User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:11:51 AM EDT
[#1]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Most ridiculous post of the day so far. If they want to protest like that get the appropriate permits where they can legally assemble with that many people and the street can be shut down to traffic. Those motherfuckers would have been looking at the muzzle of my .44 Magnum for I sure as hell would have considered them a threat surrounding my car like that. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I see no problem with this 
Motor vehicles are considered deadly weapons when used like this. They weren't attacking his vehicle until he ran over that woman. I don't like the protesters either, but they don't deserve to be driven over like dogs. They have constitutional rights just as we do. The driver should be charged for attempted murder. Most ridiculous post of the day so far. If they want to protest like that get the appropriate permits where they can legally assemble with that many people and the street can be shut down to traffic. Those motherfuckers would have been looking at the muzzle of my .44 Magnum for I sure as hell would have considered them a threat surrounding my car like that. The constitution is their permit.Anything else is bullshit. The 2nd isn't the only amendment. Based on traffic copter footage, Subaru picked a fight. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:15:40 AM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That bitches leg is going to be fucked up
Motor vehicles are considered deadly weapons when used like this. They weren't attacking his vehicle until he ran over that woman. I don't like the protesters either, but they don't deserve to be driven over like dogs. They have constitutional rights just as we do. The driver should be charged for attempted murder. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I see no problem with this
Motor vehicles are considered deadly weapons when used like this. They weren't attacking his vehicle until he ran over that woman. I don't like the protesters either, but they don't deserve to be driven over like dogs. They have constitutional rights just as we do. The driver should be charged for attempted murder. Bullshit. Your right to protest does not supercede my right to drive down a public street. GTFO out of the road. F protesters and FBHO. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:15:51 AM EDT
[#3]
Quote HistoryQuoted: SOURCE? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: SNIP Hit and run is the charge SOURCE? http://www.dailydot.com/politics/ferguson-protest-minneapolis-car-plows/ ETA: They have now added that the driver was released. No charges I guess  |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:16:09 AM EDT
[#4]
Bill Hicks - LA Riot Pedestrians.avi:
Bill Hicks approves! |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:17:11 AM EDT
[#5]
Dont stand in front of anything that can harm/kill you
 .
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:17:50 AM EDT
[#6]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That bitches leg is going to be fucked up
Motor vehicles are considered deadly weapons when used like this. They weren't attacking his vehicle until he ran over that woman. I don't like the protesters either, but they don't deserve to be driven over like dogs. They have constitutional rights just as we do. The driver should be charged for attempted murder. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
I see no problem with this
Motor vehicles are considered deadly weapons when used like this. They weren't attacking his vehicle until he ran over that woman. I don't like the protesters either, but they don't deserve to be driven over like dogs. They have constitutional rights just as we do. The driver should be charged for attempted murder. Holy shit........everyone within 100 yards of me just lost 8 IQ points just because I read that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:18:16 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
"Fuck the police! Fuck the police! Fuck the police! Fuck the police!", "OMG did that guy just run over someone?! Quick someone call the police!" Ain't it the truth? |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:18:55 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The constitution is their permit.Anything else is bullshit. The 2nd isn't the only amendment. Based on traffic copter footage, Subaru picked a fight. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I see no problem with this Motor vehicles are considered deadly weapons when used like this. They weren't attacking his vehicle until he ran over that woman. I don't like the protesters either, but they don't deserve to be driven over like dogs. They have constitutional rights just as we do. The driver should be charged for attempted murder. Most ridiculous post of the day so far. If they want to protest like that get the appropriate permits where they can legally assemble with that many people and the street can be shut down to traffic. Those motherfuckers would have been looking at the muzzle of my .44 Magnum for I sure as hell would have considered them a threat surrounding my car like that. The constitution is their permit.Anything else is bullshit. The 2nd isn't the only amendment. Based on traffic copter footage, Subaru picked a fight. Riiiiight. Get the fuck out of traffic, motherfuckers, or you get rolled over. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:20:01 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If I get stuck, shift to 4 wheel drive  Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Mob my car like that and I'm going to floor it. If I get stuck, shots will be fired. <---- look out, badass over here! If I get stuck, shift to 4 wheel drive Yep. Then if I get stuck, mag dump time. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:22:08 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Best tires for rioters? Dunflops run flats I think that's what Tony Stewart uses |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:23:32 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryI feel all warm inside after seeing that. I need a moment. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:29:41 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm........... This might change things a bit. Video from just before she came in contact with the crowd. (mob) http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=001_1416960887 Gotta admit, as much as I like seeing dumbasses get run over, that does change things a bit. The driver went around another car intentionally to drive into the crowd. There was a better way to deal with that.....and yes Ive been there before, during the Ilian Gonzalez issue down in Miami. About 1000 crazy Cubans came rushing into the street to block traffic on 79th street, I was the first car in line at the light when they ran out. I hung a right across 3 lanes of traffic from the left hand turn lane to get out of there before they blocked the whole road. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:30:53 AM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
............... Gotta admit, as much as I like seeing dumbasses get run over, that does change things a bit. The driver went around another car intentionally to drive into the crowd. There was a better way to deal with that.....and yes Ive been there before, during the Ilian Gonzalez issue down in Miami. About 1000 crazy Cubans came rushing into the street to block traffic on 79th street, I was the first car in line at the light when they ran out. I hung a right across 3 lanes of traffic from the left hand turn lane to get out of there before they blocked the whole road. One of the links said the police took him into custody but released him shortly thereafter. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:32:04 AM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Bullshit. Your right to protest does not supercede my right to drive down a public street. GTFO out of the road. F protesters and FBHO. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I see no problem with this
Motor vehicles are considered deadly weapons when used like this. They weren't attacking his vehicle until he ran over that woman. I don't like the protesters either, but they don't deserve to be driven over like dogs. They have constitutional rights just as we do. The driver should be charged for attempted murder. Bullshit. Your right to protest does not supercede my right to drive down a public street. GTFO out of the road. F protesters and FBHO. See thats a stupid statement. Someone blocking your way in traffic does not give you the right to use deadly force because you couldnt get where you wanted to go. You arent talking about being afraid for your life or your safety, youre just saying you want to drive down the street....over dumbasses in the street. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:33:31 AM EDT
[#15]
I approve.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:34:43 AM EDT
[#16]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Probably had to turn off his traction control Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Why did the car stop??? Probably had to turn off his traction control |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:36:10 AM EDT
[#17]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Ain't it the truth? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
"Fuck the police! Fuck the police! Fuck the police! Fuck the police!", "OMG did that guy just run over someone?! Quick someone call the police!" Ain't it the truth? Special snowflakes are full of irony. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:37:58 AM EDT
[#18]
Needs more this
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:38:34 AM EDT
[#19]
I would love to see GD's reaction if they were 2nd amendment protesters and it was some liberal subaru driving lesbian that ran people over.
Don't drive your car into a crowd of people. I did not know that the constitution guaranteed you obstacle free roads or the right not to be inconvenienced. Stopping was an a option prior to meeting the crowd, backing up, U turn or many cars were able to make left turns. How many burning cars, Molotov cocktails, thrown projectiles, or looting did the driver see in MSP? None? The crowd did not swarm the car, the car tried to make it through the crowd. Ever been stuck in crowd traffic after a football game? You have to creep through to get people to get out of the way. This person cruised right through. Driver is an idiot. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:39:59 AM EDT
[#20]
My take aways from this...
Look for an out and work your way around if you can. There were other vehicles that were snaking around and making a left hand turn onto the side street. If you are vapor locked from fear or simply linear thinking though I could see wanting to just continue forward. The rioters had an opportunity to simply back off and let the car pass. If you feel strongly enough that you are willing to die for your cause to stop one car then more power to you, don't complain when you get pancaked. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:41:07 AM EDT
[#21]
AS long as the driver is over 40, the Reginald Denny defense will work, even with passing the other car.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:55:12 AM EDT
[#22]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
But will she? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I see no problem with this
Motor vehicles are considered deadly weapons when used like this. They weren't attacking his vehicle until he ran over that woman. I don't like the protesters either, but they don't deserve to be driven over like dogs. They have constitutional rights just as we do. The driver should be charged for attempted murder. Put me on the jury and he'd walk. But will she? WGAF? |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 11:59:17 AM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That bitches leg is going to be fucked up Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I see no problem with this That bitches leg is going to be fucked up Motor vehicles are considered deadly weapons when used like this. They weren't attacking his vehicle until he ran over that woman. I don't like the protesters either, but they don't deserve to be driven over like dogs. They have constitutional rights just as we do. The driver should be charged for attempted murder. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:01:36 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That bitches leg is going to be fucked up Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I see no problem with this That bitches leg is going to be fucked up Motor vehicles are considered deadly weapons when used like this. They weren't attacking his vehicle until he ran over that woman. I don't like the protesters either, but they don't deserve to be driven over like dogs. They have constitutional rights just as we do. The driver should be charged for attempted murder.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:06:18 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I would love to see GD's reaction if they were 2nd amendment protesters and it was some liberal subaru driving lesbian that ran people over. Don't drive your car into a crowd of people. I did not know that the constitution guaranteed you obstacle free roads or the right not to be inconvenienced. Stopping was an a option prior to meeting the crowd, backing up, U turn or many cars were able to make left turns. How many burning cars, Molotov cocktails, thrown projectiles, or looting did the driver see in MSP? None? The crowd did not swarm the car, the car tried to make it through the crowd. Ever been stuck in crowd traffic after a football game? You have to creep through to get people to get out of the way. This person cruised right through. Driver is an idiot. Has never happened because they aren't fucking stupid enough to stand in the street. If they are actually dumb enough to go play in traffic they get what they deserve. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:08:45 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The problem is the driver drove TO the crowd THEN through the crowd. Bad plowing. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I see no problem with this Motor vehicles are considered deadly weapons when used like this. They weren't attacking his vehicle until he ran over that woman. I don't like the protesters either, but they don't deserve to be driven over like dogs. They have constitutional rights just as we do. The driver should be charged for attempted murder. No constitutional right to put the driver in fear for his life. No constitutional right to restrict his freedom of movement in a place he has every right to be. The rules regarding cars on the street and pedestrians on that sidewalk don't suddenly get suspended when you are angry enough and have a big enough mob. The people who got ran over knew what game they were playing. The problem is the driver drove TO the crowd THEN through the crowd. Bad plowing. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:13:12 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: And yet the driver was arrested.  Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: I see no problem with this Motor vehicles are considered deadly weapons when used like this. They weren't attacking his vehicle until he ran over that woman. I don't like the protesters either, but they don't deserve to be driven over like dogs. They have constitutional rights just as we do. The driver should be charged for attempted murder. No constitutional right to put the driver in fear for his life. No constitutional right to restrict his freedom of movement in a place he has every right to be. The rules regarding cars on the street and pedestrians on that sidewalk don't suddenly get suspended when you are angry enough and have a big enough mob. The people who got ran over knew what game they were playing. And yet the driver was arrested. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:15:30 PM EDT
[#28]
I am sure people here remember the asian dude who ran over the motorcycle guys (thugs) in NYC. Of course many here cheered him as his life was endanger.
So my question here is will the driver be able to claim that he was afraid for his life thus justifying his actions? |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:19:23 PM EDT
[#29]
You know, if we would cut off these fucking savages' welfare and free goodies, they would have to get a job like the rest of us and they wouldn't have all of this free time to block roads.
Instead, we give them total free support and they continue to have babies every nine months to get even more free shit. This will not end well. Wait and see. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:22:19 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
What is that? Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Needs more scythed wheel action. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/87/The_charge_of_the_Persian_scythed_chariots_at_the_battle_of_Gaugamela_by_Andre_Castaigne_(1898-1899).jpg http://www.imfdb.org/images/thumb/2/22/Jackass2_3.jpg/600px-Jackass2_3.jpg drive into a crowd that has gotten too rowdy, and then fire in the hole. After they get back up, hit them with one of those South African anti-carjacker flame thrower systems filled to the top with CS. Then hit them with a light/speaker mount in the back displaying rapidly flashing lights at 200+ lumens and sound at 200+ decibels. What is that? Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile Less than lethal Claymore. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:22:41 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I am sure people here remember the asian dude who ran over the motorcycle guys (thugs) in NYC. Of course many here cheered him as his life was endanger. So my question here is will the driver be able to claim that he was afraid for his life thus justifying his actions? I would say so. It's easy for some, from the safety of their computers, to look at an overhead video and say "oh, this direction is less dangerous than that direction". On the ground, all you are going to see is stopped or slow moving cars and the mob. I've been blocked in (or attempted so) by Houston's "Critical Mass" animals on bicycles in downtown Houston. Having 200 plus people storming down a street towards you will really, really change your point of view. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:24:47 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted: I would love to see GD's reaction if they were 2nd amendment protesters and it was some liberal subaru driving lesbian that ran people over. Don't drive your car into a crowd of people. I did not know that the constitution guaranteed you obstacle free roads or the right not to be inconvenienced. Stopping was an a option prior to meeting the crowd, backing up, U turn or many cars were able to make left turns. How many burning cars, Molotov cocktails, thrown projectiles, or looting did the driver see in MSP? None? The crowd did not swarm the car, the car tried to make it through the crowd. Ever been stuck in crowd traffic after a football game? You have to creep through to get people to get out of the way. This person cruised right through. Driver is an idiot. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:25:20 PM EDT
[#33]
I'd buy that driver a beer.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:27:27 PM EDT
[#34]
if they were not in a crosswalk, then they were jaywalking and the driver has the right of way. those claiming injury from being hit should be held liable for vehicle damages. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:28:05 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted: That bitches leg is going to be fucked up Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I see no problem with this That bitches leg is going to be fucked up Motor vehicles are considered deadly weapons when used like this. They weren't attacking his vehicle until he ran over that woman. I don't like the protesters either, but they don't deserve to be driven over like dogs. They have constitutional rights just as we do. The driver should be charged for attempted murder. There is at least one vision-impairing cloth and one asshole already jumping on the hood before the cunt with the ugly glasses gets in the way. You are 100% wrong. The crowd would have gotten to smashing windows in a few seconds anyway, had no collision with people occurred. But, I should have just said "teener" and left it at that. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:28:15 PM EDT
[#36]
needs moar speed cap'n
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:32:46 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
See thats a stupid statement. Someone blocking your way in traffic does not give you the right to use deadly force because you couldnt get where you wanted to go. You arent talking about being afraid for your life or your safety, youre just saying you want to drive down the street....over dumbasses in the street. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I see no problem with this
Motor vehicles are considered deadly weapons when used like this. They weren't attacking his vehicle until he ran over that woman. I don't like the protesters either, but they don't deserve to be driven over like dogs. They have constitutional rights just as we do. The driver should be charged for attempted murder. Bullshit. Your right to protest does not supercede my right to drive down a public street. GTFO out of the road. F protesters and FBHO. See thats a stupid statement. Someone blocking your way in traffic does not give you the right to use deadly force because you couldnt get where you wanted to go. You arent talking about being afraid for your life or your safety, youre just saying you want to drive down the street....over dumbasses in the street. The street is a place commonly known to contain automobiles moving at moderate paces in order to gt from A to B. Said vehicles are commonly known to be deadly if you get in their way as a pedestrian. This is why we don't let children play in streets. Stay the fuck out of the street, or shit like that can happen. I don't give a fuck what the purpose is for being in a public roadway. The result is the same. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:34:54 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I am sure people here remember the asian dude who ran over the motorcycle guys (thugs) in NYC. Of course many here cheered him as his life was endanger. So my question here is will the driver be able to claim that he was afraid for his life thus justifying his actions? That guy got boxed in while innocently driving down the road, and didn't move to engage the aggressors with his vehicle until they began to approach. This guy appears to have driven up to the crowd (instead of turning or turning around as appear to have been options), then began moving through the crowd. It looks like he either panicked or raged once he got all the way in, at which point the crowd got ugly at him. Not really similar circumstances. ETA: I'm still on the fence as to whether or not this was a good drive-over. The Range Rover one in NYC was good, no question. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:35:37 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I would love to see GD's reaction if they were 2nd amendment protesters and it was some liberal subaru driving lesbian that ran people over. Don't drive your car into a crowd of people. I did not know that the constitution guaranteed you obstacle free roads or the right not to be inconvenienced. Stopping was an a option prior to meeting the crowd, backing up, U turn or many cars were able to make left turns. How many burning cars, Molotov cocktails, thrown projectiles, or looting did the driver see in MSP? None? The crowd did not swarm the car, the car tried to make it through the crowd. Ever been stuck in crowd traffic after a football game? You have to creep through to get people to get out of the way. This person cruised right through. Driver is an idiot. Every 2A event I've seen (here in Phoenix) has shown the people involved to understand what a sidewalk is, how to use a crosswalk, and how to not get hit by cars that are driving by on the roads nearby. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:35:50 PM EDT
[#40]
This thread is great is showing how editing can completely change the outcome and mindset of a crowd. I along with many others at first saw the shorter video where all we see is a car surrounded by an angry crowd of protesters. The driver, attempts to escape by driving forward. We side with the driver from that clip due to previous incidents like the LA Riots.
But the longer video on Liveleak shows a different story. The vehicle wasn't swarmed and surrounded by the angry mob. Instead the vehicle is clearly driving down a roadway with viable avenues of escape. The roadway was clear and the mob was visible. The driver coule have made a u turn or made a left like the other vehicles did. Instead the driver clearly stayed in the far right lane and proceeded to drive into the crowd. At no point did the driver even attempt to avoid the confrontation. Now, did the crowd have the right to block traffic? No, not at all. The driver legally had the right of way. But the driver didn't in anyway try to avoid conflict. Yes, I'm for the right to stand one's ground but to go looking for trouble doesn't help. So take this as an example of how easy it is to whip up a crowd and change public opinion. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:36:09 PM EDT
[#41]
Those organizing protests in the street should be held liable for any resulting injuries from getting run over
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:38:47 PM EDT
[#42]
Good. Stay out of the streets.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:41:26 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Do you have a Texas CHL--that class should have covered this for you. In Texas, display of a firearm is legally considered the same as using the firearm. In practice, this may not be true, but the way the law is written, you are justified in displaying a firearm in the same circumstances you are justified in using the firearm. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Is it legal or should you show your firearm and tell people to get out of the way in this situation? Do you have a Texas CHL--that class should have covered this for you. In Texas, display of a firearm is legally considered the same as using the firearm. In practice, this may not be true, but the way the law is written, you are justified in displaying a firearm in the same circumstances you are justified in using the firearm. Well you guys got shitty gun laws and have a lot of catching up to do.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:42:37 PM EDT
[#44]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
This thread is great is showing how editing can completely change the outcome and mindset of a crowd. I along with many others at first saw the shorter video where all we see is a car surrounded by an angry crowd of protesters. The driver, attempts to escape by driving forward. We side with the driver from that clip due to previous incidents like the LA Riots. But the longer video on Liveleak shows a different story. The vehicle wasn't swarmed and surrounded by the angry mob. Instead the vehicle is clearly driving down a roadway with viable avenues of escape. The roadway was clear and the mob was visible. The driver coule have made a u turn or made a left like the other vehicles did. Instead the driver clearly stayed in the far right lane and proceeded to drive into the crowd. At no point did the driver even attempt to avoid the confrontation. Now, did the crowd have the right to block traffic? No, not at all. The driver legally had the right of way. But the driver didn't in anyway try to avoid conflict. Yes, I'm for the right to stand one's ground but to go looking for trouble doesn't help. So take this as an example of how easy it is to whip up a crowd and change public opinion. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:46:05 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Yeh. Well you guys got shitty gun laws and have a lot of catching up to do. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Is it legal or should you show your firearm and tell people to get out of the way in this situation? Do you have a Texas CHL--that class should have covered this for you. In Texas, display of a firearm is legally considered the same as using the firearm. In practice, this may not be true, but the way the law is written, you are justified in displaying a firearm in the same circumstances you are justified in using the firearm. Well you guys got shitty gun laws and have a lot of catching up to do. Disagree. Brandishing is stupid and should not be encouraged. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:47:01 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted: The crowd did not swarm the car, the car tried to make it through the crowd. Ever been stuck in crowd traffic after a football game? You have to creep through to get people to get out of the way. This person cruised right through. Driver is an idiot. The person nosed up to the crowd THINKING that they could get through just like a sports event. Then they close in and damage the car and cover it with the banner or whatever it is. True, probably shouldn't have gotten close, but the way that collection of retards swelled off the sidewalk it's a 50/50 proposition on who closed the gap. That said, I would have shot both the blonde cunt and the idiot at the driver side window. They were intending to get in... likely to cause harm. THEN sped right the fuck over whomever was in front. The cops did the right thing, they got the guy's name and now whomever wants to can get on public record and sue civilly. (You know, using courts to change how things work rather than rioting in the streets.)
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:47:38 PM EDT
[#47]
So, what car for Protesters?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:48:27 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Has never happened because they aren't fucking stupid enough to stand in the street. If they are actually dumb enough to go play in traffic they get what they deserve. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I would love to see GD's reaction if they were 2nd amendment protesters and it was some liberal subaru driving lesbian that ran people over. Don't drive your car into a crowd of people. I did not know that the constitution guaranteed you obstacle free roads or the right not to be inconvenienced. Stopping was an a option prior to meeting the crowd, backing up, U turn or many cars were able to make left turns. How many burning cars, Molotov cocktails, thrown projectiles, or looting did the driver see in MSP? None? The crowd did not swarm the car, the car tried to make it through the crowd. Ever been stuck in crowd traffic after a football game? You have to creep through to get people to get out of the way. This person cruised right through. Driver is an idiot. Has never happened because they aren't fucking stupid enough to stand in the street. If they are actually dumb enough to go play in traffic they get what they deserve. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:52:27 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Disagree. Brandishing is stupid and should not be encouraged. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Is it legal or should you show your firearm and tell people to get out of the way in this situation? Do you have a Texas CHL--that class should have covered this for you. In Texas, display of a firearm is legally considered the same as using the firearm. In practice, this may not be true, but the way the law is written, you are justified in displaying a firearm in the same circumstances you are justified in using the firearm. Well you guys got shitty gun laws and have a lot of catching up to do. Disagree. Brandishing is stupid and should not be encouraged. Someone actively trying to get through a window (what the fuck do you think happens when someone smashes at glass? beers steers and queers party?) it's the same as breaking into an occupied home. Weapons free. |
|
|
|
Posted: 11/26/2014 12:55:42 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
So, what car for Protesters? king ranch with guard can handle a 150lb hog at 70mph+ 
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
