User Panel
Someone tell me quick.
Do I need to duct tape my doors and windows yet? |
|
Quoted:
And keep a close eye on the *borders*. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
We've been saying it's only a matter of time until it gets here, and bringing people here for treatment in violation of good epidemiology practice certainly isn't helping. Bringing a small number of people to dedicated treatment centers is a fairly low risk situation. And not something we should be concerned about when we still have free air travel and 2 wide open boarders. The only way to secure the country from Ebola would be to shut down both boarders and close off all air and sea travel to or from the US. Which would wreck all sorts of havoc on the economy. And keep a close eye on the *borders*. Meh |
|
And just remember. He didn't wash his hands after prepping your food from the fast food drive thru. Enjoy.
|
|
|
|
Quoted: Ummm, we don't weap on the bodies of the dead. We don't ritually wash corpses with water as part of a mourning ritual. Yes Ebola could make quick work of impoverished communities if it were introduced, but it would burn out relatively quickly. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: They keep saying an Ebola outbreak can't be sustained in a modern country, just wait until it hits Detroit or East St. Louis. Ummm, we don't weap on the bodies of the dead. We don't ritually wash corpses with water as part of a mourning ritual. Yes Ebola could make quick work of impoverished communities if it were introduced, but it would burn out relatively quickly. Ghetto clearing cure? |
|
Quoted:
Ummm, we don't weap on the bodies of the dead. We don't ritually wash corpses with water as part of a mourning ritual. Yes Ebola could make quick work of impoverished communities if it were introduced, but it would burn out relatively quickly. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
They keep saying an Ebola outbreak can't be sustained in a modern country, just wait until it hits Detroit or East St. Louis. Ummm, we don't weap on the bodies of the dead. We don't ritually wash corpses with water as part of a mourning ritual. Yes Ebola could make quick work of impoverished communities if it were introduced, but it would burn out relatively quickly. so this guy in the hospital in TX was handling dead bodies before he got on the plane? all 6000+ ebola patients so far were all fucking around with corpses? |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
They keep saying an Ebola outbreak can't be sustained in a modern country, just wait until it hits Detroit or East St. Louis. Ummm, we don't weap on the bodies of the dead. We don't ritually wash corpses with water as part of a mourning ritual. Yes Ebola could make quick work of impoverished communities if it were introduced, but it would burn out relatively quickly. Ghetto clearing cure? Wow |
|
Seriously, though, for those of you worried about Ebolapocalypse, I wouldn't worry too much.
Diseases like Ebola are probably never going to become "slate wipers" for the simple reason that they usually start to kill their victims at a faster rate than new ones are infected. This generally results in them "burning themselves out" like a wildfire running out of timber. Of course, it sucks if you are one of the one or two million people in the "fire" so to speak, but, well, shit happens. |
|
Quoted:
Seriously, though, for those of you worried about Ebolapocalypse, I wouldn't worry too much. Diseases like Ebola are probably never going to become "slate wipers" for the simple reason that they usually start to kill their victims at a faster rate than new ones are infected. This generally results in them "burning themselves out" like a wildfire running out of timber. Of course, it sucks if you are one of the one or two million people in the "fire" so to speak, but, well, shit happens. View Quote not so the R0 number for the current outbreak is believed to be somewhere around 2 meaning each patient infects 2 others before croaking |
|
|
Quoted:
so this guy in the hospital in TX was handling dead bodies before he got on the plane? all 6000+ ebola patients so far were all fucking around with corpses? View Quote Same thing I was thinking; I can't believe all those doctors we've been importing were so damn careless as to weep over the dead like that! Or 'weap', whatever the fuck - doesn't sound kosher to me. |
|
|
Quoted:
not so the R0 number for the current outbreak is believed to be somewhere around 2 meaning each patient infects 2 others before croaking View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Seriously, though, for those of you worried about Ebolapocalypse, I wouldn't worry too much. Diseases like Ebola are probably never going to become "slate wipers" for the simple reason that they usually start to kill their victims at a faster rate than new ones are infected. This generally results in them "burning themselves out" like a wildfire running out of timber. Of course, it sucks if you are one of the one or two million people in the "fire" so to speak, but, well, shit happens. not so the R0 number for the current outbreak is believed to be somewhere around 2 meaning each patient infects 2 others before croaking Why do you suppose it is that previous outbreaks in Africa did not wipe out that entire continent? Just curious. |
|
Quoted:
so this guy in the hospital in TX was handling dead bodies before he got on the plane? all 6000+ ebola patients so far were all fucking around with corpses? View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
They keep saying an Ebola outbreak can't be sustained in a modern country, just wait until it hits Detroit or East St. Louis. Ummm, we don't weap on the bodies of the dead. We don't ritually wash corpses with water as part of a mourning ritual. Yes Ebola could make quick work of impoverished communities if it were introduced, but it would burn out relatively quickly. so this guy in the hospital in TX was handling dead bodies before he got on the plane? all 6000+ ebola patients so far were all fucking around with corpses? Ebola is transmitted by contact with bodily fluids, which are heavily prevalent on corpses, but also on the surface touched by infected patients. One of the major reasons Ebola was able to take root in Africa was a distrust and superstitious attitudes about medical personnel and facilities. People went to shamen instead. Here there is no such superstition, and people readily go see the doctor. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: They keep saying an Ebola outbreak can't be sustained in a modern country, just wait until it hits Detroit or East St. Louis. Ummm, we don't weap on the bodies of the dead. We don't ritually wash corpses with water as part of a mourning ritual. Yes Ebola could make quick work of impoverished communities if it were introduced, but it would burn out relatively quickly. Ghetto clearing cure? Wow No, as in everyone leaves the Ghetto and you get ghost towns. |
|
|
....and all the thousands of dead Texans will suddenly vote Democrat in the next election.
|
|
I am fearing the day they say, "no travel" and I am stuck here.
|
|
Quoted:
Why do you suppose it is that previous outbreaks in Africa did not wipe out that entire continent? Just curious. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Seriously, though, for those of you worried about Ebolapocalypse, I wouldn't worry too much. Diseases like Ebola are probably never going to become "slate wipers" for the simple reason that they usually start to kill their victims at a faster rate than new ones are infected. This generally results in them "burning themselves out" like a wildfire running out of timber. Of course, it sucks if you are one of the one or two million people in the "fire" so to speak, but, well, shit happens. not so the R0 number for the current outbreak is believed to be somewhere around 2 meaning each patient infects 2 others before croaking Why do you suppose it is that previous outbreaks in Africa did not wipe out that entire continent? Just curious. Why do you hate epidemics so much? |
|
Quoted:
Why do you suppose it is that previous outbreaks in Africa did not wipe out that entire continent? Just curious. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Seriously, though, for those of you worried about Ebolapocalypse, I wouldn't worry too much. Diseases like Ebola are probably never going to become "slate wipers" for the simple reason that they usually start to kill their victims at a faster rate than new ones are infected. This generally results in them "burning themselves out" like a wildfire running out of timber. Of course, it sucks if you are one of the one or two million people in the "fire" so to speak, but, well, shit happens. not so the R0 number for the current outbreak is believed to be somewhere around 2 meaning each patient infects 2 others before croaking Why do you suppose it is that previous outbreaks in Africa did not wipe out that entire continent? Just curious. I really hope you are being willfully ignant, and are not authentically that ignant. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Seriously, though, for those of you worried about Ebolapocalypse, I wouldn't worry too much. Diseases like Ebola are probably never going to become "slate wipers" for the simple reason that they usually start to kill their victims at a faster rate than new ones are infected. This generally results in them "burning themselves out" like a wildfire running out of timber. Of course, it sucks if you are one of the one or two million people in the "fire" so to speak, but, well, shit happens. not so the R0 number for the current outbreak is believed to be somewhere around 2 meaning each patient infects 2 others before croaking Why do you suppose it is that previous outbreaks in Africa did not wipe out that entire continent? Just curious. Why do you hate epidemics so much? No hate. They can be fun while they last. But they never seem to live up to their true science fiction potential. |
|
Here's a link to a presentation by Dr Mark Kortepeter (Colonel, US Army
Medical Corps Director, Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program) regarding viral hemorrhagic fevers (2012). It's interesting to note that he recommends precautions geared around potential airborne transmission when treating patients with suspected VHF. This presentation was developed around the same time Canadian scientists observed airborne transmission between pigs and monkeys. I guess there's a difference between sneeze droplets travelling pretty far versus a more "true" airborne process...I'm not sure how much it matters. Also note reference to a case involving parasite (tick) bites and VHF. http://wrair-www.army.mil/Documents/TropMed/Feb-2012/%2819%29%20Kortepeter_Hemorrhagic%20Fevers_February%202012.pdf |
|
Quoted:
Why do you suppose it is that previous outbreaks in Africa did not wipe out that entire continent? Just curious. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Seriously, though, for those of you worried about Ebolapocalypse, I wouldn't worry too much. Diseases like Ebola are probably never going to become "slate wipers" for the simple reason that they usually start to kill their victims at a faster rate than new ones are infected. This generally results in them "burning themselves out" like a wildfire running out of timber. Of course, it sucks if you are one of the one or two million people in the "fire" so to speak, but, well, shit happens. not so the R0 number for the current outbreak is believed to be somewhere around 2 meaning each patient infects 2 others before croaking Why do you suppose it is that previous outbreaks in Africa did not wipe out that entire continent? Just curious. it never made it to the cities before it used to just wipe out a remote village then go back into the woods and maybe this strain is behaving differently |
|
Presbyterian Hospital Dallas seven miles east of Barshaw. Target reference November Bravo X-Ray One Zero Eight. Fused airburst at ten, check, twelve thousand feet.
|
|
Frack me
I am supposed to work there in a few weeks Not good for the home team |
|
|
|
|
Quoted:
it never made it to the cities before it used to just wipe out a remote village then go back into the woods and maybe this strain is behaving differently View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Seriously, though, for those of you worried about Ebolapocalypse, I wouldn't worry too much. Diseases like Ebola are probably never going to become "slate wipers" for the simple reason that they usually start to kill their victims at a faster rate than new ones are infected. This generally results in them "burning themselves out" like a wildfire running out of timber. Of course, it sucks if you are one of the one or two million people in the "fire" so to speak, but, well, shit happens. not so the R0 number for the current outbreak is believed to be somewhere around 2 meaning each patient infects 2 others before croaking Why do you suppose it is that previous outbreaks in Africa did not wipe out that entire continent? Just curious. it never made it to the cities before it used to just wipe out a remote village then go back into the woods and maybe this strain is behaving differently Interesting. Yes, that may be true. |
|
I'm sorry, I know the likelihood in the US that an Ebola outbreak really takes hold is slim to none....however, I'm getting increasingly weary of every asshole in some third world shithole that gets Ebola that is brought here for treatment. They knew the risks of working in those areas, but now they want the US to save their ass at "potentially" the expense of US citizens when shit gets real.
|
|
Quoted:
Ebola is transmitted by contact with bodily fluids, which are heavily prevalent on corpses, but also on the surface touched by infected patients. One of the major reasons Ebola was able to take root in Africa was a distrust and superstitious attitudes about medical personnel and facilities. People went to shamen instead. Here there is no such superstition, and people readily go see the doctor. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
They keep saying an Ebola outbreak can't be sustained in a modern country, just wait until it hits Detroit or East St. Louis. Ummm, we don't weap on the bodies of the dead. We don't ritually wash corpses with water as part of a mourning ritual. Yes Ebola could make quick work of impoverished communities if it were introduced, but it would burn out relatively quickly. so this guy in the hospital in TX was handling dead bodies before he got on the plane? all 6000+ ebola patients so far were all fucking around with corpses? Ebola is transmitted by contact with bodily fluids, which are heavily prevalent on corpses, but also on the surface touched by infected patients. One of the major reasons Ebola was able to take root in Africa was a distrust and superstitious attitudes about medical personnel and facilities. People went to shamen instead. Here there is no such superstition, and people readily go see the doctor. its this contradictory doubletalk why nobody believes the "experts" this time you can only get ebola from wallowing around with dead corpses thus "it cant happen here" yet at the same time you can get it from touching an infected door handle then picking your nose which is it? you cant have it both ways |
|
|
When they get two or three confirmed cases then I will panic!
|
|
|
Quoted:
I really hope you are being willfully ignant, and are not authentically that ignant. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Seriously, though, for those of you worried about Ebolapocalypse, I wouldn't worry too much. Diseases like Ebola are probably never going to become "slate wipers" for the simple reason that they usually start to kill their victims at a faster rate than new ones are infected. This generally results in them "burning themselves out" like a wildfire running out of timber. Of course, it sucks if you are one of the one or two million people in the "fire" so to speak, but, well, shit happens. not so the R0 number for the current outbreak is believed to be somewhere around 2 meaning each patient infects 2 others before croaking Why do you suppose it is that previous outbreaks in Africa did not wipe out that entire continent? Just curious. I really hope you are being willfully ignant, and are not authentically that ignant. Hey genius, my question was rhetorical (that's a big word, so you might want to look it up) in nature. This stuff has been mathematically modeled before. Yes, I KNOW why the disease did not wipe out the entire continent. The fact that it has not only proves my original assertion. |
|
|
|
|
Reading most of the responses, it's quite easy to see that 90% of ARFCOMers have no fucking idea how Ebola is spread.
Jesus Christ, read a fucking article instead of a headline for once. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.