User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 4/26/2015 11:29:02 PM EDT
[#1]
Taurus? Fuck no.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2015 11:29:55 PM EDT
[#2]
value wise it seems like a good deal for you. I wouldn't do it but that's my tainted perception of taurus speaking. If the taurus is what you want I'd do the deal.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2015 11:30:20 PM EDT
[#3]
NIB Taurus usually has the appearance of any other gun after it has been moderately used
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2015 11:31:18 PM EDT
[#4]
Taurus revolvers aren't bad guns, and the dollar value is ok for the trade. But the G20 would be easier to sell than a big .44 mag.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2015 11:31:43 PM EDT
[#5]
First poster knows his way around a framing hammer I see.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2015 11:32:15 PM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Taurus revolvers aren't bad guns, and the dollar value is ok for the trade. But the G20 would be easier to sell than a big .44 mag. that's sort of how I'm feeling. if it was in .454 casull, I might do it and actually keep it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2015 11:33:50 PM EDT
[#7]
Fuck that noise.
Friends don't let friends buy Taurus. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2015 11:35:25 PM EDT
[#8]
Taurus? Fook no! Knew a guy whose hammer spur broke - not abused, just broke clean off. SKIP.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2015 11:35:30 PM EDT
[#9]
No. Why the hell would you get rid of a G20?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2015 11:38:02 PM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Taurus revolvers aren't bad guns, and the dollar value is ok for the trade. But the G20 would be easier to sell than a big .44 mag. This. The .44 mag on up models are supposed to be quite decent from my understanding. Not going to win a beauty contest but they aughta hold their own. That being said. Keep the G20. 10mm is MOAR BETTER 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2015 11:38:43 PM EDT
[#11]
I wouldn't do it unless it was the .454
Those are the fun version of the raging bull |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2015 11:38:45 PM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
No. Why the hell would you get rid of a G20? because I got a gen 4 G21, which fits my hand better, a threaded .45 ACP barrel, and a 10mm conversion barrel, so i can shoot whichever I choose now...with a suppressor, and because I dont want a semi-redundant pistol. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2015 11:41:48 PM EDT
[#13]
I would not make that trade but if it works for you. Do it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2015 11:46:15 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Taurus? Fuck no. FPNI. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2015 11:47:11 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
FPNI. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Taurus? Fuck no. FPNI. that was my original inclination and how i am still leaning. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2015 11:51:16 PM EDT
[#16]
Due to the amount of problems I had out of my .454 Raging Bull (lots of parts breakages) I'm going to go with FUCK NO.
Honestly, if you want a cheap .44 mag that you can shoot almost any load in, look for a Ruger Redhawk (NOT Super Redhawk). Nice guns. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2015 11:52:38 PM EDT
[#17]
I would not trade just because Taurus
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2015 11:53:12 PM EDT
[#18]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
because I got a gen 4 G21, which fits my hand better, a threaded .45 ACP barrel, and a 10mm conversion barrel, so i can shoot whichever I choose now...with a suppressor, and because I dont want a semi-redundant pistol. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
No. Why the hell would you get rid of a G20? because I got a gen 4 G21, which fits my hand better, a threaded .45 ACP barrel, and a 10mm conversion barrel, so i can shoot whichever I choose now...with a suppressor, and because I dont want a semi-redundant pistol. A 20 and a 21 are the same frame size , They should fit your hand the same |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2015 11:56:05 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuoted: A 20 and a 21 are the same frame size , They should fit your hand the same Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: No. Why the hell would you get rid of a G20? because I got a gen 4 G21, which fits my hand better, a threaded .45 ACP barrel, and a 10mm conversion barrel, so i can shoot whichever I choose now...with a suppressor, and because I dont want a semi-redundant pistol. A 20 and a 21 are the same frame size , They should fit your hand the same |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/26/2015 11:57:49 PM EDT
[#20]
Fuck no.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 12:01:14 AM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
A 20 and a 21 are the same frame size , They should fit your hand the same Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
No. Why the hell would you get rid of a G20? because I got a gen 4 G21, which fits my hand better, a threaded .45 ACP barrel, and a 10mm conversion barrel, so i can shoot whichever I choose now...with a suppressor, and because I dont want a semi-redundant pistol. A 20 and a 21 are the same frame size , They should fit your hand the same but a gen 3 and a gen 4 aren't 
the gen 4 frame fits my hand infinitely better than the gen 3. it isnt a big difference dimensionally, but it does fit much better. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 12:01:50 AM EDT
[#22]
Not a bad trade if you have a gen 4 anyways I like my Raging Bull 44 6" I have a few S&W 44's and couple Rugers.... 44 is my favorite caliber The Raging Bull is a soft shooter accurate and though no S&W trigger it is not bad and through use is smoothing out....I am keeping mine I like it a lot and its been good for me...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 12:17:50 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This. The .44 mag on up models are supposed to be quite decent from my understanding. Not going to win a beauty contest but they aughta hold their own. That being said. Keep the G20. 10mm is MOAR BETTER Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Taurus revolvers aren't bad guns, and the dollar value is ok for the trade. But the G20 would be easier to sell than a big .44 mag. This. The .44 mag on up models are supposed to be quite decent from my understanding. Not going to win a beauty contest but they aughta hold their own. That being said. Keep the G20. 10mm is MOAR BETTER BS. If you don't really know the quality of a Taurus, just shut up. OP, try searching Arfcom for my post about a comparison of S&W and Taurus revolvers, side-by-side with lots of pics. If you still want a Taurus you are retarded and there is no help for you. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 12:25:31 AM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
BS. If you don't really know the quality of a Taurus, just shut up. OP, try searching Arfcom for my post about a comparison of S&W and Taurus revolvers, side-by-side with lots of pics. If you still want a Taurus you are retarded and there is no help for you. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Taurus revolvers aren't bad guns, and the dollar value is ok for the trade. But the G20 would be easier to sell than a big .44 mag. This. The .44 mag on up models are supposed to be quite decent from my understanding. Not going to win a beauty contest but they aughta hold their own. That being said. Keep the G20. 10mm is MOAR BETTER BS. If you don't really know the quality of a Taurus, just shut up. OP, try searching Arfcom for my post about a comparison of S&W and Taurus revolvers, side-by-side with lots of pics. If you still want a Taurus you are retarded and there is no help for you. I really dont want one. for some reason i thought maybe it's easier to sell, or worth more. asking about that really. I dont really like wheelguns |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 12:26:36 AM EDT
[#25]
Taurus for Glock?
Seriously?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 1:09:48 AM EDT
[#26]
NO! Unless the Glock is broken and unusable which is is what the Taurus will be after you shoot it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 1:13:50 AM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
A 20 and a 21 are the same frame size , They should fit your hand the same Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
No. Why the hell would you get rid of a G20? because I got a gen 4 G21, which fits my hand better, a threaded .45 ACP barrel, and a 10mm conversion barrel, so i can shoot whichever I choose now...with a suppressor, and because I dont want a semi-redundant pistol. A 20 and a 21 are the same frame size , They should fit your hand the same The 20 G4 = the 20 SF G3 as far as grip size. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 1:16:58 AM EDT
[#28]
never Taurus
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 1:25:12 AM EDT
[#29]
OP, I have a 454 raging bull, have put lots of rounds down range with it..had problems with it once..bought a box of winchester supremes for it, and got some hot loads..luckily the gun didn't kaboom, but it did distort the frame..called both winchester and taurus, taurus said send us the gun and the ammo(this was years ago)..4 weeks later I got a new gun back... and a new box of winchester supremes...no headache, no muss..just taken care of..gun always shoots, is always fun and since the 44 is built off the same frame, I would imagine it would hold up just fine in 44 mag...
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 1:29:14 AM EDT
[#30]
As said above, trade for a Ruger Redhawk if you want a 44.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 2:20:29 AM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This. The .44 mag on up models are supposed to be quite decent from my understanding. Not going to win a beauty contest but they aughta hold their own. That being said. Keep the G20. 10mm is MOAR BETTER Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Taurus revolvers aren't bad guns, and the dollar value is ok for the trade. But the G20 would be easier to sell than a big .44 mag. This. The .44 mag on up models are supposed to be quite decent from my understanding. Not going to win a beauty contest but they aughta hold their own. That being said. Keep the G20. 10mm is MOAR BETTER I have had two Taurus 44 mag revolvers. Both failed under fire (cylinder locked up on one and timing went off on the other). Both went back and were repaired for free and then promptly sold. I will never own another Taurus. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 2:21:24 AM EDT
[#32]
Fuck Taurus.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 3:42:16 AM EDT
[#33]
I vote no, I wouldn't trade a Hi-point for a Taurus muchless a glock.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 4:08:14 AM EDT
[#34]
No. I personally would not OP. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 4:15:32 AM EDT
[#35]
Having tried several Taurus revolvers, I wouldn't have another even if someone tried to give it to me. Seriously.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 4:58:14 AM EDT
[#36]
A .44 mag Taurus.
That just sounds unsafe. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 5:25:15 AM EDT
[#37]
Fuck no. Why the hell would you trade a gun that's gonna work for a piece of shit like a Turdus?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 5:44:28 AM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
A .44 mag Taurus. That just sounds unsafe. Quite possibly. A friend had a .41 mag Taurus kaboom on him in a big way. In my "formative" years I owned two Taurus revolvers. Both failed me when they broke parts. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 7:08:34 AM EDT
[#39]
That's like trading a civic for a saturn, why?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 7:12:11 AM EDT
[#40]
I would hold out and see if something else comes up on the trade market.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 7:14:20 AM EDT
[#41]
They are both POSs
(Not a Glock fan and I detest Taurus crap) |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 7:14:21 AM EDT
[#42]
FPNI
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 7:21:48 AM EDT
[#43]
Taurus quality control, reliability and durability are always questionable. Some people have been lucky, great for them. Others have not been so lucky with Taurus. I know from first-hand experience that their "Customer Service" is non-existent even on a brand new gun. I can only imagine how less than unhelpful they could be with resolving issues with a second-hand gun.
IMHO- A Taurus product may be a good gamble if you are on budget with no hopes of coming up with any more money but a G20 is a proven product and I wouldn't trade it for somebody else's problem. |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 7:33:51 AM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Taurus quality control, reliability and durability are always questionable. Some people have been lucky, great for them. Others have not been so lucky with Taurus. I know from first-hand experience that their "Customer Service" is non-existent even on a brand new gun. I can only imagine how less than unhelpful they could be with resolving issues with a second-hand gun. IMHO- A Taurus product may be a good gamble if you are on budget with no hopes of coming up with any more money but a G20 is a proven product and I wouldn't trade it for somebody else's problem. To be fair they sent my friend a new .41 mag to replace the kaboomed one.....He promptly sold it. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 7:35:55 AM EDT
[#45]
Easy - NO.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 6:53:46 PM EDT
[#46]
despite a lot of reading failures here, i guess i am now solidly in the no camp, i was there to start but figured i'd ask
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 6:56:36 PM EDT
[#47]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Taurus? Fuck no. I have the .454 version and love it! 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 7:01:41 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I vote no, I wouldn't trade a Hi-point for a Taurus muchless a glock. Me neither |
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 7:15:24 PM EDT
[#49]
They quit making the 500 S&W for a reason.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 4/27/2015 7:17:51 PM EDT
[#50]
I have a .480 raging bull and have had it for years. Works great.
Of course in GD, Taurus isn't the flavor of the month. A year ago the 92 was the best ever in this forum. |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
