Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Page / 7
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:12:42 PM EDT
[#1]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Cool

I have been on the Iwo Jima before
View Quote




I'm sorry.


Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:13:06 PM EDT
[#2]
sigh. I miss the days when US warships had real guns on them.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:14:26 PM EDT
[#3]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:





Based off similar deployments, my guess is one, two at most. Unless they plan on getting dicey, that is.



Regarding types, your guess is as good as any, but odds are it's a Virginia.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:

I'm wondering what type of/how many subs would accompany a task force of that size?





Based off similar deployments, my guess is one, two at most. Unless they plan on getting dicey, that is.



Regarding types, your guess is as good as any, but odds are it's a Virginia.
Given the Virginia class has better littoral capabilities I would hope they are Virginias. A kilo in that neck of the woods would be a legit concern. Shallow and noisie. There are spots in the Gulf where an ssn is longer than the water is deep.

 
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:15:53 PM EDT
[#4]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Given the Virginia class has better littoral capabilities I would hope they are Virginias. A kilo in that neck of the woods would be a legit concern. Shallow and noisie. There are spots in the Gulf where an ssn is longer than the water is deep.  
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I'm wondering what type of/how many subs would accompany a task force of that size?


Based off similar deployments, my guess is one, two at most. Unless they plan on getting dicey, that is.

Regarding types, your guess is as good as any, but odds are it's a Virginia.
Given the Virginia class has better littoral capabilities I would hope they are Virginias. A kilo in that neck of the woods would be a legit concern. Shallow and noisie. There are spots in the Gulf where an ssn is longer than the water is deep.  

there are other possibilities, like a seawolf, but there's not as many of them, or a Los angeles class.. but my bet would still be on a Virginia.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:16:34 PM EDT
[#5]
I was on the uss iwo jima, when i was in the Marines.When i was on it, it was LPH 2.I notice now it has  a big #7 on the flight deck.Does anyone know what this means?
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:17:06 PM EDT
[#6]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quite obviously you have no fear in inquiring Allah's vengeful wrath delivered by the mighty Iranian suicide speedboat swarms...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ofmkikhAnA

View Quote


More like 2 dudes on a jetski with one holding a RPG...true story.

Side note-There is nothing more rewarding than seeing an inferior navy try and follow a carrier doing 32 knots, the way they eat shit in our wake makes it all worth it.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:18:55 PM EDT
[#7]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I was on the uss iwo jima, when i was in the Marines.When i was on it, it was LPH 2.I notice now it has  a big #7 on the flight deck.Does anyone know what this means?
View Quote
So the Marines don't forget to change their underwear every seventh day?



 
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:19:49 PM EDT
[#8]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I was on the uss iwo jima, when i was in the Marines.When i was on it, it was LPH 2.I notice now it has  a big #7 on the flight deck.Does anyone know what this means?
View Quote

It means you're old.

LPH-2 has long since been decommissioned and a new ship LHD-7 was commissioned in 2001.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:20:12 PM EDT
[#9]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I was on the uss iwo jima, when i was in the Marines.When i was on it, it was LPH 2.I notice now it has  a big #7 on the flight deck.Does anyone know what this means?
View Quote

This is a different ship, LHD class amphibious assault ship.  Similar ship to the LPH in mission.  7 is the hull number, 7 of 8 LHD's in commission now.  
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:20:15 PM EDT
[#10]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I was on the uss iwo jima, when i was in the Marines.When i was on it, it was LPH 2.I notice now it has  a big #7 on the flight deck.Does anyone know what this means?
View Quote

Your old ship was decommissioned and this is her new namesake. Way more capable.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:20:22 PM EDT
[#11]
Ive got wood.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:20:41 PM EDT
[#12]
Needs a couple of Battleships
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:22:34 PM EDT
[#13]
D7


Did I hit one?


Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:24:03 PM EDT
[#14]
I have a strange urge to play C&C right now
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:24:30 PM EDT
[#15]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
So the Marines don't forget to change their underwear every seventh day?
 
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
I was on the uss iwo jima, when i was in the Marines.When i was on it, it was LPH 2.I notice now it has  a big #7 on the flight deck.Does anyone know what this means?
So the Marines don't forget to change their underwear every seventh day?
 


They change them?  Sure didn't smell like it.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:26:18 PM EDT
[#16]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History

This looks like something Wyle E. Coyote  purchased from an ACME catalog.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:29:07 PM EDT
[#17]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
lol Iran...go back to wearing large gold chains and wearing too much colon.
View Quote


I see what you did there, whether intentional or not
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:30:14 PM EDT
[#18]
Pretty cool ships


Maybe its just me but i'd love to see some kickass battleships again, not so much because they may be needed but because they are awesome
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:33:06 PM EDT
[#19]
Please tell me we have more than a cruiser and two destroyers escorting all of that.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:34:45 PM EDT
[#20]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I was on the uss iwo jima, when i was in the Marines.When i was on it, it was LPH 2.I notice now it has  a big #7 on the flight deck.Does anyone know what this means?
View Quote

 

 It's the new Iwo the one you were on was decommissioned in the 1990's.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:34:51 PM EDT
[#21]
May God Bless all who serve on those fine ships.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:38:26 PM EDT
[#22]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
I was on the uss iwo jima, when i was in the Marines.When i was on it, it was LPH 2.I notice now it has  a big #7 on the flight deck.Does anyone know what this means?
View Quote



I think it means the Navy will always have a ship named Iwo Jima to transport Marines.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:38:42 PM EDT
[#23]
And to think, in 25-30 years we will be Britain as well.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:40:27 PM EDT
[#24]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:





there are other possibilities, like a seawolf, but there's not as many of them, or a Los angeles class.. but my bet would still be on a Virginia.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:


Quoted:


Quoted:

I'm wondering what type of/how many subs would accompany a task force of that size?





Based off similar deployments, my guess is one, two at most. Unless they plan on getting dicey, that is.



Regarding types, your guess is as good as any, but odds are it's a Virginia.
Given the Virginia class has better littoral capabilities I would hope they are Virginias. A kilo in that neck of the woods would be a legit concern. Shallow and noisie. There are spots in the Gulf where an ssn is longer than the water is deep.  


there are other possibilities, like a seawolf, but there's not as many of them, or a Los angeles class.. but my bet would still be on a Virginia.
I am no expert but I was under the impression that 688s and the two non special project Seawolfs were more of a deep water boat. Long tails, low freq active arrays Etc.  The Virginia class was specifically designed for shallower waters with lateral arrays and better noise reduction processing

 
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:41:28 PM EDT
[#25]
One of these...










Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:42:50 PM EDT
[#26]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
More like 2 dudes on a jetski with one holding a RPG...true story.



Side note-There is nothing more rewarding than seeing an inferior navy try and follow a carrier doing 32 knots, the way they eat shit in our wake makes it all worth it.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:

Quite obviously you have no fear in inquiring Allah's vengeful wrath delivered by the mighty Iranian suicide speedboat swarms...



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ofmkikhAnA







More like 2 dudes on a jetski with one holding a RPG...true story.



Side note-There is nothing more rewarding than seeing an inferior navy try and follow a carrier doing 32 knots, the way they eat shit in our wake makes it all worth it.
32 knots huh? Only one reactor on line?

 
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:49:19 PM EDT
[#27]
Roughly how many Marines would be aboard those amphibs? How many attack helicopters?
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:50:24 PM EDT
[#28]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Please tell me we have more than a cruiser and two destroyers escorting all of that.
View Quote

Why would you need more?

Interesting graphic:
http://i2.wp.com/news.usni.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/yemen_cig_pgn_cimsec-17apr15.png
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:50:44 PM EDT
[#29]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Roughly how many Marines would be aboard those amphibs? How many attack helicopters?
View Quote

Three. Anymore is overkill.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:55:46 PM EDT
[#30]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History



Some one is trolling dport.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:57:56 PM EDT
[#31]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:



Quoted:

Please tell me we have more than a cruiser and two destroyers escorting all of that.


Why would you need more?



Interesting graphic:

http://i2.wp.com/news.usni.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/yemen_cig_pgn_cimsec-17apr15.png
Well, because it was only a decade or so ago that you had more escorts than that just for the CBG, and the MEU had its own impressive array of escorts.  Also, ships can only be in one place at a time, no matter how capable.  In any event, I just think we need a definite FFG replacement and we needed it yesterday.  

 
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 8:58:29 PM EDT
[#32]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Roughly how many Marines would be aboard those amphibs? How many attack helicopters?
View Quote

One article I read stated somewhere in the neighborhood of 2,500 marines. Helicopters, no clue.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 9:00:35 PM EDT
[#33]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Roughly how many Marines would be aboard those amphibs? How many attack helicopters?
View Quote




Too many.

They're all standing in line in front of the ship's store.


Link Posted: 4/20/2015 9:02:34 PM EDT
[#34]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Well, because it was only a decade or so ago that you had more escorts than that just for the CBG, and the MEU had its own impressive array of escorts.  Also, ships can only be in one place at a time, no matter how capable.  In any event, I just think we need a definite FFG replacement and we needed it yesterday.    
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Please tell me we have more than a cruiser and two destroyers escorting all of that.

Why would you need more?

Interesting graphic:
http://i2.wp.com/news.usni.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/yemen_cig_pgn_cimsec-17apr15.png
Well, because it was only a decade or so ago that you had more escorts than that just for the CBG, and the MEU had its own impressive array of escorts.  Also, ships can only be in one place at a time, no matter how capable.  In any event, I just think we need a definite FFG replacement and we needed it yesterday.    


We don't escort carriers with the quantities we used to. Too many ships, not enough missions.

I really think the LPD's need those VLS tubes and ESSM's they were designed for for that reason. They don't always have a DDG around.

ETA: That infographic shows 2 more DDG's than was shown above.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 9:02:53 PM EDT
[#35]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Well, because it was only a decade or so ago that you had more escorts than that just for the CBG, and the MEU had its own impressive array of escorts.  Also, ships can only be in one place at a time, no matter how capable.  In any event, I just think we need a definite FFG replacement and we needed it yesterday.    
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Please tell me we have more than a cruiser and two destroyers escorting all of that.

Why would you need more?

Interesting graphic:
http://i2.wp.com/news.usni.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/yemen_cig_pgn_cimsec-17apr15.png
Well, because it was only a decade or so ago that you had more escorts than that just for the CBG, and the MEU had its own impressive array of escorts.  Also, ships can only be in one place at a time, no matter how capable.  In any event, I just think we need a definite FFG replacement and we needed it yesterday.    

Did you look at the graphic?

And what is the threat? Why would you need more?

Also, during the height of the Cold War, do you know how many escorts an Amphibious Ready Group had? Zero.
It was only about 15 years ago that the idea of an Expeditionary Strike Group, putting one or two DDGs with an ARG, was put into practice. And about 10 years ago, the practice was largely abandoned.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 9:09:33 PM EDT
[#36]

Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:





This looks like something Wyle E. Coyote  purchased from an ACME catalog.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:





This looks like something Wyle E. Coyote  purchased from an ACME catalog.
"We Keel You"  OMG  



 
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 9:14:02 PM EDT
[#37]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:

Did you look at the graphic?

And what is the threat? Why would you need more?

Also, during the height of the Cold War, do you know how many escorts an Amphibious Ready Group had? Zero.
It was only about 15 years ago that the idea of an Expeditionary Strike Group, putting one or two DDGs with an ARG, was put into practice. And about 10 years ago, the practice was largely abandoned.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Please tell me we have more than a cruiser and two destroyers escorting all of that.

Why would you need more?

Interesting graphic:
http://i2.wp.com/news.usni.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/yemen_cig_pgn_cimsec-17apr15.png
Well, because it was only a decade or so ago that you had more escorts than that just for the CBG, and the MEU had its own impressive array of escorts.  Also, ships can only be in one place at a time, no matter how capable.  In any event, I just think we need a definite FFG replacement and we needed it yesterday.    

Did you look at the graphic?

And what is the threat? Why would you need more?

Also, during the height of the Cold War, do you know how many escorts an Amphibious Ready Group had? Zero.
It was only about 15 years ago that the idea of an Expeditionary Strike Group, putting one or two DDGs with an ARG, was put into practice. And about 10 years ago, the practice was largely abandoned.



The ARGs did use to have a couple of LSTs before they went to three ship ARGs.

Not exactly an escort by any means though.


Link Posted: 4/20/2015 9:15:21 PM EDT
[#38]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


We don't escort carriers with the quantities we used to. Too many ships, not enough missions.

I really think the LPD's need those VLS tubes and ESSM's they were designed for for that reason. They don't always have a DDG around.

ETA: That infographic shows 2 more DDG's than was shown above.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Please tell me we have more than a cruiser and two destroyers escorting all of that.

Why would you need more?

Interesting graphic:
http://i2.wp.com/news.usni.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/yemen_cig_pgn_cimsec-17apr15.png
Well, because it was only a decade or so ago that you had more escorts than that just for the CBG, and the MEU had its own impressive array of escorts.  Also, ships can only be in one place at a time, no matter how capable.  In any event, I just think we need a definite FFG replacement and we needed it yesterday.    


We don't escort carriers with the quantities we used to. Too many ships, not enough missions.

I really think the LPD's need those VLS tubes and ESSM's they were designed for for that reason. They don't always have a DDG around.

ETA: That infographic shows 2 more DDG's than was shown above.

The infograph mentions the Sterrett, which has left with the previous CSG, but I did confirm that the USS Farragut, a destroyer, is also part of the Roosevelt's CSG. Also added it to the OP. So that's one more DDG than originally posted.

http://news.usni.org/2015/04/17/uss-carl-vinson-carrier-chops-out-of-5th-fleet-roosevelt-picks-up-isis-strike-missions
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 9:20:01 PM EDT
[#39]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I think I see it on most all, just small is all.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Unless I missed it, most of the ships were not flying the US flag.

Is that because the photos were taken before the ships were accepted by the Navy or what?

Don't US military ships normally fly the US flag?  I never thought about it before.


I think I see it on most all, just small is all.



Link Posted: 4/20/2015 9:22:38 PM EDT
[#40]
Having been on three WestPacs I have to say those pictures give me wood.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 9:27:00 PM EDT
[#41]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


If we had no subs in the water. Which is incredibly unlikely if a carrier is nearby.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Meanwhile, sailing out of Iran.....

INS Battleship Death
http://peacemoonbeam.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83451af9f69e20176161a7473970c-pi


From the stuff I recall seeing, I thought the Iranian navy consisted of a bunch of center console Boston Whaler type fishing boats and a couple commercial shrimp catchers like in Forest Gump seemed with some rocket launchers they repurposed from Vietnam era Huey's.


Iran has a few Kilos and Yugos (submarines) that could pose a legitimate threat.

Obviously, their competence level and technology is nowhere near ours, but under the right circumstances, they could cause some trouble before being destroyed.


If we had no subs in the water. Which is incredibly unlikely if a carrier is nearby.


Stickfigure posted the video of what I was thinking about.  After seeing that, I just can't take the idea of the Iranian Navy seriously.  It reminds me of scenes from one of the Pirates of the Caribbean movies where the sailing ship is traveling across the desert or the Greenpeace tards trying to ram the Japanese whaler.


Having said that; needs more Iowa class.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 9:28:24 PM EDT
[#42]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Need a picture of the man in charge, on his bike.
View Quote


Link Posted: 4/20/2015 9:29:53 PM EDT
[#43]
Older pic of the carrier, as I see F-14 goodness towards the fantail.
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 9:31:52 PM EDT
[#44]
I didn't realize how small those minesweepers are. I wouldn't want to be way out in the middle of the ocean on one of those in a bad storm!
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 9:32:10 PM EDT
[#45]
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 9:33:45 PM EDT
[#46]


This seems to me like using a very expensive shotgun to kill flies.

Link Posted: 4/20/2015 9:34:38 PM EDT
[#48]
FFS man do you even opsec?

F. B. H. O.  Could see this and our boys would be fucked.  




Thats a bunch of awesome whoopass there.  



Link Posted: 4/20/2015 9:35:32 PM EDT
[#49]
Link Posted: 4/20/2015 9:37:54 PM EDT
[#50]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:


I see what you did there, whether intentional or not
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Quoted:
Quoted:
lol Iran...go back to wearing large gold chains and wearing too much colon.


I see what you did there, whether intentional or not

Auto correct  but it turned out for the best
Page / 7
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top