Quote History Quoted:
Not being particularly knowledgeable on the subject of modern military technology, strategy or tactics, I gotta ask:
It would appear that on the modern battlefield, quite a bit hurt can be delivered both quickly and accurately.
In light of this, in a reasonably evenly-matched, conventional conflict, how does one... win?
View Quote
maneuver trumps firepower for obvious reasons.
The objective is to "find, fix and destroy." How you "fix" the enemy is somewhat a mystery. In the case of delivering that much firepower in a small area you have to have reserves to counter attack the force that exploits that area because the force there is either going to be annihilated, or, more likely, they will withdraw.
The clash of mass between equal powers is not of concern to the US simply because of nuclear weapons. arguably the same is true in the korean peninsula. if SK massed that much combat power in a 2 square mile area, would NK use a nuke to wipe it out?
Who knows? and thats the point of deterrence. Mitigating risk on a possible nuclear battlefield is why the army developed the pentomic division.
its a tactical paradox. you must mass force at the decisive point, but you cannot mass it to the point that you invite the use of unconventional weapons to wipe it out.
that paradox reigns supreme in our Korean scenarios. It will become an issue in the middle east very soon with an upcoming nuclear iran.