User Panel
|
|
|
|
The airforce has really improved their video production quality. Someone must have traded an xbox for a gopro.
|
|
Quoted:
They always have, and always will be practicing delivery. It's one of the very very few things that must not be fucked up if done "for real". View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Really now. Why would they be practicing this, I wonder. They always have, and always will be practicing delivery. It's one of the very very few things that must not be fucked up if done "for real". This thing fits on an F-35, if I'm not mistaken. I kinda wonder if they're not tweaking a few things. Perhaps making sure the Mod 11 flies like it's supposed to. |
|
Quoted:
Likely to let the Izzys know Obama is serious about protecting Iran View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Really now. Why would they be practicing this, I wonder. Likely to let the Izzys know Obama is serious about protecting Iran What hardened targets does Israel possess that would warrant a nuclear strike to prevent their interdiction of Iranian pursuits? What does Iran possess that would necessitate delivery and effective performance of a B61 Mod11? |
|
|
|
Where's the kaboom? There is supposed to be an earth shattering kaboom.
|
|
|
|
... Dud
No 7 people should ever be able to unleash that much Hell in one afternoon |
|
Damn, it's hard to comprehend that that little thing would flatten a city. E=mc^2 is a bitch.
|
|
|
Maybe the true delivery vehicle would be the SR-72? I doubt they would use an F-15 to delivery this thing.
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Never realized they were spin stabilized like that. View Quote I didn't realize that until you pointed it out. Why did they leave fins on it? Is spinning something related to the warhead, or for stability? Do any non-nuke bombs use spin stabilization? I know the AMRAAM missiles do, but what about other gravity bombs? |
|
Quoted:
That was the main reason I posted the video. I thought the rocket spin was wicked cool View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Never realized they were spin stabilized like that. That was the main reason I posted the video. I thought the rocket spin was wicked cool I read the below from the B61 wiki page. So basically they are making a JDAM accurate, adjustable yield, fighter deliverable nuke. 'Merica In May 2010 the National Nuclear Security Administration asked Congress for $40 million to redesign the bomb to enable the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II to carry the weapon internally by 2017.[23] This version is designated Mod 12.[24] The four hundred B61-12 bombs will be used by both tactical aircraft (such as the F-35) and strategic aircraft (such as the B-2) and the Tail Subassembly (TSA) will give them Joint Direct Attack Munition levels of accuracy, allowing the fifty kiloton warhead to have strategic effects from all carrying aircraft.[25] However, refitting the 400 weapons is now expected to cost over $10 billion.[26] The B61 Mod 12 tail assembly contract was awarded to Boeing on November 27, 2012 for $178 million.[27] Boeing will use their experience with the Joint Direct Attack Munition to yield JDAM equivalent accuracy in a nuclear bomb.[28] This contract is only the first part of the billion dollar expense of producing and applying the tail kits, over and above the $10 billion cost to refurbish the warheads.[29] The B61-12 uses an internal guidance system and can glide to its target. The bomb has four selectable yields: 0.3; 5; 10; and 50 kilotons.[30] On 1 July 2015, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) conducted the first of three flight tests of the B61-12 tail kit assembly.[31] |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
I didn't realize that until you pointed it out. Why did they leave fins on it? Is spinning something related to the warhead, or for stability? Do any non-nuke bombs use spin stabilization? I know the AMRAAM missiles do, but what about other gravity bombs? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Never realized they were spin stabilized like that. I didn't realize that until you pointed it out. Why did they leave fins on it? Is spinning something related to the warhead, or for stability? Do any non-nuke bombs use spin stabilization? I know the AMRAAM missiles do, but what about other gravity bombs? Probably makes it go deeper. |
|
Quoted:
It's less weird and more entertaining if you read that in the voice of the Swedish Chef. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Maybe the true delivery vehicle would be the SR-72? I doubt they would use an F-15 to delivery this thing. Wat It's less weird and more entertaining if you read that in the voice of the Swedish Chef. Bork Bork Bork |
|
|
View Quote Oh Russia. Everybody's out to get them. |
|
How are we going to use this to fight climate change? Fucking climate change!!!
|
|
Quoted:
The warhead in a B-61 isn't all that impressive. It's the precision and depth of delivery that makes it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Damn, it's hard to comprehend that that little thing would flatten a city. E=mc^2 is a bitch. The warhead in a B-61 isn't all that impressive. It's the precision and depth of delivery that makes it. Yeah fuck a lot of 340kt. Megatons, FTW!!! |
|
They've got a super bunker buster bomb that can probably take out any Iranian subterranean target. Probably done to make a point after the talks, showing what will happen if Iran fails to keep their end of the deal. And to a lesser degree, try to calm down Israel, showing that we have a "plan" if Iran misbehaves.
|
|
Quoted:
Haha, sorry. I didnt make the video. Hence the "canned sunshine" being in "" View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
All that and no sunshine? WTF OP. Needs more boom. Haha, sorry. I didnt make the video. Hence the "canned sunshine" being in "" It would be a bit of a treaty violation, so there's that. Not that it would bother me if such a treaty were ignored. |
|
Quoted:
Yeah fuck a lot of 340kt. Megatons, FTW!!! View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Damn, it's hard to comprehend that that little thing would flatten a city. E=mc^2 is a bitch. The warhead in a B-61 isn't all that impressive. It's the precision and depth of delivery that makes it. Yeah fuck a lot of 340kt. Megatons, FTW!!! The internet says this -12 is only good for a max of 50kt. That's a pretty small yield, even by today's standards. |
|
Quoted:
Do you think an F-15 would be able to penetrate airspace covered by S-300 or S-400 missile systems? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Maybe the true delivery vehicle would be the SR-72? I doubt they would use an F-15 to delivery this thing. Wat Do you think an F-15 would be able to penetrate airspace covered by S-300 or S-400 missile systems? While an interesting question, Russia's the only country with those and they're networked... which poses unique possibilities, a fighter is very likely the last place this will be deployed. Besides, we have guys like LimaXray to go downtown Moscow. |
|
View Quote Fixed for those of us who can't see embedded videos. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.