User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:06:34 PM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I don't think there would be a slippery slope if clear lines were made and enforcement was laid out quick. I'm not going to say how risque the the chicks can be, but if they found a line, made it certain, and publicly enforced it, I think it would be a non issue. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:07:31 PM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I think it would bring peace and tranquility to GD. It's like Rodney Carrington says: "Nobody wants to fight when they're looking at boobies." Of something to that effect. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't care what the rules are or how they're administered. I just like posting pictures of Christina Hendricks'a monster knockers. <a href="http://s957.photobucket.com/user/762RUM/media/332FFD39-B220-40DF-87E4-A39E056D20DD_zpspnhley8z.gif.html" target="_blank">http://i957.photobucket.com/albums/ae52/762RUM/332FFD39-B220-40DF-87E4-A39E056D20DD_zpspnhley8z.gif</a> I think it would bring peace and tranquility to GD. It's like Rodney Carrington says: "Nobody wants to fight when they're looking at boobies." Of something to that effect. It's a very good song, and I believe it is called "show them to me" |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:08:31 PM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Freedom is messy. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: That's how it used to be. However, this site is full of fucking dumbasses who refused to follow the rules and insisted on both constantly pushing the limits of what was allowed and constantly inserting these pictures randomly in all sorts of threads. Thank your fellow members for the current rule. To me it sounds like the olden days suffered from an enforcement issue. What was the punishment for pushing to far, or randomly dropping sluts in threads? Freedom is messy. If posters will leave because of chicks in beach attire they are not good posters. If posters get banned for trying to push the limits then they deserve what they get. No fucks given on either account. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:08:54 PM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
To me it sounds like the olden days suffered from an enforcement issue. What was the punishment for pushing to far, or randomly dropping sluts in threads? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
That's how it used to be. However, this site is full of fucking dumbasses who refused to follow the rules and insisted on both constantly pushing the limits of what was allowed and constantly inserting these pictures randomly in all sorts of threads. Thank your fellow members for the current rule. To me it sounds like the olden days suffered from an enforcement issue. What was the punishment for pushing to far, or randomly dropping sluts in threads? The same as it is now, all the way up to bans for repeat offenders. It was still a big enough problem that it had to be banned for all of the site except the specific BOTD forum. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:11:52 PM EDT
[#5]
Quote HistoryQuoted: It was a huge issue. Maybe you should consider the fact that the "old timers" are the ones against it, because, you know, we were here when it was just as you're asking and it went to shit. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I don't think there would be a slippery slope if clear lines were made and enforcement was laid out quick. I'm not going to say how risque the the chicks can be, but if they found a line, made it certain, and publicly enforced it, I think it would be a non issue. As you all have said it was different "back then". You started with no rules (at least y'all make it sound like that) then slowly they built up rules. Posters ignored them, because they were brought up with a site that had none. Now it is the opposite. We are letting go of some rules, so people will treat it differently. I bet the majority of posters will still be timid to post bikini pics if the rules when away. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:12:15 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PlaneJane My interest in women ends at the waist. So far as I'm concerned, the legs and ass are only there to provide mobility to the chassis the tits are mounted on. Others may feel differently, as is their right. Quote HistoryOriginally Posted By PlaneJane Agreed My interest in women ends at the waist. So far as I'm concerned, the legs and ass are only there to provide mobility to the chassis the tits are mounted on. Others may feel differently, as is their right. I married big boobs and a pair of vice grips between the legs. Teenage girl rodeo builds character and kegel muscles!!!!!  |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:14:53 PM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's a very good song, and I believe it is called "show them to me" Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't care what the rules are or how they're administered. I just like posting pictures of Christina Hendricks'a monster knockers. <a href="http://s957.photobucket.com/user/762RUM/media/332FFD39-B220-40DF-87E4-A39E056D20DD_zpspnhley8z.gif.html" target="_blank">http://i957.photobucket.com/albums/ae52/762RUM/332FFD39-B220-40DF-87E4-A39E056D20DD_zpspnhley8z.gif</a> I think it would bring peace and tranquility to GD. It's like Rodney Carrington says: "Nobody wants to fight when they're looking at boobies." Of something to that effect. It's a very good song, and I believe it is called "show them to me" Yes. Yes, it is. On both counts. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:17:29 PM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
The final one. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
To me it sounds like the olden days suffered from an enforcement issue. What was the punishment for pushing to far, or randomly dropping sluts in threads? Ask SteyrAUG As far as I know that's not why he was banned. Which time?  The final one. As cool as he could be at times, Steyr had a long history of warnings and temporary and permanent account locks that lead up to that. A lot of his problem was an insistence on posting at least partially nude pics and pushing the limits of the then-evolving CoC regarding it. He was probably half the reason that the BOTD compromise was made and is where it is today. Believe it or not, things are the way they are for good reason. Not much sense trying to re-invent that wheel. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:17:40 PM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
As you all have said it was different "back then". You started with no rules (at least y'all make it sound like that) then slowly they built up rules. Posters ignored them, because they were brought up with a site that had none. Now it is the opposite. We are letting go of some rules, so people will treat it differently. I bet the majority of posters will still be timid to post bikini pics if the rules when away. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't think there would be a slippery slope if clear lines were made and enforcement was laid out quick. I'm not going to say how risque the the chicks can be, but if they found a line, made it certain, and publicly enforced it, I think it would be a non issue. As you all have said it was different "back then". You started with no rules (at least y'all make it sound like that) then slowly they built up rules. Posters ignored them, because they were brought up with a site that had none. Now it is the opposite. We are letting go of some rules, so people will treat it differently. I bet the majority of posters will still be timid to post bikini pics if the rules when away. Again, you'd be wrong. People aren't even too timid to post them now. It's a reasonable rule that's in place for a good reason and that ensures that some of us are able to use the site much more often. There's no reason at all to remove it, especially when those of us who are actually responsible for enforcing the rules have seen this all play out before. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:23:00 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
As you all have said it was different "back then". You started with no rules (at least y'all make it sound like that) then slowly they built up rules. Posters ignored them, because they were brought up with a site that had none. Now it is the opposite. We are letting go of some rules, so people will treat it differently. I bet the majority of posters will still be timid to post bikini pics if the rules when away. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't think there would be a slippery slope if clear lines were made and enforcement was laid out quick. I'm not going to say how risque the the chicks can be, but if they found a line, made it certain, and publicly enforced it, I think it would be a non issue. As you all have said it was different "back then". You started with no rules (at least y'all make it sound like that) then slowly they built up rules. Posters ignored them, because they were brought up with a site that had none. Now it is the opposite. We are letting go of some rules, so people will treat it differently. I bet the majority of posters will still be timid to post bikini pics if the rules when away. I think perhaps we can cut this short by simply reminding our young padawan of the most important reason the rule is what it is. Goatboy said so, and isn't ever changing it back. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:24:31 PM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I think perhaps we can cut this short by simply reminding our young padawan of the most important reason the rule is what it is. Goatboy said so, and isn't ever changing it back. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I don't think there would be a slippery slope if clear lines were made and enforcement was laid out quick. I'm not going to say how risque the the chicks can be, but if they found a line, made it certain, and publicly enforced it, I think it would be a non issue. As you all have said it was different "back then". You started with no rules (at least y'all make it sound like that) then slowly they built up rules. Posters ignored them, because they were brought up with a site that had none. Now it is the opposite. We are letting go of some rules, so people will treat it differently. I bet the majority of posters will still be timid to post bikini pics if the rules when away. I think perhaps we can cut this short by simply reminding our young padawan of the most important reason the rule is what it is. Goatboy said so, and isn't ever changing it back. Why cut it short? It was just getting fun  |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:25:06 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
!oL. I married big boobs and a pair of vice grips between the legs. Teenage girl rodeo builds character and kegel muscles!!!!!
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Originally Posted By PlaneJane Agreed My interest in women ends at the waist. So far as I'm concerned, the legs and ass are only there to provide mobility to the chassis the tits are mounted on. Others may feel differently, as is their right. Teenage girl rodeo builds character and kegel muscles!!!!!
And she's a redhead! |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:25:30 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Again, you'd be wrong. People aren't even too timid to post them now. It's a reasonable rule that's in place for a good reason and that ensures that some of us are able to use the site much more often. There's no reason at all to remove it, especially when those of us who are actually responsible for enforcing the rules have seen this all play out before. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't think there would be a slippery slope if clear lines were made and enforcement was laid out quick. I'm not going to say how risque the the chicks can be, but if they found a line, made it certain, and publicly enforced it, I think it would be a non issue. As you all have said it was different "back then". You started with no rules (at least y'all make it sound like that) then slowly they built up rules. Posters ignored them, because they were brought up with a site that had none. Now it is the opposite. We are letting go of some rules, so people will treat it differently. I bet the majority of posters will still be timid to post bikini pics if the rules when away. Again, you'd be wrong. People aren't even too timid to post them now. It's a reasonable rule that's in place for a good reason and that ensures that some of us are able to use the site much more often. There's no reason at all to remove it, especially when those of us who are actually responsible for enforcing the rules have seen this all play out before. It's an unreasonable rule, but it's in place because GD is full of unreasonable people.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:25:55 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Again, you'd be wrong. People aren't even too timid to post them now. It's a reasonable rule that's in place for a good reason and that ensures that some of us are able to use the site much more often. There's no reason at all to remove it, especially when those of us who are actually responsible for enforcing the rules have seen this all play out before. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I don't think there would be a slippery slope if clear lines were made and enforcement was laid out quick. I'm not going to say how risque the the chicks can be, but if they found a line, made it certain, and publicly enforced it, I think it would be a non issue. As you all have said it was different "back then". You started with no rules (at least y'all make it sound like that) then slowly they built up rules. Posters ignored them, because they were brought up with a site that had none. Now it is the opposite. We are letting go of some rules, so people will treat it differently. I bet the majority of posters will still be timid to post bikini pics if the rules when away. Again, you'd be wrong. People aren't even too timid to post them now. It's a reasonable rule that's in place for a good reason and that ensures that some of us are able to use the site much more often. There's no reason at all to remove it, especially when those of us who are actually responsible for enforcing the rules have seen this all play out before. If the rule was changed like in the OP, then people would have no problem surfing the site. I'll volunteer to mod if it's changed just to help out  |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:26:24 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Google blocks porn links. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: This is fucking stupid. The way it used to be is just like you described. It was fine as long as BOTD was in the title. Well, people would use random memes and shit from all over so the OP would need to monitor his own thread, or site staff would have to go in and edit the title. It worked fine for the most part, but people on the internet are stupid children, and members kept pushing the envelope. So then we had limited BOTD only threads in GD. There were only so many allowed at a time. We couldn't handle that either, and an all out ban was put in place. Then the specific forums were created, but even those are heavily policed. If you want to see porn and half naked women, use Bing and get the real stuff. If you get the shakes after having not seen a woman in a bikini in the last five minutes on a gun forum, then maybe you have a bigger problem. I was with you until that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:26:40 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: And she's a redhead! Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Originally Posted By PlaneJane Agreed My interest in women ends at the waist. So far as I'm concerned, the legs and ass are only there to provide mobility to the chassis the tits are mounted on. Others may feel differently, as is their right. Teenage girl rodeo builds character and kegel muscles!!!!! And she's a redhead! It's a boat load of crazy but I can't complain.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:27:00 PM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If the rule was changed like in the OP, then people would have no problem surfing the site. I'll volunteer to mod if it's changed just to help out
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
As you all have said it was different "back then". You started with no rules (at least y'all make it sound like that) then slowly they built up rules. Posters ignored them, because they were brought up with a site that had none. Now it is the opposite. We are letting go of some rules, so people will treat it differently. I bet the majority of posters will still be timid to post bikini pics if the rules when away. Again, you'd be wrong. People aren't even too timid to post them now. It's a reasonable rule that's in place for a good reason and that ensures that some of us are able to use the site much more often. There's no reason at all to remove it, especially when those of us who are actually responsible for enforcing the rules have seen this all play out before. If the rule was changed like in the OP, then people would have no problem surfing the site. I'll volunteer to mod if it's changed just to help out
Johnny_Reno's next in line. Wait your turn. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:27:21 PM EDT
[#18]
No |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:27:43 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If the rule was changed like in the OP, then people would have no problem surfing the site. I'll volunteer to mod if it's changed just to help out
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I don't think there would be a slippery slope if clear lines were made and enforcement was laid out quick. I'm not going to say how risque the the chicks can be, but if they found a line, made it certain, and publicly enforced it, I think it would be a non issue. As you all have said it was different "back then". You started with no rules (at least y'all make it sound like that) then slowly they built up rules. Posters ignored them, because they were brought up with a site that had none. Now it is the opposite. We are letting go of some rules, so people will treat it differently. I bet the majority of posters will still be timid to post bikini pics if the rules when away. Again, you'd be wrong. People aren't even too timid to post them now. It's a reasonable rule that's in place for a good reason and that ensures that some of us are able to use the site much more often. There's no reason at all to remove it, especially when those of us who are actually responsible for enforcing the rules have seen this all play out before. If the rule was changed like in the OP, then people would have no problem surfing the site. I'll volunteer to mod if it's changed just to help out
The mammary mod
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:29:26 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
With the broad range of topis discussed in GD, BOTD is where you draw the line? MG purchases, dating advice, dog advise, pic threads, gif threads, current news, guns, boats, cars, trucks, insurance. But noooo, posting a woman who isn't in a pant suit is to far. I laugh at that. Plus I don't need to IM some cam whore. I don't need to see sharpie in vagoo, I just want to be able to post pictures of chicks that aren't dressed like it's winter in Alaska. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
The right tool for the right job, and BOTD in GD ain't it. Do that and that is all that would be posted in GD, plus I'm not here to jerk off. There are 100% free interweb locations, that are 100% computer cootie free, that offer enough subs to cover what I can only imagine is close to 100% of fetishes. (they even have one where you will never be able to look at a Sharpie the same way again.) And get this, many are everyday ladies that take and post pictures of themselves and you can even say Hi! via IM. When I'm there, I don't want guns, religion and politics interrupting serious business. With the broad range of topis discussed in GD, BOTD is where you draw the line? MG purchases, dating advice, dog advise, pic threads, gif threads, current news, guns, boats, cars, trucks, insurance. But noooo, posting a woman who isn't in a pant suit is to far. I laugh at that. Plus I don't need to IM some cam whore. I don't need to see sharpie in vagoo, I just want to be able to post pictures of chicks that aren't dressed like it's winter in Alaska. Laugh all you want. The reality is that's all there would be. Look at the AM release numbers and number of male, they already had some at home but paid money to talk to another one. Now look at GD and tell me you really don't think that would get out of hand real quick. And they were not placed in vaggo.. their put in the other side. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:29:27 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:29:41 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted: No Yes |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:31:01 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yes Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
No Yes Absolutely zero chance of it ever being allowed again. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:31:31 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Indeed. It's a boat load of crazy but I can't complain.
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Originally Posted By PlaneJane Agreed My interest in women ends at the waist. So far as I'm concerned, the legs and ass are only there to provide mobility to the chassis the tits are mounted on. Others may feel differently, as is their right. Teenage girl rodeo builds character and kegel muscles!!!!!
And she's a redhead!
Here in Janeville, we prefer the term "eccentric". |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:31:52 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yes Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: No Yes |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:34:05 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Absolutely zero chance of it ever being allowed again. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
No Yes Absolutely zero chance of it ever being allowed again.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:34:58 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: No Yes Absolutely zero chance of it ever being allowed again. Subnet's probably frying right now, I wouldn't trust him |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:35:13 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Absolutely zero chance of it ever being allowed again. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
No Yes Absolutely zero chance of it ever being allowed again. That isn't true Forever is a long time. And the Avila's could sell the site to a smutliver like smiley |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:35:48 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted: 13er mode activated Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: No Yes Fuck Yeah. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:36:04 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Absolutely zero chance of it ever being allowed again. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
No Yes Absolutely zero chance of it ever being allowed again. An exception needs to be made for CH in evening wear. I could do another Monday "Good Morning, ARFCOM" series. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:36:16 PM EDT
[#31]
Liked that one so much, I posted it twice.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:37:03 PM EDT
[#32]
DD's in GD glistening with bacon grease then dipped in Chili with an ice cube.
The line starts here. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:37:38 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Here in Janeville, we prefer the term "eccentric". Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Originally Posted By PlaneJane Here in Janeville, we prefer the term "eccentric". Womanly assets--underestimate them at your own peril, men!!!! Rich people are eccentric, not crazy. Women with plenty of womanly assets--works the same way. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:38:46 PM EDT
[#34]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Liked that one so much, I posted it twice. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:39:48 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I like this thread |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:39:55 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Liked that one so much, I posted it twice. This was well worth the double tap. I'm down. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:43:48 PM EDT
[#37]
That is the way it used to be.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:49:31 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yes Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
No Yes I'm rubber and you're glue. Seriously, it's not going to happen. Please don't get all spun up about it, because you will be disappointed. As others have said, the chances are zero. Now don't get me wrong. It COULD absolutely work, IF everyone in GD was able to be adult and responsible about it... and that is precisely why it will never happen. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:50:05 PM EDT
[#39]
GB's reply in the other thread.....
http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1781724_Official___Discussion_about_Lists__VacaDuck_and_Signal25.html&page=19#i55308515 Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
As for the more important issue. I'm with Aimless. BOTD only became a problem because people could not control themselves. Long ago even nudity was allowed in certain forums and that was ruined as well. The majority of our issues are not what is being said, or who is saying it, it's other people. Someone is always going to break the rules or take things to far. Someone will cry foul or say this is an attack and not just a joke. Hell, I can't even do an April fools joke without chaos erupting because WHAT IF it wasn't a joke. Give it another chance.
Ya because this thread is the perfect example of how well we play with others? People are out to nitpick and play devil's advocate for no other reason than they enjoy it. So you REALLY think that people wont abuse rules on nudity and just splay it anywhere they want? After all, if it's allowed in a private forum, it should be allowed in ALL forums.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:51:17 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I'm rubber and you're glue. Seriously, it's not going to happen. Please don't get all spun up about it, because you will be disappointed. As others have said, the chances are zero. Now don't get me wrong. It COULD absolutely work, IF everyone in GD was able to be adult and responsible about it... and that is precisely why it will never happen. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: No Yes I'm rubber and you're glue. Seriously, it's not going to happen. Please don't get all spun up about it, because you will be disappointed. As others have said, the chances are zero. Now don't get me wrong. It COULD absolutely work, IF everyone in GD was able to be adult and responsible about it... and that is precisely why it will never happen. Lock this bitch down!!!!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:53:34 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I'm rubber and you're glue. Seriously, it's not going to happen. Please don't get all spun up about it, because you will be disappointed. As others have said, the chances are zero. Now don't get me wrong. It COULD absolutely work, IF everyone in GD was able to be adult and responsible about it... and that is precisely why it will never happen. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: No Yes I'm rubber and you're glue. Seriously, it's not going to happen. Please don't get all spun up about it, because you will be disappointed. As others have said, the chances are zero. Now don't get me wrong. It COULD absolutely work, IF everyone in GD was able to be adult and responsible about it... and that is precisely why it will never happen. I'm just having fun man I realize that the possibility of a rule change is slim to none, but it's interesting to seek out the reason why. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:57:33 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
More specifically, Google attempts to filter out porn links from their image and video search. If you google "glory hole" you might get a few porn pics, but most of it will just be a hole. If you go to Bing and search "glory hole" it's all going to be porn. You used to be able to switch from filtered and unfiltered search, but now nearly everything has some degree of filter to it. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Google blocks porn links. As of last night they didn't. If you google "glory hole" you might get a few porn pics, but most of it will just be a hole. If you go to Bing and search "glory hole" it's all going to be porn. You used to be able to switch from filtered and unfiltered search, but now nearly everything has some degree of filter to it. so you're the last guy on the internet to know how to work around this apparent problem? huh. well, for the uninformed... TRY THIS ONE SIMPLE TRICK ON GOOGLE: append "xxx" to your search term. e.g. "penguin gloryhole xxx" look, lots of porn links! but wait, there is more. now click "images" in the search result header. now click the pulldown "search tools" now click "size" and select "larger than X" -- choose X for your twenty-whatever inch monitor. enjoy. there, that wasn't difficult now, was it? note: i did not test the above search term -- use at own risk. if erection lasts more than four hours, consult a doctor. ar-jedi |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 5:59:44 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No Good. It's not like there aren't 87 million other sites to go to for that shit. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 6:00:09 PM EDT
[#44]
Yeah, that's all we need is to have the Mrs look over our shoulder when one of those "random" pics shows up in a thread.
It aint' broken. Leave it alone. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 6:01:11 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Yeah, that's all we need is to have the Mrs look over our shoulder when one of those "random" pics shows up in a thread. It aint' broken. Leave it alone. Me and my girl look at hot chicks on the internet together all the time. You're doing it wrong. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 6:04:53 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Not true, there are a lot of fat chicks, and their udders are nasty Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The guys here who enjoy fucking little boy like skinny inkies would be grossed out by a set of glorious womanly flesh orbs size 36DD Don't be a boob bigot. Nearly all boobs are good, big, little, whatever. Not true, there are a lot of fat chicks, and their udders are nasty |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 6:07:50 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You can easily write software to find words or phrases in text. If you have a way of programmatically determining if a picture is pornography or not, it's worth billions. Literally billions of dollars. Google and/or Microsoft will pay you obscene amounts of money for that. I feel like you should give me at least a couple hundred million just for letting you know cause otherwise you'd still be getting up and going to work every day. It's only fair dude. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
The "It's too hard to police" seems like a copout when as Smiley pointed out you guys have successfully banned words or phrases when used in certain context in the recent past. A picture is a good bit easier to see than the context of a word in a block of text. You can easily write software to find words or phrases in text. If you have a way of programmatically determining if a picture is pornography or not, it's worth billions. Literally billions of dollars. Google and/or Microsoft will pay you obscene amounts of money for that. I feel like you should give me at least a couple hundred million just for letting you know cause otherwise you'd still be getting up and going to work every day. It's only fair dude. So the site staff has software that scans for certain words or phrases, as well as comprehend the context and usage of said words or phrases, and then auto warns/bans them? Neat. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 6:09:49 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I don't understand why it matters which forum it's allowed in. If you want BOTD stuff, just keep a second tab open to it. <shrug> A picture of a woman in a bikini or showing cleavage may be relevant in a thread in GD, but because of the rules we would be unable to post it. I would say it's probably more NSFW to have some ISIS dude who has his brains and guts blown all over the place than it is to have a woman in a bikini. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 6:14:14 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
It's about quality, not quantity In terms of titties, quantity plays a direct role in quality. A cups vs. D cups. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/26/2015 6:15:16 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I'm just having fun man
I realize that the possibility of a rule change is slim to none, but it's interesting to seek out the reason why. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
No Yes I'm rubber and you're glue. Seriously, it's not going to happen. Please don't get all spun up about it, because you will be disappointed. As others have said, the chances are zero. Now don't get me wrong. It COULD absolutely work, IF everyone in GD was able to be adult and responsible about it... and that is precisely why it will never happen. I'm just having fun man
I realize that the possibility of a rule change is slim to none, but it's interesting to seek out the reason why. Sometimes we get pissy because we've explained it a billion times already
I actually got so tired of writing out the same explanation, that a few years ago I think I actually saved one so I could just cut & paste it. I'm on my iPad now, but when I get to my computer, I'll look for it.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
