Good, very accurate. I haven't stretched it out yet. Next week.

 You dickhead!

Yes, I'm jelly.

Congrats.

I still love you man, no homo

Sent you some ammo for the stretch out stage, wait till it gets there. You are gonna love it, I promise.

Friend who's kid is a Marine sniper told me they're making them wear face shields for practice with the Barrett rifles now. Too many detached retinas. Be careful.

Thanks Mo, you're the best

Look at all the gas coming out the action, I'm guessing it's not lefty friendly.

Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile

The M107A1 was basically designed to be used suppressed.  I remember cans giving a lot of mechanical and reliability issues with these M82 rifles as they are reciprocating (without a brake it wont be able to pull the barrel forward).  


Ronnie made some video explaining the reason why you shouldn't suppress an 82 and why you can with a M107A1, but I have no idea where that video is now on the internet.  It was something to do with the added weight, wear, spring, and accelerator rod.  A can also throws a lot of momentum back into the rifle because non Barrett suppressors do not have brakes.  A lot of the claim has been reliability and weakness of parts (seems like the M107A1 uses a lot of titanium).  Seems like a lot of complaints about accuracy for a non 107 suppressed.


The Military did extensive testing on 50 cal cans and the barrett m82's (keep in mind, the mil called the 82's as M107's, notice the no "A1" designation) and basically found that the reliability is gone with it and the rifles were prone to breaking and failing.

Here is that link: http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2006smallarms/semick.pdf

Next time you're on the island for a fishing trip, drop by my place and I'll babysit it for you.