User Panel
This thread is done. It has been taken over by liberals and trannies.
|
|
|
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
This thread is done. It has been taken over by liberals and trannies. You called, big boy? https://passmeanothercupcake.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/kristen.gif |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Hey guys, what'd I miss?? For real this time. Seems fine to me. And still open and running.... Clearly it's done. Then you should just log out if it is done |
|
It's not really done, it's just mostly done.
Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Never left, never said that. I said this forum is done. ARF of old is long gone, and I only go back 8 years or so. It's a SJW party now. |
|
Quoted: Never left, never said that. I said this forum is done. ARF of old is long gone, and I only go back 8 years or so. It's a SJW party now. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Maybe not done, but a SJW playground now. Oh you're back. Never left, never said that. I said this forum is done. ARF of old is long gone, and I only go back 8 years or so. It's a SJW party now. |
|
Quoted: Name some names if you think so, don't hide behind blanket statements and generalizations. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Maybe not done, but a SJW playground now. Oh you're back. Never left, never said that. I said this forum is done. ARF of old is long gone, and I only go back 8 years or so. It's a SJW party now. He used to I think was, he still might. |
|
Quoted:
Name some names if you think so, don't hide behind blanket statements and generalizations. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Maybe not done, but a SJW playground now. Oh you're back. Never left, never said that. I said this forum is done. ARF of old is long gone, and I only go back 8 years or so. It's a SJW party now. I will not name names...that's against CoC here. Are you saying I should break the rules? |
|
Quoted: I will not name names...that's against CoC here. Are you saying I should break the rules? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Maybe not done, but a SJW playground now. Oh you're back. Never left, never said that. I said this forum is done. ARF of old is long gone, and I only go back 8 years or so. It's a SJW party now. I will not name names...that's against CoC here. Are you saying I should break the rules? I don't think naming the names of people you think are SJWs is against the COC . Doesn't fit either of the relevant COC #. 6) Attacking or insulting a member in an effort to elicit a negative response. You have the right to disagree, but please do so in a respectful manner. This rule also includes posting disparaging remarks about a member's family. More specifically creating topics and or replies meant to disrupt the Site's day to day management, disrupt member's resources, or the ability of the Site to function normally. This can include but is not limited to posting overly large photos, excessive GIF animations, or the use of repetitive or overly long text strings. It can also be the posting of threads or replies, in which it appears that the sole purpose is to provoke other members, or to damage the image and/or reputation of the site. |
|
|
Quoted:
Never left, never said that. I said this forum is done. ARF of old is long gone, and I only go back 8 years or so. It's a SJW party now. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Maybe not done, but a SJW playground now. Oh you're back. Never left, never said that. I said this forum is done. ARF of old is long gone, and I only go back 8 years or so. It's a SJW party now. I'm sorry to hear you feel that way. FWIW I'm sorry about your pup, and I also don't mind you being here at all even if you don't necessarily approve, because I don't recall you actively going out of your way to fuck with me. I can deal with disapproval as long as the parties have that courtesy. |
|
Quoted:
It's been almost completely taken over by liberals. Good luck to the owners, I wish them well. View Quote I'm not sure if it's been taken over per se by liberals. There is a certain majority comprised of: cop-hating dopers Internet lawyers criminal apologists subversive union supporters |
|
Quoted:
I'm not sure if it's been taken over per se by liberals. There is a certain majority comprised of: cop-hating dopers Internet lawyers criminal apologists subversive union supporters View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
It's been almost completely taken over by liberals. Good luck to the owners, I wish them well. I'm not sure if it's been taken over per se by liberals. There is a certain majority comprised of: cop-hating dopers Internet lawyers criminal apologists subversive union supporters Oh dear. |
|
Quoted: I will not name names...that's against CoC here. Are you saying I should break the rules? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Name some names if you think so, don't hide behind blanket statements and generalizations. I will not name names...that's against CoC here. Are you saying I should break the rules? eta- by that I mean your concern troll antics and lack of taking initiative to investigate and determine root causes and seek productive ways to affect positive change is fundamentally annoying. You spawned a 40 page thread in which your assertion that the forum was "done" only to have it blow up in your face is hilarious, but your red herring of saying "well not done, but there's so many SJW's" is weak. You stated "This forum is done. It's been almost completely taken over by liberals. Good luck to the owners, I wish them well." Break the rules? No. Look in a mirror? Yes.
|
|
Im with you razorback. We have picked up extra fucktards in the last year. But we always had them. Just at a lower count . We got a new owner ??? Who ?? Where the hell have I been ?
|
|
Quoted:
Never left, never said that. I said this forum is done. ARF of old is long gone, and I only go back 8 years or so. It's a SJW party now. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Maybe not done, but a SJW playground now. Oh you're back. Never left, never said that. I said this forum is done. ARF of old is long gone, and I only go back 8 years or so. It's a SJW party now. And I'm sure, that you lump me in there. Never mind that I still hold the same politics I always have and am the same person you have IMed with. I think you are applying a very liberal definition to what an SJW is. PROTIP: Just because someone is not lockstep with the GOP does not automatically make them and SJW, sometimes it just means they don't care. |
|
Quoted:
Textbook liberal SJW here: http://i1070.photobucket.com/albums/u494/eesmith79/995FF0C4-282A-48FE-A1A4-FB5237DF9BDD_zps8oovpvdb.png View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Maybe not done, but a SJW playground now. Oh you're back. Never left, never said that. I said this forum is done. ARF of old is long gone, and I only go back 8 years or so. It's a SJW party now. And I'm sure, that you lump me in there. Never mind that I still hold the same politics I always have and am the same person you have IMed with. I think you are applying a very liberal definition to what an SJW is. PROTIP: Just because someone is not lockstep with the GOP does not automatically make them and SJW, sometimes it just means they don't care. Textbook liberal SJW here: http://i1070.photobucket.com/albums/u494/eesmith79/995FF0C4-282A-48FE-A1A4-FB5237DF9BDD_zps8oovpvdb.png You are such a horrible person, you might as well just get that "BERNIE 2016" tattoo now |
|
Quoted:
You are such a horrible person, you might as well just get that "BERNIE 2016" tattoo now View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Textbook liberal SJW here: http://i1070.photobucket.com/albums/u494/eesmith79/995FF0C4-282A-48FE-A1A4-FB5237DF9BDD_zps8oovpvdb.png You are such a horrible person, you might as well just get that "BERNIE 2016" tattoo now Aw, jeez, now you've done it. First she becomes a trans-SJW, and now you're telling her to become an inky??? No wonder this forum is done. |
|
Quoted:
You know as well as I do that site staff is mostly pro-SJW. There are maybe one or two staff left that are conservative. The new owner is forgetting the face of his father. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You know as well as I do that site staff is mostly pro-SJW. There are maybe one or two staff left that are conservative. The new owner is forgetting the face of his father. |
|
Quoted:
You know as well as I do that site staff is mostly pro-SJW. There are maybe one or two staff left that are conservative. The new owner is forgetting the face of his father. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You know as well as I do that site staff is mostly pro-SJW. There are maybe one or two staff left that are conservative. The new owner is forgetting the face of his father. |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You know as well as I do that site staff is mostly pro-SJW. There are maybe one or two staff left that are conservative. The new owner is forgetting the face of his father. The Avilas sold Arfkom to MSNBC, duh. |
|
Quoted:
The Avilas sold Arfkom to MSNBC, duh. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You know as well as I do that site staff is mostly pro-SJW. There are maybe one or two staff left that are conservative. The new owner is forgetting the face of his father. The Avilas sold Arfkom to MSNBC, duh. Which is funded by Soros, who is in turn supported by the gay mafia, who are run by the Illuminati. Finally, it all makes sense. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You know as well as I do that site staff is mostly pro-SJW. There are maybe one or two staff left that are conservative. The new owner is forgetting the face of his father. Would it be against the COC for him to name members he believes are SJWs? Would he get banned, locked, or edited if he did? |
|
|
Quoted:
You know as well as I do that site staff is mostly pro-SJW. There are maybe one or two staff left that are conservative. The new owner is forgetting the face of his father. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You know as well as I do that site staff is mostly pro-SJW. There are maybe one or two staff left that are conservative. The new owner is forgetting the face of his father. Wait a minute, who do you think the old owner was and who do you think the new owner is? |
|
Quoted:
Would it be against the COC for him to name members he believes are SJWs? Would he get banned, locked, or edited if he did? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You know as well as I do that site staff is mostly pro-SJW. There are maybe one or two staff left that are conservative. The new owner is forgetting the face of his father. Would it be against the COC for him to name members he believes are SJWs? Would he get banned, locked, or edited if he did? I think his claim that most of staff is pro-SJW and non-conservative pretty much demonstrates how accurate his claims would be. As such, most of his accusations of being SJW would likely be considered personal attacks by the people he's accusing (since they likely are not SJWs at all), or as a call-out. So, while it would undoubtedly be funny, he is probably correct that it would end up being a hilarious rule violation to post his accusations. |
|
I will admit that I have opted out of renewing my membership for the first time because of all the cop bashing that goes on around here.
|
|
Quoted: I think his claim that most of staff is pro-SJW and non-conservative pretty much demonstrates how accurate his claims would be. As such, most of his accusations of being SJW would likely be considered personal attacks by the people he's accusing (since they likely are not SJWs at all), or as a call-out. So, while it would undoubtedly be funny, he is probably correct that it would end up being a hilarious rule violation to post his accusations. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You know as well as I do that site staff is mostly pro-SJW. There are maybe one or two staff left that are conservative. The new owner is forgetting the face of his father. Would it be against the COC for him to name members he believes are SJWs? Would he get banned, locked, or edited if he did? I think his claim that most of staff is pro-SJW and non-conservative pretty much demonstrates how accurate his claims would be. As such, most of his accusations of being SJW would likely be considered personal attacks by the people he's accusing (since they likely are not SJWs at all), or as a call-out. So, while it would undoubtedly be funny, he is probably correct that it would end up being a hilarious rule violation to post his accusations. Well, I stand corrected then This is why the old new pit was so great. |
|
Quoted:
I will admit that I have opted out of renewing my membership for the first time because of all the cop bashing that goes on around here. View Quote Shit can't get fixed if no one is willing to do anything about it. Mods and site staff can't see everything. So report the shit when you see it. |
|
|
What, no poll???
Aiden, I dropped my membership back when I realized this wasn't a Conservative site. It's a Pro-Gun site, just like they want. |
|
|
Quoted:
You know as well as I do that site staff is mostly pro-SJW. There are maybe one or two staff left that are conservative. The new owner is forgetting the face of his father. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You know as well as I do that site staff is mostly pro-SJW. There are maybe one or two staff left that are conservative. The new owner is forgetting the face of his father. lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol |
|
Quoted:
I think his claim that most of staff is pro-SJW and non-conservative pretty much demonstrates how accurate his claims would be. As such, most of his accusations of being SJW would likely be considered personal attacks by the people he's accusing (since they likely are not SJWs at all), or as a call-out. So, while it would undoubtedly be funny, he is probably correct that it would end up being a hilarious rule violation to post his accusations. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
You know as well as I do that site staff is mostly pro-SJW. There are maybe one or two staff left that are conservative. The new owner is forgetting the face of his father. Would it be against the COC for him to name members he believes are SJWs? Would he get banned, locked, or edited if he did? I think his claim that most of staff is pro-SJW and non-conservative pretty much demonstrates how accurate his claims would be. As such, most of his accusations of being SJW would likely be considered personal attacks by the people he's accusing (since they likely are not SJWs at all), or as a call-out. So, while it would undoubtedly be funny, he is probably correct that it would end up being a hilarious rule violation to post his accusations. I know I would be triggered at minimum |
|
|
Quoted:
Well, I stand corrected then This is why the old new pit was so great. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Would it be against the COC for him to name members he believes are SJWs? Would he get banned, locked, or edited if he did? I think his claim that most of staff is pro-SJW and non-conservative pretty much demonstrates how accurate his claims would be. As such, most of his accusations of being SJW would likely be considered personal attacks by the people he's accusing (since they likely are not SJWs at all), or as a call-out. So, while it would undoubtedly be funny, he is probably correct that it would end up being a hilarious rule violation to post his accusations. Well, I stand corrected then This is why the old new pit was so great. The new pit can still be used for this. Aiden can sack up and take EdSr to the pit for being pro-SJW. Seriously, though, what does Aiden have to lose by doing that? Worst case he loses membership to a place he obviously doesn't feel he belongs at anyway. |
|
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.