Quote History Quoted:
I sort of understand your comment in red, but not entirely. Jim Davis marketed Garfleld to the point that it was crass and Charles Schulz should have thrown in the towel a long time ago. Gary Larsen never pulled a gun and made me buy a Far Side calendar.
I respect his desire to control the distribution of his work, but aside from the money, a lot of people would have loved to own a piece of something they truly enjoyed. I thought it was a touch of reverse snobbery.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Quote History Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Kept all my Calvin and Hobbes comics.
As a kid, I always wanted a Hobbes doll (the version where he is "inanimate", not "alive"). Didn't know until later that I could never find one because Watterson never sold the rights.
I think that that fact says a lot about his artistic integrity. He could have made a MINT selling that franchise!
Long story short, my girlfriend made me a handmade Hobbes doll using pictures from the internet and comics for me for our first Christmas together. Damn near brought a tear to my eye; that something I mentioned to her in passing one day was put together by hand.
This coming Christmas will be our third together. She is a special lady, that's for sure.
I sort of understand your comment in red, but not entirely. Jim Davis marketed Garfleld to the point that it was crass and Charles Schulz should have thrown in the towel a long time ago. Gary Larsen never pulled a gun and made me buy a Far Side calendar.
I respect his desire to control the distribution of his work, but aside from the money,
a lot of people would have loved to own a piece of something they truly enjoyed. I thought it was a touch of reverse snobbery.
I totally agree with that statement! I'd have jumped on it as soon as it appeared. But imagine the author loving C&H FAR more than anyone on this thread. Throw in just a bit of dislike/hatred of corporate capitalism and you begin to see into his motivation. Add to that the fact that he most likely would not be as nearly well-paid for his license as the outsider may imagine*, and you can see why he wouldn't enjoy marketing the image.
*Many times when the ink on the contract has dried, the owner of the license subject finds that he's in a far less advantageous position that he thought he'd be. Add to this the well-known Chinese respect for copyright laws, and you can see that it'll become a mess that no one in his right mind would get in to.