Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
Member Login

Log In

A valid email is required.
Password is required.
Site Notices
3/20/2017 5:03:23 PM
Page / 3
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 6:59:24 PM EDT


If the napkin won't wipe, your claim is made of tripe.



Link Posted: 2/27/2014 6:59:39 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Who_Me:
Judge should rule in his favor and order McDonald's to give him one more napkin.
View Quote


Plus the bill for all legal fees and court costs.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 7:01:13 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 2/27/2014 7:02:23 PM EDT by justsayin]
Case dismissed.

Plaintiff will pay XXXX thousand dollars in court costs.

Next.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 7:05:51 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By justsayin:
Case dismissed.

Plaintiff will pay XXXX thousand dollars in court costs.

Next.
View Quote
Good luck collecting.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 7:19:31 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Danj:
Good luck collecting.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Danj:
Originally Posted By justsayin:
Case dismissed.

Plaintiff will pay XXXX thousand dollars in court costs.

Next.
Good luck collecting.

The court always collects. It's either pay up or go to jail until you do.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 7:26:59 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 2/27/2014 7:30:08 PM EDT by perpetual_fng]
Originally Posted By gym007:
McDonalds has made a new golden arch enemy -- a California man is suing the company for $1.5 MILLION ... because he says he only got ONE NAPKIN with his meal.

Webster Lucas claims he was stiffed on napkins at the Mickey D's in Pacoima, CA on January 29th -- after ordering a Quarter Pounder Deluxe -- and when he went up to the counter to ask for more, he was rudely rebuffed by the manager ... who insisted he already got some.

According to his lawsuit, Lucas -- who is black -- then retorted, "I should have went to eat at the Jack-in-the-Box because I didn't come here to argue over napkins. I came here to eat."

That's when Lucas says things got racist -- claiming the manager (a Mexican-American) mumbled something about "you people."


Lucas subsequently emailed the general manager to complain -- insisting he couldn't work because of the "undue mental anguish" he was suffering as a result of the napkin debacle -- and says he was insultingly offered free burgers in return.

Lucas wants to super size instead -- $1.5 million.


Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2014/02/27/mcdonalds-webster-lucas-napkin-lawsuit/#ixzz2ua1tHb00
View Quote


That was predictable....

BTW, McDonald's really does have a black website, so they *are* racist, but not in the way that guy claims.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 7:32:42 PM EDT
Some black people are really way overy "touchy" about shit. Some are not. Same with homosexuals.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 7:35:25 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Dana1972:


What attorney would take that case?
View Quote



Link Posted: 2/27/2014 7:41:09 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By figley:



http://i58.tinypic.com/25p2yrs.jpg
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By figley:
Originally Posted By Dana1972:


What attorney would take that case?



http://i58.tinypic.com/25p2yrs.jpg




Touché.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 7:56:35 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By dryflash3:
Well I'm glad his coffee wasn't too hot.

How much did that women get?
View Quote


I don't mean to pick nits with you, but supposedly during discovery it was revealed that Mickey Dee's HQ knew their coffee was too hot, and that their lids/cups were if-ey. The reason behind them cranking up the heat on the coffee was so that the sit down and lobby areas would get filled with the smell of coffee, and they would sell more.

Also, AFAIK, the woman was burnt or scalded so bad in or on her genitals that the burn treatment required scrubbing the dead skin off, I guess, on a daily basis.

Imagine taking a bristle brush to your nutsack, vigorously.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:02:25 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By WeimaranerDad:


I don't mean to pick nits with you, but supposedly during discovery it was revealed that Mickey Dee's HQ knew their coffee was too hot, and that their lids/cups were if-ey. The reason behind them cranking up the heat on the coffee was so that the sit down and lobby areas would get filled with the smell of coffee, and they would sell more.

Also, AFAIK, the woman was burnt or scalded so bad in or on her genitals that the burn treatment required scrubbing the dead skin off, I guess, on a daily basis.

Imagine taking a bristle brush to your nutsack, vigorously.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By WeimaranerDad:
Originally Posted By dryflash3:
Well I'm glad his coffee wasn't too hot.

How much did that women get?


I don't mean to pick nits with you, but supposedly during discovery it was revealed that Mickey Dee's HQ knew their coffee was too hot, and that their lids/cups were if-ey. The reason behind them cranking up the heat on the coffee was so that the sit down and lobby areas would get filled with the smell of coffee, and they would sell more.

Also, AFAIK, the woman was burnt or scalded so bad in or on her genitals that the burn treatment required scrubbing the dead skin off, I guess, on a daily basis.

Imagine taking a bristle brush to your nutsack, vigorously.

If I remember, she was holding the cup between her legs with the lid off while driving, trying to mix in creamer or sugar.

I don't know about you, but if I tried to hold a fresh cup of coffee in my crotch with the lid removed in a moving vehicle, I'd blame myself if I got burned.

Good old Stella Lieback, I think was her name.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:04:01 PM EDT
HAHA! Thats funny... Coffee burns, anyone?
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:05:05 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By aztrooper:
HAHA! Thats funny... Coffee burns, anyone?
View Quote

Without a warning on the cup, how are we to know it's hot enough to burn us?


Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:05:18 PM EDT
"we apologize for underestimating how much of a slob you are and didn't know you would require a diaper for your face"
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:08:41 PM EDT
[Last Edit: 2/27/2014 8:16:19 PM EDT by perpetual_fng]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Dana1972:



What attorney would take that case?
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Dana1972:
Originally Posted By gym007:
McDonalds has made a new golden arch enemy -- a California man is suing the company for $1.5 MILLION ... because he says he only got ONE NAPKIN with his meal.

Webster Lucas claims he was stiffed on napkins at the Mickey D's in Pacoima, CA on January 29th -- after ordering a Quarter Pounder Deluxe -- and when he went up to the counter to ask for more, he was rudely rebuffed by the manager ... who insisted he already got some.

According to his lawsuit, Lucas -- who is black -- then retorted, "I should have went to eat at the Jack-in-the-Box because I didn't come here to argue over napkins. I came here to eat."

That's when Lucas says things got racist -- claiming the manager (a Mexican-American) mumbled something about "you people."


Lucas subsequently emailed the general manager to complain -- insisting he couldn't work because of the "undue mental anguish" he was suffering as a result of the napkin debacle -- and says he was insultingly offered free burgers in return.

Lucas wants to super size instead -- $1.5 million.


Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2014/02/27/mcdonalds-webster-lucas-napkin-lawsuit/#ixzz2ua1tHb00



What attorney would take that case?


Russell & Tate Law Firm!!!
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:15:53 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By WeimaranerDad:


I don't mean to pick nits with you, but supposedly during discovery it was revealed that Mickey Dee's HQ knew their coffee was too hot, and that their lids/cups were if-ey. The reason behind them cranking up the heat on the coffee was so that the sit down and lobby areas would get filled with the smell of coffee, and they would sell more.

Also, AFAIK, the woman was burnt or scalded so bad in or on her genitals that the burn treatment required scrubbing the dead skin off, I guess, on a daily basis.

Imagine taking a bristle brush to your nutsack, vigorously.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By WeimaranerDad:
Originally Posted By dryflash3:
Well I'm glad his coffee wasn't too hot.

How much did that women get?


I don't mean to pick nits with you, but supposedly during discovery it was revealed that Mickey Dee's HQ knew their coffee was too hot, and that their lids/cups were if-ey. The reason behind them cranking up the heat on the coffee was so that the sit down and lobby areas would get filled with the smell of coffee, and they would sell more.

Also, AFAIK, the woman was burnt or scalded so bad in or on her genitals that the burn treatment required scrubbing the dead skin off, I guess, on a daily basis.

Imagine taking a bristle brush to your nutsack, vigorously.



After seeing her injuries on a different website, she deserved every dime.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:27:05 PM EDT
Lucas actually has a job? I doubt it.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:32:26 PM EDT
It's a good thing the manager didn't throw a napkin at him, that's a hate crime felony in California and the customer would be within his rights to
shoot him
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:33:21 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Mah_lee:
It's a good thing the manager didn't throw a napkin at him, that's a hate crime felony in California and the customer would be within his rights to
shoot him
View Quote

It's important to remember that if you're going to hit someone with a napkin, make sure they aren't black.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:33:30 PM EDT
Yer supposed to eat it, not wear it.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:34:26 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By perpetual_fng:


That was predictable....

BTW, McDonald's really does have a black website, so they *are* racist, but not in the way that guy claims.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By perpetual_fng:
Originally Posted By gym007:
McDonalds has made a new golden arch enemy -- a California man is suing the company for $1.5 MILLION ... because he says he only got ONE NAPKIN with his meal.

Webster Lucas claims he was stiffed on napkins at the Mickey D's in Pacoima, CA on January 29th -- after ordering a Quarter Pounder Deluxe -- and when he went up to the counter to ask for more, he was rudely rebuffed by the manager ... who insisted he already got some.

According to his lawsuit, Lucas -- who is black -- then retorted, "I should have went to eat at the Jack-in-the-Box because I didn't come here to argue over napkins. I came here to eat."

That's when Lucas says things got racist -- claiming the manager (a Mexican-American) mumbled something about "you people."


Lucas subsequently emailed the general manager to complain -- insisting he couldn't work because of the "undue mental anguish" he was suffering as a result of the napkin debacle -- and says he was insultingly offered free burgers in return.

Lucas wants to super size instead -- $1.5 million.


Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2014/02/27/mcdonalds-webster-lucas-napkin-lawsuit/#ixzz2ua1tHb00


That was predictable....

BTW, McDonald's really does have a black website, so they *are* racist, but not in the way that guy claims.

Da Fuk?
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:34:37 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Mah_lee:
It's a good thing the manager didn't throw a napkin at him, that's a hate crime felony in California and the customer would be within his rights to
shoot him
View Quote



Or popcorn.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:35:58 PM EDT
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:36:39 PM EDT
insisting he couldn't work because of the "undue mental anguish" he was suffering as a result of the napkin debacle -- and says he was insultingly offered free burgers in return.
View Quote

If you're that much of a fuckup, might as well just kill yourself. You aren't going to be doing anything valuable anyway.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:39:38 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Who_Me:
Judge should rule in his favor and order McDonald's to give him one more napkin.
View Quote




This and ban him from all McDonald restaurants
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:43:38 PM EDT
They do seem have this thing where they only give one or two napkins, no matter what you order. On the rare occasions I eat McDonald's, I always ask for extra napkins. They still hand over one or two. Finally, I went through with my daughter after school one day. She wanted a drink and some fries. Same thing.
I asked the drive thru halfwit for extra napkins. She handed me two. I told her, that's too many. I only need half that many, and handed one back to her. She took it back, but then didn't seem to know what to do with it. My daughter thought it was the funniest thing she ever saw, and loves to tell that story.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:44:29 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By whiskerz:




This and ban him from all McDonald restaurants
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By whiskerz:
Originally Posted By Who_Me:
Judge should rule in his favor and order McDonald's to give him one more napkin.




This and ban him from all McDonald restaurants

That would be a favorable judgement for the plaintiff.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:44:50 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Ryan81:
I wouldn't be opposed to a judge walking down to the man, slapping him across the face and ruling in McD's favor.
View Quote


Advocating violence against minorities? Classy! And people wonder why gun owners have a rep for being racist...


























j/k
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:46:41 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Tim_the_enchanter:

That would be a favorable judgement for the plaintiff.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Tim_the_enchanter:
Originally Posted By whiskerz:
Originally Posted By Who_Me:
Judge should rule in his favor and order McDonald's to give him one more napkin.




This and ban him from all McDonald restaurants

That would be a favorable judgement for the plaintiff.




Well, I actually agree with you; I just like using this pic.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:47:58 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Dana1972:



After seeing her injuries on a different website, she deserved every dime.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Dana1972:
Originally Posted By WeimaranerDad:
Originally Posted By dryflash3:
Well I'm glad his coffee wasn't too hot.

How much did that women get?


I don't mean to pick nits with you, but supposedly during discovery it was revealed that Mickey Dee's HQ knew their coffee was too hot, and that their lids/cups were if-ey. The reason behind them cranking up the heat on the coffee was so that the sit down and lobby areas would get filled with the smell of coffee, and they would sell more.

Also, AFAIK, the woman was burnt or scalded so bad in or on her genitals that the burn treatment required scrubbing the dead skin off, I guess, on a daily basis.

Imagine taking a bristle brush to your nutsack, vigorously.



After seeing her injuries on a different website, she deserved every dime.


Yeah, the herp and derp about this case in GD typically never fails through the years.
It was proved in court McDs. brewed their crappy, cheap beans 30-35 degrees hotter than recommended to extract max profit from them. McDonald's also knew that the extra profit would offset the occasional awards for 3rd degree burns caused by their willful negligence and resulting lawsuits. IIRC, they initially offered her about $800. Also the usual claims of the "millions " she got was actually a fraction of the $400K +/- judgement after the lawyers took their cut.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:51:40 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Powderfinger:


Yeah, the herp and derp about this case in GD typically never fails through the years.
It was proved in court McDs. brewed their crappy, cheap beans 30-35 degrees hotter than recommended to extract max profit from them. McDonald's also knew that the extra profit would offset the occasional awards for 3rd degree burns caused by their willful negligence and resulting lawsuits. IIRC, they initially offered her about $800. Also the usual claims of the "millions " she got was actually a fraction of the $400K +/- judgement after the lawyers took their cut.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Powderfinger:
Originally Posted By Dana1972:
Originally Posted By WeimaranerDad:
Originally Posted By dryflash3:
Well I'm glad his coffee wasn't too hot.

How much did that women get?


I don't mean to pick nits with you, but supposedly during discovery it was revealed that Mickey Dee's HQ knew their coffee was too hot, and that their lids/cups were if-ey. The reason behind them cranking up the heat on the coffee was so that the sit down and lobby areas would get filled with the smell of coffee, and they would sell more.

Also, AFAIK, the woman was burnt or scalded so bad in or on her genitals that the burn treatment required scrubbing the dead skin off, I guess, on a daily basis.

Imagine taking a bristle brush to your nutsack, vigorously.



After seeing her injuries on a different website, she deserved every dime.


Yeah, the herp and derp about this case in GD typically never fails through the years.
It was proved in court McDs. brewed their crappy, cheap beans 30-35 degrees hotter than recommended to extract max profit from them. McDonald's also knew that the extra profit would offset the occasional awards for 3rd degree burns caused by their willful negligence and resulting lawsuits. IIRC, they initially offered her about $800. Also the usual claims of the "millions " she got was actually a fraction of the $400K +/- judgement after the lawyers took their cut.


She underwent skin grafts too...

My ex-fiancee had scars on her thighs from a ramen noodle incident.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:54:45 PM EDT
First world problem.

Meaning it's a problem for the first world when third worlders use the court system to shake down first worlders.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 8:54:48 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Powderfinger:


Yeah, the herp and derp about this case in GD typically never fails through the years.
It was proved in court McDs. brewed their crappy, cheap beans 30-35 degrees hotter than recommended to extract max profit from them. McDonald's also knew that the extra profit would offset the occasional awards for 3rd degree burns caused by their willful negligence and resulting lawsuits. IIRC, they initially offered her about $800. Also the usual claims of the "millions " she got was actually a fraction of the $400K +/- judgement after the lawyers took their cut.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Powderfinger:
Originally Posted By Dana1972:
Originally Posted By WeimaranerDad:
Originally Posted By dryflash3:
Well I'm glad his coffee wasn't too hot.

How much did that women get?


I don't mean to pick nits with you, but supposedly during discovery it was revealed that Mickey Dee's HQ knew their coffee was too hot, and that their lids/cups were if-ey. The reason behind them cranking up the heat on the coffee was so that the sit down and lobby areas would get filled with the smell of coffee, and they would sell more.

Also, AFAIK, the woman was burnt or scalded so bad in or on her genitals that the burn treatment required scrubbing the dead skin off, I guess, on a daily basis.

Imagine taking a bristle brush to your nutsack, vigorously.



After seeing her injuries on a different website, she deserved every dime.


Yeah, the herp and derp about this case in GD typically never fails through the years.
It was proved in court McDs. brewed their crappy, cheap beans 30-35 degrees hotter than recommended to extract max profit from them. McDonald's also knew that the extra profit would offset the occasional awards for 3rd degree burns caused by their willful negligence and resulting lawsuits. IIRC, they initially offered her about $800. Also the usual claims of the "millions " she got was actually a fraction of the $400K +/- judgement after the lawyers took their cut.



And yet, she still put hot coffee between her legs, yes? Or was that false, as well? Was a long time ago.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 9:21:41 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Room101:
In what law book does "you people" always mean black?
View Quote


H. Ross Perot's
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 10:29:34 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Marsh_Rat:
White napkins too. Clearly racist.
View Quote


Genius. Pure unadulterated genius.
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 10:45:14 PM EDT
Hey, if you can't hit the lottery....make your own
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 10:50:49 PM EDT
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 11:25:54 PM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By zoom:

Which one? The idiot guy suing or the idiot guy that refuses to give napkins to customers?z
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By zoom:
Originally Posted By wicketsurplus:
What a loser.

Which one? The idiot guy suing or the idiot guy that refuses to give napkins to customers?z



Link Posted: 2/27/2014 11:31:55 PM EDT
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 11:34:25 PM EDT
Not super related to this thread, but I think it would be funny if someone shot a mcdonald's commercial with typical customers. eg. 350lb lady with facial hair, thong and manly voice saying i'm lovin it
Link Posted: 2/27/2014 11:55:52 PM EDT
this aggression will not stand man
Link Posted: 2/28/2014 12:00:32 AM EDT
Didnt Governor Moonbeam declare a napkin shortage in Kalifornia?

Link Posted: 2/28/2014 12:56:31 AM EDT
Webster is a cunt
Link Posted: 2/28/2014 1:00:11 AM EDT
Originally Posted By gym007:
McDonalds has made a new golden arch enemy -- a California man is suing the company for $1.5 MILLION ... because he says he only got ONE NAPKIN with his meal.

Webster Lucas claims he was stiffed on napkins at the Mickey D's in Pacoima, CA on January 29th -- after ordering a Quarter Pounder Deluxe -- and when he went up to the counter to ask for more, he was rudely rebuffed by the manager ... who insisted he already got some.

According to his lawsuit, Lucas -- who is black -- then retorted, "I should have went to eat at the Jack-in-the-Box because I didn't come here to argue over napkins. I came here to eat."

That's when Lucas says things got racist -- claiming the manager (a Mexican-American) mumbled something about "you people."


Lucas subsequently emailed the general manager to complain -- insisting he couldn't work because of the "undue mental anguish" he was suffering as a result of the napkin debacle -- and says he was insultingly offered free burgers in return.

Lucas wants to super size instead -- $1.5 million.


Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2014/02/27/mcdonalds-webster-lucas-napkin-lawsuit/#ixzz2ua1tHb00
View Quote




Link Posted: 2/28/2014 1:49:29 AM EDT
[Last Edit: 2/28/2014 1:50:52 AM EDT by klutz347]
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Chaingun:
What lawyer is going to represent this guy, given it's a percentage and a lot of court time.
View Quote


Lawyers are probably lining up at his door.

Most attorneys take 1/3 of the settlement plus expenses. That would be 1/2 mil plus if they win.
Link Posted: 2/28/2014 1:54:13 AM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By 72826:

If you're that much of a fuckup, might as well just kill yourself. You aren't going to be doing anything valuable anyway.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By 72826:
insisting he couldn't work because of the "undue mental anguish" he was suffering as a result of the napkin debacle -- and says he was insultingly offered free burgers in return.

If you're that much of a fuckup, might as well just kill yourself. You aren't going to be doing anything valuable anyway.


You really think the guy had a real "9 to 5" job?

He probably just couldn't pick up bottles and cans on the side of the road.
Link Posted: 2/28/2014 2:14:34 AM EDT
$1.5 million dollars is selling his dignity rather cheaply. ("Madam, we have already established what you are, now we are negotiating your fee")
Link Posted: 2/28/2014 2:16:05 AM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By WeimaranerDad:


I don't mean to pick nits with you, but supposedly during discovery it was revealed that Mickey Dee's HQ knew their coffee was too hot, and that their lids/cups were if-ey. The reason behind them cranking up the heat on the coffee was so that the sit down and lobby areas would get filled with the smell of coffee, and they would sell more.

Also, AFAIK, the woman was burnt or scalded so bad in or on her genitals that the burn treatment required scrubbing the dead skin off, I guess, on a daily basis.

Imagine taking a bristle brush to your nutsack, vigorously.
View Quote View All Quotes
View All Quotes
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By WeimaranerDad:
Originally Posted By dryflash3:
Well I'm glad his coffee wasn't too hot.

How much did that women get?


I don't mean to pick nits with you, but supposedly during discovery it was revealed that Mickey Dee's HQ knew their coffee was too hot, and that their lids/cups were if-ey. The reason behind them cranking up the heat on the coffee was so that the sit down and lobby areas would get filled with the smell of coffee, and they would sell more.

Also, AFAIK, the woman was burnt or scalded so bad in or on her genitals that the burn treatment required scrubbing the dead skin off, I guess, on a daily basis.

Imagine taking a bristle brush to your nutsack, vigorously.



STOP! NOW!
Link Posted: 2/28/2014 2:31:25 AM EDT
Discussion ForumsJump to Quoted PostQuote History
Originally Posted By Who_Me:
Judge should rule in his favor and order McDonald's to give him one more napkin.
View Quote


Spot on!

Link Posted: 2/28/2014 2:44:37 AM EDT
Just use your shirt sleeve. Gimme Gimme. Retard. Award him exactly 1 napkin.
Page / 3
Top Top