User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:08:05 PM EDT
[#1]
See avatar
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:08:31 PM EDT
[#2]
Fugly little thing. I predict another flop...a la SRS. Stick to making new & improved ACOGs and RMRs. Leave the aimpoints to aimpoint.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:08:51 PM EDT
[#3]
hmmmmmm
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:09:33 PM EDT
[#4]
Reminds me of a periscope
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:10:17 PM EDT
[#5]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:12:38 PM EDT
[#6]
As much as I hate it when people advertise "Aircraft-Grade Aluminum", it looks like a nice optic.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:13:08 PM EDT
[#7]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:13:49 PM EDT
[#8]
Is this the latest must have?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:14:10 PM EDT
[#9]
Quoted:
T1 size and specs but with larger objective and fov. I caught a glimpse of it on the optics forum, but the topic was removed/nuked from orbit. My guess it was info that was released too early and Trijicon said no-no. Anyone else see it? For real. I commented in it and then poof! |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:15:04 PM EDT
[#10]
Meh.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:16:04 PM EDT
[#11]
Price point?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:16:26 PM EDT
[#12]
Let me guess, MSRP $900.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:16:53 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
For real. I commented in it and then poof! Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
T1 size and specs but with larger objective and fov. I caught a glimpse of it on the optics forum, but the topic was removed/nuked from orbit. My guess it was info that was released too early and Trijicon said no-no. Anyone else see it? For real. I commented in it and then poof! The thread comes up in a Google search, but yeah- no joy. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:16:54 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryThis, I love Trijicon |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:17:25 PM EDT
[#15]
Looks good. Although they need to make a fiber optic/tritium version, then I'd really be interested.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:18:20 PM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
As much as I hate it when people advertise "Aircraft-Grade Aluminum", it looks like a nice optic. Makes me wonder what aircraft, and which part of it. I've got 2 blends and 4 tempers just on the Gulfstream 550 wing. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:18:28 PM EDT
[#17]
A little late i think.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:19:16 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Price point? This? I need something for my Evo Scorpion. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:20:25 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Looks good. Wonder what battery life is like. Although they need to make a fiber optic/tritium version, then I'd really be interested. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Looks good. Wonder what battery life is like. Although they need to make a fiber optic/tritium version, then I'd really be interested. Battery life, 5 years of continuous use on setting three |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:20:29 PM EDT
[#20]
Interesting, but I bet it costs a nut.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:20:58 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
A little late i think. I don't think so. I was thinking on a T-2 and now I want to hear more on this. People are always buying new optics. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:21:21 PM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Looks good. Wonder what battery life is like. Although they need to make a fiber optic/tritium version, then I'd really be interested. Battery life, 5 years of continuous use on setting three I went back and read the ad after I replied 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:22:55 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Looks good. Wonder what battery life is like. Although they need to make a fiber optic/tritium version, then I'd really be interested. 5 years is what's on the spec sheet, rumor has it $500ish is the msrp, but that seems low for retail, street price maybe. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:23:45 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
5 years is what's on the spec sheet, rumor has it $500ish is the msrp, but that seems low for retail, street price maybe. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Looks good. Wonder what battery life is like. Although they need to make a fiber optic/tritium version, then I'd really be interested. I'd buy one at $500. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:24:06 PM EDT
[#25]
Sold! My Klip Klops!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:24:16 PM EDT
[#26]
Quoted:
T1 size and specs but with larger objective and fov. I caught a glimpse of it on the optics forum, but the topic was removed/nuked from orbit. My guess it was info that was released too early and Trijicon said no-no. Anyone else see it? Yup, a buddy and I were oogling it earlier, and when I refreshed... POOF! it was gone... |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:24:50 PM EDT
[#27]
What's the benefit over a traditional micro red dot? Just the larger glass?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:25:19 PM EDT
[#28]
All depends on the price point
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:25:22 PM EDT
[#29]
i like it
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:25:34 PM EDT
[#30]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:25:59 PM EDT
[#31]
  |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:26:56 PM EDT
[#32]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:27:18 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Price point? +1 |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:27:26 PM EDT
[#34]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:29:31 PM EDT
[#35]
If it was priced to compete with the Aimpoint PRO I can see it doing well.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:30:17 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
hmmmmmm This |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:33:51 PM EDT
[#37]
Looks good. Trijicon makes quality stuff.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:34:57 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Fugly little thing. I predict another flop...a la SRS. Stick to making new & improved ACOGs and RMRs. Leave the aimpoints to aimpoint. http://www.gandrtactical.com/images/archive/Trijicon/MRO-Spec-Sheet-1.jpg http://www.gandrtactical.com/images/archive/Trijicon/MRO-Spec-Sheet-2.jpg In their defense, the T1 is ugly as shit as well. Of course, not that aesthetics matter a damn when it comes to functionality, reliability, and durability, but really, Aimpoint T1s look hideous on top of just about any firearm. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:35:27 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Looks good. Although they need to make a fiber optic/tritium version, then I'd really be interested. And then it would have an 8 moa dot. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:36:53 PM EDT
[#40]
I'm all stocked up on T-1s,
but am willing to finger bang once we get some at work 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:40:18 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted: In their defense, the T1 is ugly as shit as well. Of course, not that aesthetics matter a damn when it comes to functionality, reliability, and durability, but really, Aimpoint T1s look hideous on top of just about any firearm. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Fugly little thing. I predict another flop...a la SRS. Stick to making new & improved ACOGs and RMRs. Leave the aimpoints to aimpoint. http://www.gandrtactical.com/images/archive/Trijicon/MRO-Spec-Sheet-1.jpg http://www.gandrtactical.com/images/archive/Trijicon/MRO-Spec-Sheet-2.jpg In their defense, the T1 is ugly as shit as well. Of course, not that aesthetics matter a damn when it comes to functionality, reliability, and durability, but really, Aimpoint T1s look hideous on top of just about any firearm. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:40:25 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Price point? Tag for answer. Looks interesting, but I'm not sure what advantages it would have over my T-2. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:40:52 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Looks good. Although they need to make a fiber optic/tritium version, then I'd really be interested. Fucking this!!! |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:41:32 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryThey should really add the recoil lug slot the T1 has so it's compatible with the same mounts. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:43:13 PM EDT
[#45]
Interesting.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:43:15 PM EDT
[#46]
One lens cap at best. And things are most likely to brush against it from the side which is more likely to spin that rheostat than one mounted against the side.
Just my opinion, but for a CQB sight 1 click to turn it off from any setting makes it more likely to mind fuck you by surprise when you expect a dot to be "in there somewhere" when a threat materializes. Reorienting your brain to a ghost ring or instinctive technique could cost threat focus and a fatal second when you have to recognize there is no dot first. |
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:43:33 PM EDT
[#47]
It needs to be ~$600 to be competitive with Aimpoint.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:44:31 PM EDT
[#48]
I'd buy one.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:46:33 PM EDT
[#49]
DO YOU EVEN MRO BRO?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 8/10/2015 8:48:02 PM EDT
[#50]
I like the larger objective on the MRO versus the T2. I would consider buying it, as I don't have a small RDS. I just hope it's not ONE BILLION DOLLARS.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
