User Panel
Posted: 7/7/2015 10:55:58 AM EDT
http://www.cnbc.com/id/102811143
Health Insurance Companies Seek Big Rate Increases for 2016 WASHINGTON — Health insurance companies around the country are seeking rate increases of 20 percent to 40 percent or more, saying their new customers under the Affordable Care Act turned out to be sicker than expected. Federal officials say they are determined to see that the requests are scaled back. Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans — market leaders in many states — are seeking rate increases that average 23 percent in Illinois, 25 percent in North Carolina, 31 percent in Oklahoma, 36 percent in Tennessee and 54 percent in Minnesota, according to documents posted online by the federal government and state insurance commissioners and interviews with insurance executives. The Oregon insurance commissioner, Laura N. Cali, has just approved 2016 rate increases for companies that cover more than 220,000 people. Moda Health Plan, which has the largest enrollment in the state, received a 25 percent increase, and the second-largest plan, LifeWise, received a 33 percent increase. Jesse Ellis O'Brien, a health advocate at the Oregon State Public Interest Research Group, said: "Rate increases will be bigger in 2016 than they have been for years and years and will have a profound effect on consumers here. Some may start wondering if insurance is affordable or if it's worth the money." View Quote In their submissions to federal and state regulators, insurers cite several reasons for big rate increases. These include the needs of consumers, some of whom were previously uninsured; the high cost of specialty drugs; and a policy adopted by the Obama administration in late 2013 that allowed some people to keep insurance that did not meet new federal standards. Amy L. Bowen, a spokeswoman for the Geisinger Health Plan in Pennsylvania, and people buying insurance on the exchange were therefore sicker than expected. Geisinger, often praised as a national model of coordinated care, has requested an increase of 40 percent in rates for its health maintenance organization. ... Federal officials have often highlighted a provision of the Affordable Care Act that caps insurers' profits and requires them to spend at least 80 percent of premiums on medical care and related activities. "Because of the Affordable Care Act," Mr. Obama told supporters in 2013, "insurance companies have to spend at least 80 percent of every dollar that you pay in premiums on your health care — not on overhead, not on profits, but on you." in the last two months, some insurers said that their claims payments totaled not just 80 percent, but more than 100 percent of premiums. And that, they said, is unsustainable. It would be funny if it weren't going to ruin a lot of people, destroy the healthcare system, and if it hadn't been predicted from the get-go. |
|
It's going to become so bad and unaffordable for people that everyone is going to be screaming for universal healthcare. That's the plan.
|
|
|
This won't affect my $2500 reduction in healthcare cost per year will it?
|
|
|
|
ACA has benefited insurance companies greatly. I wouldn't worry about them.
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
It's going to become so bad and unaffordable for people that everyone is going to be screaming for universal healthcare. That's the plan. This, the thread could stop here. One of our resident Brits will be along to say how wonderful their system is. |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
It's going to become so bad and unaffordable for people that everyone is going to be screaming for universal healthcare. That's the plan. I concur. Single-payer is the goal. We are truly fucked if the federal government is ever in charge of hiring all health care providers. Don't get sick. |
|
I can afford health insurance, I just can't afford the health care that is attached to it. $15000.00 grand a year
before I see any benefits. $700.00 per month plus $6200.00 out of pocket and that's just me, my wife pays the same thing. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
It's going to become so bad and unaffordable for people that everyone is going to be screaming for universal healthcare. That's the plan. That was ALWAYS the end goal. Of course it was. The left has never hidden the fact that this is their end-game. Everyone who has even a basic knowledge of how the world works knew this. The rest fell for the BS. |
|
My Platinum Plan got cancelled as of the end of this year making it the third self employed plan to be cancelled since I was told I could keep my Health Insurance
|
|
Quoted: I can afford health insurance, I just can't afford the health care that is attached to it. $15000.00 grand a year before I see any benefits. $700.00 per month plus $6200.00 out of pocket and that's just me, my wife pays the same thing. View Quote I pay $205/month for the whole family. IIRC it's $150 deductible per person, then 10% to $1,000. At $1,000 out of pocket for the family it's capped for the year and 100% is paid after that. Pregnancy is always 100% covered. Of course the real cost is 1 weekend a month, two weeks in the summer and they can deploy me any time. |
|
From a local paper.
"Blue Cross lost $141 million in the first year. Last year they raised 19%, they have filed to raise 36% for 2016. One county in Tennessee, they have 23,600 customers. 16,000 from the website. 3% of those drove up 50% of the cost. There is a hair dresser paying $2 dollars a month for healthcare. The rest is covered by the State of Tennessee." See any problems with this |
|
A few of the older folks at my work are on the bubble for retirement. Due to the recent health cost increases, they have decided to just throw in the towel and retire so that they can collect medicare. My employer is dropping coverage that they have offered for 30+ years and giving us a meager pay bump to cover the difference. I'll be paying an extra $1k or so out of pocket for my young family for barely adequate coverage.
YAY affordable healthcare for everyone! What a fucking joke. |
|
Found out yesterday that my insurance company of 123 years is throwing in the towel after 1.5 years with Obamacare. I, yet AGAIN have to find another insurance policy!
|
|
Looking at this one way is that these huge increases impacting most voters before November 2016 "might" lead to Obamacare being repealed.
The downside if that happens (rates rise up to 40%) is that for a year or two beaucoup millions of Americans are seriously hurt financially. |
|
Quoted:
A few of the older folks at my work are on the bubble for retirement. Due to the recent health cost increases, they have decided to just throw in the towel and retire so that they can collect medicare. My employer is dropping coverage that they have offered for 30+ years and giving us a meager pay bump to cover the difference. I'll be paying an extra $1k or so out of pocket for my young family for barely adequate coverage. YAY affordable healthcare for everyone! What a fucking joke. View Quote You filthy racist, its affordable care for the preferred classes. |
|
Ours is going from $1k per month to $1200. Don't know about the rest of the plan yet.
|
|
Quoted:
A few of the older folks at my work are on the bubble for retirement. Due to the recent health cost increases, they have decided to just throw in the towel and retire so that they can collect medicare. View Quote Do you have to retire to be on Medicare? Or can you still work and just get Medicare medical coverage? |
|
Insurers with decades of experience and brand-new plans underestimated claims costs. View Quote From the article. The way I understand it is that the government changed the playing rules part way through the process...initially 'everyone' would have to have a plan that met the Obamacare criteria....then after a push back by the insured losing their plan/doctor, the government decided to let people keep their older plans...So the new obamacare plans (with rates based on an average population) got the sick people (not an average population) to sign up. They were the uninsured (too expensive to get their insurance due to pre-existing conditions in a lot of cases) who didn't qualify for group (employer paid for the most part) insurances. Of course, they've pushed the Employer requirements on Obamacare back...so the worst part hasn't hit yet.....employers dropping insurance coverage, cutting positions and hours, etc. |
|
Quoted: Looking at this one way is that these huge increases impacting most voters before November 2016 "might" lead to Obamacare being repealed. The downside if that happens (rates rise up to 40%) is that for a year or two beaucoup millions of Americans are seriously hurt financially. View Quote |
|
I liked my plan. The Gov didn't like it and made it obsolete. My health care carrier offered me a new plan, I didn't like it quite as much but it was still okay. The Gov didn't like it and made it obsolete. I'm now on a plan I don't F'ing like, now the rates are going to go up. LOL WTF.
|
|
Its unaffordable now.
What are they doing with all the money they currently are collecting. THAT is the industry that no one is watching. |
|
|
Quoted:
ACA has benefited insurance companies greatly. I wouldn't worry about them. View Quote some insurance companies have grown from it. most are losing money on exchange business. some companies it put out of business. the real plan in this law is 2-3 giant national companies controlling it all. it will make it easier for the government to control. fewer ceos to lean on. if they can't have national health where the government employs the dr's (which is the long run plan), then they'll have de-facto single payor where government tells 2-3 giant corporations what to do, and uses regulation to lean on dr's and hospitals by capping prices. |
|
|
In financial statements filed with the government in the last two months, some insurers said that their claims payments totaled not just 80 percent, but more than 100 percent of premiums. And that, they said, is unsustainable. View Quote This is the key statement for understanding the situation. Insuring the uninsurable, even at the current rates, is unsustainable. This is as damning of single payer as it is of Obamacare. Free healthcare my ass. |
|
Quoted:
From the article. The way I understand it is that the government changed the playing rules part way through the process...initially 'everyone' would have to have a plan that met the Obamacare criteria....then after a push back by the insured losing their plan/doctor, the government decided to let people keep their older plans...So the new obamacare plans (with rates based on an average population) got the sick people (not an average population) to sign up. They were the uninsured (too expensive to get their insurance due to pre-existing conditions in a lot of cases) who didn't qualify for group (employer paid for the most part) insurances. Of course, they've pushed the Employer requirements on Obamacare back...so the worst part hasn't hit yet.....employers dropping insurance coverage, cutting positions and hours, etc. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Insurers with decades of experience and brand-new plans underestimated claims costs. From the article. The way I understand it is that the government changed the playing rules part way through the process...initially 'everyone' would have to have a plan that met the Obamacare criteria....then after a push back by the insured losing their plan/doctor, the government decided to let people keep their older plans...So the new obamacare plans (with rates based on an average population) got the sick people (not an average population) to sign up. They were the uninsured (too expensive to get their insurance due to pre-existing conditions in a lot of cases) who didn't qualify for group (employer paid for the most part) insurances. Of course, they've pushed the Employer requirements on Obamacare back...so the worst part hasn't hit yet.....employers dropping insurance coverage, cutting positions and hours, etc. yes, they required insurers to set rates for 2014 by early 2013, then changed the rules in december 2013 in a way that drastically changed the expected costs of the people enrolling in 2014. 2015 pricing happened in early 2014 before the impact of the new enrollees and last minute changes was fully known. 2016 pricing (which is what all the big increases in the news lately is about) was the first round that had a somewhat ok idea of what the costs of the insured pool look like, and it's not pretty. = big increases. On top of all that, even if we had got the cost estimates right, there are stabilization programs for the first three years of the program that phase out and add to the needed increases. Plans could have guessed the cost profile for 2014 exactly right and still been perfectly reasonable in putting out 15%+ rate increases just because of medical expense inflation and the phase out of these stabilization programs. it will be fun once the Cadillac tax starts dismantling employer based insurance. |
|
Quoted:
some insurance companies have grown from it. most are losing money on exchange business. some companies it put out of business. the real plan in this law is 2-3 giant national companies controlling it all. it will make it easier for the government to control. fewer ceos to lean on. if they can't have national health where the government employs the dr's (which is the long run plan), then they'll have de-facto single payor where government tells 2-3 giant corporations what to do, and uses regulation to lean on dr's and hospitals by capping prices. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
ACA has benefited insurance companies greatly. I wouldn't worry about them. some insurance companies have grown from it. most are losing money on exchange business. some companies it put out of business. the real plan in this law is 2-3 giant national companies controlling it all. it will make it easier for the government to control. fewer ceos to lean on. if they can't have national health where the government employs the dr's (which is the long run plan), then they'll have de-facto single payor where government tells 2-3 giant corporations what to do, and uses regulation to lean on dr's and hospitals by capping prices. What companies went out of busines and what companies are controlling it?? |
|
Quoted:
Its unaffordable now. What are they doing with all the money they currently are collecting. THAT is the industry that no one is watching. View Quote at the idea that no one is watching the health "insurance" industry. there aren't few that are more regulated and more the topic of headline news right now. |
|
My wife went to work for our family doctor starting yesterday. Her insurance will cost her $160 a month with a $5000 deductible. If she were to add me it would cost $498 per month just for me. Total $658 a month. I guess I won't have insurance. Fuck obammy.
|
|
Quoted:
ACA has benefited insurance companies greatly. I wouldn't worry about them. View Quote They will benefit greatly right up the point they are all forced out of business because .gov will be taking all their customers and putting them in a single payer plan. Some argue they were short sighted and stupid, others argue they had no choice - make money while they're still around. Long story short, government involvement always fucks things up. ALWAYS. |
|
Quoted:
What companies went out of busines and what companies are controlling it?? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
ACA has benefited insurance companies greatly. I wouldn't worry about them. some insurance companies have grown from it. most are losing money on exchange business. some companies it put out of business. the real plan in this law is 2-3 giant national companies controlling it all. it will make it easier for the government to control. fewer ceos to lean on. if they can't have national health where the government employs the dr's (which is the long run plan), then they'll have de-facto single payor where government tells 2-3 giant corporations what to do, and uses regulation to lean on dr's and hospitals by capping prices. What companies went out of busines and what companies are controlling it?? example of going out of business: http://www.jsonline.com/business/assurant-to-exit-health-insurance-business-b99516948z1-306779721.html http://www.siouxlandmatters.com/story/d/story/iowa-insurance-commissioner-to-take-over-coopportu/25236/X4CGKIw7HEaN_Rw0tVl8hw who will be running the show? the feds will be telling the companies that result from all this M&A activity what to do, and will write regulation to benefit them and drive small cos out of business: http://www.unitedhealthgroup.com/ http://www.wsj.com/articles/with-merger-deal-aetna-humana-get-ahead-of-the-pack-1436143581 http://www.wsj.com/articles/anthem-cigna-rekindle-merger-talks-1435845994 |
|
Quoted:
You're delusional if you think Obamacare is going to be repealed ever. Even if we get another Reagan in the White House and have majority in Congress, it isn't going to happen. The republicans want this as much as the libs. What's sad is that there are so many blindly voting for the GOP thinking they'll actually do something about it. NOT GONNA HAPPEN. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Looking at this one way is that these huge increases impacting most voters before November 2016 "might" lead to Obamacare being repealed. The downside if that happens (rates rise up to 40%) is that for a year or two beaucoup millions of Americans are seriously hurt financially. In that way healthcare and immigration reform/enforcement are similar............ |
|
Thanks, "Affordable" Care Act.
Maybe we should name the next one the "Really Mutherfucking Expensive Care Act" and it'll bring prices down. |
|
yeah im going to lose my cadillac plan and get the universal yugo plan.
|
|
View Quote and yet he was re-elected when he should have been brought of the WH in handcuffs. |
|
|
|
|
Not even going to FBHO...no this warrants a
FUCK YOU BARRACK HUSSEIN OBAMA... AWESOME PLAN at $347 a month and a 2500 deductible to SHIT PLAN at $971 a month and a $12900 deductible...with some FSA bitch paying $67 a month for her identical plan and bitching about it...I pay more in a month than that bitch pays in a year... |
|
Quoted:
.................... some insurance companies have grown from it. most are losing money on exchange business. some companies it put out of business. the real plan in this law is 2-3 giant national companies controlling it all. it will make it easier for the government to control. fewer ceos to lean on. if they can't have national health where the government employs the dr's (which is the long run plan), then they'll have de-facto single payor where government tells 2-3 giant corporations what to do, and uses regulation to lean on dr's and hospitals by capping prices. View Quote I don't think there is much doubt about what you post. Didn't Obama years ago say he wanted a one payor (or minimum payor) system? |
|
Mine has increased $1000 over the last two years and I have major medical... I'm actually lucky, I got grandfathered in and pay $25x.xx a month. My GF went to get insurance with the exact same company, we are the same age, she only makes $32k a year, and the cheapest plan BC/BS had (which was worse than my plan) was $368 a month! No way she can afford that!
...and I don't mean to come off like a dick, but all these newly insurance are really screwing up ones ability to see a doctor in a timely manner. I remember when you would call the doc, speak to someone, and depending the problem, you'd be in in a few days, maybe a week. Now? "Next month." It's honestly quicker to just go to urgent care, which for some odd reason in actually CHEAPER! Than going to see my Primarily. My Dad is a Doc, he actually retired because it was costing him more to keep his practice open... Too bad, he is a great Doc and really cared about his patients. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
It's going to become so bad and unaffordable for people that everyone is going to be screaming for universal healthcare. That's the plan. FPNI as usual... I doubt we'll go single payor anytime soon. Decades out, probably. What we will get is more and more regulations that shift people out of employer based coverage and into the exchanges, and tweaks to medicaid that shift those people into exchanges. When the outcry over high premiums gets bad enough, then they'll pass a "public option" government run plan that will "compete" with insurance co's to drive prices down. Though it won't really compete because it will be priced at a loss with taxpayers picking up the tab. the 2-3 mega companies that result from all the insurer M&A will get contracts with the gov to administer the public option. All other competitors will be driven out of business because you can't compete with someone who can fund losses from the fedgov's budget. meanwhile, they'll continue passing regs that go after the providers (since the prices dr's / clinics / hospitals / pharma / device manufacturers /etc. charge are the real driver of insurance prices). When the gov caps the money the providers can get for a service, then our service will go to shit. good dr's will retire early. those who stay will cut corners in order to survive on inadequate payments from medicare / medicaid / public option plans. ask a dr how much money they make on the average medicaid funded patient. it's a shit show. |
|
The cost of the premiums, coupled with the huge deductibles are making it worthless coverage to me and you wind up paying out of pocket for almost everything anyway. IMO it's like paying $1500 a month insurance and having a 80K deductible on your $15k car. Catastrophic illness means bankruptcy one way or the other, so why not roll the dice. I'm considering joining a recognised religious health sharing group which gives me a waver to opt out of the whole blood sucking system. I've been considering something like this: http://www.healthcaresharing.org/hcsm/ Anyone have experience with this? |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.