User Panel
Posted: 9/30/2014 12:27:13 PM EDT
Toyota Announces Voluntary Recall of Certain Tacoma Pickup Trucks for Rear Leaf SpringsTORRANCE, Calif., Sept. 29, 2014 – Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.,today announced that it has advised the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of plans to conduct a voluntary safety recall of approximately 690,000 Model Year 2005-2011 Tacoma 4x4 and Tacoma Pre-Runner pickup trucks. The involved vehicles’ rear suspension system contains leaf springs that are constructed of either three or four leaves. There is a possibility that a leaf could fracture due to stress and corrosion. If this occurs and the vehicle continues to be operated, the broken leaf could move out of position and contact surrounding components, including the fuel tank. If the broken leaf contacts the fuel tank repeatedly, it could puncture the tank and cause a fuel leak. In the presence of an ignition source, this could result in a fire. Toyota is not aware of any fires, crashes, injuries or fatalities associated with this condition. Owners of the vehicles involved in this recall will receive a notification by first class mail. Toyota dealers will remedy the condition at no cost to the owner. Detailed information is available to customers at www.toyota.com/recall and by calling the Toyota Customer Experience Center at 1-800-331-4331. View Quote http://toyotanews.pressroom.toyota.com/releases/toyota+tacoma+recall+sept29.htm |
|
Toyota's reputation is not based in the reality of their products.
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Toyota's reputation is not based in the reality of their products. View Quote Yes, I'm old and stupid... ETA: I think you are bashing Toyota but I find that really hard to believe. The quality and durability can not be argued. |
|
Quoted: Only that they last forever. Unlike Chevy and Ford, Toyota will fix their problems. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Toyota's reputation is not based in the reality of their products. Only that they last forever. Unlike Chevy and Ford, Toyota will fix their problems. Before they rack up a string of fatalities and try to cover them up.
|
|
Did my Frontier that I paid thousands less than a similar Taco get recalled?
|
|
Quoted: Before they rack up a string of fatalities and try to cover them up. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Toyota's reputation is not based in the reality of their products. Only that they last forever. Unlike Chevy and Ford, Toyota will fix their problems. Before they rack up a string of fatalities and try to cover them up. |
|
Quoted:
Only that they last forever. Unlike Chevy and Ford, Toyota will fix their problems. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Toyota's reputation is not based in the reality of their products. Only that they last forever. Unlike Chevy and Ford, Toyota will fix their problems. They do seem to stand behind their products. A friend of mine had one of the older Tacomas with the frame rot issues, it was already beat right to shit anyway and they still gave him something like 5k towards a new vehicle and a loaner car until he could buy a new one. It might have even been more than 5k, but it was way more than the truck was actually worth at the time, and the frame was still in one piece. |
|
Quoted: I don't know what you mean, can you please clarify. Thank you. Yes, I'm old and stupid... ETA: I think you are bashing Toyota but I find that really hard to believe. The quality and durability can not be argued. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Toyota's reputation is not based in the reality of their products. Yes, I'm old and stupid... ETA: I think you are bashing Toyota but I find that really hard to believe. The quality and durability can not be argued. |
|
|
I also have a 2005 Corolla, only has 136,000 on it. Took it in for the 100,000 mile service about a month ago. It needed a computer program update but the update would not download to my car. Toyota put a new computer in it and didn't charge me a penny.
|
|
Guess I am getting a new rear suspension.
sweet. Nice to have a company that will fix things before people die. |
|
|
I drove a 98 Tacoma for work for years... They were great little trucks but the we always laughed about how the leaf springs bent the wrong way! Even with the smallest of payloads. Never had any trouble though, other than being scary on the highway....
|
|
Quoted:
Leaf springs fail on anything that has leaf springs. Try again. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Toyota's reputation is not based in the reality of their products. Leaf springs fail on anything that has leaf springs. Try again. I see. Then why is Toyota initiating a recall? |
|
Why did you post that here? No one on this site owns a Taco.
|
|
Quoted:
I don't know what you mean, can you please clarify. Thank you. Yes, I'm old and stupid... ETA: I think you are bashing Toyota but I find that really hard to believe. The quality and durability can not be argued. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Toyota's reputation is not based in the reality of their products. Yes, I'm old and stupid... ETA: I think you are bashing Toyota but I find that really hard to believe. The quality and durability can not be argued. Indeed. Uncommanded accelerations and numerous recalls are indications of quality and durability. |
|
Damn
Mine is too old. I'll just have to put another 200K on the same old Springs |
|
Quoted:
Remember when Toyota had to sit in front of congress? Why didn't Government Motors have to do that. I Fucking hate GM, they owe every American a free car in my opinion. I would sell mine in Mexico then use the dough for moar AR's..... View Quote Because the U.S. Government owned GM? |
|
Quoted:
He's probably a union guy with a hardon. Plus, I think he's dodging a pit thread right now anyway.... View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Toyota's reputation is not based in the reality of their products. Yes, I'm old and stupid... ETA: I think you are bashing Toyota but I find that really hard to believe. The quality and durability can not be argued. I do not belong to a union. I simply do not understand Toyota's reputation given the facts of numerous recalls. Other vehicle manufacturers' reputations rightfully suffer. Toyota's does not. |
|
|
Quoted:
I do not belong to a union. I simply do not understand Toyota's reputation given the facts of numerous recalls. Other vehicle manufacturers' reputations rightfully suffer. Toyota's does not. View Quote Other manufacturers generally make a shit product to begin with. Toyota products, on average, are viewed to last longer and are perceived to provide better overall value. Not rocket science. When the consumer already has a positive outlook on the brand a recall isn't going to hurt them as much. 2007 Rav4 v6 with 160k miles |
|
Quoted:
Other manufacturers generally make a shit product to begin with. Toyota products, on average, are viewed to last longer and are perceived to provide better overall value. Not rocket science. When the consumer already has a positive outlook on the brand a recall isn't going to hurt them as much. 2007 Rav4 v6 with 160k miles View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I do not belong to a union. I simply do not understand Toyota's reputation given the facts of numerous recalls. Other vehicle manufacturers' reputations rightfully suffer. Toyota's does not. Other manufacturers generally make a shit product to begin with. Toyota products, on average, are viewed to last longer and are perceived to provide better overall value. Not rocket science. When the consumer already has a positive outlook on the brand a recall isn't going to hurt them as much. 2007 Rav4 v6 with 160k miles Interesting hypothesis. What are the competitors to the 2007 Rav4 v6? What is their average lifespan compared to the 2007 Rav4 v6? |
|
Quoted:
I see. Then why is Toyota initiating a recall? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Toyota's reputation is not based in the reality of their products. Leaf springs fail on anything that has leaf springs. Try again. I see. Then why is Toyota initiating a recall? Because they care more about their customers than domestic truck makers? Fuck if I know, but there was a long "Well, this could lead to this, which could lead to this, which may cause a fire." explanation in the recall notice. The only way that a broken leaf spring would rub through a tank is through abject negligence on the part of the owner. I've seen broken leaf springs on pretty much every brand truck that uses leaf springs. Furthermore, if you owned a FWD Ford product manufactured since the '90's, chances are that you've had to replace the coil springs at least once, especially if you owned a wagon. I've seen one fail in such a way that it destroyed a tire, while the vehicle was moving. No recalls for the shit Ford springs, though. |
|
|
This site is interesting:
http://www.edmunds.com/recalls/toyota.html Let us only hit the highlights: 1. 803,000 vehicles recalled due to faulty air conditioning units 2. 1.3 million vehicles recalled due to a faulty air bag system 3. 752,000 vehicles recalled due to faulty air bag system 4. 209,000 vehicles recalled due to a faulty seat belt mechanism 5. 2.8 million vehicles recalled due to steering and water pump problems 6. 242,000 vehicles recalled due to a faulty brake system 7. 615,000 vehicles recalled due to a faulty shifter mechanism 8. 150,000 vehicles recalled due to the spare tire coming separated from the vehicle 9. 342,000 vehicles recalled due to faulty seat belts 10. 472,500 vehicles recalled due to faulty seat belts I stopped at ten. It is disturbing how many seat belt and air bag systems are faulty and must be recalled. |
|
Quoted:
Interesting hypothesis. What are the competitors to the 2007 Rav4 v6? What is their average lifespan compared to the 2007 Rav4 v6? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I do not belong to a union. I simply do not understand Toyota's reputation given the facts of numerous recalls. Other vehicle manufacturers' reputations rightfully suffer. Toyota's does not. Other manufacturers generally make a shit product to begin with. Toyota products, on average, are viewed to last longer and are perceived to provide better overall value. Not rocket science. When the consumer already has a positive outlook on the brand a recall isn't going to hurt them as much. 2007 Rav4 v6 with 160k miles Interesting hypothesis. What are the competitors to the 2007 Rav4 v6? What is their average lifespan compared to the 2007 Rav4 v6? You have google, knock yourself out finding the answers. |
|
|
Quoted:
This site is interesting: http://www.edmunds.com/recalls/toyota.html Let us only hit the highlights: 1. 803,000 vehicles recalled due to faulty air conditioning units 2. 1.3 million vehicles recalled due to a faulty air bag system 3. 752,000 vehicles recalled due to faulty air bag system 4. 209,000 vehicles recalled due to a faulty seat belt mechanism 5. 2.8 million vehicles recalled due to steering and water pump problems 6. 242,000 vehicles recalled due to a faulty brake system 7. 615,000 vehicles recalled due to a faulty shifter mechanism 8. 150,000 vehicles recalled due to the spare tire coming separated from the vehicle 9. 342,000 vehicles recalled due to faulty seat belts 10. 472,500 vehicles recalled due to faulty seat belts I stopped at ten. It is disturbing how many seat belt and air bag systems are faulty and must be recalled. View Quote GM has recalled almost 3 million vehicles due to the shitty ignition switch, which actually has killed people. Checkmate. |
|
Quoted:
Because they care more about their customers than domestic truck makers? Fuck if I know, but there was a long "Well, this could lead to this, which could lead to this, which may cause a fire." explanation in the recall notice. The only way that a broken leaf spring would rub through a tank is through abject negligence on the part of the owner. I've seen broken leaf springs on pretty much every brand truck that uses leaf springs. Furthermore, if you owned a FWD Ford product manufactured since the '90's, chances are that you've had to replace the coil springs at least once, especially if you owned a wagon. I've seen one fail in such a way that it destroyed a tire, while the vehicle was moving. No recalls for the shit Ford springs, though. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Toyota's reputation is not based in the reality of their products. Leaf springs fail on anything that has leaf springs. Try again. I see. Then why is Toyota initiating a recall? Because they care more about their customers than domestic truck makers? Fuck if I know, but there was a long "Well, this could lead to this, which could lead to this, which may cause a fire." explanation in the recall notice. The only way that a broken leaf spring would rub through a tank is through abject negligence on the part of the owner. I've seen broken leaf springs on pretty much every brand truck that uses leaf springs. Furthermore, if you owned a FWD Ford product manufactured since the '90's, chances are that you've had to replace the coil springs at least once, especially if you owned a wagon. I've seen one fail in such a way that it destroyed a tire, while the vehicle was moving. No recalls for the shit Ford springs, though. I believe there was a recall. They installed some sort of tire guard to prevent tire rupture in the event of faliure. They refused to replace the defective springs though. |
|
Quoted:
GM has recalled almost 3 million vehicles due to the shitty ignition switch, which actually has killed people. Checkmate. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
This site is interesting: http://www.edmunds.com/recalls/toyota.html Let us only hit the highlights: 1. 803,000 vehicles recalled due to faulty air conditioning units 2. 1.3 million vehicles recalled due to a faulty air bag system 3. 752,000 vehicles recalled due to faulty air bag system 4. 209,000 vehicles recalled due to a faulty seat belt mechanism 5. 2.8 million vehicles recalled due to steering and water pump problems 6. 242,000 vehicles recalled due to a faulty brake system 7. 615,000 vehicles recalled due to a faulty shifter mechanism 8. 150,000 vehicles recalled due to the spare tire coming separated from the vehicle 9. 342,000 vehicles recalled due to faulty seat belts 10. 472,500 vehicles recalled due to faulty seat belts I stopped at ten. It is disturbing how many seat belt and air bag systems are faulty and must be recalled. GM has recalled almost 3 million vehicles due to the shitty ignition switch, which actually has killed people. Checkmate. People died in runaway Toyotas. |
|
Anyone know what the criteria for the recall is?
I have a 2010 4x4 that I had the rear leaf add a leaf TSB done right after I got it. But they didn't replace the whole leaf pack that I am aware. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
This site is interesting: http://www.edmunds.com/recalls/toyota.html Let us only hit the highlights: 1. 803,000 vehicles recalled due to faulty air conditioning units 2. 1.3 million vehicles recalled due to a faulty air bag system 3. 752,000 vehicles recalled due to faulty air bag system 4. 209,000 vehicles recalled due to a faulty seat belt mechanism 5. 2.8 million vehicles recalled due to steering and water pump problems 6. 242,000 vehicles recalled due to a faulty brake system 7. 615,000 vehicles recalled due to a faulty shifter mechanism 8. 150,000 vehicles recalled due to the spare tire coming separated from the vehicle 9. 342,000 vehicles recalled due to faulty seat belts 10. 472,500 vehicles recalled due to faulty seat belts I stopped at ten. It is disturbing how many seat belt and air bag systems are faulty and must be recalled. GM has recalled almost 3 million vehicles due to the shitty ignition switch, which actually has killed people. Checkmate. People died in runaway Toyotas. Correct, but Toyota didnt have 3 million runaway cars (Prius') |
|
|
New 2014 TRD...I'm good...until the next recall
My second Tacoma. Great pickups, will buy another or a 4-runner in 2020... |
|
Quoted: Indeed. Uncommanded accelerations and numerous recalls are indications of quality and durability. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Toyota's reputation is not based in the reality of their products. Yes, I'm old and stupid... ETA: I think you are bashing Toyota but I find that really hard to believe. The quality and durability can not be argued. Indeed. Uncommanded accelerations and numerous recalls are indications of quality and durability. |
|
|
Quoted:
GM has recalled almost 3 million vehicles due to the shitty ignition switch, which actually has killed people. Checkmate. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
This site is interesting: http://www.edmunds.com/recalls/toyota.html Let us only hit the highlights: 1. 803,000 vehicles recalled due to faulty air conditioning units 2. 1.3 million vehicles recalled due to a faulty air bag system 3. 752,000 vehicles recalled due to faulty air bag system 4. 209,000 vehicles recalled due to a faulty seat belt mechanism 5. 2.8 million vehicles recalled due to steering and water pump problems 6. 242,000 vehicles recalled due to a faulty brake system 7. 615,000 vehicles recalled due to a faulty shifter mechanism 8. 150,000 vehicles recalled due to the spare tire coming separated from the vehicle 9. 342,000 vehicles recalled due to faulty seat belts 10. 472,500 vehicles recalled due to faulty seat belts I stopped at ten. It is disturbing how many seat belt and air bag systems are faulty and must be recalled. GM has recalled almost 3 million vehicles due to the shitty ignition switch, which actually has killed people. Checkmate. And only recalled them after pressured to do so and people had died. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Correct, but Toyota didnt have 3 million runaway cars (Prius') View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
This site is interesting: http://www.edmunds.com/recalls/toyota.html Let us only hit the highlights: 1. 803,000 vehicles recalled due to faulty air conditioning units 2. 1.3 million vehicles recalled due to a faulty air bag system 3. 752,000 vehicles recalled due to faulty air bag system 4. 209,000 vehicles recalled due to a faulty seat belt mechanism 5. 2.8 million vehicles recalled due to steering and water pump problems 6. 242,000 vehicles recalled due to a faulty brake system 7. 615,000 vehicles recalled due to a faulty shifter mechanism 8. 150,000 vehicles recalled due to the spare tire coming separated from the vehicle 9. 342,000 vehicles recalled due to faulty seat belts 10. 472,500 vehicles recalled due to faulty seat belts I stopped at ten. It is disturbing how many seat belt and air bag systems are faulty and must be recalled. GM has recalled almost 3 million vehicles due to the shitty ignition switch, which actually has killed people. Checkmate. People died in runaway Toyotas. Correct, but Toyota didnt have 3 million runaway cars (Prius') No. Toyota just has 3 million cars with defective safety equipment. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
This site is interesting: http://www.edmunds.com/recalls/toyota.html Let us only hit the highlights: 1. 803,000 vehicles recalled due to faulty air conditioning units 2. 1.3 million vehicles recalled due to a faulty air bag system 3. 752,000 vehicles recalled due to faulty air bag system 4. 209,000 vehicles recalled due to a faulty seat belt mechanism 5. 2.8 million vehicles recalled due to steering and water pump problems 6. 242,000 vehicles recalled due to a faulty brake system 7. 615,000 vehicles recalled due to a faulty shifter mechanism 8. 150,000 vehicles recalled due to the spare tire coming separated from the vehicle 9. 342,000 vehicles recalled due to faulty seat belts 10. 472,500 vehicles recalled due to faulty seat belts I stopped at ten. It is disturbing how many seat belt and air bag systems are faulty and must be recalled. GM has recalled almost 3 million vehicles due to the shitty ignition switch, which actually has killed people. Checkmate. People died in runaway Toyotas. My guess is that on average, consumers tend to have a better perception of Toyota as a brand than say GM. That helps cover a lot of sins. Example - my previously mentioned Rav4 had a recall for a rear axle issue. Toyota addressed it promptly and professionally, fixed it at no charge, and the local dealer was able to do the work in conjunction with an oil-change so there was no hassle. Because I've been very happy with the Rav4 overall, view it as a great value and the recall was handed well, the one-time issue doesn't cloud my judgement of Toyota in anyway. In fact, it's enhanced. Meanwhile, the wife's Windstar mini-van (that we used to own) was a non-stop string of issues from power steering units to rear window motors. It was always something with that turd. Had they had a recall along the way it would have been viewed as massive black eye on the manufacturer and I'd still be bitching about it. |
|
Were weak springs a chronic problem on Toyota pickups?
My 93 Toyota (still going strong) has always been stinky at carrying loads. Definitely doable, and we have hauled some heavy stuff including big loads of wood, but it is so terrible to drive compared to my 2000 Ranger, which does much better under a load. BTW - my Ranger has had a new transmission and 2 alternators with only 80K miles, while my Toyota has only had a clutch replaced over its life. Both been good trucks otherwise. I do agree that the public's perception of Toyota is higher than "domestic" vehicles. Although while I have had excellent Toyotas, I have had some excellent domestic vehicles also, both Ford and Chevy. |
|
Quoted:
I believe there was a recall. They installed some sort of tire guard to prevent tire rupture in the event of faliure. They refused to replace the defective springs though. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Toyota's reputation is not based in the reality of their products. Leaf springs fail on anything that has leaf springs. Try again. I see. Then why is Toyota initiating a recall? Because they care more about their customers than domestic truck makers? Fuck if I know, but there was a long "Well, this could lead to this, which could lead to this, which may cause a fire." explanation in the recall notice. The only way that a broken leaf spring would rub through a tank is through abject negligence on the part of the owner. I've seen broken leaf springs on pretty much every brand truck that uses leaf springs. Furthermore, if you owned a FWD Ford product manufactured since the '90's, chances are that you've had to replace the coil springs at least once, especially if you owned a wagon. I've seen one fail in such a way that it destroyed a tire, while the vehicle was moving. No recalls for the shit Ford springs, though. I believe there was a recall. They installed some sort of tire guard to prevent tire rupture in the event of faliure. They refused to replace the defective springs though. They were so bad that while I was a mechanic, any Ford FWD car that came in for an alignment got their springs visually checked, and then sold new rear springs, which were always broken on the wagons (Escort, Taurus, and Focus ). |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.