User Panel
Posted: 7/29/2015 10:10:24 PM EDT
A California Court Just Banned The Release Of Another Planned Parenthood Video
How proud is Planned Parenthood of its “fetal tissue” research involving body parts harvested from aborted babies? So proud that its organ procurement partner just asked a California court to ban the release of at least one video about its baby organ harvesting operations. And the court agreed. The Los Angeles Superior Court issued late Wednesday night a temporary restraining order against the Center for Medical Progress. Under the terms of the order, the non-profit organization is banned from releasing video of a May lunch attended by three StemExpress officials, according to the Associated Press: A temporary restraining order has been issued preventing an anti-abortion group from releasing any video of leaders of a California company that provides fetal tissue to researchers. The group is the same one that previously released three covertly shot videos of a Planned Parenthood leader discussing the sale of aborted fetuses for research. The Los Angeles Superior Court order issued Tuesday prohibits the Center for Medical Progress from releasing any video of three high-ranking StemExpress officials taken at a restaurant in May. It appears to be the first legal action prohibiting the release of a video from the organization. ... |
|
Now why would they be afraid of "medical procedure" videos being published?
Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
Why didn't they release all the videos at once?
Seems like making it one long video, putting it on the internet (where it never will go away), would be a pretty much game over expose. |
|
So, another judge just pissed on the Constitution and the 1st Amendment.
|
|
|
Quoted: Why didn't they release all the videos at once? Seems like making it one long video, putting it on the internet (where it never will go away), would be a pretty much game over expose. View Quote If they drop everything that they have all at once, a month from now nobody cares. If they drag it out, you slowly start to change hearts and minds. |
|
The reason Conservatives will never win, is because they follow the law.
|
|
I'm sure they would have done the same thing to 60 Minutes if they had under-cover video of a conservative organization doing something despicable.
Eric
|
|
|
|
I would assume it's not that they are afraid or support it, it comes down to California law where you cannot record people on phone or camera without telling them you are recording them.
My last job in IT we revamped the company with VOIP phones. One of the options the new phones had was to record the conversation and send the recording to your email inbox. We were advised even though we explained to the company they were not allowed to record conversations to disable the function on the phones to prevent law suits coming against the company. We disabled the function on the phones. |
|
Quoted:
Why didn't they release all the videos at once? Seems like making it one long video, putting it on the internet (where it never will go away), would be a pretty much game over expose. View Quote Because the CMP wanted to catch them in a lie. It is like a chess gambit. One week CMP releases the first video. Planned parenthood has the rest of that week to put together some sort of public response or statement. If they said, "No we don't do that!" Then another video gets released which contradicts what PP's first public statement. And so on and so forth |
|
Quoted:
Yep, somewhere without the 9th Circus court of appeals View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Release them in another state. Yep, somewhere without the 9th Circus court of appeals I hope they aren't hacked and I hope the hackers don't release the videos. |
|
Quoted: Because the CMP wanted to catch them in a lie. It is like a chess gambit. One week CMP releases the first video. Planned parenthood has the rest of that week to put together some sort of public response or statement. If they said, "No we don't do that!" Then another video gets released which contradicts what PP's first public statement. And so on and so forth View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Why didn't they release all the videos at once? Seems like making it one long video, putting it on the internet (where it never will go away), would be a pretty much game over expose. Because the CMP wanted to catch them in a lie. It is like a chess gambit. One week CMP releases the first video. Planned parenthood has the rest of that week to put together some sort of public response or statement. If they said, "No we don't do that!" Then another video gets released which contradicts what PP's first public statement. And so on and so forth No wiki-leaks types solution? |
|
|
Send it to me in NV, I'll make sure that video reaches far and wide.
|
|
It'd be a shame if it were to get out somehow. If only there was some way to release a video on the internet w/o getting caught. |
|
Quoted:
I would imagine that in the next week or so that video will find itself into the wild anyway. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The reason Conservatives will never win, is because they follow the law. I would imagine that in the next week or so that video will find itself into the wild anyway. I fucking hope so. |
|
The fact that a judge had to do this speaks volumes about what's on the video.
|
|
That's going to make people who really didn't care about it, TRY really hard to watch it now.
We are Americans after all. |
|
|
This will be revisited, as I understand it, the people had to have an expectation of privacy and there is case law stating that is not applicable in a busy restaurant
|
|
As Mark Levin would say, this is crony capitalism in its most notorious and obvious manifestation. Even IF the no recording law was the one cited, if it didn't exist the court would have found another reason to issue an injunction.
I have not trusted a politician of any stripe or robe above county level for many years, and at county level because we can keep an eye on them. Since tar and feathers are no longer readily available, I'd settle for Gorilla Glue and shredded paper to convey the message. |
|
|
Quoted:
If they drop everything that they have all at once, a month from now nobody cares. If they drag it out, you slowly start to change hearts and minds. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Why didn't they release all the videos at once? Seems like making it one long video, putting it on the internet (where it never will go away), would be a pretty much game over expose. If they drop everything that they have all at once, a month from now nobody cares. If they drag it out, you slowly start to change hearts and minds. I agree that is what they are doing. They are trying to stay in the news long enough for the majority of Americans to hear their story. If they are news at the water cooler for one week then maybe only 5% of the population hears the message, but for five months, well then 95% might hear. |
|
Quoted: I agree that is what they are doing. They are trying to stay in the news long enough for the majority of Americans to hear their story. If they are news at the water cooler for one week then maybe only 5% of the population hears the message, but for five months, well then 95% might hear. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Why didn't they release all the videos at once? Seems like making it one long video, putting it on the internet (where it never will go away), would be a pretty much game over expose. If they drop everything that they have all at once, a month from now nobody cares. If they drag it out, you slowly start to change hearts and minds. I agree that is what they are doing. They are trying to stay in the news long enough for the majority of Americans to hear their story. If they are news at the water cooler for one week then maybe only 5% of the population hears the message, but for five months, well then 95% might hear. Yep, if it were just one and done no one would care in a month. If they release a new video every couple of weeks, it will be a major election issue. Then we will see how dedicated the Democrats are to abortion. |
|
Quoted:
Because the CMP wanted to catch them in a lie. It is like a chess gambit. One week CMP releases the first video. Planned parenthood has the rest of that week to put together some sort of public response or statement. If they said, "No we don't do that!" Then another video gets released which contradicts what PP's first public statement. And so on and so forth View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Why didn't they release all the videos at once? Seems like making it one long video, putting it on the internet (where it never will go away), would be a pretty much game over expose. Because the CMP wanted to catch them in a lie. It is like a chess gambit. One week CMP releases the first video. Planned parenthood has the rest of that week to put together some sort of public response or statement. If they said, "No we don't do that!" Then another video gets released which contradicts what PP's first public statement. And so on and so forth Also agree with this. The trickle has destroyed many a people who claimed to know nothing. They probably don't have as much evidence as they'd like to have, but when they catch the enemy in contradictions then you know that they have something to hide. |
|
I say release it anyways. I'm sure the video has passed out of the State of California and their jurisdiction by this point.
|
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Why didn't they release all the videos at once? Seems like making it one long video, putting it on the internet (where it never will go away), would be a pretty much game over expose. Because the CMP wanted to catch them in a lie. It is like a chess gambit. One week CMP releases the first video. Planned parenthood has the rest of that week to put together some sort of public response or statement. If they said, "No we don't do that!" Then another video gets released which contradicts what PP's first public statement. And so on and so forth No wiki-leaks types solution? Easy enough. Just use a different private key to encrypt each video and leak the private keys over time. "I didn't release a video, I sent out a random string of text, your "honor" " |
|
So California has now pissed on the First Amendment, the Second Amendment......
Why don't they just order some troops to be quartered in people's houses, and go for a run? |
|
|
|
Release the video. If they know it's damning then the truth will set them free and the judge will run and hide from the fallout.
Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.