User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 4:10:29 PM EDT
[#1]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 4:21:15 PM EDT
[#2]
Quoted:
Quoted:
http://data3.primeportal.net/page_images/aircraft/f-4.jpg http://www.holloman.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-090722-122.jpg http://www.almansur.com/jollyrogers/vf84f4jusn.jpg http://www.topflightimaging.com/69-0286/F-4GSPDOD-1asm.jpg http://i101.photobucket.com/albums/m57/f-4dablemodels/HillGraytopside.jpg I love that plane. And she loves you back. 
Especially if you'll turn on your radar. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 4:22:55 PM EDT
[#3]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 4:38:10 PM EDT
[#4]
Quoted:
<a href="http://s118.photobucket.com/user/jvkulha/media/US_Navy_031122-N-9742R-005_An_F-14_Tomcat_assigned_to_the_Checkmates_of_Fighter_Squadron_Two_One_One_VF-211_launches_from_the_flight_dec.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o97/jvkulha/US_Navy_031122-N-9742R-005_An_F-14_Tomcat_assigned_to_the_Checkmates_of_Fighter_Squadron_Two_One_One_VF-211_launches_from_the_flight_dec.jpg</a> <a href="http://s118.photobucket.com/user/jvkulha/media/Baranek-F-14-VF-2-Zone5c.jpg.html" target="_blank">http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o97/jvkulha/Baranek-F-14-VF-2-Zone5c.jpg</a> I miss that plane, and the flashy paint schemes. 
And the ones that bitch slapped Libyans. 
And the ones that were allowed to wear some nose art. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 4:45:57 PM EDT
[#5]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
http://data3.primeportal.net/page_images/aircraft/f-4.jpg http://www.holloman.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-090722-122.jpg http://www.almansur.com/jollyrogers/vf84f4jusn.jpg http://www.topflightimaging.com/69-0286/F-4GSPDOD-1asm.jpg http://i101.photobucket.com/albums/m57/f-4dablemodels/HillGraytopside.jpg I love that plane. And she loves you back. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3b/F-4_Phantom_II_VF-301.jpg Especially if you'll turn on your radar.
http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130123001235/planesandmercs/images/6/60/F-4G_Phantom_II_wild_weasel.jpg Speaking of F4s 
and so I dont derail this thread 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 4:49:57 PM EDT
[#6]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 4:54:15 PM EDT
[#7]
The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution is the part of the United States Bill of Rights that protects the right to keep and bear arms. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, along with the rest of the Bill of Rights.
The right to bear arms |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 4:59:29 PM EDT
[#8]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 5:05:29 PM EDT
[#9]
  |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 5:07:25 PM EDT
[#10]
Quoted:
Saving this thread... http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v716/mazhouma/Military%20MM/Swedish6.jpg She's not wearing her body armour. I'm gonna have to discipline her. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 5:11:22 PM EDT
[#11]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 5:26:27 PM EDT
[#12]
And what could have been. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 5:27:36 PM EDT
[#13]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 5:29:25 PM EDT
[#14]
Quoted: My Bn was one of the last to use them in the Military as FAV's for the anti armor platoon. I was a boot and only got to ride in them before we lost them for humvee's, then went to the IFAV. Quoted: Quoted: You're talking about the jeep that had to be ballasted down if unloaded, so it didn't roll and kill everyone, vs one of the best factory offroad vehicles ever?Quoted: Won't be on many lists, but I think the C-130J is sexy http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9f/USAF_C-130J_Super_Hercules_at_RIAT_2010_arp.jpg That's Ok .. I think the MUTT is sexy, I greatly lamented their removal from service , and preferred them to the HUMMER . One day I will own one of my own. http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/6808/m1519tk.jpg They were good vehicles and would go anywhere , their only fault was that you were not supposed to jump them, which many dumb ass GI's would try to do hot rodding around in them. They are not wide , they are nimble and can pull weight greatly disproportionate to their size. They were and are great vehicles. They were generally well liked by the soldiers who used them, I take it you were not one of them ? I had no beef with them. The only thing I liked about a HUMMER better was the ability to actually stay dry in it. Most MUTTS I ever rode in just did not manage to do that with the canopy that was supplied. The IFAV while not as cool looking, is more stable, faster, and can outclimb everything and roll on and off a CH-53. Gotta love being able to go 100 mph :)  |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 5:35:43 PM EDT
[#15]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
http://data3.primeportal.net/page_images/aircraft/f-4.jpg http://www.holloman.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-090722-122.jpg http://www.almansur.com/jollyrogers/vf84f4jusn.jpg http://www.topflightimaging.com/69-0286/F-4GSPDOD-1asm.jpg http://i101.photobucket.com/albums/m57/f-4dablemodels/HillGraytopside.jpg I love that plane. And she loves you back. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3b/F-4_Phantom_II_VF-301.jpg Especially if you'll turn on your radar.
http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130123001235/planesandmercs/images/6/60/F-4G_Phantom_II_wild_weasel.jpg Speaking of F4s http://i.imgur.com/NXQpUit.gif and so I dont derail this thread http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m606g0kmOC1rnoynio1_500.jpg 
Right click, save as... Now, to get this thread back on topic...And Kill Migs... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 5:45:19 PM EDT
[#16]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 5:46:06 PM EDT
[#17]
I've got a copy of the simulator your army uses for that thing, and the fire control system DRIVES ME F-ING CRAZY! What if I want to dump the automatic lead function but retain the lased range, or fire KE rounds on full auto? I'm kinda surprised they went without a missile launcher though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 5:50:18 PM EDT
[#18]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 5:50:19 PM EDT
[#19]
Quoted:
I've got a copy of the simulator your army uses for that thing, and the fire control system DRIVES ME F-ING CRAZY! What if I want to dump the automatic lead function but retain the lased range, or fire KE rounds on full auto? I'm kinda surprised they went without a missile launcher though. There have been studies made on fitting them with an external box-launcher for the RBS-56. However, it was deemed unnecessary as we don't really need them for that. We prefer to launch ATGMs from smaller vehicles with a smaller silhouette. If a customer wanted it, it could easily be fitted though. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 5:52:22 PM EDT
[#20]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 5:53:46 PM EDT
[#21]
Quoted:
Quoted:
I've got a copy of the simulator your army uses for that thing, and the fire control system DRIVES ME F-ING CRAZY! What if I want to dump the automatic lead function but retain the lased range, or fire KE rounds on full auto? I'm kinda surprised they went without a missile launcher though. There have been studies made on fitting them with an external box-launcher for the RBS-56. However, it was deemed unnecessary as we don't really need them for that. We prefer to launch ATGMs from smaller vehicles with a smaller silhouette. If a customer wanted it, it could easily be fitted though. I've seen that, but I have to admit I was thinking a bit smaller. Even if it's just a single missile, it would be nice to have something that you could throw at an MBT if you just didn't have a way to avoid going toe to toe with it. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 5:58:49 PM EDT
[#22]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I've got a copy of the simulator your army uses for that thing, and the fire control system DRIVES ME F-ING CRAZY! What if I want to dump the automatic lead function but retain the lased range, or fire KE rounds on full auto? I'm kinda surprised they went without a missile launcher though. There have been studies made on fitting them with an external box-launcher for the RBS-56. However, it was deemed unnecessary as we don't really need them for that. We prefer to launch ATGMs from smaller vehicles with a smaller silhouette. If a customer wanted it, it could easily be fitted though. I've seen that, but I have to admit I was thinking a bit smaller. Even if it's just a single missile, it would be nice to have something that you could throw at an MBT if you just didn't have a way to avoid going toe to toe with it. In that case we would just use a APFSDS in the 40mm. They're surprisingly effective at close range (which would be the norm in Swedish terrain) and it's much faster than a missile. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 6:00:23 PM EDT
[#23]
Quoted:
Quoted:
You're talking about the jeep that had to be ballasted down if unloaded, so it didn't roll and kill everyone, vs one of the best factory offroad vehicles ever?
Quoted:
Won't be on many lists, but I think the C-130J is sexy http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9f/USAF_C-130J_Super_Hercules_at_RIAT_2010_arp.jpg That's Ok .. I think the MUTT is sexy, I greatly lamented their removal from service , and preferred them to the HUMMER . One day I will own one of my own. http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/6808/m1519tk.jpg That's known as "charm." |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 6:00:23 PM EDT
[#24]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 6:12:45 PM EDT
[#25]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 6:40:35 PM EDT
[#26]
3750 bitches! |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 7:34:31 PM EDT
[#27]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 8:18:31 PM EDT
[#28]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 8:24:48 PM EDT
[#29]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 8:31:00 PM EDT
[#32]
Quoted:
puckered ya right up? 
It was our PL truck. Our very first 'dog bomb' in 2006. I was kicked back doing maintenance on one of our BFV's when they towed this back in. About 3 hours of work and it was out on the road the next day. I'm still amazed at how much it looks like someone threw a snowball at the truck until you look at the glass inside the driver door. 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 8:36:35 PM EDT
[#33]
Is that you bringing the hate? 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 8:39:58 PM EDT
[#34]
  |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 8:44:08 PM EDT
[#35]
Plus 
Is at least equal to: 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 8:49:41 PM EDT
[#36]
Quoted:
http://i178.photobucket.com/albums/w259/Zeke_Dlyoung/CrusaderArtyCannon.jpg http://iliketowastemytime.com/sites/default/files/historical-photos-rare-pt2-hitler-gustav-railway-gun.jpg NLOS was going to be built right HERE.. I think that is probably one of the mistakes Rumsfeld made. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 8:52:07 PM EDT
[#37]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 9:02:36 PM EDT
[#38]
Quoted:
 [/thread] |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 9:25:58 PM EDT
[#39]
No one else will probably think so, but I've got a thing for the old H-2 Seasprite:
Most recent model (SH-2G) with T700 engines slinging a couple of Mavericks. Saw a claim by a former H-2 crew member that claimed that the "G" was so powerul with those engines that it could do a single-engine liftoff at max weight. (I assume the "max weight" was more a limitation of the airframe itself) 
They've tried to hang everything off of these.... I think this is a "D" model with a Sparrow and different nose housing a radar system of some sort. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 9:31:25 PM EDT
[#40]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 9:33:25 PM EDT
[#41]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 9:44:39 PM EDT
[#42]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 10:15:38 PM EDT
[#43]
You couldn't even get the wing right?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 10:23:21 PM EDT
[#44]
I started on a four deuce. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 10:27:43 PM EDT
[#45]
Quoted:
I started on a four deuce. We used to have those mounted in the back of 113's IIRC. |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 10:29:56 PM EDT
[#46]
Sexiest bomber we've ever flown.
 And don't forget the guys who kept them in the air.  |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 10:35:25 PM EDT
[#47]
Quoted:
Sexiest bomber we've ever flown. http://media.airspacemag.com/images/Arch_B47_Flash_JJ09.jpg And don't forget the guys who kept them in the air. http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/planes/boeing/kc97.jpg That looks nothing like a B58 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 10:37:46 PM EDT
[#48]
 Damn kids! ... Always breaking into my footlocker and playing with my 782 gear! |
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 10:38:27 PM EDT
[#49]
Quoted: Quoted: I started on a four deuce. We used to have those mounted in the back of 113's IIRC. best illum round there was! 1986 the 82nd got rid of battalion four deuce.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 5/5/2013 10:48:14 PM EDT
[#50]
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I started on a four deuce. We used to have those mounted in the back of 113's IIRC. best illum round there was! 1986 the 82nd got rid of battalion four deuce. Instant daylight.
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
