User Panel
Quoted: My only conclusion; Those cops are dopers. Arfcom doesn't like dopers. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: What I'm most amazed at is the fact that this is the only thread I can ever remember with police misconduct that wasn't IMMMEDIATELY swarmed by ARFCOMs holster sniffers claiming they need more context, or how this was in fact (wait for it, ARFCOM's favorite .mil/LE adjective) "outstanding" police work. It's almost as though they've thrown in the towel on this one right outta the gate. Was it the destruction of the surveillance system? Cops eating pot candy/food? The fact that the motorcycle cop from the village people was allowed to participate? Dunno. My only conclusion; Those cops are dopers. Arfcom doesn't like dopers. If the only issue they see here is the cops eating pot candy, they'd be about one rung higher on the ladder of professional ethics as those in the video. |
|
Quoted:
I read the bold and then I read it again. I have one question for you. Why? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
In! Digging the moto cop keeping his helmet on Made me laugh. Not a bad idea though. If they are trying the product, they need to be fired ASAP. Drug test. Positive hit and kick them to the curb. Even consider charging them with evidence tampering. I don't get the camera destruction. Find the recorder and unplug it. Can't do it? Well, then clip the wire or cover them up. I read the bold and then I read it again. I have one question for you. Why? To hide their pillaging. |
|
View Quote One too many edibles. |
|
Seems like this sort of think is becoming less the exception and more the rule.
|
|
Quoted:
http://tosh.cc.com/blog/files/2014/01/copbong.jpg http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m7sd9chlkh1qlcundo1_500.jpg View Quote Thank you! Those pics coupled with your username=priceless! |
|
Quoted:
Made me laugh. Not a bad idea though. If they are trying the product, they need to be fired ASAP. Drug test. Positive hit and kick them to the curb. Even consider charging them with evidence tampering. I don't get the camera destruction. Find the recorder and unplug it. Can't do it? Well, then clip the wire or cover them up. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
In! Digging the moto cop keeping his helmet on Made me laugh. Not a bad idea though. If they are trying the product, they need to be fired ASAP. Drug test. Positive hit and kick them to the curb. Even consider charging them with evidence tampering. I don't get the camera destruction. Find the recorder and unplug it. Can't do it? Well, then clip the wire or cover them up. Why wait for the positive hit? You have video evidence of them using drugs. |
|
|
California cops often can get away with anything and they know it. Highly paid and highly protected.
|
|
Quoted:
Seems like this sort of think is becoming less the exception and more the rule. View Quote Jumping to conclusions? However, Rojas added that because of the editing, it’s impossible to know if the behavior was taken out of context. The video doesn’t show where the alleged edibles came from, and it’s not completely clear whether the policewoman was referring to the amputee in her comment. The clip with officers throwing darts appears to repeat some of the same scenes more than once. “I don’t know if that’s [a marijuana] edible. Where did [the officer] get it?” Rojas said. “Is that a protein bar or an edible?” Rojas requested that Pappas turn over the full, unedited video to police to assist in the investigation. Pappas says he doesn’t know definitively that the officers were eating marijuana edibles because he “can’t see the labels,”........... Voice of OC also requested the full unedited video, but was told that it was taken from a digital video recording machine and isn’t in “a recognizable format,” making it difficult to transfer. Pappas added that he would soon be filing a lawsuit aimed at invalidating a voter-approved measure permitting 20 marijuana collectives to operate in an industrial section of the city. “I’m filing a lawsuit, so [the police] can get the raw footage in discovery,” Pappas said. http://voiceofoc.org/2015/06/santa-ana-to-investigate-police-conduct-in-pot-shop-raid/ |
|
Quoted:
It sure looked to me like they were trying to bash open an outward swinging commercial door. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
It looked like they were banging on the door then pulled it open in the beginning. Cue the gif! Eta: actually I can't tell. They may have been trying to pry it open. Nvm. It sure looked to me like they were trying to bash open an outward swinging commercial door. That's only because they were already high. |
|
Quoted:
Jumping to conclusions? However, Rojas added that because of the editing, it’s impossible to know if the behavior was taken out of context. The video doesn’t show where the alleged edibles came from, and it’s not completely clear whether the policewoman was referring to the amputee in her comment. The clip with officers throwing darts appears to repeat some of the same scenes more than once. “I don’t know if that’s [a marijuana] edible. Where did [the officer] get it?” Rojas said. “Is that a protein bar or an edible?” Rojas requested that Pappas turn over the full, unedited video to police to assist in the investigation. Pappas says he doesn’t know definitively that the officers were eating marijuana edibles because he “can’t see the labels,”........... Voice of OC also requested the full unedited video, but was told that it was taken from a digital video recording machine and isn’t in “a recognizable format,” making it difficult to transfer. Pappas added that he would soon be filing a lawsuit aimed at invalidating a voter-approved measure permitting 20 marijuana collectives to operate in an industrial section of the city. “I’m filing a lawsuit, so [the police] can get the raw footage in discovery,” Pappas said. http://voiceofoc.org/2015/06/santa-ana-to-investigate-police-conduct-in-pot-shop-raid/ View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Seems like this sort of think is becoming less the exception and more the rule. Jumping to conclusions? However, Rojas added that because of the editing, it’s impossible to know if the behavior was taken out of context. The video doesn’t show where the alleged edibles came from, and it’s not completely clear whether the policewoman was referring to the amputee in her comment. The clip with officers throwing darts appears to repeat some of the same scenes more than once. “I don’t know if that’s [a marijuana] edible. Where did [the officer] get it?” Rojas said. “Is that a protein bar or an edible?” Rojas requested that Pappas turn over the full, unedited video to police to assist in the investigation. Pappas says he doesn’t know definitively that the officers were eating marijuana edibles because he “can’t see the labels,”........... Voice of OC also requested the full unedited video, but was told that it was taken from a digital video recording machine and isn’t in “a recognizable format,” making it difficult to transfer. Pappas added that he would soon be filing a lawsuit aimed at invalidating a voter-approved measure permitting 20 marijuana collectives to operate in an industrial section of the city. “I’m filing a lawsuit, so [the police] can get the raw footage in discovery,” Pappas said. http://voiceofoc.org/2015/06/santa-ana-to-investigate-police-conduct-in-pot-shop-raid/ Alright, let's give them the benefit of the doubt on all of that, it's generous but let's do it. Why did they try to break all of the cameras? |
|
. They are totally Fucking disgusting and LE wonders why some people have got it in for them. Fire everyone of those mother suckers.
|
|
Quoted:
Alright, let's give them the benefit of the doubt on all of that, it's generous but let's do it. Why did they try to break all of the cameras? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Seems like this sort of think is becoming less the exception and more the rule. Jumping to conclusions? However, Rojas added that because of the editing, it’s impossible to know if the behavior was taken out of context. The video doesn’t show where the alleged edibles came from, and it’s not completely clear whether the policewoman was referring to the amputee in her comment. The clip with officers throwing darts appears to repeat some of the same scenes more than once. “I don’t know if that’s [a marijuana] edible. Where did [the officer] get it?” Rojas said. “Is that a protein bar or an edible?” Rojas requested that Pappas turn over the full, unedited video to police to assist in the investigation. Pappas says he doesn’t know definitively that the officers were eating marijuana edibles because he “can’t see the labels,”........... Voice of OC also requested the full unedited video, but was told that it was taken from a digital video recording machine and isn’t in “a recognizable format,” making it difficult to transfer. Pappas added that he would soon be filing a lawsuit aimed at invalidating a voter-approved measure permitting 20 marijuana collectives to operate in an industrial section of the city. “I’m filing a lawsuit, so [the police] can get the raw footage in discovery,” Pappas said. http://voiceofoc.org/2015/06/santa-ana-to-investigate-police-conduct-in-pot-shop-raid/ Alright, let's give them the benefit of the doubt on all of that, it's generous but let's do it. Why did they try to break all of the cameras? Did they break them or remove them from the mounting locations? The cop in the video seemed to be pulling them down kinda gently to be honest. Being real honest, I'm nearly positive the female cop was talking about the one legged scooter bound woman when she made the "almost kicked her in the nub" comment. |
|
Quoted:
Did they break them or remove them from the mounting locations? The cop in the video seemed to be pulling them down kinda gently to be honest. Being real honest, I'm nearly positive the female cop was talking about the one legged scooter bound woman when she made the "almost kicked her in the nub" comment. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Seems like this sort of think is becoming less the exception and more the rule. Jumping to conclusions? However, Rojas added that because of the editing, it’s impossible to know if the behavior was taken out of context. The video doesn’t show where the alleged edibles came from, and it’s not completely clear whether the policewoman was referring to the amputee in her comment. The clip with officers throwing darts appears to repeat some of the same scenes more than once. “I don’t know if that’s [a marijuana] edible. Where did [the officer] get it?” Rojas said. “Is that a protein bar or an edible?” Rojas requested that Pappas turn over the full, unedited video to police to assist in the investigation. Pappas says he doesn’t know definitively that the officers were eating marijuana edibles because he “can’t see the labels,”........... Voice of OC also requested the full unedited video, but was told that it was taken from a digital video recording machine and isn’t in “a recognizable format,” making it difficult to transfer. Pappas added that he would soon be filing a lawsuit aimed at invalidating a voter-approved measure permitting 20 marijuana collectives to operate in an industrial section of the city. “I’m filing a lawsuit, so [the police] can get the raw footage in discovery,” Pappas said. http://voiceofoc.org/2015/06/santa-ana-to-investigate-police-conduct-in-pot-shop-raid/ Alright, let's give them the benefit of the doubt on all of that, it's generous but let's do it. Why did they try to break all of the cameras? Did they break them or remove them from the mounting locations? The cop in the video seemed to be pulling them down kinda gently to be honest. Being real honest, I'm nearly positive the female cop was talking about the one legged scooter bound woman when she made the "almost kicked her in the nub" comment. Ok, we'll say "disable", why were they trying to "disable" the cameras? |
|
Quoted:
Did they break them or remove them from the mounting locations? The cop in the video seemed to be pulling them down kinda gently to be honest. Being real honest, I'm nearly positive the female cop was talking about the one legged scooter bound woman when she made the "almost kicked her in the nub" comment. View Quote I thought that was obvious, dude. |
|
Remember kids... only the police are Profesional enough to have firearms.
|
|
|
Quoted:
Jumping to conclusions? However, Rojas added that because of the editing, it’s impossible to know if the behavior was taken out of context. The video doesn’t show where the alleged edibles came from, and it’s not completely clear whether the policewoman was referring to the amputee in her comment. The clip with officers throwing darts appears to repeat some of the same scenes more than once. “I don’t know if that’s [a marijuana] edible. Where did [the officer] get it?” Rojas said. “Is that a protein bar or an edible?” Rojas requested that Pappas turn over the full, unedited video to police to assist in the investigation. Pappas says he doesn’t know definitively that the officers were eating marijuana edibles because he “can’t see the labels,”........... Voice of OC also requested the full unedited video, but was told that it was taken from a digital video recording machine and isn’t in “a recognizable format,” making it difficult to transfer. Pappas added that he would soon be filing a lawsuit aimed at invalidating a voter-approved measure permitting 20 marijuana collectives to operate in an industrial section of the city. “I’m filing a lawsuit, so [the police] can get the raw footage in discovery,” Pappas said. http://voiceofoc.org/2015/06/santa-ana-to-investigate-police-conduct-in-pot-shop-raid/ View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Seems like this sort of think is becoming less the exception and more the rule. Jumping to conclusions? However, Rojas added that because of the editing, it’s impossible to know if the behavior was taken out of context. The video doesn’t show where the alleged edibles came from, and it’s not completely clear whether the policewoman was referring to the amputee in her comment. The clip with officers throwing darts appears to repeat some of the same scenes more than once. “I don’t know if that’s [a marijuana] edible. Where did [the officer] get it?” Rojas said. “Is that a protein bar or an edible?” Rojas requested that Pappas turn over the full, unedited video to police to assist in the investigation. Pappas says he doesn’t know definitively that the officers were eating marijuana edibles because he “can’t see the labels,”........... Voice of OC also requested the full unedited video, but was told that it was taken from a digital video recording machine and isn’t in “a recognizable format,” making it difficult to transfer. Pappas added that he would soon be filing a lawsuit aimed at invalidating a voter-approved measure permitting 20 marijuana collectives to operate in an industrial section of the city. “I’m filing a lawsuit, so [the police] can get the raw footage in discovery,” Pappas said. http://voiceofoc.org/2015/06/santa-ana-to-investigate-police-conduct-in-pot-shop-raid/ |
|
If they are trying the product, they need to be fired ASAP. Drug test. Positive hit and kick them to the curb. Even consider charging them with evidence tampering.
I don't get the camera destruction. Find the recorder and unplug it. Can't do it? Well, then clip the wire or cover them up. View Quote How about prosecuted? Oh yeah, we don't do that... |
|
Will "TURN OFF THAT RADIO!" become the new pick up that can?
|
|
What the hell was Officer Spaceball doing with holding the bolt cutters up like the Ten Commandments?
|
|
|
That looked like raid by The Village People.
All it needs is the soundtrack to Macho Man! Anyone out there with good video editing skills? |
|
Quoted:
Ok, we'll say "disable", why were they trying to "disable" the cameras? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Because they were trying to destroy the business. There was a reason for the raid and it wasn't about the law. Pappas claims the lawsuit will include evidence of a “high ranking city official” having a “pecuniary interest in the operations of a lottery winning collective,” and that this official, whom Pappas declined to name, likely had a hand in directing the police raids. |
|
Shouldn't they lose their rights to carry and own firearms now? Injecting marijuanas is a disqualification for guns. oh wait.
|
|
Quoted:
I have a couple of industry contacts that make very good money wiring the access control and camera systems for the clinics. I might even know who wired this place since one of them ALWAYS does a coupe of hidden secondary, stand alone (self recording) or direct to cloud cameras outside of the regular camera and dvr setup. I am curious as to why Santa Ana PD is even raiding a clinic…. Shits legal yo. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
what camera kept recording? One they missed. Looks like they had a secondary system that was hidden better... Good thinking. I have a couple of industry contacts that make very good money wiring the access control and camera systems for the clinics. I might even know who wired this place since one of them ALWAYS does a coupe of hidden secondary, stand alone (self recording) or direct to cloud cameras outside of the regular camera and dvr setup. I am curious as to why Santa Ana PD is even raiding a clinic…. Shits legal yo. It was an "unlicensed" business.... I think the cops just wanted to try out this whole pot thing they keep arresting people for |
|
Quoted:
Jumping to conclusions? However, Rojas added that because of the editing, it’s impossible to know if the behavior was taken out of context. The video doesn’t show where the alleged edibles came from, and it’s not completely clear whether the policewoman was referring to the amputee in her comment. The clip with officers throwing darts appears to repeat some of the same scenes more than once. “I don’t know if that’s [a marijuana] edible. Where did [the officer] get it?” Rojas said. “Is that a protein bar or an edible?” Rojas requested that Pappas turn over the full, unedited video to police to assist in the investigation. Pappas says he doesn’t know definitively that the officers were eating marijuana edibles because he “can’t see the labels,”........... Voice of OC also requested the full unedited video, but was told that it was taken from a digital video recording machine and isn’t in “a recognizable format,” making it difficult to transfer. Pappas added that he would soon be filing a lawsuit aimed at invalidating a voter-approved measure permitting 20 marijuana collectives to operate in an industrial section of the city. “I’m filing a lawsuit, so [the police] can get the raw footage in discovery,” Pappas said. http://voiceofoc.org/2015/06/santa-ana-to-investigate-police-conduct-in-pot-shop-raid/ View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Seems like this sort of think is becoming less the exception and more the rule. Jumping to conclusions? However, Rojas added that because of the editing, it’s impossible to know if the behavior was taken out of context. The video doesn’t show where the alleged edibles came from, and it’s not completely clear whether the policewoman was referring to the amputee in her comment. The clip with officers throwing darts appears to repeat some of the same scenes more than once. “I don’t know if that’s [a marijuana] edible. Where did [the officer] get it?” Rojas said. “Is that a protein bar or an edible?” Rojas requested that Pappas turn over the full, unedited video to police to assist in the investigation. Pappas says he doesn’t know definitively that the officers were eating marijuana edibles because he “can’t see the labels,”........... Voice of OC also requested the full unedited video, but was told that it was taken from a digital video recording machine and isn’t in “a recognizable format,” making it difficult to transfer. Pappas added that he would soon be filing a lawsuit aimed at invalidating a voter-approved measure permitting 20 marijuana collectives to operate in an industrial section of the city. “I’m filing a lawsuit, so [the police] can get the raw footage in discovery,” Pappas said. http://voiceofoc.org/2015/06/santa-ana-to-investigate-police-conduct-in-pot-shop-raid/ |
|
|
That wasn't a bust, that was a robbery.
... And the people they robbed PAID them to do it. Boy, I hope the business owner bought them lunch too. |
|
Quoted:
Because they were trying to destroy the business. There was a reason for the raid and it wasn't about the law. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Ok, we'll say "disable", why were they trying to "disable" the cameras? Because they were trying to destroy the business. There was a reason for the raid and it wasn't about the law. Pappas claims the lawsuit will include evidence of a “high ranking city official” having a “pecuniary interest in the operations of a lottery winning collective,” and that this official, whom Pappas declined to name, likely had a hand in directing the police raids. Good to see police forces have cleaned up their act since the rough & rowdy days of the 1920's. |
|
Quoted:
Ok, we'll say "disable", why were they trying to "disable" the cameras? View Quote I don't know why they are. Some reasons to consider are: The video is on a loop and will begin erasing evidence you need You don't know how or who has remote access You don't know about or if there is a cloud back-up You don't want any interviews or potential witnesses to be immediately identified via video If you have an informant inside, you don't want them to be immediately known If you have an officer undercover, you don't want them known There is also a security issue, as the suspects would be able to monitor who has what evidence, if they planned to attempt a stop to the seizure If you don't have a valid reason, leave it alone. I have done enough where we left the cameras.on until we were done. We had video of what we did. We had video of how we did it. Since dvrs are much bigger than tapes used to be, there shouldn't be a big concern about overwrite. Standalone cameras aren't always the same though. |
|
|
I would like to see the unedited version of the tape, but it sure doesn't look good for the cops in that one. It will be interesting to see the outcome of that IA.....
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
Why wait for the positive hit? You have video evidence of them using drugs. View Quote If the video shows what he is eating and it's source, can him. The problem is we have an edited video. It shows him eating but where did the food come from. I always bring protein bars to a warrant. You never know how long the will be. If video shows him eating or drinking anything from there, he needs discipline. If it is a narcotic laced food, can him. |
|
They should have just ate some edibles, and then raided the place........
Tomorrow Yeah we will raid it tomorrow. |
|
Bet those cops all stepped on the pot needles, thuse then, they are not responsible for their behavior.
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
It's only one bad apple, what are you worried about? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Why are so many of them ok with that? Out of that many guys not one thought that was a bad idea? WTF? It's only one bad apple, what are you worried about? They'll just smile and waive now. This is the policing we've been asking for. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.