User Panel
Posted: 2/13/2014 10:56:14 AM EDT
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Snipe...ation=timeline history.. http://forum.snipershide.com/snipers-hide-bolt-action-rifles/223193-tacticalrifles-net.html
Tactical Rifles, Inc. v. Soulie et al Plaintiff: Tactical Rifles, Inc. Defendant: Marc Soulie, Frank Galli and Snipers Hide, LLC. Case Number: 6:2014cv00202 Filed: February 6, 2014 Court: Florida Middle District Court Office: Orlando Office County: Orange Presiding Judge: Charlene Edwards Honeywell Referring Judge: Gregory J. Kelly Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander Cause of Action: 28:1332 Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff |
|
the original bitching about nick this nick that seems kind of petty to me. as far as suing a site for some member posting feedback? well thats some BS.
|
|
|
View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
the original bitching about nick this nick that seems kind of petty to me. as far as suing a site for some member posting feedback? well thats some BS. white box? If there are mechanical problems with the gun then yea i get the bitching but the photos he posted seemed pretty petty. Now for 8 G's i guess you got an expectation of perfect and no way im paying 8 grand for a gun so i guess i will never be put in that spot. |
|
|
Total Butt Hurt. It is really shady when you try to use the legal system to cover up badly reviewed products.
|
|
|
They're suing over a third party posting a bad review? That sounds like a non starter, not that I know anything about Florida law
edit oh the owner posted a personal negative review
|
|
For $8.000 I ha e expectations of a rifle that in as close to 100% as humanly possible .
Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
Heh, great.
Now even more folks will see the evidence. nice going. |
|
|
Quoted:
Indeed. It's an intimidation tactic. Which is legal if you use the courts. Since its a documented complaint, which is still free speach unless it was made up with malice intent, will make for a very short suit. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
This is amusing. Indeed. It's an intimidation tactic. Which is legal if you use the courts. Since its a documented complaint, which is still free speach unless it was made up with malice intent, will make for a very short suit. Stuff like this, and other suits in our industry in the past that were retarded will only protect "here and now" revenue...but as the internet never forgets, think about how much they are loosing down the road in a suit. Will it be a "why us?" link on their site..."not only do we make nice stuff, but we'll sue anyone that says they have had a problem with us." |
|
Quoted:
Hahahahaha, good luck with those. Gotta love how companies try to cover for badly produced products. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Suing on what grounds? Hahahahaha, good luck with those. Gotta love how companies try to cover for badly produced products. Exactly this. |
|
To be at least a little fair $2300 of the price was the Nightforce NXS. I am in NO WAY defending them though as that was still WAY too much for what was provided in the the end to the customer.
|
|
Quoted: Stuff like this, and other suits in our industry in the past that were retarded will only protect "here and now" revenue...but as the internet never forgets, think about how much they are loosing down the road in a suit. Will it be a "why us?" link on their site..."not only do we make nice stuff, but we'll sue anyone that says they have had a problem with us." View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: This is amusing. Indeed. It's an intimidation tactic. Which is legal if you use the courts. Since its a documented complaint, which is still free speach unless it was made up with malice intent, will make for a very short suit. Stuff like this, and other suits in our industry in the past that were retarded will only protect "here and now" revenue...but as the internet never forgets, think about how much they are loosing down the road in a suit. Will it be a "why us?" link on their site..."not only do we make nice stuff, but we'll sue anyone that says they have had a problem with us." |
|
You can't sue for slander or libel if the accusation is true. If they provided a clearly flawed product and there's evidence of that, the libel and slander are outright nonstarters and the assault is ridiculous at best. I hope they get counter sued into oblivion.
|
|
Quoted: You can't sue for slander or libel if the accusation is true. If they provided a clearly flawed product and there's evidence of that, the libel and slander are outright nonstarters and the assault is ridiculous at best. I hope they get counter sued into oblivion. View Quote |
|
Quoted:
No, that means that snipershide wins $ 75k later after discovery and a jury trial. View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted:
Quoted:
You can't sue for slander or libel if the accusation is true. If they provided a clearly flawed product and there's evidence of that, the libel and slander are outright nonstarters and the assault is ridiculous at best. I hope they get counter sued into oblivion. I hope Frank kicks them in the balls and takes their lunch money |
|
I appreciate the heads up on a company to not support. Sheesh.
|
|
Quoted: I hope Frank kicks them in the balls and takes their lunch money View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: Quoted: You can't sue for slander or libel if the accusation is true. If they provided a clearly flawed product and there's evidence of that, the libel and slander are outright nonstarters and the assault is ridiculous at best. I hope they get counter sued into oblivion. I hope Frank kicks them in the balls and takes their lunch money |
|
Quoted:
They're suing over a third party posting a bad review? That sounds like a non starter, not that I know anything about Florida law edit oh the owner posted a personal negative review View Quote We have had to sue review sites or pay lawyers to write letters to get things taken down on occasion, especially when they were for other companies in the same industry or for areas we didn't do business |
|
How in the blue fuck does a company think they can stay in this kind of niche, disposable income business with shitty QC, and even worse customer service?
Now I'm no fan of Bill Wilson, but I will say his company does not fuck around with customer service. A brief anecdote from my days in the gun biz: Customer ordered some crazy high-end Wilson Combat 1911 (hell, they're ALL high-end). Pays a shitload of money, gets his gun about 2 months later, and it doesn't work. Customer calls Wilson Combat on Tuesday. Receives prepaid UPS next day box (sent overnight) on Wednesday, sends gun same day, gets gun back (sent overnight again) on FUCKING FRIDAY , running like a Swiss watch, with an extra WC magazine and a hat for his "trouble". That's insane, and that's the kind of service you have to have in the high-end gun business. |
|
Quoted: We have had to sue review sites or pay lawyers to write letters to get things taken down on occasion, especially when they were for other companies in the same industry or for areas we didn't do business View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes Quoted: Quoted: They're suing over a third party posting a bad review? That sounds like a non starter, not that I know anything about Florida law edit oh the owner posted a personal negative review We have had to sue review sites or pay lawyers to write letters to get things taken down on occasion, especially when they were for other companies in the same industry or for areas we didn't do business |
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
They're suing over a third party posting a bad review? That sounds like a non starter, not that I know anything about Florida law edit oh the owner posted a personal negative review We have had to sue review sites or pay lawyers to write letters to get things taken down on occasion, especially when they were for other companies in the same industry or for areas we didn't do business Well we have sued places where bad reviews were posted about our business that showed up including some forums. Once we provided proof we weren't involved in the complaint, reviews were usually removed. Home and gardening forums,Angie's List, yelp! rip off report, etc. Had one from Missouri that showed up I rip off report we only operate in Houston area of TX. However the butt hurt of the gun community is amazing to me. We have never asked a valid review to be taken down. However we go out of our way to try and track down who it is so we can rectify it. |
|
|
The new America. Where you sue if someone says anything disparaging. This is why the high end manufacturers ddon't need to advertise and are backed up for years.
What a joke!!! |
|
$8600 for that? I've got a $600 Tikka with a better fit & finish. That's insane.
|
|
guys rifle shot a best group of .74 out of the box
an $8600 rifle my $849 remington shoots .80! with a $250 scope! jesus! |
|
Quoted:
Heh, great. Now even more folks will see the evidence. nice going. View Quote The Streisand Effect at work. |
|
Quoted:
How in the blue fuck does a company think they can stay in this kind of niche, disposable income business with shitty QC, and even worse customer service? Now I'm no fan of Bill Wilson, but I will say his company does not fuck around with customer service. A brief anecdote from my days in the gun biz: Customer ordered some crazy high-end Wilson Combat 1911 (hell, they're ALL high-end). Pays a shitload of money, gets his gun about 2 months later, and it doesn't work. Customer calls Wilson Combat on Tuesday. Receives prepaid UPS next day box (sent overnight) on Wednesday, sends gun same day, gets gun back (sent overnight again) on FUCKING FRIDAY , running like a Swiss watch, with an extra WC magazine and a hat for his "trouble". That's insane, and that's the kind of service you have to have in the high-end gun business. View Quote I had a problem with a GA Precision rifle on a Saturday afternoon. I called, George answered the phone. I explained my problem, he told me how to fix it myself, or I could put it back in the case, ship it to him, and he would fix it and have it back to me on Wed. along with a T-shirt and a hat. I fixed it myself, Like you said, you have to go the extra mile, because, after all, it is someone's hard earned money. |
|
Quoted:
guys rifle shot a best group of .74 out of the box an $8600 rifle my $849 remington shoots .80! with a $250 scope! jesus! View Quote You ought to watch this video where a real gunsmith takes the $8600 gun apart and shows you the "workmanship". These guys are clowns who bought a mill & a lathe. Why the hell anyone would send them thousands of dollars is a mystery. http://rationalgun.blogspot.com/2013/08/gun-forum-and-industry-drama-for-day.html?m=1 ETA Correction, not that same gun, it's another one from the same company. |
|
Yikes if companies are willing to do that watch out all you guys who bitch about PSA's shipping and CS
I kid I kid.
|
|
Haven't these guys had shitty quality for a while now? This is the third post talking about their quality I've seen.
|
|
Laws are being strengthened to fuck up anyone, including governments, who do anything that impinges on a company's ability to profit. Have a bad opinion of a company's product and you make it public in a way that can be taken to be detrimental to that company? Get ready for the law suit.
|
|
Quoted: Nature of Suit:Assault, Libel, and Slander View Quote View All Quotes View All Quotes The site owner is not liable for the content that someone posts. The site owner must remove it if presented with legal documentation that it is not true. That's about it. Lawyers will still threaten it though. I've been threatened by a lawyer of a home owners association because I registered a site that let people talk about the home owners association. I just ignored it and nothing happened.
|
|
You know, color me "paranoid" but if I were to file a lawsuit...it wouldn't be against a group of people who excel at shooting things from a mile or so away under adverse conditions, without leaving a trace.
I think I might just chalk that up to "lesson learned" and be on my way. But, that's just me. |
|
FOR $8,600+ say it slowly...EIGHT THOUSAND, SIX HUNDRED DOLLARS for a 308... it better be %$#@ING PERFECT...and shoot onto a caliber sized hole...truth of the matter is its shit workmanship and TACTICAL RIFLES got sand in their cybervagina over the bad press he got from two of HIS builds...and again I only get this from following the thread, the people that got TACTICAL RIFLES guns whose builds were sub contracted out to another reputable builder are happy with their rifles from what I've read...
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.