do the same. You can't keep this animal in a cage. I still have the tag on my pillow. You'll never be sheepdog, brah. Hey, it's the pillow on which I cry myself to sleep every night, over the injustice in the world. |
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:50:17 PM EDT
[#49]
Okay. Who was bad?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 9/28/2015 9:55:36 PM EDT
[#50]
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
