User Panel
[#1]
|
|
[#2]
Quoted:
Better than Joe Montana? I don't think so, and Joe never ever got blown out in a super bowl or choked in big games like Peyton does all the time. It's a different league where the rules favor the wide receiver a lot more and the rules protect the QB much more. That is why current day QBs will break old records, because the game has been changed for officiating to favor offense. View Quote Montana spent most of his career on ridiculously good teams, though. I'd actually put Elway up there with Montana. He went to the Super Bowl with shitty teams most other QBs couldn't have lead to a winning record. |
|
[#3]
|
|
[#4]
Quoted:
They still got to the superbowl 2 more times since that incident. So how do you explain that? I guess they were still good enough to win their division, the playoffs, and the AFC championship. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
1 SB ring.. How many does tom brady have again? Heck, even kid brother eli has 2. How many has Brady won since the Patsies got caught cheating? They still got to the superbowl 2 more times since that incident. So how do you explain that? I guess they were still good enough to win their division, the playoffs, and the AFC championship. The explanation is that the Patriots were a really good team that was made to be a great team by cheating and playing in a shit division. |
|
[#5]
Quoted:
Using anti-Manning logic, how did Barry do in the post season compared to Emmitt Smith? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So all of you agreeing that Manning is the best QB based on some stats...do you also think Emmitt Smith is the best RB over Jim Brown, Walter Payton, and Barry Sanders? Using anti-Manning logic, how did Barry do in the post season compared to Emmitt Smith? The fact is that Manning needs everything to go right for him to be successful. Consistency and execution made him great. If his receivers routes are off a bit, or blocking breaks down he's screwed, and he ends up looking like he did against Seattle. Montana, Favre, Elway and many others could overcome and make plays when things breakdown. |
|
[#6]
Quoted:
Using anti-Manning logic, how did Barry do in the post season compared to Emmitt Smith? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So all of you agreeing that Manning is the best QB based on some stats...do you also think Emmitt Smith is the best RB over Jim Brown, Walter Payton, and Barry Sanders? Using anti-Manning logic, how did Barry do in the post season compared to Emmitt Smith? Barry Sanders never played in a super bowl and has no rings. So, clearly, Barry Sanders sucked. Thats science bitch! |
|
[#7]
Quoted:
The fact is that Manning needs everything to go right for him to be successful. Consistency and execution made him great. If his receivers routes are off a bit, or blocking breaks down he's screwed, and he ends up looking like he did against Seattle. Montana, Favre, Elway and many others could overcome and make plays when things breakdown. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So all of you agreeing that Manning is the best QB based on some stats...do you also think Emmitt Smith is the best RB over Jim Brown, Walter Payton, and Barry Sanders? Using anti-Manning logic, how did Barry do in the post season compared to Emmitt Smith? The fact is that Manning needs everything to go right for him to be successful. Consistency and execution made him great. If his receivers routes are off a bit, or blocking breaks down he's screwed, and he ends up looking like he did against Seattle. Montana, Favre, Elway and many others could overcome and make plays when things breakdown. I think Emmit Smith has more super bowl championships than Jim Brown, Walter Payton and Barry Sanders combined. So, clearly, he is the best running back to have ever played. After all, championships are everything, right? |
|
[#8]
Quoted:
The explanation is that the Patriots were a really good team that was made to be a great team by cheating and playing in a shit division. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
1 SB ring.. How many does tom brady have again? Heck, even kid brother eli has 2. How many has Brady won since the Patsies got caught cheating? They still got to the superbowl 2 more times since that incident. So how do you explain that? I guess they were still good enough to win their division, the playoffs, and the AFC championship. The explanation is that the Patriots were a really good team that was made to be a great team by cheating and playing in a shit division. AFC East is so crappy alright. Crappy enough to have a team in the AFC CHAMPIONSHIP game each of the last five years. Crappy enough to have a team in the AFC CHAMPIONSHIP game ten of the last 13 years. |
|
[#9]
Quoted:
The explanation is that the Patriots were a really good team that was made to be a great team by cheating and playing in a shit division. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
1 SB ring.. How many does tom brady have again? Heck, even kid brother eli has 2. How many has Brady won since the Patsies got caught cheating? They still got to the superbowl 2 more times since that incident. So how do you explain that? I guess they were still good enough to win their division, the playoffs, and the AFC championship. The explanation is that the Patriots were a really good team that was made to be a great team by cheating and playing in a shit division. AFC East is so crappy alright. Crappy enough to have a team in the AFC CHAMPIONSHIP game each of the last five years. Crappy enough to have a team in the AFC CHAMPIONSHIP game ten of the last 13 years. |
|
[#10]
Quoted: A lot of Brady's playoff success came during cheating-gate, though . View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: 1.) Montana2.) Brady 3.) Manning not a knock on Manning ... Brady has done more with less and playoff performance needs to be factored in when considering the GOAT. A lot of Brady's playoff success came during cheating-gate, though . Lol... Do you even know what "spy gate" was? If you think any competitive edge was gained you should really look into what it really was.
|
|
[#11]
Quoted:
Lol... Do you even know what "spy gate" was? If you think any competitive edge was gained you should really look into what it really was. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
1.) Montana2.) Brady 3.) Manning not a knock on Manning ... Brady has done more with less and playoff performance needs to be factored in when considering the GOAT. A lot of Brady's playoff success came during cheating-gate, though . Lol... Do you even know what "spy gate" was? If you think any competitive edge was gained you should really look into what it really was. Don't get into with them, it's pointless. If the pats went 6-10 or 8-8 or even 9-7 since spy gate they'd say "see!" But the Pats go the AFC championship game every year post-"spy gate" and then they can only come up with the no Super Bowl win argument. |
|
[#12]
Ok, so the AFC East has been a "shit division"? How good was the AFC South when Manning was there? Looked like a "Shit Division" as well.
|
|
[#13]
Quoted:
Incorrect. Efficiency is measured by the QB passer rating system. And the highest all-time pass rating is held by Aaron Rodgers, and it's not even close between he and Peyton (#2). Favre might have had the most touchdowns, but he was reckless, which is why he is WAY down the chart in efficiency/passer-rating...but still ahead of Jay Cutler ). http://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/pass_rating_career.htm Some of those are a bit surprising (if you haven't seen them before), because who would expect John Elway to be in 63, and Jay Cutler to be in 25th? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I give him credit for longevity, and coming back from that injury. He was always a tough competitor, accurate passer...definite HOF QB. But no way in hell is he the best QB ever. Quarterbacks are supposed to generate offense. Score points, throw touchdowns, lead an offense, manage a game and defeat defenses. No one has ever done this at a more efficient level. Period. Exactly. Incorrect. Efficiency is measured by the QB passer rating system. And the highest all-time pass rating is held by Aaron Rodgers, and it's not even close between he and Peyton (#2). Favre might have had the most touchdowns, but he was reckless, which is why he is WAY down the chart in efficiency/passer-rating...but still ahead of Jay Cutler ). http://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/pass_rating_career.htm Some of those are a bit surprising (if you haven't seen them before), because who would expect John Elway to be in 63, and Jay Cutler to be in 25th? I'm just happy that Steve Young is 4th, he and I being lefties. lol |
|
[#14]
Quoted:
rings are what matter when you get to the guys qualified to be in the conversation. Trent Dilfer isn't in the conversation. Brady Manning Montana Aikman Elway Marino Bradshaw are in the conversation. The rings matter there. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So... since rings are what really matter, is Charles Haley the best football player ever? rings are what matter when you get to the guys qualified to be in the conversation. Trent Dilfer isn't in the conversation. Brady Manning Montana Aikman Elway Marino Bradshaw are in the conversation. The rings matter there. Uh? No |
|
[#15]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So... since rings are what really matter, is Charles Haley the best football player ever? rings are what matter when you get to the guys qualified to be in the conversation. Trent Dilfer isn't in the conversation. Brady Manning Montana Aikman Elway Marino Bradshaw are in the conversation. The rings matter there. Uh? No Exactly. That's the point. Marino is usually in the conversation but he has no rings, therefore not even close to the best of all time. When you get to the cream of the crop, the top 3 or 4, Super Bowl wins are possibly the biggest factor. |
|
[#16]
Quoted:
1.) Montana 2.) Brady 3.) Manning not a knock on Manning ... Brady has done more with less and playoff performance needs to be factored in when considering the GOAT. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
1.) Montana 2.) Brady 3.) Manning not a knock on Manning ... Brady has done more with less and playoff performance needs to be factored in when considering the GOAT. What happened to the Colts with Manning on the sidelines? What happened to the Pats with Brady on the sidelines? Quoted:
Quoted:
1.) Montana 2.) Brady 3.) Manning not a knock on Manning ... Brady has done more with less and playoff performance needs to be factored in when considering the GOAT. A lot of Brady's playoff success came during cheating-gate, though . good point |
|
[#17]
He is good, but I keep thinking " he didn't catch one of those , now 510, passes." You have to give A LOT of the credit to the receivers that caught all those passes.
EBR^^^ |
|
[#18]
Quoted:
The explanation is that the Patriots were a really good team that was made to be a great team by cheating and playing in a shit division. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
1 SB ring.. How many does tom brady have again? Heck, even kid brother eli has 2. How many has Brady won since the Patsies got caught cheating? They still got to the superbowl 2 more times since that incident. So how do you explain that? I guess they were still good enough to win their division, the playoffs, and the AFC championship. The explanation is that the Patriots were a really good team that was made to be a great team by cheating and playing in a shit division. So basically you don't have an answer. Got it. |
|
[#19]
|
|
[#20]
Quoted:
AFC East is so crappy alright. Crappy enough to have a team in the AFC CHAMPIONSHIP game each of the last five years. Crappy enough to have a team in the AFC CHAMPIONSHIP game ten of the last 13 years. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
1 SB ring.. How many does tom brady have again? Heck, even kid brother eli has 2. How many has Brady won since the Patsies got caught cheating? They still got to the superbowl 2 more times since that incident. So how do you explain that? I guess they were still good enough to win their division, the playoffs, and the AFC championship. The explanation is that the Patriots were a really good team that was made to be a great team by cheating and playing in a shit division. AFC East is so crappy alright. Crappy enough to have a team in the AFC CHAMPIONSHIP game each of the last five years. Crappy enough to have a team in the AFC CHAMPIONSHIP game ten of the last 13 years. But like eight of those 10 times it was the Patriots, so that doesn't disprove my point. |
|
[#21]
Quoted:
Lol... Do you even know what "spy gate" was? If you think any competitive edge was gained you should really look into what it really was. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
1.) Montana2.) Brady 3.) Manning not a knock on Manning ... Brady has done more with less and playoff performance needs to be factored in when considering the GOAT. A lot of Brady's playoff success came during cheating-gate, though . Lol... Do you even know what "spy gate" was? If you think any competitive edge was gained you should really look into what it really was. You're right. The Patriots had nothing to gain by trying to learn the defensive signals of an opposing team. That's why they risked severe punishment from the NFL by doing it for the better part of a decade. |
|
[#22]
oh for fucks sake.
the real patriots cheating was holding receivers all the way down the field and bringing 7. but the league allowed it until they didn't. it wasn't spy gate. It was pass interference finally getting called that hurt the patriots. |
|
[#23]
|
|
[#24]
Quoted:
So basically you don't have an answer. Got it. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
1 SB ring.. How many does tom brady have again? Heck, even kid brother eli has 2. How many has Brady won since the Patsies got caught cheating? They still got to the superbowl 2 more times since that incident. So how do you explain that? I guess they were still good enough to win their division, the playoffs, and the AFC championship. The explanation is that the Patriots were a really good team that was made to be a great team by cheating and playing in a shit division. So basically you don't have an answer. Got it. Just because the answer causes you butthurt doesn't mean it isn't an answer. |
|
[#25]
Quoted:
Just because the answer causes you butthurt doesn't mean it isn't an answer. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
So basically you don't have an answer. Got it. Just because the answer causes you butthurt doesn't mean it isn't an answer. Please explain how they were cheating in those two seasons to get to the superbowl. |
|
[#26]
Quoted:
But like eight of those 10 times it was the Patriots, so that doesn't disprove my point. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
AFC East is so crappy alright. Crappy enough to have a team in the AFC CHAMPIONSHIP game each of the last five years. Crappy enough to have a team in the AFC CHAMPIONSHIP game ten of the last 13 years. But like eight of those 10 times it was the Patriots, so that doesn't disprove my point. The fact that teams from the AFC east other than the Patriots made the playoffs seven times and that the AFC east sent multiple teams five times does disprove your point. |
|
[#27]
Best ever, no. Stellar yes. He would not have nearly the numbers in the old NFL. The current NFL, National FlagFootball League, is QB friendly by far.
|
|
[#28]
Quoted:
Please explain how they were cheating in those two seasons to get to the superbowl. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So basically you don't have an answer. Got it. Just because the answer causes you butthurt doesn't mean it isn't an answer. Please explain how they were cheating in those two seasons to get to the superbowl. Their legacy of domination is greatly diminished if you remove seasons 2000-2007, when the cheating was occurring. I already said they were still a good team. |
|
[#29]
Quoted:
The fact that teams from the AFC east other than the Patriots made the playoffs seven times and that the AFC east sent multiple teams five times does disprove your point. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
AFC East is so crappy alright. Crappy enough to have a team in the AFC CHAMPIONSHIP game each of the last five years. Crappy enough to have a team in the AFC CHAMPIONSHIP game ten of the last 13 years. But like eight of those 10 times it was the Patriots, so that doesn't disprove my point. The fact that teams from the AFC east other than the Patriots made the playoffs seven times and that the AFC east sent multiple teams five times does disprove your point. Plenty of mediocre teams sneak into the playoffs with a wild card. |
|
[#30]
Quoted:
Plenty of mediocre teams sneak into the playoffs with a wild card. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
AFC East is so crappy alright. Crappy enough to have a team in the AFC CHAMPIONSHIP game each of the last five years. Crappy enough to have a team in the AFC CHAMPIONSHIP game ten of the last 13 years. But like eight of those 10 times it was the Patriots, so that doesn't disprove my point. The fact that teams from the AFC east other than the Patriots made the playoffs seven times and that the AFC east sent multiple teams five times does disprove your point. Plenty of mediocre teams sneak into the playoffs with a wild card. Peyton's AFC south sent teams other than the Colts to the playoffs seven times as well, and multiple teams five times. So either the south was as weak as the east or neither was really that weak. |
|
[#31]
Quoted:
It was generally better than the AFC East, in my opinion. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Ok, so the AFC East has been a "shit division"? How good was the AFC South when Manning was there? Looked like a "Shit Division" as well. It was generally better than the AFC East, in my opinion. Isn't that the division with Jacksonville in it? |
|
[#32]
Never been a fan of the guy, but he is one hell of a QB- without a doubt.
|
|
[#33]
Quoted:
Isn't that the division with Jacksonville in it? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Ok, so the AFC East has been a "shit division"? How good was the AFC South when Manning was there? Looked like a "Shit Division" as well. It was generally better than the AFC East, in my opinion. Isn't that the division with Jacksonville in it? The same Jacksonville that used to be a regular playoff team? |
|
[#34]
Quoted:
The same Jacksonville that used to be a regular playoff team? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Ok, so the AFC East has been a "shit division"? How good was the AFC South when Manning was there? Looked like a "Shit Division" as well. It was generally better than the AFC East, in my opinion. Isn't that the division with Jacksonville in it? The same Jacksonville that used to be a regular playoff team? So, they're like Buffalo then. |
|
[#35]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Ok, so the AFC East has been a "shit division"? How good was the AFC South when Manning was there? Looked like a "Shit Division" as well. It was generally better than the AFC East, in my opinion. Isn't that the division with Jacksonville in it? The same Jacksonville that used to be a regular playoff team? So, they're like Buffalo then. Except more recent and relevant to the discussion. |
|
[#36]
Quoted:
oh for fucks sake. the real patriots cheating was holding receivers all the way down the field and bringing 7. but the league allowed it until they didn't. it wasn't spy gate. It was pass interference finally getting called that hurt the patriots. View Quote That, and the Giants realizing "Gee, you know, we can't really hang with these guys tit for tat but if we punch Tom Brady in the mouth over and over again, he does what virtually all quarterbacks do, they start to not pass for a billion yards a game." In that first SB, the Giants just pinned their ears back and said fuck it...if he hits a 90 yard TD pass he hits it, better that than he bleeds us out slowly, let's get him. And it worked. Rocket surgery it ain't. |
|
[#37]
My only point being, is that the AFC South and the AFC East have been pretty consistently competitive. I'd seriously not consider either one of them to have been "weak" divisions this past decade or so...
|
|
[#38]
Quoted:
My only point being, is that the AFC South and the AFC East have been pretty consistently competitive. I'd seriously not consider either one of them to have been "weak" divisions this past decade or so... View Quote You are right. The south sent as many non-colts teams as the east sent non-patriots teams to the playoffs. The west was the weak division for most of the 2000's. |
|
[#39]
Quoted:
Exactly. That's the point. Marino is usually in the conversation but he has no rings, therefore not even close to the best of all time. When you get to the cream of the crop, the top 3 or 4, Super Bowl wins are possibly the biggest factor. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So... since rings are what really matter, is Charles Haley the best football player ever? rings are what matter when you get to the guys qualified to be in the conversation. Trent Dilfer isn't in the conversation. Brady Manning Montana Aikman Elway Marino Bradshaw are in the conversation. The rings matter there. Uh? No Exactly. That's the point. Marino is usually in the conversation but he has no rings, therefore not even close to the best of all time. When you get to the cream of the crop, the top 3 or 4, Super Bowl wins are possibly the biggest factor. No quarterback in history ever won a Super Bowl alone. Once again: Super Bowl rings are a team award, not an individual award. Would you say Trent Dilfer is a better QB than Dan Marino? He has a ring, you know... |
|
[#40]
Quoted:
No quarterback in history ever won a Super Bowl alone. Once again: Super Bowl rings are a team award, not an individual award. Would you say Trent Dilfer is a better QB than Dan Marino? He has a ring, you know... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
So... since rings are what really matter, is Charles Haley the best football player ever? rings are what matter when you get to the guys qualified to be in the conversation. Trent Dilfer isn't in the conversation. Brady Manning Montana Aikman Elway Marino Bradshaw are in the conversation. The rings matter there. Uh? No Exactly. That's the point. Marino is usually in the conversation but he has no rings, therefore not even close to the best of all time. When you get to the cream of the crop, the top 3 or 4, Super Bowl wins are possibly the biggest factor. No quarterback in history ever won a Super Bowl alone. Once again: Super Bowl rings are a team award, not an individual award. Would you say Trent Dilfer is a better QB than Dan Marino? He has a ring, you know... I have listened to the HOF players talk over time. They talk about rings being a factor in these type of conversations. |
|
[#41]
Rings matter period. Dan Marino was great but he has no rings. Records are good for personal recognition, rings are good for what you did for your team.
|
|
[#42]
|
|
[#43]
Quoted: It's one tool to assess the performance of a quarterback, not the only one. I'd still put Brett Favre in my top twenty, despite his mediocre pass rating. But it's not a coincidence that most of the guys near the top of the passer rating list are great QBs. Aaron Rodgers at #1, and Peyton at #2. View Quote Ah but Passer rating should be considered as statistics (plural), not as a singular statistic, because it's just a way of adding up their multiple stats to rate their overall performance. andThe only ways to have a great passer rating and still lose the game are A) have a really shitty defense that gives it away B) play against an even better offense that outscores you You can't play a shitty game and still have a good passer rating. It is mathematically impossible. That's bullshit, because it's the opinion of one guy, and again, passer rating is not a stat; it is a compilation of the critical stats that judge a QB's performance, regardless of whether the team won or lost. If it was considered useless by "most evaluators", it would not be in common use at all, but it most certainly is. I'll ask you again, if you are going to judge a QB's individual performance, how are you going to do it, if not by completion percentage, yards, touchdowns, and interceptions? And since those are the stats which comprise the passer rating, which one of those stats do you feel is "useless" in evaluating a QB's performance? If your team has a spectacular offense and the QB throws a 140 passer rating, but they lost the game because the defense is the worst in the league, don't you feel that the rating system at least shows it wasn't the QB's fault, and is a fair evaluation of his performance? andSome people don't feel the passer rating is fair, because they feel it's too heavily weighted against someone who throws a lot of picks. I disagree, because the turnover ratio decides so many games, it is extremely important. A team with a +2 turnover margin wins about 90% of the time! Bullshit! It's useless to consider touchdowns, interceptions, yards, and pass completion percentage? How else would you rate a QB's performance? The passer rating is a compilation of those stats. Anyone who says those are useless stats is a fucking moron. It doesn't tell you everything about a QB, and you need to take it with a grain of salt, but it tells you a lot. It's not a coincidence that most of the great QBs are high on that list. The only flaw in it is that it doesn't take into consideration what that QB has to work with. For example, Brett Favre threw a lot of picks, which killed his rating, but he also had a shitty O-line for most of his career, along with some mediocre receivers (although there were a few greats like Sharpe and Driver), so he usually had to get rid of the ball really quickly and make some risky throws. And if you have a shitty running game, so the D is mostly playing the pass, it's pretty tough to have a high passer rating. It wasn't all just his reckless nature; he just didn't have much choice, a lot of the time. If Favre would have had a better line, there is no doubt that he'd be higher on the list, but still wouldn't be at the top, because taking chances was just in his nature. Troy Aikman is down in 47th place on the all-time list, despite having a great O-line for much of his career, which says a lot about how overrated he is/was (and he is also a shitty fucking announcer who should be fired ). andIncorrect. Efficiency is measured by the QB passer rating system. And the highest all-time pass rating is held by Aaron Rodgers, and it's not even close between he and Peyton (#2). Favre might have had the most touchdowns, but he was reckless, which is why he is WAY down the chart in efficiency/passer-rating...but still ahead of Jay Cutler ). and so on.http://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/pass_rating_career.htm Some of those are a bit surprising (if you haven't seen them before), because who would expect John Elway to be in 63, and Jay Cutler to be in 25th? |
|
[#44]
9 more games before the playoffs start.
My prediction is 532 by season end. |
|
[#45]
Quoted:
Incorrect. Efficiency is measured by the QB passer rating system. And the highest all-time pass rating is held by Aaron Rodgers, and it's not even close between he and Peyton (#2). Favre might have had the most touchdowns, but he was reckless, which is why he is WAY down the chart in efficiency/passer-rating...but still ahead of Jay Cutler ). http://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/pass_rating_career.htm Some of those are a bit surprising (if you haven't seen them before), because who would expect John Elway to be in 63, and Jay Cutler to be in 25th? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I give him credit for longevity, and coming back from that injury. He was always a tough competitor, accurate passer...definite HOF QB. But no way in hell is he the best QB ever. Quarterbacks are supposed to generate offense. Score points, throw touchdowns, lead an offense, manage a game and defeat defenses. No one has ever done this at a more efficient level. Period. Exactly. Incorrect. Efficiency is measured by the QB passer rating system. And the highest all-time pass rating is held by Aaron Rodgers, and it's not even close between he and Peyton (#2). Favre might have had the most touchdowns, but he was reckless, which is why he is WAY down the chart in efficiency/passer-rating...but still ahead of Jay Cutler ). http://www.pro-football-reference.com/leaders/pass_rating_career.htm Some of those are a bit surprising (if you haven't seen them before), because who would expect John Elway to be in 63, and Jay Cutler to be in 25th? Your stat has Romo ahead of Tom Brady. I'm thoroughly surprised there has been no epic butthurt over this. |
|
[#46]
Quoted:
AFC East is so crappy alright. Crappy enough to have a team in the AFC CHAMPIONSHIP game each of the last five years. Crappy enough to have a team in the AFC CHAMPIONSHIP game ten of the last 13 years. View Quote This is a really stupid point. There are only 16 teams in the afc, 12% of the entire division makes it to the afc championship game every year. Having one team in the afc championship is meaningless. playing in a shitty division is a huge advantage it means more easy wins, less injuries, fewer meaningful games at the end of the season, greater chance of 1st round bye, greater chance of playing at home,.. |
|
[#47]
Quoted:
I have listened to the HOF players talk over time. They talk about rings being a factor in these type of conversations. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
No quarterback in history ever won a Super Bowl alone. Once again: Super Bowl rings are a team award, not an individual award. Would you say Trent Dilfer is a better QB than Dan Marino? He has a ring, you know... I have listened to the HOF players talk over time. They talk about rings being a factor in these type of conversations. A factor.. but when you have one guy at a position who holds 80% of all the important records for that position, rings matter less. |
|
[#48]
Quoted:
Lol... Do you even know what "spy gate" was? If you think any competitive edge was gained you should really look into what it really was. View Quote Do you know? http://nypost.com/2014/10/12/they-are-cheaters-spygate-the-nfl-scandal-that-started-it-all/ <snip>a staffer pointed a camera at an opposing team’s coaches from across the field. And it had gone on for nearly a decade — since Belichick took over the Pats in 2000, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell later revealed.<snip> It was so obvious, the Pats were busted several times before Spygate erupted, including a year earlier, during a 35-0 thrashing of Green Bay. The Packers spotted Pats video assistant Matt Estrella — who was also shooting the video during the Jets game the next season — shooting unauthorized video from the sidelines. He was asked to leave — then was spotted doing it from a tunnel, which got him booted from Lambeau Field. ,<snip>. Chris Mortensen, who reported at the time that the Pats did not “have a satisfactory explanation when asked about possible irregularities in its communication setup during the game.” Quarterbacks communicate with the sidelines via microphones in their helmets that pick up an NFL-monitored radio frequency. An NFL sideline official cuts off communications on this frequency 15 seconds before the play clock runs out. Offensive plays would be called based on stolen signals and the information relayed straight to Brady’s helmet, O’Leary theorizes. In this scenario, the extra frequency is critical, as it allows the team to do something in real time with the stolen signals, out of earshot of the NFL monitor, and change its plays accordingly. <snip> Pats backup quarterback Doug Flutie once said he accidentally picked up Brady’s helmet during the 2005 season. “He was amazed that the coaches kept right on speaking to Brady past the 15-second cutoff, right up until the snap,” according to O’Leary. “The voice in Tom Brady’s helmet was explaining the exact defense he was about to face.” <snip> That same year, Pats linebacker Ted Johnson told USA Today that an hour before game time, a list of the opposing team’s audibles — the signals a QB would use at the line of scrimmage just before a snap to change the play — would sometimes appear in his locker. He had no idea where the lists came from. <snip> On Sept. 20, the NFL announced the Pats handed over six tapes and two days later said little about what the recordings contained — only that they had been destroyed. “When somebody has a hit that looks suspicious, it takes the league three to four days of looking at a tape, then they issue a fine,” O’Leary said. “In this case, they had a team that potentially stole three Super Bowls, and they issued a verdict in four days. Does that sound like the NFL was trying to get to the bottom of anything?”<snip> Arlen Specter, who requested a meeting with Goodell in November 2008 to learn why the tapes had been destroyed.<snip> What Specter learned from the one-hour, 40-minute sitdown in February 2008 was that the Pats had been spying on opposing teams for nearly a decade, ever since Belichick’s first year as head coach of the Pats.<snip> “There was confirmation that there has been taping since 2000, when Coach Belichick took over,” said Specter, who called for an independent probe similar to a Mitchell Report on performance-<snip> even after a long-delayed meeting in May 2008 between Goodell and Matt Walsh, an ex-Pats videographer who worked for the team from 2000 to 2002. Walsh came forward and eventually handed the league eight additional tapes, including evidence that the team was swiping in-game defensive and offensive signals against Miami, Cleveland, Pittsburgh and San Diego in 2000 and 2001.<snip> Why does Belichick continue to hire cardboard cutouts for coordinators – young people with no experience or older failures – or hire no coordinators at all? Is it interesting that one such young failure, Josh McDaniels, was caught video cheating soon after he moved to Denver? View Quote I guess they were just videotaping signals for the heck of it? |
|
[#49]
Quoted:
This is a really stupid point. There are only 16 teams in the afc, 12% of the entire division makes it to the afc championship game every year. Having one team in the afc championship is meaningless. playing in a shitty division is a huge advantage it means more easy wins, less injuries, fewer meaningful games at the end of the season, greater chance of 1st round bye, greater chance of playing at home,.. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
AFC East is so crappy alright. Crappy enough to have a team in the AFC CHAMPIONSHIP game each of the last five years. Crappy enough to have a team in the AFC CHAMPIONSHIP game ten of the last 13 years. This is a really stupid point. There are only 16 teams in the afc, 12% of the entire division makes it to the afc championship game every year. Having one team in the afc championship is meaningless. playing in a shitty division is a huge advantage it means more easy wins, less injuries, fewer meaningful games at the end of the season, greater chance of 1st round bye, greater chance of playing at home,.. Know how I know you didn't read the whole thread? |
|
[#50]
Quoted:
Do you know? http://nypost.com/2014/10/12/they-are-cheaters-spygate-the-nfl-scandal-that-started-it-all/ I guess they were just videotaping signals for the heck of it? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Lol... Do you even know what "spy gate" was? If you think any competitive edge was gained you should really look into what it really was. Do you know? http://nypost.com/2014/10/12/they-are-cheaters-spygate-the-nfl-scandal-that-started-it-all/ <snip>a staffer pointed a camera at an opposing team’s coaches from across the field. And it had gone on for nearly a decade — since Belichick took over the Pats in 2000, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell later revealed.<snip> It was so obvious, the Pats were busted several times before Spygate erupted, including a year earlier, during a 35-0 thrashing of Green Bay. The Packers spotted Pats video assistant Matt Estrella — who was also shooting the video during the Jets game the next season — shooting unauthorized video from the sidelines. He was asked to leave — then was spotted doing it from a tunnel, which got him booted from Lambeau Field. ,<snip>. Chris Mortensen, who reported at the time that the Pats did not “have a satisfactory explanation when asked about possible irregularities in its communication setup during the game.” Quarterbacks communicate with the sidelines via microphones in their helmets that pick up an NFL-monitored radio frequency. An NFL sideline official cuts off communications on this frequency 15 seconds before the play clock runs out. Offensive plays would be called based on stolen signals and the information relayed straight to Brady’s helmet, O’Leary theorizes. In this scenario, the extra frequency is critical, as it allows the team to do something in real time with the stolen signals, out of earshot of the NFL monitor, and change its plays accordingly. <snip> Pats backup quarterback Doug Flutie once said he accidentally picked up Brady’s helmet during the 2005 season. “He was amazed that the coaches kept right on speaking to Brady past the 15-second cutoff, right up until the snap,” according to O’Leary. “The voice in Tom Brady’s helmet was explaining the exact defense he was about to face.” <snip> That same year, Pats linebacker Ted Johnson told USA Today that an hour before game time, a list of the opposing team’s audibles — the signals a QB would use at the line of scrimmage just before a snap to change the play — would sometimes appear in his locker. He had no idea where the lists came from. <snip> On Sept. 20, the NFL announced the Pats handed over six tapes and two days later said little about what the recordings contained — only that they had been destroyed. “When somebody has a hit that looks suspicious, it takes the league three to four days of looking at a tape, then they issue a fine,” O’Leary said. “In this case, they had a team that potentially stole three Super Bowls, and they issued a verdict in four days. Does that sound like the NFL was trying to get to the bottom of anything?”<snip> Arlen Specter, who requested a meeting with Goodell in November 2008 to learn why the tapes had been destroyed.<snip> What Specter learned from the one-hour, 40-minute sitdown in February 2008 was that the Pats had been spying on opposing teams for nearly a decade, ever since Belichick’s first year as head coach of the Pats.<snip> “There was confirmation that there has been taping since 2000, when Coach Belichick took over,” said Specter, who called for an independent probe similar to a Mitchell Report on performance-<snip> even after a long-delayed meeting in May 2008 between Goodell and Matt Walsh, an ex-Pats videographer who worked for the team from 2000 to 2002. Walsh came forward and eventually handed the league eight additional tapes, including evidence that the team was swiping in-game defensive and offensive signals against Miami, Cleveland, Pittsburgh and San Diego in 2000 and 2001.<snip> Why does Belichick continue to hire cardboard cutouts for coordinators – young people with no experience or older failures – or hire no coordinators at all? Is it interesting that one such young failure, Josh McDaniels, was caught video cheating soon after he moved to Denver? I guess they were just videotaping signals for the heck of it? Read this before you get too high and mighty: http://bleacherreport.com/articles/199345-the-truth-about-spygate-punishing-success-and-promoting-parity |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.