User Panel
Quoted:
The only people in GD talking about Christie being the GOP nominee are self-described "libertarians". Why is that? Is it because it affords these same "libertarians" the opportunity to bash the GOP once again? It has to be, since one would have to be a deluded moron to think Gov. Christie had any kind of chance to win the primary at all. A GD "libertarian" fantasy worthy of much masturbation on their part; the chance to rip Republicans a new asshole for months on the internet.... View Quote In fairness, a lot of "libertarian fantasies" have materialized against the common sense of GD. Romney Obamacare passing Obama's second term |
|
Quoted:
He would be better than any Democrat. Fiscal conservative, social liberal if he was hot he would be GDs ultimate candidate. View Quote Fiscal conservative???.... He wouldn't fight against Obamacare. Was all over signing on and taking that Fed $$$ for a couple years. Hasn't reigned in speding or taxes in his state. Draconian gun laws. He got his name in the news initially because he picked a small fight with the teachers union....and has done nothing since except try to keep his name in the national news. |
|
No one in my household will vote for him.
RNC take note, going down this path will mean the end of financial support for your party. |
|
Quoted:
In fairness, a lot of "libertarian fantasies" have materialized against the common sense of GD. Romney Obamacare passing Obama's second term View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The only people in GD talking about Christie being the GOP nominee are self-described "libertarians". Why is that? Is it because it affords these same "libertarians" the opportunity to bash the GOP once again? It has to be, since one would have to be a deluded moron to think Gov. Christie had any kind of chance to win the primary at all. A GD "libertarian" fantasy worthy of much masturbation on their part; the chance to rip Republicans a new asshole for months on the internet.... In fairness, a lot of "libertarian fantasies" have materialized against the common sense of GD. Romney Obamacare passing Obama's second term Yes, those are things that the Libertarians had hoped to see. They WANT Christie to be the Republican candidate. It is obvious. |
|
|
|
Quoted:
Yes, those are things that the Libertarians had hoped to see. They WANT Christie to be the Republican candidate. It is obvious. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The only people in GD talking about Christie being the GOP nominee are self-described "libertarians". Why is that? Is it because it affords these same "libertarians" the opportunity to bash the GOP once again? It has to be, since one would have to be a deluded moron to think Gov. Christie had any kind of chance to win the primary at all. A GD "libertarian" fantasy worthy of much masturbation on their part; the chance to rip Republicans a new asshole for months on the internet.... In fairness, a lot of "libertarian fantasies" have materialized against the common sense of GD. Romney Obamacare passing Obama's second term Yes, those are things that the Libertarians had hoped to see. They WANT Christie to be the Republican candidate. It is obvious. You misunderstand what I was trying to say. It became confusing by my quoting the original "libertarian fantasies" comment. What I was trying to say is that there's always been a certain degree of "it will NEVER happen" whenever someone whom GD will brand a Libertarian shill offers a concern or warning. What I was saying is that we BETTER be concerned about everything. I damned sure know the progressives are not taking a day off. Those that ridicule the warnings are a good part of why we have gotten to the point where we are now. This "libertarian/GOP" purse-swinging in GD is overdone. If GD doesn't think that the MSM will do everything in their power to build Christie up to be "The candidate that the GOP wants and needs," I have a bridge to sell you. They will build him up until he wins the primaries, and then start to destroy him. You've seen it before. You WILL see it again. |
|
Quoted:
A national candidate who publicly supports semi auto rifles and high capacity magazines will NEVER win a national election in the US. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
any person here who supports Crispy Creme should immediately turn in all high capacity magazines, and semi-auto firearms. You also should ask your state to implement firearms ID cards complete with purchase limitations. you cannot be for the 2nd Amendment and support Crispy Cream at the same time. They are opposite ends of the spectrum. so let's hear from the Crispy Cream supporters WHY they feel he would be good for the 2nd Amendment put up or shut up A national candidate who publicly supports semi auto rifles and high capacity magazines will NEVER win a national election in the US. GWB supported the assault weapon ban. He planned to sign it's renewal if it reached his desk in 2004. |
|
Quoted:
Fiscal conservative???.... He wouldn't fight against Obamacare. Was all over signing on and taking that Fed $$$ for a couple years. Hasn't reigned in speding or taxes in his state. Draconian gun laws. He got his name in the news initially because he picked a small fight with the teachers union....and has done nothing since except try to keep his name in the national news. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
He would be better than any Democrat. Fiscal conservative, social liberal if he was hot he would be GDs ultimate candidate. Fiscal conservative???.... He wouldn't fight against Obamacare. Was all over signing on and taking that Fed $$$ for a couple years. Hasn't reigned in speding or taxes in his state. Draconian gun laws. He got his name in the news initially because he picked a small fight with the teachers union....and has done nothing since except try to keep his name in the national news. I honestly don't follow Chritsy and don't really want to defend him. I have always heard he was fiscally conservative and I always heard he was anti assault weapons. I will study his past political decisions once the primaries start and try to make an educated choice at that time. |
|
|
|
|
how can there be a front runner when a single primary hasn't been held? <- rhetorical question
|
|
Quoted:
In fairness, a lot of "libertarian fantasies" have materialized against the common sense of GD. Romney Obamacare passing Obama's second term View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
The only people in GD talking about Christie being the GOP nominee are self-described "libertarians". Why is that? Is it because it affords these same "libertarians" the opportunity to bash the GOP once again? It has to be, since one would have to be a deluded moron to think Gov. Christie had any kind of chance to win the primary at all. A GD "libertarian" fantasy worthy of much masturbation on their part; the chance to rip Republicans a new asshole for months on the internet.... In fairness, a lot of "libertarian fantasies" have materialized against the common sense of GD. Romney Obamacare passing Obama's second term "Libertarians" here in GD continue to bash Romney two years after he lost to Obama's second term. The fact is however, America would have been better off with Gov. Romney as the CiC, and leading our economic recovery than what we have now by an order of magnitude that's not even debatable. He's also a man that pledged no new gun control because, in his words, "America had enough laws already". But like someone else said, he didn't pander to the drug and gay marriage advocates, so he's worse than a dimocRat in the eyes of so called "libertarians" here in GD. Even the very notion that he has socially conservative values-despite the fact that he didn't run on those beliefs-is enough to warrant an unrelenting frontal attack on his candidacy. It is what it is. |
|
Quoted:
GWB supported that assault weapon ban. He planned to sign it's renewal if it reached his desk in 2004. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
any person here who supports Crispy Creme should immediately turn in all high capacity magazines, and semi-auto firearms. You also should ask your state to implement firearms ID cards complete with purchase limitations. you cannot be for the 2nd Amendment and support Crispy Cream at the same time. They are opposite ends of the spectrum. so let's hear from the Crispy Cream supporters WHY they feel he would be good for the 2nd Amendment put up or shut up A national candidate who publicly supports semi auto rifles and high capacity magazines will NEVER win a national election in the US. GWB supported that assault weapon ban. He planned to sign it's renewal if it reached his desk in 2004. He said he'd sign it if Congress passed it. He neither spoke out in favor of a new ban, nor did he pressure anyone in Congress to pass one. |
|
Quoted: Yes, those are things that the Libertarians had hoped to see. They WANT Christie to be the Republican candidate. It is obvious. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: The only people in GD talking about Christie being the GOP nominee are self-described "libertarians". Why is that? Is it because it affords these same "libertarians" the opportunity to bash the GOP once again? It has to be, since one would have to be a deluded moron to think Gov. Christie had any kind of chance to win the primary at all. A GD "libertarian" fantasy worthy of much masturbation on their part; the chance to rip Republicans a new asshole for months on the internet.... In fairness, a lot of "libertarian fantasies" have materialized against the common sense of GD. Romney Obamacare passing Obama's second term Yes, those are things that the Libertarians had hoped to see. They WANT Christie to be the Republican candidate. It is obvious. I know this is GD and all, but every person I know who self-identifies as L/libertarian did not want to see Obama in office. Every one of them held their noses and voted for Romney to try and stop the second Obama term. None of them supported Obamacare in any fashion and were very vocal about that issue to their elected reps. And they certainly do not want to see Christie as the GOP candidate as they might be put into a position of having to make the same decision as the last two elections. I could make lots of broad brush stereotypes regarding conservatives and good Christians based on the knuckleheads local to me, but I refrain from that as I realize they may not be the norm. I'd suspect GD isn't the "norm" regarding L/libertarians either. |
|
|
Quoted:
"Libertarians" here in GD continue to bash Romney two years after he lost to Obama's second term. The fact is however, America would have been better off with Gov. Romney as the CiC, and leading our economic recovery than what we have now by an order of magnitude that's not even debatable. He's also a man that pledged no new gun control because, in his words, "America had enough laws already". But like someone else said, he didn't pander to the drug and gay marriage advocates, so he's worse than a dimocRat in the eyes of so called "libertarians" here in GD. Even the very notion that he has socially conservative values-despite the fact that he didn't run on those beliefs-is enough to warrant an unrelenting frontal attack on his candidacy. It is what it is. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The only people in GD talking about Christie being the GOP nominee are self-described "libertarians". Why is that? Is it because it affords these same "libertarians" the opportunity to bash the GOP once again? It has to be, since one would have to be a deluded moron to think Gov. Christie had any kind of chance to win the primary at all. A GD "libertarian" fantasy worthy of much masturbation on their part; the chance to rip Republicans a new asshole for months on the internet.... In fairness, a lot of "libertarian fantasies" have materialized against the common sense of GD. Romney Obamacare passing Obama's second term "Libertarians" here in GD continue to bash Romney two years after he lost to Obama's second term. The fact is however, America would have been better off with Gov. Romney as the CiC, and leading our economic recovery than what we have now by an order of magnitude that's not even debatable. He's also a man that pledged no new gun control because, in his words, "America had enough laws already". But like someone else said, he didn't pander to the drug and gay marriage advocates, so he's worse than a dimocRat in the eyes of so called "libertarians" here in GD. Even the very notion that he has socially conservative values-despite the fact that he didn't run on those beliefs-is enough to warrant an unrelenting frontal attack on his candidacy. It is what it is. Yeah. As I stated earlier, I voted for him. He was not my ideal candidate, but I gave my reasons why I did. I was (and am) referring to the ridicule of anyone that warns about the smoke on the wind. That breeds a certain degree of complacency among those that should be vigilant. |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
The only people in GD talking about Christie being the GOP nominee are self-described "libertarians". Why is that? Is it because it affords these same "libertarians" the opportunity to bash the GOP once again? It has to be, since one would have to be a deluded moron to think Gov. Christie had any kind of chance to win the primary at all. A GD "libertarian" fantasy worthy of much masturbation on their part; the chance to rip Republicans a new asshole for months on the internet.... Yep. Spot-on. Maybe it's disgruntled voters who have been pulling the "R" lever their whole lives who are sick of voting for candidates who don't really represent their views. MItt Romney supported the AWB, sometimes John McCain supported the AWB, and George Bush said he would sign the AWB renewal if it reached his desk in 2004. Many pundits on Fox News are openly cheerleading for Chris Christie and/or Jeb Bush. Due to foreign policy differences, I truly believe that Dick Cheney would vote for Hillary oClinton ver Rand Paul if they are the two nominees in 2016. |
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
He would be better than any Democrat. Fiscal conservative, social liberal if he was hot he would be GDs ultimate candidate. Aren't you special. http://www.crownvic.net/cvpimaster/eyeroll.gif Your so kooky |
|
Quoted:
I'll vote for the sonofabitch........... IF I have to........... then I'll go gag myself.......... View Quote I won't, reason being that it's far easier for most "R"s to oppose something put forth by a "D" then it is if a "R" puts forth the same thing. Put a lib "R" in office and you would have fence sitting "R"s who are not conservative who would be far more likely to vote for gun control issues and socialist policies due to the political blocking a "R" president in office has. Nope, would stay home or vote 3rd party and be damn good with it. |
|
Quoted:
He said he'd sign it if Congress passed it. He neither spoke out in favor of a new ban, nor did he pressure anyone in Congress to pass one. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
any person here who supports Crispy Creme should immediately turn in all high capacity magazines, and semi-auto firearms. You also should ask your state to implement firearms ID cards complete with purchase limitations. you cannot be for the 2nd Amendment and support Crispy Cream at the same time. They are opposite ends of the spectrum. so let's hear from the Crispy Cream supporters WHY they feel he would be good for the 2nd Amendment put up or shut up A national candidate who publicly supports semi auto rifles and high capacity magazines will NEVER win a national election in the US. GWB supported that assault weapon ban. He planned to sign it's renewal if it reached his desk in 2004. He said he'd sign it if Congress passed it. He neither spoke out in favor of a new ban, nor did he pressure anyone in Congress to pass one. I've written two letters to politicians in my life. I wrote GWB and Karl Rove in 2004 pleading that they not to renew the AWB if the bill reaches their desk. Both responses were obviously form letters; both said that the specifically support the AWB becoming permanent and they will sign it if it reaches their desk. |
|
The MSM will be all positive for him during the primary, attacking any candidate.
Then attacking hard in the general. The republicans will never win they let the MSM choose their candidates. |
|
Quoted:
Who here that is complaining about the inevitability of Christie winning the nomination, has been working hard at getting a better candidate on the ballot? What exactly have you done? Will you do more than just whine? View Quote There are no ANNOUNCED candidates at this point. The 2016 election is over two years away. Why people continue to moan and whine and conjecture about the Republican nominee now is beyond me. Concentrate any efforts on electing Republicans this November. |
|
Quoted: Chess, not checkers? I used to buy into this but the more and more I see how the Rs actually do shit and fuck us just as good I have a hard time believing that. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Any R is better than a D. A vote for a third party is a vote for Hillary. Chess, not checkers. Chess, not checkers? I used to buy into this but the more and more I see how the Rs actually do shit and fuck us just as good I have a hard time believing that. |
|
republicans... snatching defeat from the jaws of victory every chance they get...
say what you will but christie as nominee almost guarantees a dem president... |
|
Christie will never get the GOP nomination. I guarantee that it won't happen.
|
|
Quoted:
Yeah. As I stated earlier, I voted for him. He was not my ideal candidate, but I gave my reasons why I did. I was (and am) referring to the ridicule of anyone that warns about the smoke on the wind. That breeds a certain degree of complacency among those that should be vigilant. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The only people in GD talking about Christie being the GOP nominee are self-described "libertarians". Why is that? Is it because it affords these same "libertarians" the opportunity to bash the GOP once again? It has to be, since one would have to be a deluded moron to think Gov. Christie had any kind of chance to win the primary at all. A GD "libertarian" fantasy worthy of much masturbation on their part; the chance to rip Republicans a new asshole for months on the internet.... In fairness, a lot of "libertarian fantasies" have materialized against the common sense of GD. Romney Obamacare passing Obama's second term "Libertarians" here in GD continue to bash Romney two years after he lost to Obama's second term. The fact is however, America would have been better off with Gov. Romney as the CiC, and leading our economic recovery than what we have now by an order of magnitude that's not even debatable. He's also a man that pledged no new gun control because, in his words, "America had enough laws already". But like someone else said, he didn't pander to the drug and gay marriage advocates, so he's worse than a dimocRat in the eyes of so called "libertarians" here in GD. Even the very notion that he has socially conservative values-despite the fact that he didn't run on those beliefs-is enough to warrant an unrelenting frontal attack on his candidacy. It is what it is. Yeah. As I stated earlier, I voted for him. He was not my ideal candidate, but I gave my reasons why I did. I was (and am) referring to the ridicule of anyone that warns about the smoke on the wind. That breeds a certain degree of complacency among those that should be vigilant. Fair enough. |
|
Quoted:
I've written two letters to politicians in my life. I wrote GWB and Karl Rove in 2004 pleading that they not to renew the AWB if the bill reaches their desk. Both responses were obviously form letters; both said that the specifically support the AWB becoming permanent and they will sign it if it reaches their desk. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
any person here who supports Crispy Creme should immediately turn in all high capacity magazines, and semi-auto firearms. You also should ask your state to implement firearms ID cards complete with purchase limitations. you cannot be for the 2nd Amendment and support Crispy Cream at the same time. They are opposite ends of the spectrum. so let's hear from the Crispy Cream supporters WHY they feel he would be good for the 2nd Amendment put up or shut up A national candidate who publicly supports semi auto rifles and high capacity magazines will NEVER win a national election in the US. GWB supported that assault weapon ban. He planned to sign it's renewal if it reached his desk in 2004. He said he'd sign it if Congress passed it. He neither spoke out in favor of a new ban, nor did he pressure anyone in Congress to pass one. I've written two letters to politicians in my life. I wrote GWB and Karl Rove in 2004 pleading that they not to renew the AWB if the bill reaches their desk. Both responses were obviously form letters; both said that the specifically support the AWB becoming permanent and they will sign it if it reaches their desk. Don't care. If he really supported an AWB, he would have lobbied for one after the VT massacre. He took all sorts of shit in the media for not being more aggressive in pushing for a new ban after that horrific event. His actions tell me everything I need to know about the man, form letters sent out by some staffer not withstanding. |
|
|
Hello to 8 years of "The first female President" even though technically, I bet Hildawg has a bigger johnson than his/her inbred husband does!
Fuck Christie, yet another fall guy that the establishment trys to shove down our throats! FUCK THE RNC |
|
Quoted: "Libertarians" here in GD continue to bash Romney two years after he lost to Obama's second term. The fact is however, America would have been better off with Gov. Romney as the CiC, and leading our economic recovery than what we have now by an order of magnitude that's not even debatable. He's also a man that pledged no new gun control because, in his words, "America had enough laws already". But like someone else said, he didn't pander to the drug and gay marriage advocates, so he's worse than a dimocRat in the eyes of so called "libertarians" here in GD. Even the very notion that he has socially conservative values-despite the fact that he didn't run on those beliefs-is enough to warrant an unrelenting frontal attack on his candidacy. It is what it is. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: "Libertarians" here in GD continue to bash Romney two years after he lost to Obama's second term. The fact is however, America would have been better off with Gov. Romney as the CiC, and leading our economic recovery than what we have now by an order of magnitude that's not even debatable. He's also a man that pledged no new gun control because, in his words, "America had enough laws already". But like someone else said, he didn't pander to the drug and gay marriage advocates, so he's worse than a dimocRat in the eyes of so called "libertarians" here in GD. Even the very notion that he has socially conservative values-despite the fact that he didn't run on those beliefs-is enough to warrant an unrelenting frontal attack on his candidacy. It is what it is. And no, before you jump to one of your other favorite conclusions, Ron Paul was not high on my list, at any point during the nomination process. He was about as palatable to me as Santorum was. All that said, and bearing in mind that I do not believe that Christie can secure the nomination, I will absolutely not vote for him if, by some miracle, he wins the nomination. |
|
|
Quoted:
Maybe it's disgruntled voters who have been pulling the "R" lever their whole lives who are sick of voting for candidates who don't really represent their views. MItt Romney supported the AWB, sometimes John McCain supported the AWB, and George Bush said he would sign the AWB renewal if it reached his desk in 2004. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The only people in GD talking about Christie being the GOP nominee are self-described "libertarians". Why is that? Is it because it affords these same "libertarians" the opportunity to bash the GOP once again? It has to be, since one would have to be a deluded moron to think Gov. Christie had any kind of chance to win the primary at all. A GD "libertarian" fantasy worthy of much masturbation on their part; the chance to rip Republicans a new asshole for months on the internet.... Yep. Spot-on. Maybe it's disgruntled voters who have been pulling the "R" lever their whole lives who are sick of voting for candidates who don't really represent their views. MItt Romney supported the AWB, sometimes John McCain supported the AWB, and George Bush said he would sign the AWB renewal if it reached his desk in 2004. Romney actively campaigned on a "no new gun laws" platform for president... Of those you listed only Palin/McCain actively campaigned against guns. Their platform was "close the gunshow loophole." As for the, "I will sign it..." That was the NRA strategy. Eliminate the argument at the national level, keep the argument in congress... Then keep congress pro gun republican... The NRA has explained numerous times that Romney did good for gun rights as governor of a state with a veto- proof majority of liberal democrats... Romney was a lifelong anti- union pro-free- market conservative. He was supported and endorsed by the NRA and the heritage foundation. Romney always polled good among core conservatives. Romney was *begged* to run for governor of the most-conservative state in the US after the Olympics... Romney always had a chance to win the R primary... He always did well in polls of conservatives... Christie had no appeal to conservatives and will have no chance in the R primary... |
|
|
|
Quoted:
same here burn it all down. Republicans are Democrats with a different name I am not voting for any RNC sponsored candidates unless they have considerable history actually supporting the Constitution and true freedom. Dems will continue to win due to the RNC being deaf or NOT wanting to face reality. I honestly at this point do not care one fucking bit about how far down the hole the USA will go under Dem leadership.....The Republicans obviously share the same thoughts. Quicker we hit bottom...the quicker we start an uphill climb and fix this country. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
I'll vote third party if that assbag is the nominee. same here burn it all down. Republicans are Democrats with a different name I am not voting for any RNC sponsored candidates unless they have considerable history actually supporting the Constitution and true freedom. Dems will continue to win due to the RNC being deaf or NOT wanting to face reality. I honestly at this point do not care one fucking bit about how far down the hole the USA will go under Dem leadership.....The Republicans obviously share the same thoughts. Quicker we hit bottom...the quicker we start an uphill climb and fix this country. Agreed 110 percent. I have wrote the GOP and Rance a few times and said I am not donating any money or voting for any candidate unless they actually are a true Conservative. No more of these half conservative/ half liberal candidates. Give me a staunch fiscal conservative with a legitimate belief in the power of the Constitution and limited government. Otherwise count me out. |
|
Doesn't he have a bridge to close somewhere?
Holy crap he sucks. |
|
|
So OP quotes a washPOSt clinton machine opinion blog, alters the headlines and content to stir up the liberal anti GOP base 2 months before midterms. That's not surprising from a washPOSt DNC paperboy.
Rand Paul Leads the GOP Pack for 2016 – And Not By a Little Poll: Rand Paul 2016 frontrunner in IA, N.H. Good News For GOP, Bad News For Obama In Latest CBS/New York Times Poll |
|
This is unpossible. The arfcom GOP has promised I won't have to hold my nose this time.
Wait, that's not it...oh yeah, they insisted that I must vote however they vote, so they can win, even if I must hold my nose. |
|
no different than any dem...fuck the GOP...usually I'd vote for the lesser of two evils, but in this case I'll take my chances and vote 3rd party if it comes to that...
|
|
I hate to be one of those 3rd party/im not voting people but I cant vote for Christie. Unlike Romney who actually was a good candidate a much better one than McCain was. Christie is just to ho-hum moderate.
I would love to vote for Paul, I would vote for Cruz, Cain, Scott Walker, or pretty much anyone else, but I cant vote for Christie. Ill just vote for the Constitution party candidate. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.