User Panel
Posted: 1/12/2013 1:36:35 PM EDT
http://defdist.tumblr.com/post/40315167419/defdist-ar-hicap-mag-part-i
It apparently has the samefailure rate as a Promag product at the moment, but they are working on it. Looks like they worked out the bugs. Waiting for the write up on their blog. |
|
I am curious how hard it is to make a may from sheet metal and a jig
Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile |
|
Quoted:
Ban 3d printers ! They will at some point. It puts too much power in the hands of the public. |
|
As of current, there is no 3D printer material with sufficient strength for this application.
PMags need their covers because the material is WEAKER than aluminum. It would be better to use a 3D printer to make the pattern to make the molds. Or to make dies for home pressing of aluminum magazines. About the only real issue is the spot welds, these could be replaced by flush rivets which could be installed with an interior bucking bar and hammer. |
|
Quoted:
I am curious how hard it is to make a may from sheet metal and a jig Posted Via AR15.Com Mobile If you have a print, you can get a machine shop to make you a stamping die. The die won't be cheap, but you will have a mag stamping die. I believe the die for the Barrett 10rd mag cost $15,000. That was from when I worked there. |
|
Quoted:
oh boy watch 3D printers be banned now They can't and they won't, the backlash from huge groups beyond the firearms industry and shooting culture would be biblical. It would be like banning cameras because somebody might make child porn, or blank paper and pencils because somebody might write down the process to create sarin. |
|
Quoted:
As of current, there is no 3D printer material with sufficient strength for this application. PMags need their covers because the material is WEAKER than aluminum. It would be better to use a 3D printer to make the pattern to make the molds. Or to make dies for home pressing of aluminum magazines. About the only real issue is the spot welds, these could be replaced by flush rivets which could be installed with an interior bucking bar and hammer. Yup. 3D printers get better every year, though... Some newer ones work metals. In time, this may be possible. |
|
Quoted:
As of current, there is no 3D printer material with sufficient strength for this application. Th most significant fact around 3D printers, but knowing a couple of guys in materials science I'm confident it won't be the case for long. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
As of current, there is no 3D printer material with sufficient strength for this application. Th most significant fact around 3D printers, but knowing a couple of guys in materials science I'm confident it won't be the case for long. and even if they break you can just make more.... |
|
they can just pass law making it a felony making your own 30rd mag, then you are screwed, just like you can't turn your semi to auto
|
|
Quoted:
they can just pass law making it a felony making your own 30rd mag, then you are screwed, just like you can't turn your semi to auto So long as 3D printed mags exist before a ban with a grandfather clause... |
|
Isn't translucent plastic a bad choice for strength? I thought that's why Magpul never made them past testing? They were more brittle, and that would have been with compression molding.
|
|
Quoted:
Isn't translucent plastic a bad choice for strength? I thought that's why Magpul never made them past testing? They were more brittle, and that would have been with compression molding. Lancer Systems L5 AWM Advanced Warfighter Magazine laughs at you |
|
Quoted:
Isn't translucent plastic a bad choice for strength? I thought that's why Magpul never made them past testing? They were more brittle, and that would have been with compression molding. And yet Lancer mags are just about bombproof... Odd, isn't it? There's witchcraft involved in polymer materials engineering/chemistry... It's more complex than transparent = bad. |
|
Quoted:
they can just pass law making it a felony making your own 30rd mag, then you are screwed, just like you can't turn your semi to auto Totally agree, because like the other firearms laws this will prevent criminals from also making them when 3D printers become a household item. Therefore, do not worry... you will not be under gunned when you confront the PCP-pumped felon who needs 14 shots to go down anyway with your 10 round limited firearm. Hell, why stop there? Let's make the limit 5 rounds, you shouldn't need more than that for hunting either. Nope... that criminal won't be toting a firearm with a 3D printed 15-30 round magazine he printed with instructions off the internet. 5 rounds should be fine. Actually, let's alter the deal again... let's make the limit 3... Oh, btw... laws can also be struck down by courts simply on the basis of being unenforceable... even if the subject/lawn in question is good policy, not covered constitutionally, etc. When 3D printers get out of where computers were in the '80's they will certainly push the envelope of enforceability with regard to any magazine capacity ban. I think people have it all wrong here anyway. We should promote the highest capacity magazines as possible. Quite frankly, the more rounds you add to a magazine the more difficult it is to design one that functions properly. Each round adds that much more force/resistance/weight to be overcome by an increasingly larger spring, which then creates its own problems, etc. In general, they will tend to misfeed, jam more, etc. Let the sicko's continue to think they are the best. Also probably a good reason to start with coming up with a pattern for a 15-20 round magazine for a 3D printer first.. should be quite a bit easier than a 30. |
|
Printers will always be slower than traditional methods. And more expensive.
A good injection molding machine would be 1/4 million. Molds about 50k. Magpul probably has the lid on the Zytel they use but nothing stops you from buying the bulk resin from DuPont. It would be far better to invest time in making the molds. If you could make the molds in castable tool steel via lost wax, using the 3D printer to make the wax patterns is a far better use for this technology. |
|
Quoted: Quoted: Isn't translucent plastic a bad choice for strength? I thought that's why Magpul never made them past testing? They were more brittle, and that would have been with compression molding. Lancer Systems L5 AWM Advanced Warfighter Magazine laughs at you I will smack them with my penis if they do. |
|
Quoted:
As of current, there is no 3D printer material with sufficient strength for this application. PMags need their covers because the material is WEAKER than aluminum. It would be better to use a 3D printer to make the pattern to make the molds. Or to make dies for home pressing of aluminum magazines. About the only real issue is the spot welds, these could be replaced by flush rivets which could be installed with an interior bucking bar and hammer. I bet JD Weld would be *good enough* for a near-disposable magazine. |
|
Quoted:
Printers will always be slower than traditional methods. And more expensive. A good injection molding machine would be 1/4 million. Molds about 50k. Magpul probably has the lid on the Zytel they use but nothing stops you from buying the bulk resin from DuPont. It would be far better to invest time in making the molds. If you could make the molds in castable tool steel via lost wax, using the 3D printer to make the wax patterns is a far better use for this technology. 3D printing is expensive. Hence why they are prototyping machines, not production machines. But... Imagine a draconian future where Space Nazis occupy the US and owning stuff to make mags is a crime. No one will make molds for you. Get caught with them and its evidence against you. But a 3D printer? No crime there. Files are easy to hide. Caches and buffers easy to clear... If one doesn't sit on inventory, then unless they actually catch the act of printing, no crime can be proven. |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Isn't translucent plastic a bad choice for strength? I thought that's why Magpul never made them past testing? They were more brittle, and that would have been with compression molding. Lancer Systems L5 AWM Advanced Warfighter Magazine laughs at you I will smack them with my penis if they do. The penis smack test... The pinnacle of equipment abuse testing. |
|
It seems the answer to this might be a smooth metal liner for the feedlips - Like the Lancers...
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Isn't translucent plastic a bad choice for strength? I thought that's why Magpul never made them past testing? They were more brittle, and that would have been with compression molding. Lancer Systems L5 AWM Advanced Warfighter Magazine laughs at you I will smack them with my penis if they do. The penis smack test... The pinnacle of equipment abuse testing. I've broken a lot of equipment like this |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Isn't translucent plastic a bad choice for strength? I thought that's why Magpul never made them past testing? They were more brittle, and that would have been with compression molding. Lancer Systems L5 AWM Advanced Warfighter Magazine laughs at you I will smack them with my penis if they do. As long as your nickname is not "Hammerhead" |
|
Quoted: Quoted: As of current, there is no 3D printer material with sufficient strength for this application. PMags need their covers because the material is WEAKER than aluminum. It would be better to use a 3D printer to make the pattern to make the molds. Or to make dies for home pressing of aluminum magazines. About the only real issue is the spot welds, these could be replaced by flush rivets which could be installed with an interior bucking bar and hammer. I bet JD Weld would be *good enough* for a near-disposable magazine. Too brittle. Zytel is a Nylon with fiber reinforcement so it has exceptional material properties. JB Weld is a filled epoxy so it has decent compressive strength but horrible flexural and tensile properties. But epoxy isn't too bad for epoxy composites, using carbon fiber mat/cloth. Basically, you could make the molds using silicone rubber, then cast in halves and bond them together. Hell, you could even use an existing magazine to make the molds. Because the molds will mirror the surface finish of the existing magazine, it would be very smooth so no feeding issues. You could vary the layup schedule to enhance strength in the lips, base and mag catch. Then use glass in the rest of the areas for cheap bulk. Weight will still be less than aluminum with greater strength. I just might have to try this. |
|
since the 3D printing material is too weak, would it be possible to just make it a bit thinner and wrap it in carbon fiber? not sure of cost effectiveness but would that work?
|
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
As of current, there is no 3D printer material with sufficient strength for this application. PMags need their covers because the material is WEAKER than aluminum. It would be better to use a 3D printer to make the pattern to make the molds. Or to make dies for home pressing of aluminum magazines. About the only real issue is the spot welds, these could be replaced by flush rivets which could be installed with an interior bucking bar and hammer. I bet JD Weld would be *good enough* for a near-disposable magazine. Too brittle. Zytel is a Nylon with fiber reinforcement so it has exceptional material properties. JB Weld is a filled epoxy so it has decent compressive strength but horrible flexural and tensile properties. But epoxy isn't too bad for epoxy composites, using carbon fiber mat/cloth. Basically, you could make the molds using silicone rubber, then cast in halves and bond them together. Hell, you could even use an existing magazine to make the molds. Because the molds will mirror the surface finish of the existing magazine, it would be very smooth so no feeding issues. You could vary the layup schedule to enhance strength in the lips, base and mag catch. Then use glass in the rest of the areas for cheap bulk. Weight will still be less than aluminum with greater strength. I just might have to try this. I meant just for the spot welds on the spine... |
|
Quoted:
Quoted:
oh boy watch 3D printers be banned now They can't and they won't, the backlash from huge groups beyond the firearms industry and shooting culture would be biblical. It would be like banning cameras because somebody might make child porn, or blank paper and pencils because somebody might write down the process to create sarin. Or certain guns because someone used them to murder children..... |
|
Soon it will be too late and the cat will already be out of the bag.
|
|
Quoted:
they can just pass law making it a felony making your own 30rd mag..... California did just that 12 years ago. |
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.