User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 11:12:56 AM EDT
[#1]
Quoted:
Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. Reading is fundamental. No one asked for your opinion. They asked for pictures. Israeli Armor photo thread- Operation Protective Edge 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 11:20:42 AM EDT
[#2]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If they are willing to commit genocide to achieve lasting peace... well then you'll have your answer. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. Genuinely curious as to why you would relate Jews to Nazis. If they are willing to commit genocide to achieve lasting peace... well then you'll have your answer. Having experienced it once before, I'd say they learned never to just "lay back" and take it ever again. I'm of the opinion let'em sort it out. When both sides get tired or one side eliminates the other it'll stop. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 11:21:39 AM EDT
[#3]
better killdozer action
 |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 11:33:12 AM EDT
[#4]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You never know what warhead was being used in insurgency? Anti-Personnel (which they had a lot of), old RPG-2 rounds, off axis so the jet isn't square against the armor? A standard armor piercing RPG round will penetrate a bradley. Forgive me going off topic, however it is armor related. Perhaps this should be in another thread. I know there are a variety of anti-armor warheads for the RPG, and other shoulder fired weapons. Some of which will even defeat Abram's armor. 1. How many different types are there? 2. How frequently are they encountered? (Do enemies in Afghanistan, Iraq or even Hamas have "a lot" of them or are they rare?) 3. Reactive armor is a solution for a MBT. Do the cages around a Stryker work? Are there other "low tech" and/or light weight options to defend against these threats? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 11:37:19 AM EDT
[#5]
Something about that pic of the three Killdozers brings a smile to the face.
Imagine a company of those in Detroit or Camden or South Chicago. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 11:38:55 AM EDT
[#6]
Did the 88ers leave? Is it safe to come back?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 11:39:53 AM EDT
[#7]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Reading is fundamental. No one asked for your opinion. They asked for pictures. http://cdn.timesofisrael.com/uploads/2014/07/F140709YS20-e1404900229996.jpg Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. Reading is fundamental. No one asked for your opinion. They asked for pictures. Israeli Armor photo thread- Operation Protective Edge http://cdn.timesofisrael.com/uploads/2014/07/F140709YS20-e1404900229996.jpg Just FWIW,the last time the Israelis used these in Gaza,the Brits complained since they're old Centurions. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 11:41:01 AM EDT
[#8]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Did the 88ers leave? Is it safe to come back? Nah they're just out for lunch. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 11:41:39 AM EDT
[#9]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. Calling Israeli's Nazi thugs. Have not heard that one before. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 11:51:10 AM EDT
[#10]
Quote HistoryQuoted: short answer? No. Bradley was designed to swim, not to take RPG hits. RPGs were taking out light armored tanks (AMX) in the 1960s and 1970s. The newer stuff is just more effective. You never know what warhead was being used in insurgency? Anti-Personnel (which they had a lot of), old RPG-2 rounds, off axis so the jet isn't square against the armor? A standard armor piercing RPG round will penetrate a bradley. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: I'm sure you know more about this than me, but could there be a difference in the rounds you're referring to? Are most RPG rounds a weaker kind of AP? Because I saw a MATV take multiple RPGs and minus one guy who needed a stretcher, everybody walked away. I don't want to get into too much detail on an open forum but I seem to remember from Mech leaders that the Brad is resistant to RPGs except one or two spots. short answer? No. Bradley was designed to swim, not to take RPG hits. RPGs were taking out light armored tanks (AMX) in the 1960s and 1970s. The newer stuff is just more effective. You never know what warhead was being used in insurgency? Anti-Personnel (which they had a lot of), old RPG-2 rounds, off axis so the jet isn't square against the armor? A standard armor piercing RPG round will penetrate a bradley. Top attack EFP warheads are a different ballgame entirely.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 11:54:53 AM EDT
[#11]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. ignoramus is also ironic |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 11:59:51 AM EDT
[#12]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Abrams or go home. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
The Merkeva may or may not be the best MBT, but in my opinion it's the best looking MBT. http://s28.postimg.org/r7o2nvb3h/F140718_HP31.jpg Abrams or go home. This has thicker top armor. And probably rear to? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 12:05:05 PM EDT
[#13]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You have to be insane to think that there is a "right" side in that war. At least we have some good real-world data of what happens when an Merkava tank shoots a DU slug into a preschool. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win.  You have to be insane to think that there is a "right" side in that war. At least we have some good real-world data of what happens when an Merkava tank shoots a DU slug into a preschool. BiAtch |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 12:16:59 PM EDT
[#14]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If they are willing to commit genocide to achieve lasting peace... well then you'll have your answer. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. Genuinely curious as to why you would relate Jews to Nazis. If they are willing to commit genocide to achieve lasting peace... well then you'll have your answer. I guess that clarification means that the Jews are supposed to be the "stone-age terrorist psychopaths," then.
You're wrong in so many ways. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 12:18:48 PM EDT
[#15]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
You have to be insane to think that there is a "right" side in that war. At least we have some good real-world data of what happens when an Merkava tank shoots a DU slug into a preschool. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. You have to be insane to think that there is a "right" side in that war. At least we have some good real-world data of what happens when an Merkava tank shoots a DU slug into a preschool. Welcome to ignore |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 12:30:14 PM EDT
[#16]
Sorry if this is a dumb question. But the tank in front is outfitted with the Trophy system, right?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 12:34:18 PM EDT
[#17]
Yes
Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 12:37:49 PM EDT
[#18]
When the first one spots a Jew or Isreali thread they must popup one of these:
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 12:48:43 PM EDT
[#19]
Quote HistoryQuote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The Merkeva may or may not be the best MBT, but in my opinion it's the best looking MBT. http://s28.postimg.org/r7o2nvb3h/F140718_HP31.jpg Sorry, I disagree. Nothing looks as formidable as an Abrams. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1d/T-90_Bhisma_cropped.jpg That thing is seriously the worst MBT ever created. It's basically a T-72 with some cool gadgets. There's a reason you always see Russian armor decked out in ERA. What armor? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 12:54:35 PM EDT
[#20]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
When the first one spots a Jew or Isreali thread they must popup one of these: 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 12:54:49 PM EDT
[#21]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If they are willing to commit genocide to achieve lasting peace... well then you'll have your answer. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. Genuinely curious as to why you would relate Jews to Nazis. If they are willing to commit genocide to achieve lasting peace... well then you'll have your answer. Let me guess. Still haven't hit 30 and voted Paul. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 12:55:21 PM EDT
[#22]
Hamas vs Israel is a lot like "Suicide By Cop"
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 12:58:03 PM EDT
[#23]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
These threads really bring out the finest people...... Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. These threads really bring out the finest people...... |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 1:06:13 PM EDT
[#24]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
On ships. The way all our shit travels. We cube out before we gross out. So the weight doesn't matter. Or we could buy light shit the AF loves and then die when we get to the battlefield. See also: Strykers. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I've never seen this thing before. Looks fucking amazing. 60t APC with a giant roomy interior and individual fold-up seats, all kinds of shelves & stowage. Driver, commander, and dismounts all in the same compartment with plenty of room to move around without crawling all over one another. http://i.imgur.com/8RGjcOj.jpg And just look at the fucking size of it: http://i.imgur.com/oOyFOO3.jpg After spending years stuck in the arse of a LAV the Namer looks like heaven. Oh, and check this tidbit from the Wiki: The US Army conducted non-developmental vehicle operational assessments of current combat vehicles in 2012 to evaluate capabilities against requirements for purchase of a new IFV for the Ground Combat Vehicle program. One of the vehicles validated was the Namer.[21] On 2 April 2013, the Congressional Budget Office released a report that advised purchasing current vehicles instead of developing a new vehicle for the GCV program. Buying the Namer would cost $9 billion less, and met the required nine-man carrying capacity.[22] The army responded by saying that although the Namer and other vehicles assessed in 2012 met some GCV requirements, no currently fielded vehicle met enough without needing significant redesign.[23] You guys could've had these things but instead you chose to spend billions more on god only knows what (and god only knows how many delays). How do you plan on transporting them quickly and in numbers across oceans? That's the downside. On ships. The way all our shit travels. We cube out before we gross out. So the weight doesn't matter. Or we could buy light shit the AF loves and then die when we get to the battlefield. See also: Strykers. Hey, if the Army or Marines want them and can reasonably convince me they will actually employ them, I'm fine with footing the bill. It is a kick ass vehicle. I would like it to be domestically produced, though. But the five sided funny farm has decided it doesn't want it. The only reasonable arguments that can be made against it, I have articulated. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 1:06:27 PM EDT
[#25]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 1:26:57 PM EDT
[#26]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
That last picture. I never knew that the "wings" on the Merkavas turret were spaced armor. Cool. Quote HistoryQuoted:
That last picture. I never knew that the "wings" on the Merkavas turret were spaced armor. Cool. Some ones going to be in a world of shit when someone find's out they didn't have the end plate on that. see the screw holes? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 1:28:11 PM EDT
[#27]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Genuinely curious as to why you would relate Jews to Nazis. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. Genuinely curious as to why you would relate Jews to Nazis. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 1:30:37 PM EDT
[#28]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Was that the preschool with the rockets in it, or the preschool they were building suicide belts in? I forget which. There really is a clear right and wrong in that fight, if you don't see it you just don't want to see it. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. You have to be insane to think that there is a "right" side in that war. At least we have some good real-world data of what happens when an Merkava tank shoots a DU slug into a preschool.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 1:36:07 PM EDT
[#29]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. Man.... WOW. As I don't want to get a time-out I'll just plant my flag and say "I Stand With Israel." |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 1:43:12 PM EDT
[#30]
Quote HistoryQuoted: This has thicker top armor. And probably rear to? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: The Merkeva may or may not be the best MBT, but in my opinion it's the best looking MBT. http://s28.postimg.org/r7o2nvb3h/F140718_HP31.jpg Abrams or go home. This has thicker top armor. And probably rear to? yup, top armor on the Merk 4 is in the 10-12" range while on the Abrams its under 2". hopefully the US will never fight someone that has modern top-attack ATGMs where the Abrams comes out ahead is in the turret front area that has the DU armor layer |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 1:45:07 PM EDT
[#31]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
http://i.imgur.com/LJ1wO3f.png I believe it was canceled. I believe it was based on a more modern Merkava chasis than the Namer. To be honest, it makes more sense for the Izzy's. Having to haul a 70 ton APC/IFV around would suck. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Now that they have a good amount of them, I'd like to hear how the Namers are doing. http://www.armyrecognition.com/images/stories/middle_east/israel/light_armoured/namer/pictures1/Namer_APC_tracked_infantry%20armoured_vehicle_personnel_carrier_Israel_Israeli_Defense_Forces_Army_IDF_defence_industry_017.jpg http://i62.tinypic.com/r1x8w9.jpg Scaring the shit out of everything it can actually get to... 
Just needs a 30mm Bushmaster or 40Mmm BAE turret on top... I present the Uber-Bradley... Now with 15,000% more armor. America has a few being testing for the GCV program, and I read they stuck a unmanned 30mm cannon on one. Can't find pictures of that, though. http://i.imgur.com/LJ1wO3f.png I believe it was canceled. I believe it was based on a more modern Merkava chasis than the Namer. To be honest, it makes more sense for the Izzy's. Having to haul a 70 ton APC/IFV around would suck. I wouldn't worry about the hauling- since they're more or less completely surrounded by the enemy, and their country is so small- they don't have to travel far. ETA for speed-typing mistake.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 1:47:44 PM EDT
[#32]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
yup, top armor on the Merk 4 is in the 10-12" range while on the Abrams its under 2". hopefully the US will never fight someone that has modern top-attack ATGMs where the Abrams comes out ahead is in the turret front area that has the DU armor layer Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The Merkeva may or may not be the best MBT, but in my opinion it's the best looking MBT. http://s28.postimg.org/r7o2nvb3h/F140718_HP31.jpg Abrams or go home. This has thicker top armor. And probably rear to? yup, top armor on the Merk 4 is in the 10-12" range while on the Abrams its under 2". hopefully the US will never fight someone that has modern top-attack ATGMs where the Abrams comes out ahead is in the turret front area that has the DU armor layer Didn't two Merkevas get knocked out in Lebanon in 2006 with Russian AT-14 missiles? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 1:48:41 PM EDT
[#33]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
I wouldn't about the hauling- since they're more or less completely surrounded by the enemy, and their country is so small- they don't have to travel far. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Now that they have a good amount of them, I'd like to hear how the Namers are doing. http://www.armyrecognition.com/images/stories/middle_east/israel/light_armoured/namer/pictures1/Namer_APC_tracked_infantry%20armoured_vehicle_personnel_carrier_Israel_Israeli_Defense_Forces_Army_IDF_defence_industry_017.jpg http://i62.tinypic.com/r1x8w9.jpg Scaring the shit out of everything it can actually get to...
Just needs a 30mm Bushmaster or 40Mmm BAE turret on top... I present the Uber-Bradley... Now with 15,000% more armor. America has a few being testing for the GCV program, and I read they stuck a unmanned 30mm cannon on one. Can't find pictures of that, though. http://i.imgur.com/LJ1wO3f.png I believe it was canceled. I believe it was based on a more modern Merkava chasis than the Namer. To be honest, it makes more sense for the Izzy's. Having to haul a 70 ton APC/IFV around would suck. I wouldn't about the hauling- since they're more or less completely surrounded by the enemy, and their country is so small- they don't have to travel far. That was the point. The Israelis don't really need to transport them. We would. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 1:57:02 PM EDT
[#34]
Inside look at the armor on an MK4
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 2:02:24 PM EDT
[#35]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Didn't two Merkevas get knocked out in Lebanon in 2006 with Russian AT-14 missiles? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
The Merkeva may or may not be the best MBT, but in my opinion it's the best looking MBT. http://s28.postimg.org/r7o2nvb3h/F140718_HP31.jpg Abrams or go home. This has thicker top armor. And probably rear to? yup, top armor on the Merk 4 is in the 10-12" range while on the Abrams its under 2". hopefully the US will never fight someone that has modern top-attack ATGMs where the Abrams comes out ahead is in the turret front area that has the DU armor layer Didn't two Merkevas get knocked out in Lebanon in 2006 with Russian AT-14 missiles? More than that. 40-something took hits. About half had significant penetrations and damage. A single digit number (2? 4? I cannot recall) were damaged beyond repair/catastrophic losses. Despite this, casualties among buttoned-up tankers were very light. Single-digit KIAs if I recall. Most of the WIA were fairly minor. There were some seriously injured tankers though, which isn't surprising. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 2:03:12 PM EDT
[#36]
Quote HistoryDon't forget, Merks have the engine compartment up front, so that space functions as a big standoff to protect against the really big stuff. There's more armor between the engine compartment and the crew compartment I believe. The big side armor add-ons on the turret are also visible since one section is removed in those photos which lets you see how thick those parts are. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 2:06:17 PM EDT
[#37]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Don't forget, Merks have the engine compartment up front, so that space functions as a big standoff to protect against the really big stuff. There's more armor between the engine compartment and the crew compartment I believe. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Don't forget, Merks have the engine compartment up front, so that space functions as a big standoff to protect against the really big stuff. There's more armor between the engine compartment and the crew compartment I believe. The unusual engine-foward arrangement of the Merkava is also why she makes a good IFV/APC conversion. Couldn't really do the same thing with an Abrams... Not practically. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 2:13:23 PM EDT
[#38]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
If they are willing to commit genocide to achieve lasting peace... well then you'll have your answer. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. Genuinely curious as to why you would relate Jews to Nazis. If they are willing to commit genocide to achieve lasting peace... well then you'll have your answer. Tell me how many Japanese civilians we killed in Japan with nukes in WW2 and in Germany when we firebombed pretty much everything oh highest of morality? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 2:19:29 PM EDT
[#39]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Tell me how many Japanese civilians we killed in Japan with nukes in WW2 and in Germany when we firebombed pretty much everything oh highest of morality? Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. Genuinely curious as to why you would relate Jews to Nazis. If they are willing to commit genocide to achieve lasting peace... well then you'll have your answer. Tell me how many Japanese civilians we killed in Japan with nukes in WW2 and in Germany when we firebombed pretty much everything oh highest of morality? Engaging civilian targets, primarily production facilities, in an effort to both interrupt production of war materials AND demoralize the populace and government to the point of giving up to end the war, is not the same as trying to annihilate a group of people because they don't share your religious beliefs. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 2:22:57 PM EDT
[#40]
Quote HistoryThe soldier who took those photos and posted them regretted the hell out of it. The Jordanians developed a heavy APC from old Centurions very similar to the Namer. They got around the problem of the engine in back by essentially building it backwards,pretty much just how Israel developed the Merkava to begin with. They've also put a less modified version in service that's similar to the Israeli Puma but with a unique front hatch,a bit similar to the rear of an Achzarit 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 2:24:57 PM EDT
[#41]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Engaging civilian targets, primarily production facilities, in an effort to both interrupt production of war materials AND demoralize the populace and government to the point of giving up to end the war, is not the same as trying to annihilate a group of people because they don't share your religious beliefs. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. Genuinely curious as to why you would relate Jews to Nazis. If they are willing to commit genocide to achieve lasting peace... well then you'll have your answer. Tell me how many Japanese civilians we killed in Japan with nukes in WW2 and in Germany when we firebombed pretty much everything oh highest of morality? Engaging civilian targets, primarily production facilities, in an effort to both interrupt production of war materials AND demoralize the populace and government to the point of giving up to end the war, is not the same as trying to annihilate a group of people because they don't share your religious beliefs. You're asserting Israel is leading the ground war because Hamas aren't Jews!? That's an infinite stretch. Show me the evidence. Obviously they CAN'T be defending themselves from the thousands of rockets that have been launched at them from Hamas. That wouldn't make sense. Did you attend UC Berkley?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 2:26:56 PM EDT
[#42]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Engaging civilian targets, primarily production facilities, in an effort to both interrupt production of war materials AND demoralize the populace and government to the point of giving up to end the war, is not the same as trying to annihilate a group of people because they don't share your religious beliefs. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. Genuinely curious as to why you would relate Jews to Nazis. If they are willing to commit genocide to achieve lasting peace... well then you'll have your answer. Tell me how many Japanese civilians we killed in Japan with nukes in WW2 and in Germany when we firebombed pretty much everything oh highest of morality? Engaging civilian targets, primarily production facilities, in an effort to both interrupt production of war materials AND demoralize the populace and government to the point of giving up to end the war, is not the same as trying to annihilate a group of people because they don't share your religious beliefs. So you're saying that that's what Israel is doing?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 2:29:38 PM EDT
[#43]
Quote HistoryQuoted: So you're saying that that's what Israel is doing? Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted:trying to annihilate a group of people because they don't share your religious beliefs. So you're saying that that's what Israel is doing? They must not be very good at it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 2:31:40 PM EDT
[#44]
       |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 2:47:16 PM EDT
[#45]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Don't want a DU slug in your preschool? Then don't store your munitions in the preschool. You realize Hamas deliberately intertwined their resources within the civilian community such that when the unfortunate but inevitable civilian collateral casualties occur it stirs up self righteous indignation among those lacking critical thinking the world over? I have never seen any proof of Isreal targeting a civilian location for the sole purpose of causing civilian casualties. Can't say the same for their opposition however. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. You have to be insane to think that there is a "right" side in that war. At least we have some good real-world data of what happens when an Merkava tank shoots a DU slug into a preschool. Don't want a DU slug in your preschool? Then don't store your munitions in the preschool. You realize Hamas deliberately intertwined their resources within the civilian community such that when the unfortunate but inevitable civilian collateral casualties occur it stirs up self righteous indignation among those lacking critical thinking the world over? I have never seen any proof of Isreal targeting a civilian location for the sole purpose of causing civilian casualties. Can't say the same for their opposition however. A DU sabot would just rip through and keep going. If it didn't hit the kid the kid would probably be OK. Depleted Uranium sounds way scarier than High Explosive Anti-Tank. |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 2:49:23 PM EDT
[#46]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Let me guess. Still haven't hit 30 and voted Paul. Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. Genuinely curious as to why you would relate Jews to Nazis. If they are willing to commit genocide to achieve lasting peace... well then you'll have your answer. Let me guess. Still haven't hit 30 and voted Paul. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 2:51:44 PM EDT
[#48]
Quote HistoryQuoted: Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. The PLO vs the Russians??? |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 2:53:02 PM EDT
[#49]
Quote HistoryQuoted: You have to be insane to think that there is a "right" side in that war. At least we have some good real-world data of what happens when an Merkava tank shoots a DU slug into a preschool. Quote HistoryQuoted: Quoted: Quoted: Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. You have to be insane to think that there is a "right" side in that war. At least we have some good real-world data of what happens when an Merkava tank shoots a DU slug into a preschool. But there is, The Israelis' are... |
|
|
|
Posted: 7/20/2014 2:55:10 PM EDT
[#50]
Quote HistoryQuoted:
Show us on this doll where the bad jew touched you... <a href="http://s21.photobucket.com/user/bytor94/media/anatomicaldolls_0_zps8a32105b.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b265/bytor94/anatomicaldolls_0_zps8a32105b.jpg</a> Quote HistoryQuoted:
Quoted:
Stone-age terrorist psychopaths vs 21st century Nazi thugs. I really don't give a shit who will win. Show us on this doll where the bad jew touched you... <a href="http://s21.photobucket.com/user/bytor94/media/anatomicaldolls_0_zps8a32105b.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b265/bytor94/anatomicaldolls_0_zps8a32105b.jpg</a> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHABbBbbFflfllflfhahahhaahahahha |
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
